Before discussing the variations in MTF with time in more detail, it is reasonable to ask how the present optimal mean MTFs for a 5-mm pupil, which are found approximately 6 seconds after a blink, compare with those in the literature, particularly those based on wavefront aberration alone.
Figure 3makes this comparison. The MTF by the method of Artal
30 is based on the double-pass technique in monochromatic light and hence includes the effects of intraocular scattered light, while those of Walsh and Charman
31 and Liang and Williams
32 are derived from wavefront data alone and hence would be expected to be a little higher, due to the absence of the contrast-degrading effects of scattered light. All these earlier data were obtained with carefully corrected eyes under cycloplegia, so that errors of focus were minimized. Although the times after a blink at which these earlier data were obtained were not specified, it seems reasonable to assume that they represent near-optimal optical performance.
It can be seen that our optimal double-pass MTF was lower than all the others. It was also slightly more irregular. We attribute these effects mainly to a combination of errors of focus associated with accommodative lead for many of our subjects when viewing the distant target of our OQAS double-pass instrument under natural viewing conditions and the longitudinal chromatic aberration between the wavelengths of the red visible accommodation target and the infrared wavelength (780 nm) at which the PSFs were measured. The signs of these defocus effects are opposite one another. Although accommodative leads (excesses in ocular power) for a target at infinity vary between subjects, at photopic levels, they typically amount to approximately 0.50 D.
33 In contrast, the reduction in apparent ocular power associated with the ocular longitudinal chromatic aberration and the fact that infrared is reflected from deeper retinal–choroidal layers than the receptors probably also amounts to approximately 0.5 D for a wavelength of approximately 780 nm,
34 so that there is an approximate balance between the two defocus effects. The normal fluctuations in accommodation, over a range of approximately 0.5 D,
35 will be superimposed on the mean defocus and cause variations in individual sampled MTFs, even in the absence of changes in higher-order aberration. Last, there may be some residual uncorrected second-order spherical and cylindrical wavefront errors in our “emmetropic” subjects, whereas second-order aberrations have been removed from the wavefront aberration-based MTFs in
Figure 3 . Higher-order aberrations are essentially the same in visible and the infrared
34 when expressed in micrometers, but the same wavefront errors will have less impact in the infrared because the wavelength is longer. In contrast, image-degrading light-scattering within the retina and choroid may be higher at the longer wavelength, so that overall the MTF measured in the near infrared would not be expected to differ greatly from that which would be measured if visible light were to be used. An error of focus of approximately 0.25 D or less would be sufficient to explain the discrepancy between our optimal MTF and that in the earlier work.
36 Finally, we note that that the use of the small (1.5 mm) entrance pupil in our equipment and a wavelength of 780-nm limits spatial frequencies reaching the retina to a maximum of approximately 35 cyc/deg, so that we cannot make measurements at spatial frequencies higher than this; however, this effect does not explain our comparatively low readings at spatial frequencies of approximately 10 cyc/deg.
If we now consider the postblink changes in MTF recorded in the present experiment,
Figure 2suggests strongly that, if high spatial frequencies are important, optical performance is optimal after approximately 6 seconds. It is, however, of interest to use other performance criteria to see whether they lead to the same conclusion. A large number of MTF-based, single-figure performance metrics have been suggested in the literature.
37 We have chosen to use the following: the cut-off frequency at which the mean MTF falls to zero; the visual high-contrast cut-off frequency at which the MTF intersects the neural contrast threshold curve; the area under the MTF; the area between the MTF and the neural contrast threshold; the volume under the two-dimensional MTF (which relates to the Strehl ratio
2 ); and the volume between the two-dimensional MTF and the corresponding two-dimensional neural threshold (which relates to the visual Strehl ratio
37 ). Objective refraction based on finding the correction that maximizes the volume under the MTF has been shown to correlate well with subjective refraction.
38 The results of the six image metrics as a function of time after a blink are shown in
Figure 4 . The neural contrast threshold used, which is plotted in
Figure 3 , is that appropriate to the luminance level that typically leads to a 5-mm natural pupil and gives a retinal illuminance of 130 trolands.
39 40
It can be seen that all the performance measures peaked at approximately 5 to 6 seconds. The inclusion of neural as opposed to purely optical effects may tend to move the peak performance to slightly shorter times, presumably because it reduces the importance of modulation transfer at high spatial frequencies. In general, though, it appears that assessing optical performance by direct measurement of the retinal MTF leads to the same conclusion as was reached on the basis of wavefront measurements
16 17 —that optical performance in normal subjects is best some 6 seconds or so after a blink.
This result is perhaps not surprising, in that marked increases in light scattering from the eye’s anterior surface would be expected to arise only after the tear film has started to break up, which occurred at an average of approximately 10 seconds in our subjects. Before this time, dynamic changes in both the wavefront aberration and the single-pass MTF are caused mainly by aberration changes associated with the local alterations in the thickness of the still-unbroken tear layer although, as noted earlier, the MTF is additionally degraded by time-invariant intraocular scattering and by focus errors. Note too that we cannot exclude the possibility that lid pressure during blinking has some effect on corneal contour and that the contour changes during the interval between blinks to produce local changes in optical path that are independent of tear film changes. Buehren et al.
41 have interpreted their videokeratoscope data in terms of effects of this kind, and their results suggest that the upper and lower areas of a 5-mm pupil may be affected.
The results of this study therefore support those of earlier work based purely on wavefront aberration measurements. Optimal optical performance in normal subjects occurs some 5 to 6 seconds after a blink. If indeed optical quality continues to improve over this timescale, it may be wondered why blink intervals are usually comparable to or shorter than this (normal blink intervals were around 6 seconds in our subjects). Our results provide no evidence that, in normal subjects, blinking is delayed until tear film break-up starts within the corneal area corresponding to that of the pupil. The discomfort caused by spot-wise drying of the precorneal tear film has been suggested to be an initiating factor for blinking in some normal persons and patients with dry eye.
42 The present results imply that most blinking is not triggered by any detectable deterioration in the retinal image (as is, of course, also evidenced by the fact that blink rates are similar in darkness), and it may be that the local dry spots involved in the initiation of some blinks are usually located in the peripheral cornea,
42 where they have no impact on axial image quality. Another possible factor in blink initiation is that blinking may also be an unconscious part of the mechanism to correct for slow drifts in fixation, accommodation and convergence. The basic blink rate appears to be a characteristic of the individual, although it can, of course, be affected by a variety of external stimuli, such as stress or task difficulty.
43 44 45