ET-1 activates ET-1 receptors on the cellular membrane of vascular smooth muscle, which stimulates entry of Ca
2+ ions through Ca
2+ channels and the release of Ca
2+ ions from the sarcoplasmic reticulum, which leads to subsequent muscular contraction by activating myosin light chain kinase.
25 26 If there is a pharmacologically active concentration of a Ca
2+ channel blocker in the retina, ET-1-induced contraction of smooth muscle cells should be partly inhibited. After a single instillation of iganidipine, there was no difference in the time course of retinal artery constriction between the drug- and vehicle-treated eyes at intravitreous doses of ET-1 of 2.5 or 0.5 ng. After twice-daily 20-day instillation, however, the ET-1-induced constriction of retinal arteries was significantly less on the drug-treated side than on the vehicle-treated side. At a higher intravitreous ET-1 dose (12.5 ng), there was no significant difference in the time course of retinal artery constriction between the drug- and vehicle-treated fellow eyes, and at a low intravitreous ET-1 dose (0.1 ng), there was no significant constriction on either side. This finding indicates that topically instilled iganidipine, a Ca
2+ antagonist, reached the posterior retina in pharmacologically active concentrations through local penetration rather than through systemic circulation at least 30 minutes after the last instillation of a twice-daily 20-day regimen. In a separate group of rabbits, we measured retinal artery constriction induced by intravitreous injection of ET-1 at a dose of 0.5 ng after slow intravenous injection of various doses of iganidipine. After intravenous injection of vehicle or 10 μg/kg iganidipine, ET-1-induced constriction of the retinal arteries was not different from that observed in the vehicle-treated eyes
(Fig. 2c) , whereas after intravenous injection at a dose 30 μg/kg, constriction was significantly inhibited, just as was observed in the iganidipine-treated eyes in experiment 2. The free iganidipine concentration in the plasma during the first hour was between 1.9 × 10
−8 and 0.7 × 10
−8 M, which suggests that the iganidipine concentration in the ipsilateral posterior retina 30 minutes after the last instillation of the twice-daily 20-day unilateral treatment with 0.03% solution was approximately 1.0 × 10
−8 M or higher and that in the vehicle-treated eye was approximately 0.3 × 10
−8 M [(10 μg/30 μg) × 1.0 × 10
−8 M] or lower. Thus, the iganidipine concentration in the posterior retina due to local penetration in experiment 2 was approximately 0.7 × 10
−8 M [(1.0 − 0.3) × 10
−8 M] or higher. The route by which topically instilled iganidipine reached the ipsilateral posterior retina remains unknown. The route from the anterior chamber through the vitreous seems unlikely, because the vitreous concentration was negligible, even after twice-daily 14-day instillation, as determined as in experiment 1 (data not shown). Diffusion from the anterior chamber through the anterior and posterior choroid also seems unlikely, because of the relatively long distance. As discussed later, the route from the posterior periocular tissues cannot be excluded, but is difficult to determine from the present results. Intravitreous 0.5-ng ET-1-induced constriction of retinal arteries in the vehicle-treated eye was significantly less after a twice-daily 20-day instillation regimen than after a single instillation (49.2% ± 11.8% vs. 9.6% ± 5.8%,
P < 0.039). This is probably due to differences in the plasma concentration of iganidipine. After a single instillation, plasma iganidipine was less than 10
−9 M
(Fig. 2) , but was approximately 3 × 10
−9 M after twice-daily 14-day instillation (Isaka M, unpublished data of Senju Pharmacological Co, 1999).