To perform semiquantitative analysis of the protein expression of p16
INK4a, p21
WAF1/Cip1, and p27
Kip1, we obtained corneas from eight donors and passaged isolated HCECs four times. The corneas were divided into two age groups. The young group consisted of four donors: 12, 15, 18, and 24 years old. The older group also consisted of four donors: 54, 65, 66, and 69 years old. Information about corneas from these donors is shown in the table in
Figure 2 . Although there was a statistically significant difference in days from death to culture between the two groups, all corneas were preserved less than 1 week (Optisol-GS; Baush & Lomb). As described in previous studies,
14 it tended to take longer to culture HCECs from older donors, but the difference in days from HCECs isolation to protein harvest between the two age groups was not statistically significant (
P = 0.052). Representative phase-contrast images of confluent HCECs at passage 4 from donors of different ages are also presented in
Figure 2 . Cells formed a normal monolayer and retained the characteristic morphology of HCECs—that is, the hexagonal pattern of organization was still apparent, especially in cultures from younger donors. As was demonstrated previously,
14 48 an increase in polymorphism and cell size was clearly noted with increasing donor age.
Proteins extracted from passage 4 HCECs from the same eight donors were used to perform semiquantitative Western blot analyses for p16
INK4a, p21
WAF1/Cip1, and p27
Kip1 Figure 3shows that expression of p16
INK4a in cells from donors in their teens was extremely low compared with that of older donors. Comparison of the results between the two age-groups revealed a statistically significant difference (
P = 0.039) in p16
INK4a expression. Data for p21
WAF1/Cip1 are shown in
Figure 4 . The relative expression of this CKI was similar to that observed for p16
INK4a. p21
WAF1/Cip1 protein expression was very low in cells from the 12- and 15-year-old donors and gradually increased with donor age. There was a statistically significant difference in p21
WAF1/Cip1 expression (
P = 0.022) between the young and older groups. In contrast to the results for p16
INK4a and p21
WAF1/Cip1, expression of p27
Kip1 appeared to decrease in an age-related manner in HCECs at passage 4
(Fig. 5) . After the Western blot for p21
WAF1/Cip1 was completed, the same membrane was chemically stripped and used for the Western blot of p27
Kip1. This made the background of the p27
Kip1 blot a little higher, but the opposite tendency in protein expression of p21
WAF1/Cip1 and p27
Kip1 was obvious. The difference in p27
Kip1 protein expression between the two age groups was statistically significant (
P = 0.044). Similar results were obtained from duplicate blots. Together, Western blot analysis using passage-4 cells revealed that HCECs from older donors expressed significantly higher levels of p16
INK4a and p21
WAF1/Cip1 than cells from younger donors. In contrast, expression of p27
Kip1 tended to decrease with age.