Abstract
purpose. To analyze the dynamics of N- and B-cadherin cell adhesion molecule
expression and cytoskeletal interaction during embryonic chick lens
development.
methods. Localization of N- and B-cadherin, F-actin, and connexin 56 were
determined by immunohistochemistry of developing lenses or
immunocytochemistry of differentiating primary lens cultures.
Biochemical analysis of cytoskeletal linkage of N- or B-cadherin was
assessed by differential detergent extraction, electrophoresis, and
immunoblotting.
results. The results indicate that although both cadherins are expressed
throughout lens development, N-cadherin expression detected was similar
in both lens epithelial and fiber cells, whereas B-cadherin was
preferentially localized to the lens fiber cells. During
differentiation, both cadherins become increasingly associated with the
lens cytoskeleton, as indicated biochemically by a transition from
largely Triton X-100–soluble to Triton X-100–insoluble pools and
immunocytologically by cadherin localization to cell–cell borders and
colocalization with the actin cytoskeleton. Although a significant
fraction of N-cadherin remains Triton X-100–soluble as the lens cells
differentiate, B-cadherin becomes resistant to extraction by both
Triton X-100 as well as RIPA buffers. As detected immunocytochemically
in lens cell cultures, the temporal localization of N-cadherin to
cell–cell interfaces precedes that of B-cadherin. Furthermore,
temporal localization of B-cadherin, as opposed to N-cadherin, to
cell–cell borders more closely parallels that of connexin 56 in vitro
as well as in vivo.
conclusions. These results suggest that while both N- and B-cadherin are expressed
during lens cell differentiation, both their patterns of expression as
well as their cytoskeletal association differ between epithelial and
fiber cells.
During development of the ocular lens, epithelial cells in a
predetermined region of the head ectoderm differentiate to form the
lens placode, an ectodermal thickening that then invaginates to form
the lens pit and then the lens vesicle.
1 2 The lens
vesicle then becomes partitioned into an anterior portion that retains
an epithelial phenotype and a posterior portion that undergoes
differentiation to form the primary fibers. During subsequent
development and continuing throughout adulthood, the anterior
epithelium provides a continuous source of undifferentiated cells that
migrate toward the equator of the lens where the cells initiate
differentiation into secondary fiber cells that form concentric layers
overlying the core of primary fiber cells. This morphologic
differentiation of epithelial cells into elongated fiber cells is
accompanied by biochemical changes, in both primary and secondary
fibers, including the synthesis of lens differentiation markers such as
the crystallins, connexins, and filensin.
2 3 4 5 Because of
its unique pattern of growth, the periphery or cortex of the embryonic
lens consists of newly differentiating fiber cells, whereas the core or
center contains terminally differentiating or differentiated fiber
cells. Although terminally differentiated fiber cells normally may
persist for the life of the organism, failure to establish or maintain
proper lens fiber organization and biochemical differentiation may be a
cause of congenital and age-onset cataracts, a major cause of visual
impairment. The dynamic changes in cellular relationships during the
course of lens development and the maintenance of proper intercellular
relationships in the mature lens are likely to be dependent on
cell–cell interactions mediated by cell adhesion molecules (CAMs).
One major family of CAMs that is likely to play a critical role in lens
development is the cadherins, Ca
2+-dependent,
cell–cell adhesion molecules that have been shown to mediate tissue
morphogenesis.
6 7 8 Cadherins mediate their homophilic
cell–cell adhesions via highly conserved extracellular and cytoplasmic
domains.
6 7 9 The extracellular portion of cadherins is
responsible for mediating specific homophilic interactions, whereas the
intracellular domain is required for cadherin binding to the
cytoplasmic proteins β- or γ-catenin (plakoglobin). This complex is
in turn linked to the actin cytoskeleton via α-catenin andα
-actinin, an event required for cadherin participation in adherens
junction formation.
10 11 12 13 14 However, cadherins are also
found in cytosolic and membrane pools,
10 11 where they may
sequester β-catenin and plakoglobin, which can also function
independently of cadherins.
9 15 16 17 Other than acting as a
regulator of catenin levels, it is unknown what functions cadherins
might mediate when they are unlinked to the cytoskeleton.
9 Linkage to the cytoskeleton is required for stable cadherin–cadherin
binding,
18 and mutational studies with cadherins that lack
the cytoplasmic domain and are incapable of binding catenin clearly
indicate the importance of cadherin binding to catenins and of linkage
to the cytoskeleton for certain cadherin functions.
19 20 21
In lens development, cadherins have been best characterized in the
chicken, where the cadherins that have been identified are N-cadherin,
B-cadherin, and L-CAM.
22 23 24 25 26 The cadherin names refer to N
for neural cadherin, B for brain cadherin, and L for liver CAM, where
these proteins were originally identified. Although L-CAM is expressed
in the embryonic ectoderm and lens placode, it is downregulated once
the lens vesicle separates from the overlying
ectoderm.
25 26 B-cadherin, as indicated by an initial
study of its expression during chick development, is expressed in the
lens placode and lens vesicle and after primary fiber formation becomes
lost from lens epithelial cells but is retained in lens fiber
cells.
25 However, the detailed developmental analysis of
B-cadherin in the lens or its association with the lens cytoskeleton
has not been previously examined. In contrast, N-cadherin has been more
extensively studied in the lens, where it is found in association with
both lens epithelial cells and fiber cells,
22 23 24 suggesting that it might play an important role throughout lens
development. Furthermore, N-cadherin has been implicated in the
formation of lens epithelial cell monolayers in vitro and in the gap
junction–mediated dye transfer between lentoid
cells.
14 27 28 Taken together, these data would support
the hypothesis that cadherins play an important role in lens
development, but the distinct functions of the different cadherins
expressed in the lens remains to be determined. To begin to address
this issue, we undertook an analysis of N- and B-cadherin expression
and cytoskeletal interaction during lens differentiation in vivo and in
vitro. The results indicate that although both N- and B-cadherin
increase their association with the lens cytoskeleton during the course
of differentiation, this effect is more pronounced for B-cadherin,
whose temporal expression also appears to be more specifically
correlated with that of a specific marker of lens cell differentiation,
connexin 56. The results indicate that individual cadherins are likely
to play distinct roles in lens development.
Triton-soluble proteins were obtained by immediately extracting
the lens fractions for 1 to 1.5 hours with 100 μl of ice cold 10 mM
imidazole-100 mM NaCl-1 mM MgCl2-5 mM
Na2EDTA-1% Triton X-100, pH 7.4, containing 50μ
g/mL aprotinin (Sigma), 25 μg/mL soybean trypsin inhibitor
(Sigma), 100 μM benzamidine (Fisher Scientific, Fairlawn, NJ), 5μ
g/mL leupeptin (Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA), and 0.5 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (Calbiochem). The Triton-soluble and
-insoluble fractions were separated by centrifugation at
12,000g for 10 minutes. The resulting Triton-insoluble
pellet was briefly rinsed with 100 μl Triton extraction buffer,
repelleted by centrifugation at 12,000g for 10 minutes, and
was subsequently reextracted for an additional 15 minutes with 100 μl
ice cold 50 mM Tris-150 mM NaCl-5 mM Na2EDTA-1%
Triton X-100– 0.1% sodium deoxycholate-0.1% SDS, pH 8 (RIPA buffer),
containing the above protease inhibitor cocktail. The RIPA-insoluble
and -soluble fractions were separated by centrifugation at
12,000g for 10 minutes. The resulting RIPA-insoluble pellet
was rinsed with 100 μl RIPA buffer as described above and
solublilized in modified Laemmli sample buffer without bromphenol blue
or β-mercaptoethanol.
Triton-soluble, RIPA-soluble, and RIPA-insoluble proteins were
brought to 1× modified Laemmli sample buffer, and protein contents of
these lysates were determined by BCA (Pierce, Rockford, IL). Lysates
were then prepared for reduced or nonreduced SDS-PAGE for N- or
B-cadherin analysis, respectively, followed by electrotransfer and
Western blotting. To compare the relative proportions of
detergent-soluble and -insoluble cadherins within each region of the
microdissected lens, detergent-soluble and -insoluble fractions were
loaded at equivalent proportions of the original tissue by volume. The
Triton-soluble lysates were loaded at equal protein (30 μg).
For N-cadherin analysis, membranes were blocked for 1 hour with 5%
nonfat milk (NFM) in 10 mM Tris-150 mM NaCl (TBS), pH 7.4, and probed
with 6B3, an N-cadherin—specific monoclonal antibody (1:2000 in 3%
NFM in TBS; Moore, Knudsen, and Grunwald, unpublished results,
1996) for 1 hour. After three washes in TBS containing 0.1%
Tween 20 (TBS-Tween), the membranes were incubated with 1:5000 sheep
anti-mouse antibodies conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Amersham,
Arlington Heights, IL) for 1 hour, followed by three additional washes
in TBS-Tween. N-cadherin was then visualized by chemiluminescence using
ECL + substrate (Amersham) and luminography followed by densitometric
analysis for cadherins using a one-dimensional gel analysis program
(Eastman-Kodak, Rochester, NY). For B-cadherin analysis, membranes were
processed as described for N-cadherin, except that the
B-cadherin–reactive monoclonal antibody 6D5
31 32 (1:1000
in 3% NFM) was used instead of 6B3, and the blocking and primary
antibody solutions contained 0.05% Tween 20 and 1 mM
CaCl
2 to maximize immunoreactivity of this
conformation-sensitive antibody.
Chick embryos, heads, or eyes were isolated and processed for
frozen sections according to Bronner-Fraser et al.
33 Briefly, tissues were processed by overnight fixation in methanol at
4°C, rehydration in 10 mM HEPES-150 mM NaCl-3 mM KCl-5.6 mM glucose-1
mM CaCl
2 (HBSG-Ca
2+) for 1
hour, and sequential equilibration in 0.5% sucrose and 15% sucrose in
HBSG-Ca
2+ for 2 to 4 hours and overnight,
respectively. Tissues were embedded and frozen in O.C.T. compound, and
20-μm sections, either parallel or perpendicular to the visual plane,
were obtained and processed for immunofluorescence.
Tissue sections were permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 in
HBSG-Ca
2+ for 15 minutes, washed three times with
HBSG-Ca
2+, and blocked 1 hour with 10% normal
goat serum (NGS; Sigma) in HBSG-Ca
2+.
Hybridoma-conditioned medium containing the N-cadherin–specific
antibody NCD-2
34 was used neat with the tissue
sections, whereas ascites containing the B-cadherin–reactive 6D5 was
used at a 1:1000 dilution. Also, in preliminary experiments,
B-cadherin–specific antibody 5A6
25 produced staining
patterns identical to those of the B-cadherin–reactive 6D5. In some
cases, tissues were double-stained for connexin 56, using an
anti–connexin 56 antiserum,
35 and for B-cadherin. Tissues
were incubated 1 hour with cadherin or connexin 56 antibody, washed
three times, and exposed to appropriate secondary antibodies. These
were 1:150 donkey anti-rat or 1:100 goat anti-mouse antibodies
conjugated to Lissamine rhodamine sulfonyl chloride (Jackson
ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA), 1:500 goat anti-mouse
antibodies conjugated to Oregon Green (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR),
and 1:500 goat anti-rabbit antibodies conjugated to Alexa 568
(Molecular Probes). Negative controls consisted of tissue sections from
which the primary antibody was omitted. After five additional washes,
three in 10% NGS and two in HBSG-Ca
2+, slides
were coverslipped and examined using a Nikon Optiphot microscope
(Garden City, NJ) fitted with fluorescence filters.
After specific days in culture, primary lens cells were washed three
times with PBS freshly supplemented with 1 mM
CaCl2 and 1 mM MgCl2, fixed
10 minutes with 3.7% paraformaldehyde in PBS-1 mM
CaCl2-1 mM MgCl2, and
washed three times more with PBS-1 mM CaCl2-1 mM
MgCl2 before storage at 4°C. Immunocytochemical
staining of primary lens cultures were performed as described above,
except that 1:500 NCD-2 and 1:250 6D5 in 10% NGS in PBS-1 mM
CaCl2-1 mM MgCl2 were used
to probe for N- and B-cadherin, respectively. Lens cultures were also
stained for chick connexin 56, using 1:500 connexin 56 antiserum,
followed by 1:100 dilution of the appropriate rhodamine-conjugated
secondary antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories), respectively.
In some instances, the cultures were double-stained with either N- or
B-cadherin and fluorescein isothiocyanate–conjugated phalloidin
(Molecular Probes) to visualize actin filaments or with connexin 56
antiserum, followed by 1:100 fluorescein dichlorotiazine conjugated to
goat anti-rabbit antibodies (Molecular Probes). Slides were
coverslipped and examined by conventional or confocal microscopy.
Increased Association of N- and B-Cadherin with the Cytoskeleton
during Lens Cell Differentiation In Vivo
Distinct Regulation of N- and B-Cadherin during Lens Cell
Differentiation In Vitro