Figure 6 , a schematic lateral view of a horizontal rectus EOM and its pulley, illustrates the kinematic consequences of EOM recession.
11 Before surgery (
Fig. 6 , left), the distance D
2 from globe center to insertion is maintained equal to distance D
1 from pulley to globe center. For a trigonometrically small angle of supraduction α typical of the ocular motor system, this relationship causes the rotational velocity axis imposed on the globe by the EOM to tilt posteriorly by angle α/2. This “half angle” dependence of ocular rotational velocity axis on eye position is a sufficient condition for the eye to remain in compliance with Listing’s Law of ocular torsion.
24 Listing’s Law is a quantitative description of ocular torsion whose corollary and original statement is that, when the head is upright and stationary, any eye orientation can be reached from a primary position by rotation about a single axis lying inListing’s plane.
24 Because three-dimensional eye velocity is imparted by the direction of EOM force, maintenance of the mechanical arrangement of the rectus EOM pulleys accounts for Listing’s Law without any explicit neural computation of eye torsion
25 26 and also makes the ocular motor periphery appear to the brain to be mathematically commutative with respect to the sequence of ocular rotations.
27 This kinematic analysis is supported by recent neurophysiological observations in monkeys. Motoneurons innervating vertical rectus and oblique EOMs do not encode the torsion corresponding to half-angle behavior during pursuit,
28 whereas direct electrical stimulation of the abducens nerve without the possibility of downstream neural processing evoke horizontal saccades conforming to Listing’s Law.
29 Known violations of Listing’s Law during convergence
30 and ocular counterrolling
31 have been demonstrated by MRI in humans to be associated with rotation of the rectus pulley array in the coronal plane in coordination with ocular torsion. Thus, even after ocular torsion has been driven out of Listing’s plane by a vestibular stimulus, subsequent visual saccades conform to Listing’s Law in a new Listing’s plane paralleling the original one,
32 and modulation of the orientation of Listing’s plane by gravity
33 can be explained by rotation of the rectus pulley array.
31