The functional significance of the two Cx46 cleavage zones is uncertain. One possibility is that Cx46 processing is related to changes in the pH sensitivity of fiber cell gap junctions. The reliance of fiber cells on anaerobic metabolism generates a radial pH gradient in the lens.
37 Gap junction channels are normally uncoupled by a reduction in intracellular pH. Thus, the acidic environment observed in the lens core (pH ∼ 6.5) would be expected to disrupt gap-junction–mediated communication between the periphery and the center of the lens. However, impedance measurements conducted on whole lenses have shown that despite the presence of a pH gradient, all fiber cells in the lens core are electrically coupled, and furthermore that fiber cell gap junction channels abruptly lost their sensitivity to changes in pH at
r/
a 0.75.
12 This observed loss of the pH sensitivity has been attributed to the cleavage of the fiber cell connexins,
30 which removes the cytoplasmic tail portion of the pH gate. Comparison of the pH sensitivities of Cx46 and Cx50 expressed in HeLa cells
38 showed that although both connexins have a similar pK
A, Cx50 was much more sensitive to changes in pH (Hill coefficient = 6.8) than Cx46 (Hill coefficient = 2.2). Furthermore, whereas cleavage dramatically reduced Cx50 pH sensitivity,
30 it had only a mild effect on the pH sensitivity of Cx46 channels, with a small shift in pK
A from 6.8 to 6.56.
38 The dominant effect of Cx50 on the pH sensitivity of fiber cell gap junctions is supported by experiments in Cx50 knockout mice, which appear to express pH-insensitive (Cx46) gap junction channels.
39 From this discussion, it appears that most Cx46 cleavage occurs in a region separate from where pH sensitivity is lost and that, in any case, Cx46 cleavage would have little effect on pH sensitivity. Thus, the loss of pH sensitivity observed in the previous impedance measurements is not primarily due to Cx46 cleavage, but more likely to the cleavage of Cx50. It is possible that the secondary loss of Cx46 tail signal at
r/
a ∼ 0.7 that we observed is a consequence of the processing directed toward Cx50 to reduce pH sensitivity. In this case, the residual uncleaved Cx46 at
r/
a ∼ 0.7 would be modified as a “bystander” to Cx50 tail processing and would have no real impact on pH regulation, per se.