October 2006
Volume 47, Issue 10
Free
Cornea  |   October 2006
Age Differences in Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor Expression and Rb Hyperphosphorylation in Human Corneal Endothelial Cells
Author Affiliations
  • Kikuko Enomoto
    From the Schepens Eye Research Institute and the Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Tatsuya Mimura
    From the Schepens Eye Research Institute and the Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Deshea L. Harris
    From the Schepens Eye Research Institute and the Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Nancy C. Joyce
    From the Schepens Eye Research Institute and the Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science October 2006, Vol.47, 4330-4340. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.05-1581
  • Views
  • PDF
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Kikuko Enomoto, Tatsuya Mimura, Deshea L. Harris, Nancy C. Joyce; Age Differences in Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor Expression and Rb Hyperphosphorylation in Human Corneal Endothelial Cells. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2006;47(10):4330-4340. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.05-1581.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

purpose. Human corneal endothelial cells (HCECs) are considered to be nonreplicative in vivo; however, isolated HCECs can be cultured and grown successfully, indicating that they retain proliferative capacity. This capacity to replicate tends to decrease with donor age. Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (CKIs) are important negative regulators of the cell cycle. Of those CKIs, p16INK4a, p21WAF1/Cip1, and p27Kip1 are expressed in corneal endothelium. To help reveal the mechanism of this age-related difference, the relative expression of those CKIs and the kinetics of hyperphosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein, Rb, were analyzed in HCECs from various aged donors.

methods. Fresh-frozen sections of corneas from an 18-year-old and a 74-year-old donor were immunostained to reveal the expression and localization of the three CKIs in corneal endothelium in situ. HCECs from eight donors of various ages were isolated and cultured until they reached passage 4. After the cells reached confluence, total protein was extracted, and the relative expression of p16INK4a, p21WAF1/Cip1, and p27Kip1 was determined by Western blot analysis. A parallel analysis was performed with primary cultures of HCECs obtained from eight different donors. Subconfluent passage 2 HCECs from eight donors were serum starved and, at different times after growth factor stimulation, protein was extracted, and Western blot analysis was used to compare the overall expression of Rb protein and the kinetics of Rb hyperphosphorylation.

results. Immunocytochemistry confirmed the expression and nuclear localization of p16INK4a, p21WAF1/Cip1, and p27Kip1 in HCECs in situ. Western blot studies revealed an age-related increase in p16INK4a and p21WAF1/Cip1 protein expression in cultured HCECs. Expression of p27Kip1 tended to decrease with the donor’s age in passage-4 cells; however, there was no significant difference in p27Kip1 expression level between young and older donors in primary cultured HCECs. No age-related difference in total Rb protein was observed in the Western blots; however, the rate of Rb hyperphosphorylation was significantly slower in HCECs from older donors.

conclusions. p16INK4a, p21WAF1/Cip1, p27Kip1, and Rb were all expressed in HCECs, regardless of donor age. Age-related differences in the relative expression of p16INK4a and p21WAF1/Cip1 and in the kinetics of Rb hyperphosphorylation led to the conclusion that, in addition to the normal inhibitory activity of p27Kip1, there is an age-dependent increase in negative regulation of the cell cycle by p16INK4a and p21WAF1/Cip1. This additional molecular mechanism may be responsible, at least in part, for the reduced proliferative response observed in HCECs from older donors.

Corneal endothelium is the single layer of cells at the most posterior part of the cornea, bordering the anterior chamber. The endothelium plays an important role in maintaining corneal clarity by regulating corneal hydration through its barrier and Na+,K+-ATPase and bicarbonate pump functions. 1 2 Human corneal endothelial cells (HCECs) are known to be nonproliferative in vivo, and therefore loss of HCECs as the result of surgery, disease, or aging is usually compensated by cell migration and enlargement from the surrounding intact area. 3 4 5 6 Previous studies showed that HCECs can be successfully cultured by the stimulation of growth factors. 7 8 9 10 11 12 This means that HCECs do not lose their proliferative capacity, but retain the potential to proliferate. Previous studies in our laboratory revealed that there are age-related differences in the proliferative capacity of HCECs. 13 14 Significantly fewer HCECs from older donors respond to mitogens and those that respond require stronger mitogenic stimulation than do their younger counterparts. The mechanism underlying this age-related difference in proliferative capacity has yet to be investigated. 
HCECs in vivo are arrested in the G1-phase of the cell cycle. 15 16 Cell cycle progression is controlled by the activity of several cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs). These CDKs must bind appropriate cyclins to be activated, and the expression level of cyclins varies, depending on the stage of the cell cycle. Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (CKIs) inhibit cell-cycle progression and prevent activation of the kinase activity of cyclin–CDK complexes. CKIs play important roles in maintaining G1-phase arrest, in part by preventing cyclin/CDK-induced hyperphosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein Rb. There are two families of CKI proteins. The CIP/KIP family (p21WAF1/Cip1, p27Kip1, and p57Kip2) is inhibitory against all G1-phase cyclin–CDK complexes. 17 18 19 The INK4 family (p16INK4a, p15INK4b, p18INK4c, and p19INK4d) interferes with cyclin D binding to CDK4/6 kinases and decreases their activity. 20 21 22 23 24 Previous studies have shown that p16INK4a, p21WAF1/Cip1, p27Kip1, and Rb are expressed in corneal endothelial cells from several species. 16 25 26 27 28  
p16INK4a is a member of the INK4 family. When p16INK4a is bound to CDK4, interaction of G1-specific cyclin D and CDK4 is inhibited, resulting in suppression of the hyperphosphorylation of Rb by these kinases. In its hypophosphorylated state, Rb protein tightly binds and inactivates the E2F transcription factor, whose activity is essential for entry into the S-phase of the cell cycle. 29 An age-related increase in p16INK4a protein expression has been reported in some cell types. 30 31 p16INK4a is also known to act as a tumor suppressor. Genetic alterations of this gene, including deletions or mutations, have been detected in many kinds of cancers. 32 33  
p21WAF1/Cip1 is a member of the CIP/KIP family and helps regulate the G1/S-phase transition. Protein expression of p21WAF1/Cip1 increases when cells are in an unfavorable environment for proliferation, such as in oxidative stress, 34 senescence, 35 or differentiation. 36 37 Accumulation of p21WAF1/Cip1 protein results in growth arrest in the G1-phase. 38 p21WAF1/Cip1 expression can be induced in a p53-dependent 39 or p53-independent manner, by several types of transcription factors 40 and during terminal differentiation. 37  
p27Kip1 is another member of the CIP/KIP family. The level of p27Kip1 protein expression is high in the G1-phase and decreases in the S-phase. Interaction of p27Kip1 with CDK2 in the G1-phase leads to inactivation of CDK2 kinase activity and results in G1-phase arrest. p27Kip1 helps mediate cell cycle arrest induced by cell-to-cell contact and TGF-β. 41 42 43 Different from p16INK4a and p21WAF1/Cip1, p27Kip1 protein expression is not solely dependent on its mRNA level, but is also regulated posttranslationally. 44 Some studies have revealed accumulated p27Kip1 protein in aged cells in several types of tissue, 45 46 but there are also reports that p27Kip1 protein expression is not age dependent. 47  
There is a possibility that the expression of CKIs increases in an age-dependent manner in HCECs and causes the age-related decrease in proliferative capacity that is observed in these cells. To begin testing this hypothesis, we compared the protein expression of p16INK4a, p21WAF1/Cip1, and p27Kip1, and the kinetics of hyperphosphorylation of Rb protein in HCECs cultured from young and older donors. 
Materials and Methods
Donor Human Corneas
Donor human corneas were obtained through National Disease Research Interchange (NDRI, Philadelphia, PA). Handling of donor information by the source eye bank, NDRI, and this laboratory adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki 1983 revision in protecting donor confidentiality. All corneas were preserved (Optisol-GS; Baush & Lomb, Rochester, NY) at 4°C. Exclusion criteria were applied as previously indicated. 48 Corneas were divided into two age groups: young (<30 years old) and old (>50 years old). 
Immunocytochemistry
Fresh-frozen transverse sections of corneas from an 18-year-old and a 74-year-old donor were fixed for 10 minutes in methanol at −20°C. All further incubations were at room temperature. Before they were stained with antibodies, the sections were rinsed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; Invitrogen-Gibco, Grand Island, NY) and incubated in blocking buffer (PBS containing 2% bovine serum albumin). After a 2-hour incubation in diluted primary antibodies, the slides were rinsed with PBS and reincubated in blocking buffer. Antibodies and their dilutions are shown in Table 1 . Negative controls consisted of primary antibody preabsorbed with its antigen or incubation of tissue in secondary antibody alone. Subsequently, the slides were incubated with fluorescein-conjugated secondary antibody for 1 hour and then rinsed with PBS. Coverslips were applied, and staining was visualized (Eclipse E800 Microscope; Nikon, Melville, NY) with an epifluorescence attachment (VFM; Nikon Inc., Melville, NY) equipped with a digital camera (Spot camera with ver. 4.0.5 Software; Diagnostic Instruments, Sterling Heights, MI). 
Culture of Human Corneal Endothelial Cells
Corneal endothelial cells were isolated from donor corneas and cultured according to a previously described method. 12 14 Briefly, Descemet’s membrane with endothelium was dissected in small strips and then incubated overnight in culture medium (OptiMEM-I; Invitrogen-Gibco) supplemented with 8% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Hyclone, Logan, UT), 5 ng/mL epidermal growth factor (EGF; Upstate Biotechnologies, Lake Placid, NY), 20 ng/mL nerve growth factor (NGF; Biomedical Technologies, Stoughton, MA), 100 μg/mL bovine pituitary extract (Biomedical Technologies), 20 μg/mL ascorbic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), 200 mg/mL calcium chloride, 0.08% chondroitin sulfate (Sigma-Aldrich), 50 μg/mL gentamicin (Invitrogen-Gibco), and antibiotic–antimycotic solution (Sigma-Aldrich) diluted 1:100. After centrifugation, the strips were incubated in 0.02% EDTA solution (Sigma-Aldrich) at 37°C for 1 hour to separate cells. After cells were pipetted and resuspended cells in the culture medium described earlier, cells and pieces of Descemet’s membrane were pelleted by centrifugation, then resuspended in medium, and plated in precoated six-well tissue culture plates (FNC Coating Mix; Biological Research Faculty & Facility, Inc., Ijamsville, MD). Once cells reached confluence, they were cultured in medium without EGF, NGF, or pituitary extract for several days, to stabilize the monolayer and optimally reflect its in vivo morphology. For some experiments, cells were passaged by subculturing at a 1:2 ratio. 
Protein Extraction
Cultures of HCECs used to detect relative CKI expression were removed from the culture plate 3 to 7 days after reaching confluence. Subconfluent cultures were used in studies to detect Rb phosphorylation (described later). Protein was extracted by incubating cells for 30 minutes at 4°C in lysis buffer containing 1% Triton X-100, 250 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 10 μg/mL aprotinin, 10 μg/mL leupeptin, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (all from Sigma-Aldrich), followed by homogenization and centrifugation. Supernatants were stored at −80°C until use in SDS-PAGE and Western blot analyses. 
Western Blot Analysis of CKI Expression
Soluble protein was loaded on 10% Bis-Tris gels for SDS-PAGE and then transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA). Nonspecific binding was blocked by incubation of the membrane for 1 hour at room temperature in 5% milk diluted in PBS containing 1% Triton X-100. Membranes were incubated with diluted primary CKI antibodies overnight at 4°C. Membranes were incubated with primary antibody for β-actin for only 1 hour at room temperature. All antibodies were diluted in 5% milk in PBS containing 1% Triton X-100. Antibody dilutions are indicated in Table 1 . Blots were then rinsed three times for 10 minutes each with PBS containing 1% Triton X-100 and incubated 1 hour at room temperature with secondary antibody. Membranes were washed three times with PBS containing 1% Triton X-100 for 10 minutes, and antibody binding was visualized using a chemiluminescent substrate (SuperSignal West Pico; Pierce, Rockford, IL). Immunoblots used to detect p21WAF1/Cip1 expression were stripped by incubation in buffer containing 2% SDS, 62.5 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.8) and 100 mM 2-mercaptoethanol (all from Sigma-Aldrich) for 15 minutes at room temperature and then re-probed with p27Kip1 antibody. All membranes were stripped and reprobed with β-actin antibody as the loading control. Duplicate gels and immunoblots were run for all samples. 
Analysis of Phosphorylated Rb
Passage 1 HCECs were grown to confluence and then trypsinized with 0.05%:0.02% trypsin-EDTA solution (Sigma-Aldrich). Cells were seeded at a density of 100,000 cells per well into six-well dishes. These subconfluent cells were incubated for 24 hours in basal medium without FBS, EGF, NGF, or pituitary extract, to induce mitotic quiescence. Complete culture medium, containing EGF, NGF, pituitary extract, and FBS, was then added to stimulate entry into the cell cycle. At 0, 24, 48, and 72 hours after growth factor was added, protein was extracted for Western blot analysis of total and hyperphosphorylated Rb. Gel electrophoresis, protein transfer, and immunoblot analysis were performed as described earlier Primary and secondary antibody dilutions are indicated in Table 1 . To test the specificity of anti-Rb Ser 807/811, blocking peptide (5:1 peptide-to-antibody ratio; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was used as a negative control. For this negative control, blocking peptide was preincubated with primary antibody before incubation with the PVDF membrane. Membranes were washed, and antibody binding was visualized using a chemiluminescent substrate as described earlier. Duplicate gels and immunoblots were run for all samples. 
Densitometric Analysis
Quantification of protein bands was performed by densitometry using NIH Image software (NIH Image 1.34; National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; available in the public domain at http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/). Protein expression was represented as a value relative to β-actin expression. Statistical analyses were performed using unpaired Student’s t-test. P < 0.05 was considered significant. 
Results
Immunocytochemical Localization of p16INK4a, p21WAF1/Cip1, and p27Kip1
Expression of p16INK4a, p21WAF1/Cip1, and p27Kip1 has been demonstrated in corneal endothelium from several different species. 16 25 26 27 28 Immunofluorescence studies were initially performed to confirm expression of these three CKIs in human corneal endothelium in situ. Figure 1presents representative micrographs of cross-sections of posterior human cornea from an 18- and a 74-year-old donor. Results confirm that all three CKIs are expressed in HCECs. Positive staining for p16INK4a (Figs. 1A 1D) , p21WAF1/Cip1 (Figs. 1B 1E) , and p27Kip1 (Figs. 1C 1F)show similar nuclear localization in endothelial cells from both donors. Positive staining for all three CKIs was confirmed either by preabsorbing primary antibody with its specific antigen or by incubating tissue in secondary antibody alone (data not shown). 
p16INK4a, p21WAF1/Cip1, and p27Kip1 Protein Expression in Passage-4 HCECs
To perform semiquantitative analysis of the protein expression of p16INK4a, p21WAF1/Cip1, and p27Kip1, we obtained corneas from eight donors and passaged isolated HCECs four times. The corneas were divided into two age groups. The young group consisted of four donors: 12, 15, 18, and 24 years old. The older group also consisted of four donors: 54, 65, 66, and 69 years old. Information about corneas from these donors is shown in the table in Figure 2 . Although there was a statistically significant difference in days from death to culture between the two groups, all corneas were preserved less than 1 week (Optisol-GS; Baush & Lomb). As described in previous studies, 14 it tended to take longer to culture HCECs from older donors, but the difference in days from HCECs isolation to protein harvest between the two age groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.052). Representative phase-contrast images of confluent HCECs at passage 4 from donors of different ages are also presented in Figure 2 . Cells formed a normal monolayer and retained the characteristic morphology of HCECs—that is, the hexagonal pattern of organization was still apparent, especially in cultures from younger donors. As was demonstrated previously, 14 48 an increase in polymorphism and cell size was clearly noted with increasing donor age. 
Proteins extracted from passage 4 HCECs from the same eight donors were used to perform semiquantitative Western blot analyses for p16INK4a, p21WAF1/Cip1, and p27Kip1 Figure 3shows that expression of p16INK4a in cells from donors in their teens was extremely low compared with that of older donors. Comparison of the results between the two age-groups revealed a statistically significant difference (P = 0.039) in p16INK4a expression. Data for p21WAF1/Cip1 are shown in Figure 4 . The relative expression of this CKI was similar to that observed for p16INK4a. p21WAF1/Cip1 protein expression was very low in cells from the 12- and 15-year-old donors and gradually increased with donor age. There was a statistically significant difference in p21WAF1/Cip1 expression (P = 0.022) between the young and older groups. In contrast to the results for p16INK4a and p21WAF1/Cip1, expression of p27Kip1 appeared to decrease in an age-related manner in HCECs at passage 4 (Fig. 5) . After the Western blot for p21WAF1/Cip1 was completed, the same membrane was chemically stripped and used for the Western blot of p27Kip1. This made the background of the p27Kip1 blot a little higher, but the opposite tendency in protein expression of p21WAF1/Cip1 and p27Kip1 was obvious. The difference in p27Kip1 protein expression between the two age groups was statistically significant (P = 0.044). Similar results were obtained from duplicate blots. Together, Western blot analysis using passage-4 cells revealed that HCECs from older donors expressed significantly higher levels of p16INK4a and p21WAF1/Cip1 than cells from younger donors. In contrast, expression of p27Kip1 tended to decrease with age. 
p16INK4a, p21WAF1/Cip1, and p27Kip1 Protein Expression in Primary Cultures of HCECs
As shown in the table in Figure 2 , it took a long time for the passage-4 cells to reach confluence. This long culture time and the fact that cells were passaged four times may have affected CKI protein expression, and the culture may not reflect relative CKI expression of HCECs in vivo. To minimize possible artifactual modifications in CKI expression, parallel analyses were performed with primary cultures of HCECs from young and older donors. The table in Figure 6shows information about corneas used for these studies. As in the prior experiments, corneas were divided into two age groups. The young group consisted of four donors: two aged 2 and 19 years, and two aged 20 years. The older group also consisted of four donors aged 51, 59, 60, and 76 years. Overall, the morphology of the HCECs after primary culture was more homogeneous than in passage-4 cells (Fig. 6) ; however, age-related changes in morphology, such as increased cell size and heterogeneity, were also observed after primary culture. 
Results of the Western blot analysis of p16INK4a in primary cultures of HCECs are shown in Figure 7 . Those for p21WAF1/Cip1 and p27Kip1 are in Figures 8 and 9 , respectively. Expression patterns for two CKIs were similar to those of passage-4 cells. That is, HCECs from the older donors expressed p16INK4a and p21WAF1/Cip1 at significantly higher levels (P = 0.026 and P = 0.022, respectively) than did cells from younger donors. Of interest was the fact that there was no statistically significant difference (P = 0.885) in the relative expression of p27Kip1 in primary cultures of HCECs from the young and older donors, unlike that observed in passage-4 cells. Similar results were obtained from duplicate blots. 
Kinetics of Rb Hyperphosphorylation
One of the important events leading to movement of cells from G1- to S-phase of the cell cycle on mitogenic stimulation is hyperphosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein, Rb, by active cyclin–kinase complexes. This hyperphosphorylation event results in inactivation of the inhibitory activity of Rb, subsequent activation of the E2F transcription factor, and entry into the S-phase. CKIs inhibit cyclin–kinase activity, preventing hyperphosphorylation of Rb and inhibiting cell cycle progression. Previous studies from this laboratory 13 48 have demonstrated that HCECs from older donors enter the cell cycle more slowly than cells from younger donors. The finding that the expression of p16INK4a and p21WAF1/Cip1 increases with donor age suggests that these CKIs may suppress cyclin-kinase–dependent hyperphosphorylation of Rb. We therefore conducted studies to determine whether there is any age-related difference in the kinetics of Rb hyperphosphorylation in growth factor-stimulated HCECs cultured from four young and four older donors. 
The table in Figure 10presents information regarding corneas used as a source of HCECs for these studies. This figure also presents representative phase-contrast images of confluent cultures of passage 1 HCECs. For this study, equal numbers of passage 1 cells were plated at subconfluent density and incubated for 24 hours in culture medium minus growth factors to induce mitotic quiescence. Growth factors were then added as indicated in the Materials and Methods section to stimulate cell cycle entry, and samples were removed 0, 24, 48, and 72 hours after addition of growth factor. Western blot analyses were prepared with an antibody that recognizes total Rb protein (IF8) or an antibody that recognizes Rb specifically phosphorylated on Ser807/811 to detect the hyperphosphorylated fraction of Rb. Densitometry was performed using β-actin for normalization. Figure 11demonstrates that there was very similar expression of total Rb protein in HCECs, regardless of donor age or time after growth factor was added. The same samples probed for hyperphosphorylated Rb (Ser 807/811) revealed an age-related difference in the kinetics of Rb hyperphosphorylation (Fig. 12) . Preincubation of this antibody with a specific blocking peptide eliminated all antibody binding within the blot (data not shown). In HCECs from younger donors, Rb hyperphosphorylation increased to maximum levels within 24 hours, and the level remained high during the entire 72-hour test period. Of note, HCECs from older donors demonstrated a lower basal level of Rb hyperphosphorylation, and cells did not reach maximum levels until 48 hours after the addition of growth factors. Similar results were obtained from duplicate blots. Together, results indicate that there is no significant age-related difference in the relative expression of total Rb protein in HCECs; however, the kinetics of Rb hyperphosphorylation differed in an age-dependent manner, indicating a slower response to growth factor stimulation in HCECs from older donors. 
Discussion
Today the only treatment for the dysfunction of corneal endothelium due to low cell density is either penetrating keratoplasty (PK) or deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty (DLEK). Both methods require donor corneas and involve a surgical procedure. Most corneal donors are older (i.e., >50 years old). Corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) is often not high enough to use corneas from older donors for transplantation. This decrease in ECD can be due to aging, history of surgeries, or trauma. It may be possible to induce HCECs to proliferate transiently in situ as demonstrated in a previous study. 49 For example, in donor corneas, the ability to induce transient proliferation and increase cell density would contribute to better outcomes of corneal transplantation and expansion of the number of donor corneas acceptable for transplantation. A final goal could be treatment or prevention of poor visual acuity because of low ECD by increasing ECD in vivo, that is, directly in patients’ eyes, without the need for transplant surgery. This would be epoch-making progress in the treatment of HCEC dysfunction caused by low ECD. Careful analysis of the proliferative mechanism in HCECs is essential for the establishment of this new treatment. Previous studies have revealed age-related differences in proliferative capacity in HCECs. 13 14 48 50 Because of the reasons mentioned, the future target of the transient proliferation of HCECs will be older donors or patients. As such, it is very important to reveal the underlying causes of the observed age-related differences in proliferative capacity and to explore methods to enhance this in HCECs from older donors. 
This is the first known study to compare relative CKI expression in human corneal endothelium from young and older donors. Results from both the immunocytochemistry and Western blot studies confirm the expression of p16INK4a, p21WAF1/Cip1, and p27Kip1 in human corneal endothelium. Overall, results from primary cultures of HCECs indicate that p16INK4a and p21WAF1/Cip1 protein levels increase as a function of donor age, whereas p27Kip1 levels remain relatively steady. The finding of increased expression of p16INK4a and p21WAF1/Cip1 is consistent with results of age-related studies in other cell types. 30 31 An age-related increase in p16INK4a and p21WAF1/Cip1 expression was observed not only in primary cultures, but also in passage-4 cells. The consistency of the levels of these proteins under both culture conditions reflects their known mRNA and protein stability and suggests that, as in other cell types, 32 these two CKIs may be involved in long-term cell cycle arrest rather than in controlling short-term cellular responses. In a recent review article, 51 we presented results of preliminary studies of the relative expression of p16INK4a, p21WAF1/Cip1, and p27Kip1 from a 24- and a 65-year-old donor. With this small sample, it appeared that only p21WAF1/Cip1 increased with donor age. Data from these two samples was included among the larger number of samples used for the current studies; however, with the larger sample, it became clear that p16INK4a, as well as p21WAF1/Cip1, increased in an age-dependent fashion. 
In primary cultures of HCECs, p27Kip1 levels did not appear to differ with donor age; however, in passage-4 cells, p27Kip1 levels were significantly lower in HCECs from older donors. This finding may reflect a difference in cellular response to multiple passaging rather than to an intrinsic age-related difference in p27Kip1 expression. p27Kip1 protein is regulated at both the level of translation and turnover, 44 permitting more short-term regulation of the cell cycle in response to various environmental changes, including exposure to TGF-β and formation of mature cell–cell contacts. 41 42 43 From results of the primary cultures, it can be concluded that, in addition to the normal inhibitory activity of p27Kip1, there is an age-dependent increase in negative regulation of the cell cycle by p16INK4a and p21WAF1/Cip1 and that this additional molecular mechanism is responsible, at least in part, for the replicative senescence-like, reduced proliferative response observed in HCECs from older donors. Further study is needed to determine why increased passaging results in apparently lower p27Kip1 protein levels. 
Results of the current studies should be considered in light of previous reports from our laboratory 25 26 and from Yoshida et al. 28 regarding the role of p27Kip1 in regulating corneal endothelial proliferation. Together, those studies indicate that, during postnatal corneal endothelial development in neonatal rats 25 26 and mice, 28 increased p27Kip1 expression correlates with the decreased proliferation that occurs on formation of a mature, contact-inhibited monolayer, strongly suggesting that p27Kip1 helps negatively regulate proliferation in developing endothelium. Results from our current studies comparing relative CKI expression in endothelium from young and older donors suggest that different molecular mechanisms are responsible for the replicative senescence-like reduction in proliferative capacity observed in the endothelium of older donors and for the decrease in proliferation that occurs on maturation of the developing endothelial monolayer. 
In several previous studies from this laboratory, a rat model was used to study cell cycle regulation in corneal endothelium. Certain observations using this model may appear to conflict with more recent findings in human corneal endothelial cells; however, these results do not conflict, if relative donor age is considered. As with humans, the density of corneal endothelial cells in both rats and mice decreases in an age-dependent manner. Fitch et al. 52 showed a progressive decline in the number of cells and an increase in pleomorphism in rat corneal endothelium from age 6 to 30 months, closely paralleling changes reported in human endothelium in individuals from 20 to 70 years old. Similar results were obtained by Meyer et al. 53 Studies of mouse corneal endothelium 54 demonstrated an age-dependent increase in cell area and decrease in hexagonal cells corresponding to an age-dependent decrease in the relative number of endothelial cells over a period of 1 through 27 months. These results suggest that there is a similar age-related decrease in the proliferative capacity of corneal endothelium in rodents and in humans. In all studies of rat tissue, we used young rats, approximately 6 weeks old. Thus, we believe the data we have obtained from our rat studies most closely reflect the phenotype and cell cycle behavior of HCECs obtained from young donors. 
This age-related difference is important in interpreting studies from this laboratory that were designed to determine the effect of reducing p27Kip1 levels on corneal endothelial cell proliferation. Kikuchi et al. 55 reported that p27Kip1 antisense treatment promoted proliferation in fully confluent cultures of rat corneal endothelial cells, indicating that this CKI is a negative regulator of proliferation in corneal endothelium. Similar studies were conducted in confluent cultures of HCECs from young and older donors (Kikuchi M, et al., manuscript submitted). Results of those studies indicate that p27Kip1 siRNA treatment promoted proliferation in confluent cultures of HCECs from young donors (<30 years old), but not in cultures from old donors (>50 years old). Taken together, it can be seen that reduction of p27Kip1 protein levels in corneal endothelial cells from young rats or young human donors was sufficient to promote proliferation. However, the lack of proliferation in p27Kip1 siRNA–treated HCECs from older donors strongly suggests that the age-related decrease in proliferative capacity observed in HCECs from older donors is regulated by other molecular mechanisms in addition to that of p27Kip1
Although expression of Rb protein has been reported in rabbit and human corneal endothelium, 16 this is the first time that the kinetics of Rb hyperphosphorylation has been determined in HCECs. Results of the Western blot analyses indicated that there was no age-related difference in the overall protein expression of Rb in HCECs, as indicated by use of the IF8 antibody; however, hyperphosphorylation of Ser807/811 of Rb did differ in an age-dependent manner. Of interest is the fact that Ser807/811 is one of four motifs on Rb whose phosphorylation is regulated by cyclin-dependent kinase activity. 56 The demonstrated age-related difference in the kinetics of deactivation of Rb provides suggestive evidence that regulation of this important process differs with donor age. Because the expression of both p16INK4a and p21WAF1/Cip1 is increased in HCECs from older donors, and these CKIs are known to inhibit the activity of the cyclin/kinase complexes that are responsible for hyperphosphorylating Rb, it is reasonable to hypothesize that the increased expression of p16INK4a and p21WAF1/Cip1 contributes to the reduced proliferative response observed in HCECs from older donors. Although the data obtained in the current studies provide only evidence correlating increased p16INK4a and p21WAF1/Cip1 expression with decreased Rb phosphorylation, it does not prove a direct relationship. Additional functional studies must be conducted to determine specifically whether increased expression of p16INK4a and p21WAF1/Cip1 is directly responsible for decreased Rb hyperphosphorylation, leading to the age-related decrease in proliferative capacity of HCECs. 
 
Table 1.
 
Antibodies
Table 1.
 
Antibodies
Primary Antibodies Dilutions Secondary Antibodies Dilutions
Immunocytochemistry
 p16 (N-20)* 1:50 FITC-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG, † 1:200
 p21 (C-19)* 1:50 FITC-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG, † 1:200
 p27 (P2092), ‡ 1:50 FITC-conjugated donkey anti-mouse IgG, † 1:100
Western Blot
 p16 (N-20)* 1:400 Peroxidase-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG, † 1:10,000
 p21 Waf1/Cip1 (DCS60), § 1:2,000 Peroxidase-conjugated donkey anti-mouse IgG, † 1:2,000
 p27 (N-20)* 1:200 Peroxidase-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG, † 1:10,000
 Rb (Ser 807/811)* 1:400 Peroxidase-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG, † 1:10,000
 Rb (IF8)* 1:500 Peroxidase-conjugated donkey anti-mouse IgG, † 1:10,000
 β-Actin (A1978), ‡ 1:10,000 Peroxidase-conjugated donkey anti-mouse IgG, † 1:20,000
Figure 1.
 
Fresh-frozen sections of human cornea from an 18-year-old (AC) and a 74-year-old donor (DF) were stained with antibodies for p16INK4a (A, D), p21WAF1/Cip1 (B, E), or p27Kip1 (C, F). Positive staining for all three CKIs was clearly visible in endothelial nuclei from both donors. Arrows: positive staining in corneal endothelial cells. Anterior Descemet’s membrane (DM) showed relatively strong autofluorescence in some sections. S, stroma; En, endothelium. Original magnification, ×60.
Figure 1.
 
Fresh-frozen sections of human cornea from an 18-year-old (AC) and a 74-year-old donor (DF) were stained with antibodies for p16INK4a (A, D), p21WAF1/Cip1 (B, E), or p27Kip1 (C, F). Positive staining for all three CKIs was clearly visible in endothelial nuclei from both donors. Arrows: positive staining in corneal endothelial cells. Anterior Descemet’s membrane (DM) showed relatively strong autofluorescence in some sections. S, stroma; En, endothelium. Original magnification, ×60.
Figure 2.
 
The table provides donor and culture information for Western blot studies conducted in passage 4 HCECs. Representative phase-contrast images are shown in (A) through (D). HCECs at passage 4 were grown to confluence and then maintained an additional 3 to 7 days, to ensure formation of a contact-inhibited monolayer. The size of the cells from younger donors (A, B) was consistently smaller than that from older donors (C, D). An increase in polymorphism was clearly noted with increasing donor age. Original magnification, ×40.
Figure 2.
 
The table provides donor and culture information for Western blot studies conducted in passage 4 HCECs. Representative phase-contrast images are shown in (A) through (D). HCECs at passage 4 were grown to confluence and then maintained an additional 3 to 7 days, to ensure formation of a contact-inhibited monolayer. The size of the cells from younger donors (A, B) was consistently smaller than that from older donors (C, D). An increase in polymorphism was clearly noted with increasing donor age. Original magnification, ×40.
Figure 3.
 
Western blot and densitometric analysis of p16INK4a protein expression in passage 4 HCECs from young and older donors. Protein samples from all eight donors were electrophoresed, and Western blots were prepared to determine the relative expression of p16INK4a in each sample (A). Densitometric results with β-actin used for normalization are shown in (B). The average level of p16INK4a expressed in HCECs from young and older donors was compared in (C). Bars, SD. Results indicate a significant increase (P = 0.039) in p16INK4a expression in HCECs from older donors.
Figure 3.
 
Western blot and densitometric analysis of p16INK4a protein expression in passage 4 HCECs from young and older donors. Protein samples from all eight donors were electrophoresed, and Western blots were prepared to determine the relative expression of p16INK4a in each sample (A). Densitometric results with β-actin used for normalization are shown in (B). The average level of p16INK4a expressed in HCECs from young and older donors was compared in (C). Bars, SD. Results indicate a significant increase (P = 0.039) in p16INK4a expression in HCECs from older donors.
Figure 4.
 
Western blot and densitometric analyses of p21WAF1/Cip1 protein expression. Western blots were prepared with protein samples from the same eight donors as in Figure 3 , to determine the relative expression of p21WAF1/Cip1 (A). Densitometric results with β-actin used for normalization are shown in (B). The average level of p21WAF1/Cip1 expressed in HCECs from young and older donors was compared (C). Bars, SD. Results indicate a significant increase (P = 0.022) in p21WAF1/Cip1 expression in HCECs from older donors.
Figure 4.
 
Western blot and densitometric analyses of p21WAF1/Cip1 protein expression. Western blots were prepared with protein samples from the same eight donors as in Figure 3 , to determine the relative expression of p21WAF1/Cip1 (A). Densitometric results with β-actin used for normalization are shown in (B). The average level of p21WAF1/Cip1 expressed in HCECs from young and older donors was compared (C). Bars, SD. Results indicate a significant increase (P = 0.022) in p21WAF1/Cip1 expression in HCECs from older donors.
Figure 5.
 
Western blot and densitometric analyses of p27Kip1 protein expression. The same blot used for analysis of p21WAF1/Cip1 protein expression in Figure 4was chemically stripped, to remove all bound antibodies and was reprobed to analyze p27Kip1 protein expression (A). Densitometric results with β-actin used for normalization are shown in (B). The average level of p27Kip1 expressed in HCECs from young and older donors was compared (C). Bars, SD. Results indicate a significant decrease (P = 0.044) in p27Kip1 expression in HCECs from older donors.
Figure 5.
 
Western blot and densitometric analyses of p27Kip1 protein expression. The same blot used for analysis of p21WAF1/Cip1 protein expression in Figure 4was chemically stripped, to remove all bound antibodies and was reprobed to analyze p27Kip1 protein expression (A). Densitometric results with β-actin used for normalization are shown in (B). The average level of p27Kip1 expressed in HCECs from young and older donors was compared (C). Bars, SD. Results indicate a significant decrease (P = 0.044) in p27Kip1 expression in HCECs from older donors.
Figure 6.
 
Tableprovides donor and culture information for studies conducted in primary cultures of HCECs for the CKI studies. Representative phase-contrast images are shown in (A) through (D). Primary cultures of HCECs were grown to confluence and then maintained an additional 3 to 7 days to ensure formation of a contact-inhibited monolayer. A similar age-related difference in cell shape was observed in primary cultures as seen in passage-4 cells (Fig. 2) . Cells from younger donors (A, B) tended to be more homogeneous and smaller than those from older donors (C, D). Original magnification, ×40.
Figure 6.
 
Tableprovides donor and culture information for studies conducted in primary cultures of HCECs for the CKI studies. Representative phase-contrast images are shown in (A) through (D). Primary cultures of HCECs were grown to confluence and then maintained an additional 3 to 7 days to ensure formation of a contact-inhibited monolayer. A similar age-related difference in cell shape was observed in primary cultures as seen in passage-4 cells (Fig. 2) . Cells from younger donors (A, B) tended to be more homogeneous and smaller than those from older donors (C, D). Original magnification, ×40.
Figure 7.
 
Western blot and densitometric analyses of p16INK4a protein expression in primary cultures of HCECs from young and older donors. Protein samples from eight donors were electrophoresed and Western blots were prepared, to determine the relative expression of p16INK4a in each sample (A) Densitometric results with β-actin used for normalization are shown in (B). The average level of p16INK4a expressed in HCECs from young and older donors was compared (C). Bars, SD. Results indicate a significant increase (P = 0.026) in p16INK4a expression in HCECs from older donors.
Figure 7.
 
Western blot and densitometric analyses of p16INK4a protein expression in primary cultures of HCECs from young and older donors. Protein samples from eight donors were electrophoresed and Western blots were prepared, to determine the relative expression of p16INK4a in each sample (A) Densitometric results with β-actin used for normalization are shown in (B). The average level of p16INK4a expressed in HCECs from young and older donors was compared (C). Bars, SD. Results indicate a significant increase (P = 0.026) in p16INK4a expression in HCECs from older donors.
Figure 8.
 
Western blot and densitometric analyses of p21WAF1/Cip1 protein expression in primary cultures of HCECs from young and older donors. Protein samples from the same eight donors as in Figure 7were electrophoresed, and Western blots were prepared, to determine the relative expression of p21WAF1/Cip1 in each sample (A). Densitometric results with β-actin used for normalization are shown in (B). The average level of p21WAF1/Cip1 expressed in HCECs from young and older donors was compared (C). Bars, SD. Results indicate a significant increase (P = 0.022) in p21WAF1/Cip1 expression in HCECs from older donors.
Figure 8.
 
Western blot and densitometric analyses of p21WAF1/Cip1 protein expression in primary cultures of HCECs from young and older donors. Protein samples from the same eight donors as in Figure 7were electrophoresed, and Western blots were prepared, to determine the relative expression of p21WAF1/Cip1 in each sample (A). Densitometric results with β-actin used for normalization are shown in (B). The average level of p21WAF1/Cip1 expressed in HCECs from young and older donors was compared (C). Bars, SD. Results indicate a significant increase (P = 0.022) in p21WAF1/Cip1 expression in HCECs from older donors.
Figure 9.
 
Western blot and densitometric analyses of p27Kip1 protein expression in primary cultures of HCECs from young and older donors. The same blot used for analysis of p21WAF1/Cip1 protein expression in Figure 8was chemically stripped to remove all bound antibodies and reprobed to analyze p27Kip1 protein expression (A). Densitometric results with β-actin used for normalization are shown in (B). The average level of p27Kip1 expressed in HCECs from young and older donors was compared (C). Bars, SD. In primary cultures of HCEC, there was no significant difference (P = 0.885) in the relative expression of p27Kip1 between young and older donors.
Figure 9.
 
Western blot and densitometric analyses of p27Kip1 protein expression in primary cultures of HCECs from young and older donors. The same blot used for analysis of p21WAF1/Cip1 protein expression in Figure 8was chemically stripped to remove all bound antibodies and reprobed to analyze p27Kip1 protein expression (A). Densitometric results with β-actin used for normalization are shown in (B). The average level of p27Kip1 expressed in HCECs from young and older donors was compared (C). Bars, SD. In primary cultures of HCEC, there was no significant difference (P = 0.885) in the relative expression of p27Kip1 between young and older donors.
Figure 10.
 
Tableprovides donor and culture information for studies conducted to compare the kinetics of Rb hyperphosphorylation in HCECs cultured from young and older donors. Representative phase-contrast images of confluent passage-1 HCECs are also shown. Original magnification, ×10.
Figure 10.
 
Tableprovides donor and culture information for studies conducted to compare the kinetics of Rb hyperphosphorylation in HCECs cultured from young and older donors. Representative phase-contrast images of confluent passage-1 HCECs are also shown. Original magnification, ×10.
Figure 11.
 
Western blot analysis using mouse anti-human Rb (IF8) to demonstrate total Rb protein expression in subconfluent, passage-2 HCECs at 0, 24, 48, and 72 hours after growth factor addition (A). Blot showing a β-actin band from all samples (B). Densitometric analysis using β-actin for normalization (C) demonstrated a similar level of total Rb protein expression in all HCECs, regardless of donor age or time after growth factor addition. Bars, SD.
Figure 11.
 
Western blot analysis using mouse anti-human Rb (IF8) to demonstrate total Rb protein expression in subconfluent, passage-2 HCECs at 0, 24, 48, and 72 hours after growth factor addition (A). Blot showing a β-actin band from all samples (B). Densitometric analysis using β-actin for normalization (C) demonstrated a similar level of total Rb protein expression in all HCECs, regardless of donor age or time after growth factor addition. Bars, SD.
Figure 12.
 
Western blot analysis using rabbit anti-human Rb (Ser 807/811) demonstrate the kinetics of Rb hyperphosphorylation in the same samples of subconfluent HCECs as used in Figure 11 . Samples were taken at 0, 24, 48, and 72 hours after growth factor addition (A) Blot showing β-actin band from all samples (B). Densitometric analysis with β-actin used for normalization (C) demonstrated a maximum increase in Rb hyperphosphorylation in HCECs from younger donors within 24 hours of growth factor addition, whereas maximum hyperphosphorylation of Rb did not occur in HCECs from older donors until 48 hours after growth factor stimulation. Bars, SD. Probabilities demonstrate statistically significant differences.
Figure 12.
 
Western blot analysis using rabbit anti-human Rb (Ser 807/811) demonstrate the kinetics of Rb hyperphosphorylation in the same samples of subconfluent HCECs as used in Figure 11 . Samples were taken at 0, 24, 48, and 72 hours after growth factor addition (A) Blot showing β-actin band from all samples (B). Densitometric analysis with β-actin used for normalization (C) demonstrated a maximum increase in Rb hyperphosphorylation in HCECs from younger donors within 24 hours of growth factor addition, whereas maximum hyperphosphorylation of Rb did not occur in HCECs from older donors until 48 hours after growth factor stimulation. Bars, SD. Probabilities demonstrate statistically significant differences.
MauriceDM. The location of the fluid pump in the cornea. J Physiol. 1972;332:43–54.
BarfortP, MauriceD. Electrical and fluid transport across the corneal endothelium. Exp Eye Res. 1974;19:11–19. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
HoppenreijsVP, PelsE, VrensenGF, OostingJ, TreffersWF. Effects of human epidermal growth factor on endothelial wound healing of human corneas. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992;33:1946–1957. [PubMed]
MatsubaraM, TanishimaT. Wound-healing of corneal endothelium in monkey: an autoradiographic study. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 1983;27:444–450. [PubMed]
LaingRA, SandstromMM, BerrospiAR, LeibowitzHM. Changes in the corneal endothelium as a function of age. Exp Eye Res. 1976;22:587–594. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
MurphyC, AlvaradoJ, JusterR, MaglioM. Prenatal and postnatal cellularity of the human corneal endothelium: a quantitative histologic study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1984;25:312–322. [PubMed]
BaumJL, NiedraR, DavisC, YueBY. Mass culture of human corneal endothelial cells. Arch Ophthalmol. 1979;97:1136–1140. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
NayakSK, BinderPS. The growth of endothelium from human corneal rims in tissue culture. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1984;25:1213–1216. [PubMed]
EngelmannK, BohnkeM, FriedlP. Isolation and long-term cultivation of human corneal endothelial cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1988;29:1656–1662. [PubMed]
InslerMS, LopezJG. Microcarrier cell culture of neonatal human corneal endothelium. Curr Eye Res. 1990;9:23–30. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
PistsovMY, SadovnikovaEYu, DanilovSM. Human corneal endothelial cells: isolation, characterization and long-term cultivation. Exp Eye Res. 1988;47:403–414. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
ChenKH, AzarD, JoyceNC. Transplantation of adult human corneal endothelium ex vivo: a morphologic study. Cornea. 2001;20:731–737. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
SenooT, JoyceNC. Cell cycle kinetics in corneal endothelium from old and young donors. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:660–667. [PubMed]
ZhuC, JoyceNC. Proliferative response of corneal endothelial cells from young and older donors. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:1743–1751. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
JoyceNC, MeklirB, JoyceSJ, ZieskeJD. Cell cycle protein expression and proliferative status in human corneal cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;37:645–655. [PubMed]
JoyceNC, NavonSE, RoyS, ZieskeJD. Expression of cell cycle-associated proteins in human and rabbit corneal endothelium in situ. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;37:1566–1575. [PubMed]
HarperJW, AdamiGR, WeiN, KeyomarsiK, ElledgeSJ. The p21 Cdk-interacting protein Cip1 is a potent inhibitor of G1 cyclin-dependent kinases. Cell. 1993;75:805–816. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
PolyakK, LeeMH, Erdjument-BromageH, et al. Cloning of p27Kip1, a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor and a potential mediator of extracellular antimitogenic signals. Cell. 1994;78:59–66. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
LeeMH, ReynisdottirI, MassagueJ. Cloning of p57KIP2, a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor with unique domain structure and tissue distribution. Genes Dev. 1995;9:639–649. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
HannonGJ, BeachD. p15INK4B is a potential effector of TGF-beta-induced cell cycle arrest. Nature. 1994;371:257–261. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
SerranoM, HannonGJ, BeachD. A new regulatory motif in cell-cycle control causing specific inhibition of cyclin D/CDK4. Nature. 1993;366:704–707. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
GuanKL, JenkinsCW, LiY, et al. Growth suppression by p18, a p16INK4/MTS1- and p14INK4B/MTS2-related CDK6 inhibitor, correlates with wild-type pRb function. Genes Dev. 1994;8:2939–2952. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
ChanFK, ZhangJ, ChengL, ShapiroDN, WinotoA. Identification of human and mouse p19, a novel CDK4 and CDK6 inhibitor with homology to p16ink4. Mol Cell Biol. 1995;15:2682–2688. [PubMed]
LeesE. Cyclin dependent kinase regulation. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1995;7:773–780. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
JoyceNC, HarrisDL, ZieskeJD. Mitotic inhibition of corneal endothelium in neonatal rats. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;39:2572–2583. [PubMed]
JoyceNC, HarrisDL, MelloD. TGF-β and contact inhibition: Effects on expression of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors in corneal endothelium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:2152–2159. [PubMed]
KimTY, KimWI, SmithRE, KayEP. Differential activity of TGF-beta2 on the expression of p27Kip1 and Cdk4 in actively cycling and contact inhibited rabbit corneal endothelial cells. Mol Vis. 2001;7:261–270. [PubMed]
YoshidaK, KaseS, NakayamaK, NagahamaH, et al. Involvement of p27KIP1 in the proliferation of the developing corneal endothelium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:2163–2167. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
SherrCJ, RobertsJM. CDK inhibitors: positive and negative regulators of G1-phase progression. Genes Dev. 1999;13:1501–1512. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
SharplessNE. Ink4a/Arf links senescence and aging. Exp Gerontol. 2004;39:1751–1759. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
FamulskiKS, HalloranPF. Molecular events in kidney ageing. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2005;14:243–248. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
SerranoM. The tumor suppressor protein p16INK4a. Exp Cell Res. 1997;237:7–13. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
RousselM. The INK4 family of cell cycle inhibitors in cancer. Oncogene. 1999;18:5311–5317. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
ChenJH, StoeberK, KingsburyS, OzanneSE, WilliamsGH, HalesCN. Loss of proliferative capacity and induction of senescence in oxidatively stressed human fibroblasts. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:49439–49446. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
NodaA, NingY, VenableSF, Pereira-SmithOM, SmithJR. Cloning of senescent cell-derived inhibitors of DNA synthesis using an expression screen. Exp Cell Res. 1994;211:90–98. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
HalevyO, NovitchBG, SpicerDB, et al. Correlation of terminal cell cycle arrest of skeletal muscle with induction of p21 by MyoD. Science. 1995;267:1018–1021. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
ParkerSB, EicheleG, ZhangP, et al. p53-independent expression of p21Cip1 in muscle and other terminally differentiating cells. Science. 1995;267:1024–1027. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
LaBaerJ, GarrettMD, StevensonLF, et al. New functional activities for the p21 family of CDK inhibitors. Genes Dev. 1997;11:847–862. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
NiculescuAB, 3rd, ChenX, SmeetsM, HengstL, PrivesC, ReedSI. Effects of p21(Cip1/Waf1) at both the G1/S and the G2/M cell cycle transitions: pRb is a critical determinant in blocking DNA replication and in preventing endoreduplication. Mol Cell Biol. 1998;18:629–643. [PubMed]
GartelAL, TynerAL. Transcriptional regulation of the p21(WAF1/CIP1) gene. Exp Cell Res. 1999;246:280–289. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
ReynisdottirI, PolyakK, IavaroneA, MassagueJ. Kip/Cip and Ink4 Cdk inhibitors cooperate to induce cell cycle arrest in response to TGF-beta. Genes Dev. 1995;9:1831–1845. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
PolyakK, KatoJY, SolomonMJ, et al. p27Kip1, a cyclin-Cdk inhibitor, links transforming growth factor-beta and contact inhibition to cell cycle arrest. Genes Dev. 1994;8:9–22. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
LevenbergS, YardenA, KamZ, GeigerB. p27 is involved in N-cadherin-mediated contact inhibition of cell growth and S-phase entry. Oncogene. 1999;18:869–876. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
HengstL, ReedSI. Translational control of p27Kip1 accumulation during the cell cycle. Science. 1996;271:1861–1864. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
ZhengF, PlatiAR, BanerjeeA, ElliotS, StrikerLJ, StrikerGE. The molecular basis of age-related kidney disease. Sci Aging Knowledge Environ. 2003;2003:PE20. [PubMed]
ChkhotuaAB, GabusiE, AltimariA, et al. Increased expression of p16(INK4a) and p27(Kip1) cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor genes in aging human kidney and chronic allograft nephropathy. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003;41:1303–1313. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
WongH, RiabowolK. Differential CDK-inhibitor gene expression in aging human diploid fibroblasts. Exp Gerontol. 1996;31:311–325. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
JoyceNC, ZhuCC. Human corneal endothelial cell proliferation: potential for use in regenerative medicine. Cornea. 2004;23(suppl 1)S8–S19. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
McAlisterJC, JoyceNC, HarrisDL, AliRR, LarkinDFP. Induction of replication in human corneal endothelial cells by E2F2 transcription factor cDNA transfer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:3597–3603. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
KonomiK, ZhuC, HarrisD, JoyceNC. Comparison of the proliferative capacity of human corneal endothelial cells from the central and peripheral areas. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:4086–4091. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
JoyceNC. Cell cycle status of corneal endothelium. Exp Eye Res. 2005;81:629–638. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
FitchKL, NadakavukarenMJ, RichardsonA. Age-related changes in the corneal endothelium of the rat. Exp Gerontol. 1982;17:179–183. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
MeyerLA, UbelsJL, EdelhauserHF. Corneal endothelial morphology in the rat. Effects of aging, diabetes, and topical aldose reductase inhibitor treatment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1988;29:940–948. [PubMed]
FitchKL, NadakavukarenMJ. Age-related changes in the corneal endothelium of the mouse. Exp Gerontol. 1986;21:31–35. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
KikuchiM, HarrisDL, ObaraY, SenooT, JoyceNC. p27kip1 antisense-induced proliferative activity of rat corneal endothelial cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:1763–1770. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
DriscollB, T’AngA, HuYH, et al. Discovery of a regulatory motif that controls the exposure of specific upstream cyclin-dependent kinase sites that determine both conformation and growth suppressing activity of Rb. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:9463–9471. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1.
 
Fresh-frozen sections of human cornea from an 18-year-old (AC) and a 74-year-old donor (DF) were stained with antibodies for p16INK4a (A, D), p21WAF1/Cip1 (B, E), or p27Kip1 (C, F). Positive staining for all three CKIs was clearly visible in endothelial nuclei from both donors. Arrows: positive staining in corneal endothelial cells. Anterior Descemet’s membrane (DM) showed relatively strong autofluorescence in some sections. S, stroma; En, endothelium. Original magnification, ×60.
Figure 1.
 
Fresh-frozen sections of human cornea from an 18-year-old (AC) and a 74-year-old donor (DF) were stained with antibodies for p16INK4a (A, D), p21WAF1/Cip1 (B, E), or p27Kip1 (C, F). Positive staining for all three CKIs was clearly visible in endothelial nuclei from both donors. Arrows: positive staining in corneal endothelial cells. Anterior Descemet’s membrane (DM) showed relatively strong autofluorescence in some sections. S, stroma; En, endothelium. Original magnification, ×60.
Figure 2.
 
The table provides donor and culture information for Western blot studies conducted in passage 4 HCECs. Representative phase-contrast images are shown in (A) through (D). HCECs at passage 4 were grown to confluence and then maintained an additional 3 to 7 days, to ensure formation of a contact-inhibited monolayer. The size of the cells from younger donors (A, B) was consistently smaller than that from older donors (C, D). An increase in polymorphism was clearly noted with increasing donor age. Original magnification, ×40.
Figure 2.
 
The table provides donor and culture information for Western blot studies conducted in passage 4 HCECs. Representative phase-contrast images are shown in (A) through (D). HCECs at passage 4 were grown to confluence and then maintained an additional 3 to 7 days, to ensure formation of a contact-inhibited monolayer. The size of the cells from younger donors (A, B) was consistently smaller than that from older donors (C, D). An increase in polymorphism was clearly noted with increasing donor age. Original magnification, ×40.
Figure 3.
 
Western blot and densitometric analysis of p16INK4a protein expression in passage 4 HCECs from young and older donors. Protein samples from all eight donors were electrophoresed, and Western blots were prepared to determine the relative expression of p16INK4a in each sample (A). Densitometric results with β-actin used for normalization are shown in (B). The average level of p16INK4a expressed in HCECs from young and older donors was compared in (C). Bars, SD. Results indicate a significant increase (P = 0.039) in p16INK4a expression in HCECs from older donors.
Figure 3.
 
Western blot and densitometric analysis of p16INK4a protein expression in passage 4 HCECs from young and older donors. Protein samples from all eight donors were electrophoresed, and Western blots were prepared to determine the relative expression of p16INK4a in each sample (A). Densitometric results with β-actin used for normalization are shown in (B). The average level of p16INK4a expressed in HCECs from young and older donors was compared in (C). Bars, SD. Results indicate a significant increase (P = 0.039) in p16INK4a expression in HCECs from older donors.
Figure 4.
 
Western blot and densitometric analyses of p21WAF1/Cip1 protein expression. Western blots were prepared with protein samples from the same eight donors as in Figure 3 , to determine the relative expression of p21WAF1/Cip1 (A). Densitometric results with β-actin used for normalization are shown in (B). The average level of p21WAF1/Cip1 expressed in HCECs from young and older donors was compared (C). Bars, SD. Results indicate a significant increase (P = 0.022) in p21WAF1/Cip1 expression in HCECs from older donors.
Figure 4.
 
Western blot and densitometric analyses of p21WAF1/Cip1 protein expression. Western blots were prepared with protein samples from the same eight donors as in Figure 3 , to determine the relative expression of p21WAF1/Cip1 (A). Densitometric results with β-actin used for normalization are shown in (B). The average level of p21WAF1/Cip1 expressed in HCECs from young and older donors was compared (C). Bars, SD. Results indicate a significant increase (P = 0.022) in p21WAF1/Cip1 expression in HCECs from older donors.
Figure 5.
 
Western blot and densitometric analyses of p27Kip1 protein expression. The same blot used for analysis of p21WAF1/Cip1 protein expression in Figure 4was chemically stripped, to remove all bound antibodies and was reprobed to analyze p27Kip1 protein expression (A). Densitometric results with β-actin used for normalization are shown in (B). The average level of p27Kip1 expressed in HCECs from young and older donors was compared (C). Bars, SD. Results indicate a significant decrease (P = 0.044) in p27Kip1 expression in HCECs from older donors.
Figure 5.
 
Western blot and densitometric analyses of p27Kip1 protein expression. The same blot used for analysis of p21WAF1/Cip1 protein expression in Figure 4was chemically stripped, to remove all bound antibodies and was reprobed to analyze p27Kip1 protein expression (A). Densitometric results with β-actin used for normalization are shown in (B). The average level of p27Kip1 expressed in HCECs from young and older donors was compared (C). Bars, SD. Results indicate a significant decrease (P = 0.044) in p27Kip1 expression in HCECs from older donors.
Figure 6.
 
Tableprovides donor and culture information for studies conducted in primary cultures of HCECs for the CKI studies. Representative phase-contrast images are shown in (A) through (D). Primary cultures of HCECs were grown to confluence and then maintained an additional 3 to 7 days to ensure formation of a contact-inhibited monolayer. A similar age-related difference in cell shape was observed in primary cultures as seen in passage-4 cells (Fig. 2) . Cells from younger donors (A, B) tended to be more homogeneous and smaller than those from older donors (C, D). Original magnification, ×40.
Figure 6.
 
Tableprovides donor and culture information for studies conducted in primary cultures of HCECs for the CKI studies. Representative phase-contrast images are shown in (A) through (D). Primary cultures of HCECs were grown to confluence and then maintained an additional 3 to 7 days to ensure formation of a contact-inhibited monolayer. A similar age-related difference in cell shape was observed in primary cultures as seen in passage-4 cells (Fig. 2) . Cells from younger donors (A, B) tended to be more homogeneous and smaller than those from older donors (C, D). Original magnification, ×40.
Figure 7.
 
Western blot and densitometric analyses of p16INK4a protein expression in primary cultures of HCECs from young and older donors. Protein samples from eight donors were electrophoresed and Western blots were prepared, to determine the relative expression of p16INK4a in each sample (A) Densitometric results with β-actin used for normalization are shown in (B). The average level of p16INK4a expressed in HCECs from young and older donors was compared (C). Bars, SD. Results indicate a significant increase (P = 0.026) in p16INK4a expression in HCECs from older donors.
Figure 7.
 
Western blot and densitometric analyses of p16INK4a protein expression in primary cultures of HCECs from young and older donors. Protein samples from eight donors were electrophoresed and Western blots were prepared, to determine the relative expression of p16INK4a in each sample (A) Densitometric results with β-actin used for normalization are shown in (B). The average level of p16INK4a expressed in HCECs from young and older donors was compared (C). Bars, SD. Results indicate a significant increase (P = 0.026) in p16INK4a expression in HCECs from older donors.
Figure 8.
 
Western blot and densitometric analyses of p21WAF1/Cip1 protein expression in primary cultures of HCECs from young and older donors. Protein samples from the same eight donors as in Figure 7were electrophoresed, and Western blots were prepared, to determine the relative expression of p21WAF1/Cip1 in each sample (A). Densitometric results with β-actin used for normalization are shown in (B). The average level of p21WAF1/Cip1 expressed in HCECs from young and older donors was compared (C). Bars, SD. Results indicate a significant increase (P = 0.022) in p21WAF1/Cip1 expression in HCECs from older donors.
Figure 8.
 
Western blot and densitometric analyses of p21WAF1/Cip1 protein expression in primary cultures of HCECs from young and older donors. Protein samples from the same eight donors as in Figure 7were electrophoresed, and Western blots were prepared, to determine the relative expression of p21WAF1/Cip1 in each sample (A). Densitometric results with β-actin used for normalization are shown in (B). The average level of p21WAF1/Cip1 expressed in HCECs from young and older donors was compared (C). Bars, SD. Results indicate a significant increase (P = 0.022) in p21WAF1/Cip1 expression in HCECs from older donors.
Figure 9.
 
Western blot and densitometric analyses of p27Kip1 protein expression in primary cultures of HCECs from young and older donors. The same blot used for analysis of p21WAF1/Cip1 protein expression in Figure 8was chemically stripped to remove all bound antibodies and reprobed to analyze p27Kip1 protein expression (A). Densitometric results with β-actin used for normalization are shown in (B). The average level of p27Kip1 expressed in HCECs from young and older donors was compared (C). Bars, SD. In primary cultures of HCEC, there was no significant difference (P = 0.885) in the relative expression of p27Kip1 between young and older donors.
Figure 9.
 
Western blot and densitometric analyses of p27Kip1 protein expression in primary cultures of HCECs from young and older donors. The same blot used for analysis of p21WAF1/Cip1 protein expression in Figure 8was chemically stripped to remove all bound antibodies and reprobed to analyze p27Kip1 protein expression (A). Densitometric results with β-actin used for normalization are shown in (B). The average level of p27Kip1 expressed in HCECs from young and older donors was compared (C). Bars, SD. In primary cultures of HCEC, there was no significant difference (P = 0.885) in the relative expression of p27Kip1 between young and older donors.
Figure 10.
 
Tableprovides donor and culture information for studies conducted to compare the kinetics of Rb hyperphosphorylation in HCECs cultured from young and older donors. Representative phase-contrast images of confluent passage-1 HCECs are also shown. Original magnification, ×10.
Figure 10.
 
Tableprovides donor and culture information for studies conducted to compare the kinetics of Rb hyperphosphorylation in HCECs cultured from young and older donors. Representative phase-contrast images of confluent passage-1 HCECs are also shown. Original magnification, ×10.
Figure 11.
 
Western blot analysis using mouse anti-human Rb (IF8) to demonstrate total Rb protein expression in subconfluent, passage-2 HCECs at 0, 24, 48, and 72 hours after growth factor addition (A). Blot showing a β-actin band from all samples (B). Densitometric analysis using β-actin for normalization (C) demonstrated a similar level of total Rb protein expression in all HCECs, regardless of donor age or time after growth factor addition. Bars, SD.
Figure 11.
 
Western blot analysis using mouse anti-human Rb (IF8) to demonstrate total Rb protein expression in subconfluent, passage-2 HCECs at 0, 24, 48, and 72 hours after growth factor addition (A). Blot showing a β-actin band from all samples (B). Densitometric analysis using β-actin for normalization (C) demonstrated a similar level of total Rb protein expression in all HCECs, regardless of donor age or time after growth factor addition. Bars, SD.
Figure 12.
 
Western blot analysis using rabbit anti-human Rb (Ser 807/811) demonstrate the kinetics of Rb hyperphosphorylation in the same samples of subconfluent HCECs as used in Figure 11 . Samples were taken at 0, 24, 48, and 72 hours after growth factor addition (A) Blot showing β-actin band from all samples (B). Densitometric analysis with β-actin used for normalization (C) demonstrated a maximum increase in Rb hyperphosphorylation in HCECs from younger donors within 24 hours of growth factor addition, whereas maximum hyperphosphorylation of Rb did not occur in HCECs from older donors until 48 hours after growth factor stimulation. Bars, SD. Probabilities demonstrate statistically significant differences.
Figure 12.
 
Western blot analysis using rabbit anti-human Rb (Ser 807/811) demonstrate the kinetics of Rb hyperphosphorylation in the same samples of subconfluent HCECs as used in Figure 11 . Samples were taken at 0, 24, 48, and 72 hours after growth factor addition (A) Blot showing β-actin band from all samples (B). Densitometric analysis with β-actin used for normalization (C) demonstrated a maximum increase in Rb hyperphosphorylation in HCECs from younger donors within 24 hours of growth factor addition, whereas maximum hyperphosphorylation of Rb did not occur in HCECs from older donors until 48 hours after growth factor stimulation. Bars, SD. Probabilities demonstrate statistically significant differences.
Table 1.
 
Antibodies
Table 1.
 
Antibodies
Primary Antibodies Dilutions Secondary Antibodies Dilutions
Immunocytochemistry
 p16 (N-20)* 1:50 FITC-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG, † 1:200
 p21 (C-19)* 1:50 FITC-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG, † 1:200
 p27 (P2092), ‡ 1:50 FITC-conjugated donkey anti-mouse IgG, † 1:100
Western Blot
 p16 (N-20)* 1:400 Peroxidase-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG, † 1:10,000
 p21 Waf1/Cip1 (DCS60), § 1:2,000 Peroxidase-conjugated donkey anti-mouse IgG, † 1:2,000
 p27 (N-20)* 1:200 Peroxidase-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG, † 1:10,000
 Rb (Ser 807/811)* 1:400 Peroxidase-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG, † 1:10,000
 Rb (IF8)* 1:500 Peroxidase-conjugated donkey anti-mouse IgG, † 1:10,000
 β-Actin (A1978), ‡ 1:10,000 Peroxidase-conjugated donkey anti-mouse IgG, † 1:20,000
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×