The model of infection used in these experiments was developed in
our laboratory in an effort to parallel as closely as possible the
circumstances surrounding human infection. Several important features
appear to make this model more useful than previous attempts.
First, the cornea is not traumatized other than by removal of the
epithelium so that spores are not inoculated into the stroma. As we
observed in these animals, when the organism is inoculated into the
cornea, as occurred in several rabbits when the trephine cuts
penetrated the stroma, the whole dynamic of the infection is changed.
Because of this observation, we no longer use a trephine to mark the
epithelium but instead use a filter paper disc moistened with N-heptanol to remove the epithelium from the cornea.
Second, in our previous models of corneal infection, blastoconidia were
injected directly into the corneal stroma. Because some but not all of
the blastoconidia germinate, viable fungus is present in the stroma in
both growing and resting phases. This leads to confusion of the
evaluation of disease by both histology and quantitative isolate
recovery.
In this model, organisms invading the cornea are only in the growing
phase, mimicking human infection. Blastoconidia that do not attach and
invade the cornea appear to be swept away from the corneal surface,
probably by the mechanical action of the lids.
Third, the host animal is immunocompetent. We have not found it
necessary to use local injection of corticosteroid to initiate
infection. With this model, we are able to detect differences in
virulence between strains that are capable of establishing disease in
the rabbit cornea. Of the three measures used, clinical photography,
histologic assessment and quantitative mycology, only quantitative
isolate recovery failed to demonstrate a difference between these two
strains. The histologic parameters chosen (number of hyphae per
section, biomass, and depth of invasion into the cornea) clearly
demonstrate aspects of virulence that differ between the two strains.
These measurements, although time consuming and tedious, are
straightforward to obtain because fungal elements are clearly visible
under the microscope, with appropriate staining. Alterations in corneal
thickness, as a result of the infection or as a fixation artifact, add
some uncertainty to the assessment of depth penetration but the
difference in invasiveness between the these strains was sufficiently
great to render dependence on precise measurements unnecessary.
Although we did not study them, other objective histologic measures
deserve further investigation, including measurement of horizontal
spread of the fungus through the cornea, and the severity of the host
response.
Histologic examination of multiple sections from infected corneas is
extremely labor intensive. In previous work, we have shown that
analyses of one to three sections, separated by 100 μm, from an
infected cornea correlate well with data from multiple sections
throughout the cornea.
33 This greatly reduces the amount
of work involved in each experiment.
Clinical evaluation by grading of photographs of infected corneas
produced the same result. Although the scoring method was empirical, it
correlated with a severity ranking of the disease including all 12
rabbits for the three masked observers. The failure to detect a
difference between the two strains by quantitative isolate recovery was
not unexpected, given the inability of this method to differentiate
between groups of rabbits with clearly different clinical disease that
we have observed in other studies.
33 The reason for this
insensitivity seems to be the varied colony-forming potential of hyphal
fragments of unequal length or cell numbers. Quantitative
isolate recovery appears to be most suited to assessment of unicellular
phase organisms, particularly when subtle differences are present. For
these studies, we endeavored to control for experimental factors that
might influence virulence. Each strain was maintained in an identical
manner, the preparation of the inoculum was identical, and the
concentration of the inoculum paste, although not the same, was
similar. Only a small percentage of the inoculum attaches to the cornea
and is not eliminated when the tarsorrhaphy sutures and contact lens
are removed on the day after inoculation. In previous experiments we
have shown that the keratitis caused by
C. albicans in Dutch
belted rabbits is remarkably consistent from animal to animal, and for
this reason this animal species was selected for these
studies.
34 All observations were made in a masked fashion.
Thus, although we cannot exclude extraneous factors that could
influence the degree of penetration, and the actual measurements have
an element of uncertainty due to edema of the cornea that occurs with
the infection, all the evidence from these studies points to an
intrinsic difference between these strains to account for the
difference in virulence.
Various intrinsic differences between the
C. albicans strains can be responsible for the observed marked difference in
pathogenicity in vivo. First, fungal genes that control morphogenesis
may be involved. Recent work in the signal transduction pathways that
lead to hyphal or yeast formation in
C. albicans demonstrated that genetic mutations in key virulence factors of the
fungus can have profound effect on fungal virulence.
21 24 For example, Lo et al.
24 showed that null
mutations in proteins such as CPH and EFG lead to a locked morphologic
state of the fungus in the presumed less virulent yeast form. On the
contrary, Braun and Johnson
21 demonstrated that knockout
deletion mutations in transcriptional repressors such as TUP1 could in
fact lock the organism in the presumed more invasive hyphal form. It
should be cautioned that the relationship between dimorphism and
virulence in
C. albicans has not been well established,
evidenced by our recent study that the TUP1 homozygous deletion mutant
is in fact less invasive than the isogenic strain in our model of
contact lens–facilitated keratitis in rabbits.
35 In the
present work, it is interesting to note that the less virulent strain,
VE175, was unable to form true hyphae. In appears, therefore, that
although the relationship between dimorphism and
C. albicans pathogenicity is not well established,
C. albicans strains
that fail to form true hyphae in vivo are perhaps less penetrative, and
thus cause less disease in tissues such as the cornea. In addition to
the investigation of genes controlling
C. albicans dimorphism, other genes that are involved in fungal adherence and
penetration can also be involved in fungal
virulence.
36 37 38 39
In summary, we believe the present work demonstrates that intrinsic
differences between C. albicans wild-type strains can lead
to marked difference in predilection toward clinical infection. Further
investigation in the molecular mechanisms responsible for this
difference may shed new light on the pathogenic mechanisms of this
fungus and suggest new therapeutic targets.