This study was designed to provide proof of principle that CNV closure may be achieved while avoiding damage to the surrounding physiologic choroid. The data show that an occlusion of the surrounding choriocapillaris is not necessary to achieve closure of the CNV lesion, but that these effects can be separated by choosing an appropriate dosimetry. Achievement of complete CNV closure together with an intact choroidal perfusion is a qualitative observation, a quantitative analysis of different dosages was not intended and further patient enrollment in the 50-J/cm2 group was stopped after evidence of a significant photodynamic effect on the choroidal circulation.
So far, the only parameters used for the treatment of CNV in AMD are those recommended by the TAP guidelines. The fact that the TAP regimen regularly leads to damage to the physiologic choroid has been demonstrated by ICGA showing early and often persistent nonperfusion of the surrounding choroid,
7 8 by histology showing a dose-dependent thrombosis of the choriocapillaris,
6 and by immunostaining demonstrating a reactive upregulation of VEGF.
9 However, the present study clearly demonstrates that such consequences are the result of the parameter selection and that such overtreatment effects may be avoided. Selecting optimal parameters allows differentiation between intended effects on the pathologic neovasculature and unwanted effects on the physiologic choroid. Patients treated with a light dose of 25 J/cm
2 demonstrated, similar to patients treated with a light dose of 50 J/cm
2, a complete closure of CNV at the 1-day follow-up. However, the choriocapillaris was substantially less affected by treatment with the lower light dose, as seen in early and late ICGA at day 1 and during further follow-up
(Figs. 1 2) . No overall difference was seen in the 300- and 600-mW subgroups in the 25-J/cm
2 regimen. Patients in the 50-J/cm
2 group, receiving photosensitization 5 minutes after verteporfin infusion tended to have earlier, more, and longer-lasting choroidal changes. A detailed study was performed earlier quantifying the early effects of standard verteporfin therapy by using the same FA and ICGA measurements.
7 Comparing results of the 50-J/cm
2 protocol with the previous standard regimen study demonstrates that the qualitative sequence of angiographic events is identical with regard to standard infusion therapy or bolus administration.
7
However, choroidal damage appeared to be inseparable from CNV effects with the standard therapy. Modification of treatment parameters with bolus administration and reduced fluence allowed selective closure of the CNV and less effect on the physiologic choroidal vasculature. Changing treatment parameters appeared not to have a relevant effect on short-term safety. None of the patients in any group lost more than 2 lines of vision over a 3-month follow-up and no closure of retinal vessels was observed.
A selective approach may be particularly useful if earlier retreatment is considered or when other lesion types that are primarily less sensitive to PDT are treated as shown in the VIM study.
12 Combining verteporfin therapy with antiangiogenic and anti-inflammatory therapies is currently in debate.
16 17 The postulated benefits are a lower CNV recurrence rate after verteporfin PDT, improved durability, inhibition of the verteporfin PDT–induced angiogenic response, and eventually better functional outcomes. In experimental studies, PDT was shown to induce a rapid inflammatory response including infiltration of leukocytes, increased expression of cytokines (e.g., intracellular adhesion molecules [ICAM]-1 and interleukin [IL]-6).
18 This inflammatory response correlates with increased retinal edema detected especially by OCT.
19 Selective verteporfin therapy primarily induces less angiogenic and inflammatory side effects on the level of the choroid and should respond even better to combination therapy. The additional benefit of adjunct therapy provides further evidence to support the hypothesis that outcomes are improved when the collateral side effects are reduced or, ideally, primarily avoided.
Anti-VEGF therapy by intravitreal injection or systemic therapy has shown promising initial results.
20 21 22 23 24 Adding selective verteporfin therapy may improve angiographic and functional outcomes. However, VEGF is not only a potent angiogenic and permeability inducing factor,
25 26 but is also essential in maintaining normal vascular structures.
27 Inhibiting a physiologic angiogenic response secondary to choriocapillary hypoxia after standard PDT will most likely prevent choriocapillary recanalization and lead to more extensive and persistent choriocapillary closure.
Bolus infusion and reduced light dose in verteporfin therapy have demonstrated an improved selectivity with complete angiographic closure of the CNV and absence of a significant effect on the choroid. Modified parameters in verteporfin therapy should be of particular interest for evaluating the potential of combination therapy of PDT and antiangiogenic drugs.