December 2005
Volume 46, Issue 12
Free
Physiology and Pharmacology  |   December 2005
Aqueous Humor Dynamics in Monkeys after Topical R-DOI
Author Affiliations
  • B’Ann T. Gabelt
    From Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin; and
  • Mehmet Okka
    From Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin; and
  • Tom R. Dean
    Research and Development, Alcon Research Ltd., Fort Worth, Texas.
  • Paul L. Kaufman
    From Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin; and
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science December 2005, Vol.46, 4691-4696. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.05-0647
  • Views
  • PDF
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      B’Ann T. Gabelt, Mehmet Okka, Tom R. Dean, Paul L. Kaufman; Aqueous Humor Dynamics in Monkeys after Topical R-DOI. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005;46(12):4691-4696. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.05-0647.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

purpose. To determine the effects of R-DOI, a selective 5-HT2 agonist, on intraocular pressure (IOP) and aqueous humor dynamics in monkeys.

methods. Normotensive cynomolgus monkeys (n = 8) were treated topically once daily with four 5-μL drops of 0.5% R-DOI in one eye, vehicle in the opposite eye. The 6-hour IOP response (Goldmann applanation tonometry) was determined before the drug application and on the third day of treatment. Aqueous humor formation, or flow (AHF, measured by fluorophotometry), was measured from hours 3 to 8 after the third dose. Beginning 3.5 hours after the fourth or fifth dose, AHF was measured by dilution of radio-iodinated monkey albumin perfused through the anterior chamber and flow to blood by accumulation of albumin in the general circulation. Uveoscleral outflow (Fu) was calculated. Flow to blood was determined at spontaneous and elevated pressures, allowing calculation of trabecular outflow facility. Total outflow facility was determined by two-level constant pressure perfusion from 3.5 to 5 hours and from 5.5 to 6.25 hours after R-DOI treatment.

results. Reduction of IOP in treated eyes was compared to the opposite control eyes corrected for the 6-hour IOP baseline before the first dose. After the third dose of R-DOI, IOP was significantly (P < 0.01, n = 7) decreased by 1.4 to 4.7 mm Hg over the 6 hours. AHF (by fluorophotometry) increased by 13% (P < 0.05, n = 8) in treated compared with control eyes corrected for baseline. AHF (isotope dilution) increased by 30% (P < 0.01, n = 8), flow to blood decreased by 28% (n = 5), and Fu increased by 241% (P < 0.05, n = 5). Total and trabecular outflow facility were unchanged.

conclusions. R-DOI caused a small but significant increase in AHF and lowered IOP in normotensive monkeys primarily by increasing Fu.

Serotonin receptors have been identified in ocular tissues of the anterior segment of the eye in several species, including humans. 1 2 Functional mRNA for the serotonin 5-HT2 receptors coupled to phosphoinositide turnover and [Ca2+] mobilization have been confirmed in human trabecular meshwork cells and ciliary muscle cells (Sharif NA, et al. IOVS 2003;44:ARVO E-Abstract 2084). mRNA encoding 5-HT1A, 5HT2A–C, and 5HT7 receptors were detected in human ciliary body samples. 3 These findings suggest that 5-HT may play a role in regulating aqueous humor dynamics and intraocular pressure (IOP). 
There have been conflicting reports on the effects of 5-HT receptor subtype ligands on IOP in various species and as a consequence of activity at other classes of receptors. The 5-HT1A agonists 8-OH-DPAT and the 5-HT1A agonist/α1-antagonist flesinoxan had no effect on IOP in anesthetized 4 or conscious 5 cynomolgus monkeys, in contrast to their IOP-lowering effects in rabbits. 6 7 8 The mechanism for the ocular hypotensive responses to the 5-HT2 receptor antagonists ketanserin 9 10 and sarpogrelate (Takenaka H, et al. IOVS 1995;36:ARVO Abstract 36) in patients with glaucoma is most likely mediated through their α1-adrenergic antagonist activity and not their 5-HT2 antagonist activity. 5  
Of particular interest, one study demonstrated that 5-HT2 agonists, but not 5-HT2 antagonists or 5-HT1A agonists, are involved in locally mediated control of IOP in conscious cynomolgus monkeys. 5 Potent and dose-dependent IOP lowering was observed in both hypertensive (lasered) and normotensive eyes. The response in hypertensive eyes followed an unusual time course, with the peak effect at least 6 hours after the drug was applied. It was thus of interest to determine the mechanism by which 5-HT2 agonists reduce IOP. R-DOI ((R)(–)-1-(4-iodo-2,5-dimethoxyphenyl)-2-aminopropane)) was selected for this study because it is a prototypic selective 5-HT2 agonist with a known IOP dose–response relationship in the cynomolgus monkey. 5 11  
We report studies conducted to investigate further the IOP lowering mechanism of R-DOI in normotensive monkeys. 
Methods
Animals and Anesthesia
Eight ocular normotensive cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis; five females, three males, 2.6–5.0 kg) were used for IOP, isotope dilution and accumulation studies (AHF, flow to blood, and outflow facility measurements). This group (group 1) of eight monkeys had undergone no invasive ocular procedures before the IOP measurements. These animals were subsequently used in the present study for one outflow facility experiment (Fig. 1)and then, after a rest period, for isotope studies. Eight normotensive cynomolgus monkeys (group 2) with virgin eyes (two females, six males, 3.0–7.5 kg) were used for fluorophotometry AHF studies. All monkeys were free of any ocular abnormalities according to slit lamp biomicroscopy at the time the measurements were taken. All experiments were conducted in accordance with the ARVO Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research and the University of Wisconsin Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. 
The monkeys were anesthetized with intramuscular ketamine (10 mg/kg initial, supplement with 5 mg/kg as needed) for drug administration, 6-hour IOP, and fluorophotometry and with intramuscular ketamine (10 mg/kg) followed by intravenous pentobarbital sodium (15 mg/kg initial, supplemented by 5 to 10 mg/kg as needed) for femoral artery cannulation and isotope and outflow facility studies. 
Subcutaneous or intravenous fluids (lactated Ringers with 5% dextrose, 10 mL/kg per hour) were given during all experiments. For isotope studies, a femoral artery was cannulated for subsequent blood sampling. 
Treatments
The R-DOI dose (100 μg) was selected based on the IOP-lowering response in normal and hypertensive eyes in conscious monkeys measured at Alcon Research, Inc. (Fort Worth, TX). 5  
R-DOI (0.5%, formulated at Alcon from commercially available material obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) or vehicle (phosphate-buffered saline with 0.5% hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose; pH 7.4) was administered once daily (8–9 AM) to the central cornea of opposite eyes in four 5-μL drops, separated by 30 seconds, while the eyelids were held open with the animal supine. 
Intraocular Pressure and Slit Lamp Examination
IOP was measured with a “minified” Goldmann applanation tonometer 12 with cream used as a tear film indicator. 13 IOP was measured at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 hours on the baseline day and after the first and third doses on days 1 and 3. Slit lamp examination (to determine the presence of biomicroscopic cells or flare) was performed before the first IOP measurement and at hours 3 and 6 on each day of measurement. 
Isotope Studies: Aqueous Humor Flow, Uveoscleral Outflow, Flow to Blood, and Trabecular Outflow Facility
The IOP-lowering response was verified on day 3, and treatments were continued. After treatment on the fourth or fifth day, the femoral artery was cannulated. Approximately 3 hours after the last treatment with R-DOI or vehicle, the eyes were cannulated with three needles. AHF was measured by dilution of radio-iodinated monkey albumin perfused through the anterior chamber and flow to blood by accumulation of labeled albumin in the general circulation. 14 15 16 17 18 Uveoscleral outflow (Fu) was calculated from measurements obtained by circulating I-125 (one eye)- and I-131 (opposite eye)-labeled albumin solution through the anterior chambers. The difference in the gamma emission spectrum of the isotopes permits determination of how much fluid from each eye enters the general circulation during any particular time interval. The dilution of label by newly formed aqueous was monitored with a well detector and allowed calculation of AHF. Accumulation of isotope in the blood within a 2-hour period after its initial introduction into the eye was assumed to be entirely by outflow through the trabecular meshwork. 19 The difference between the rates of AHF and trabecular outflow was a measure of Fu. 
Flow to blood was determined at both spontaneous IOP from 40 to 90 minutes and elevated IOP (15–16 mm Hg) from 90 to 120 minutes, to guard against any suppression of trabecular outflow due to low spontaneous IOP. 20 21 A crude calculation of trabecular outflow facility was performed from the flow-to-blood data collected at two different pressures. 
Outflow Facility
Total outflow facility was determined by two-level constant-pressure perfusion with Bárány’s perfusate 22 on two separate occasions. Pressures were alternated between approximately 15 and 25 mm Hg every 4 minutes. For the first study, before R-DOI treatment on the fourth or fifth day, baseline outflow facility was determined for 35 to 45 minutes. Reservoirs were then closed, and R-DOI or vehicle was administered topically to opposite eyes. After 3.25 hours, reservoirs were opened, and outflow facility was measured for the interval of 3.5 to 5 hours after treatment. On the second occasion, outflow facility was measured in the same monkeys for 35 to 45 minutes at the conclusion of the isotope studies, from approximately 5.5 to 6.25 hours after treatment. 22  
AHF Measured by Fluorophotometry
Fluorophotometry measurements were performed (Fluorotron Master Ocular Scanning Fluorophotometer; OcuMetrics Inc., Mountain View, CA), and the flow rate was calculated by a modification of the method of Jones and Maurice. 23 Pachymetry, keratometry, and limbus-to-limbus measurements were taken for calculation of anterior chamber volume. 24 Then, topical anesthetic (proparacaine HCl 0.5% [Alcaine]; Alcon Laboratories) was given and, after 5 minutes, 2% fluorescein drops (usually 5 drops of 2 μL) were administered 1 minute apart to the central cornea. The following day, IOP measurement (with cream) 13 and biomicroscopy were performed before the first scan. Baseline fluorophotometry scans were measured hourly from 11 AM to 3 PM. After the last scan, biomicroscopy and IOP were checked. 
R-DOI or vehicle treatment of opposite eyes was begun the following day and the 6-hour IOP response was verified after the third dose, as described earlier. 
Treatments were continued on day 4. On day 5, monkeys were treated with R-DOI or vehicle at approximately 8 AM. Before fluorophotometry scans, at approximately 2.75 hours after treatment, IOP was measured (with cream) and biomicroscopy performed. Fluorophotometry was performed as for the baseline measurements. 
Three to 5 weeks after the last R-DOI treatment, post-treatment baseline fluorophotometry measurements were taken. Baseline values were averaged to obtain one mean value. 
Analysis
Data are the mean ± SEM. Ratios are unitless. Significance was determined by the two-tailed paired t-test for differences compared with 0.0 or ratios compared with 1.0. 
Results
IOP and Slit Lamp Examination
Before any treatment, initial IOP was 15.1 ± 0.5 mm Hg in vehicle-treated eyes and 15.0 ± 0.4 mm Hg in R-DOI-treated eyes (n = 7). IOP, compared with time 0 by two-tailed paired t-test, did not change significantly in either eye at any time point during the 6-hour baseline measurement period, except for an increase at 1 hour in eyes to be treated with R-DOI (to-be-R-DOI eyes; P < 0.05). However, regression analysis of baseline IOP showed a significant decrease in IOP over time in monkeys under ketamine anesthesia in the to-be-vehicle– but not the to-be-R-DOI–treated eyes as follows:  
\[\mathrm{IOP\ vehicle}\ {=}\ 15.2\ {-}\ 0.0895\ {\times}\ \mathrm{time}.\ R^{2}\ {=}\ 36.0\%,\ P\ {=}\ 0.052.\]
 
\[\mathrm{IOP\ R-DOI}\ {=}\ 15.3\ {-}\ 0.0908\ {\times}\ \mathrm{time}.\ R^{2}\ {=}\ 29.8\%,\ P\ {=}\ 0.074.\]
We typically see this type of variability with time under ketamine anesthesia. 25 Slit lamp biomicroscopy findings in both eyes were normal throughout the 6 hours. 
Before the first treatment, IOP was 16.0 ± 0.2 mm Hg in vehicle-treated eyes and 14.9 ± 0.4 mm Hg in R-DOI-treated eyes. After the first treatment, IOP did not change significantly in vehicle-treated eyes over the 6-hour measurement period compared with the 6-hour baseline. IOP in R-DOI-treated eyes was significantly decreased by approximately 2 mm Hg from hours 1 to 6, compared with the corresponding 6-hour baseline measurement (P < 0.05). No biomicroscopic cells or flare were observed with R-DOI or vehicle at any time on day 1 (Fig. 2)
Before treatment on day 3, IOP was 15.3 ± 0.3 mm Hg in vehicle-treated eyes and 13.8 ± 0.4 mm Hg in R-DOI-treated eyes. IOP after the third dose of vehicle did not differ from the 6-hour baseline at any time point. IOP before and after R-DOI administration was significantly decreased at all time points compared with the 6-hour baseline (P < 0.05 or less). IOP after R-DOI decreased by approximately 5 mm Hg after 5 to 6 hours (Fig. 2) . This response was similar to that produced in conscious monkeys at Alcon. 5  
Slit lamp biomicroscopy in R-DOI-treated eyes revealed that before and at 6 hours after the third dose, one eye (not included in the analysis) had 1+ cells and trace flare. This effect may have been unrelated to the R-DOI treatment because the same monkey was used on separate occasions for outflow facility and isotope experiments and had no signs of inflammation before or after the third or fourth dose of R-DOI in those studies. All other eyes were clear. 
AHF, Trabecular Outflow, and Fu
IOP measured before treatment on day 3 was 14.9 ± 0.3 and 14.2 ± 0.2 mm Hg in vehicle- and R-DOI-treated eyes, respectively. After the third treatment, IOP decreased significantly in R-DOI- compared with vehicle-treated eyes (by 1.1 ± 0.4 to 2.2 ± 0.5 mm Hg; P < 0.05 or less) during hours 1.5 to 6. 
During isotope perfusion experiments on treatment days 4 and 5, in monkeys under pentobarbital anesthesia, IOP was no different between the eyes after cannulation and an initial 10-minute stabilization period at approximately 3.5 hours after treatment (vehicle, 14.1 ± 0.7 mm Hg and R-DOI, 14.1 ± 0.6 mm Hg) and at 5 hours after treatment before opening the reservoirs (vehicle, 9.6 ± 0.6 and R-DOI, 8.6 ± 0.5 mm Hg). 
Aqueous Humor Flow.
AHF determined by isotope dilution at the spontaneous IOP at approximately 4 to 5 hours after the fourth or fifth dose of R-DOI was significantly increased (30%) in R-DOI- compared with vehicle-treated eyes (Table 1)
At 5 hours after treatment, the reservoirs were opened and adjusted so that the IOP in both eyes was the same (∼15 mm Hg). Total flow from the reservoirs plus AHF was not significantly different between the eyes when measured by isotope dilution. 
Flow to Blood and Fu.
Comparison of R-DOI- with vehicle-treated eyes showed flow to blood from 4 to 5 hours at the spontaneous IOP after the fourth or fifth topical dose to be reduced significantly (43%; Table 1 ). The ratio of flow to blood to AHF also decreased significantly (57%). 
Because flow to blood can be greatly diminished if the IOP during the experiment becomes less than episcleral venous pressure, additional calculations were performed with the data from animals in which the spontaneous IOP remained above 8 mm Hg (n = 5). Again, the ratio of flow to blood to AHF decreased significantly (28%) in R-DOI- compared with vehicle-treated eyes. 
Fu calculated for eight monkeys indicated a significant 212% increase in R-DOI- compared with vehicle-treated eyes and a 141% increase when expressed relative to AHF. When the calculations were performed in five subjects (i.e., animals with IOP >8 mm Hg during the experiment), similar 241% and 138% increases were found, respectively. 
To compensate for potentially low IOPs and loss of the pressure gradient across Schlemm’s canal, IOP was elevated to the same pressure in both eyes (approximately 15 mm Hg) in all monkeys after 90 minutes by opening the eyes to reservoirs filled with plain Bárány’s solution. These data showed that flow to blood compared with total flow decreased significantly (31%) in R-DOI- versus vehicle-treated eyes. Calculated Fu at the elevated IOP was variable, in part due to the hybrid nature of this determination and the numerous assumptions used in making the calculations, with some values being negative and the resultant SEM very high. However, in every case, Fu was greater in R-DOI-treated eyes, and the arithmetic differences were statistically significant. 
Total and Trabecular Outflow Facility
Baseline total outflow facility on the first occasion (outflow facility 1) before the fourth or fifth treatment was 0.58 ± 0.10 μL/min per mm Hg in R-DOI-treated eyes and 0.53 ± 0.10 μL/min per mm Hg in vehicle-treated eyes. At 3.5 to 5 hours after treatment, total outflow facility 1 was not different between the eyes (Table 2)but had increased in both eyes by 53% to 65% compared with baseline, probably due to washout resulting from the prolonged perfusion (not shown). No change in total outflow facility between the eyes was detected when 30-minute intervals were compared. 
Total outflow facility, measured at the conclusion of isotope studies at approximately 5.5 to 6.25 hours after the fourth or fifth treatment (facility 2) was also no different between the eyes. Baseline measurements were not usually performed as part of the isotope studies, due to the length of the entire experiment. Correction for baseline measurements performed during the single prior perfusion experiment in these same monkeys also revealed no differences between the eyes (not shown). 
Because flow to blood during isotope studies was measured at two pressures (spontaneous and 15 to 16 mm Hg), a crude estimate of trabecular outflow facility was obtainable. There was no change in trabecular outflow facility comparing R-DOI- and vehicle-treated eyes using all data or data only from animals in which the IOP never went below 8 mm Hg. 
AHF Measured by Fluorophotometry
Initial IOP before any treatments was 16.3 ± 0.3 mm Hg in vehicle-treated eyes and 16.0 ± 0.4 mm Hg in R-DOI-treated eyes (n = 8). On day 3, before treatment, IOP in R-DOI-treated eyes was significantly less than in vehicle-treated eyes (by 2.2 ± 0.3 mm Hg; P < 0.001) and continued to decrease throughout the 6 hours of measurements (difference at 6 hours, 4.0 ± 0.5 mm Hg; P < 0.001). IOP before the fifth treatment was significantly less in R-DOI compared with vehicle-treated eyes by 1.8 ± 0.6 mm Hg (P < 0.025) and by 3.9 ± 0.4 mm Hg (P < 0.001) at 8 hours. IOP before the post-treatment baseline fluorophotometry had recovered to the initial pretreatment levels. 
There was no difference in baseline AHF between R-DOI- and vehicle-treated eyes before and 3 to 5 weeks after the last treatment (Table 3) . Also, there was no difference between R-DOI- and vehicle-treated eyes after treatment. However, compared with vehicle and corrected for the average baseline, R-DOI significantly increased AHF by 13% ± 5% (P < 0.05) during the interval 3 to 8 hours after drug application on day 5. No significant difference was detectable when shorter intervals were analyzed. 
Slit lamp biomicroscopy confirmed that all eyes were free of cells and flare at all time points examined during confirmation of the IOP response, baseline, and post-treatment AHF measurements. 
Discussion
Agonists at the 5-HT2 receptors have been identified as effective hypotensive agents in the nonhuman primate experimental glaucoma model and in normotensive monkey eyes. 5 In the present study, we found a similar time course and magnitude of IOP lowering in ketamine-anesthetized monkeys. The study drug was applied once daily, in the morning. It is not known whether the efficacy would be greater if it were applied in the evening instead. Our studies suggest the mechanism for the IOP lowering response is primarily due to an increase in Fu. The discovery of functional 5-HT2 receptors in the human ciliary muscle (Sharif et al., IOVS 2003;44:ARVO E-Abstract 2084) supports the plausibility of an effect on Fu. 
The magnitude of the IOP lowering, increase in Fu, lack of an effect on outflow facility, and small increase in AHF are similar to responses observed after PGF-ie (topical drops in monkeys). 26 27 28 Given the similarity of the responses to R-DOI and PGF-ie, cross-reactivity with prostaglandin receptors should be assessed, and studies with prostaglandin antagonists are indicated. 
5-HT1A agonists have been shown to increase AHF in nonhuman primates. 4 However, the selectivity of R-DOI for the 5-HT2 receptor 5 makes it unlikely that the increase in AHF in the present study is due to cross-reactivity at the 5-HT1A receptor subtype. The magnitude of the AHF increase in the current studies was greater in the isotope studies than in the fluorophotometry studies, probably because of the lower AHF rate in pentobarbital- versus ketamine-anesthetized monkeys. 29 Increases in AHF after epinephrine treatment are similarly magnified in pentobarbital-anesthetized monkeys. 29  
The lack of an effect of R-DOI on outflow facility in the current studies suggests that functional 5-HT2 receptors, which were detected in human trabecular meshwork cells (Sharif et al. IOVS 2003;44:ARVO E-Abstract 2084), are unlikely to be involved in the predominant mechanism for IOP lowering in vivo in monkeys. 
In conclusion, R-DOI, a selective 5-HT2 agonist, caused a small but significant increase in AHF and lowered IOP in normotensive monkeys, primarily by increasing Fu. 5-HT2 receptor stimulation may represent another pathway for development of IOP-lowering drug therapy. However, the possibility of an overlapping effect by prostaglandin-related mechanisms should be explored. 
 
Figure 1.
 
Time line for studies. Rx, treatment (R-DOI or vehicle); Fluoro, fluorophotometry; OF, total outflow facility.
Figure 1.
 
Time line for studies. Rx, treatment (R-DOI or vehicle); Fluoro, fluorophotometry; OF, total outflow facility.
Figure 2.
 
IOP after 100 μg topical R-DOI. IOP was measured for 6 hours before any treatments (baseline) and on days 1 and 3 of once-daily treatment with 100 μg R-DOI in one eye and vehicle in the opposite eye. Time 0 on day 1 was before any treatment; time 0 on day 3 was approximately 24 hours after the second treatment, but before the third treatment. Significance determined by the two-tailed paired t-test for differences compared to 0.0: *P < 0.05 or less for baseline versus time 0 and for days 1 and 3 versus baseline day for each corresponding time point. n = 7.
Figure 2.
 
IOP after 100 μg topical R-DOI. IOP was measured for 6 hours before any treatments (baseline) and on days 1 and 3 of once-daily treatment with 100 μg R-DOI in one eye and vehicle in the opposite eye. Time 0 on day 1 was before any treatment; time 0 on day 3 was approximately 24 hours after the second treatment, but before the third treatment. Significance determined by the two-tailed paired t-test for differences compared to 0.0: *P < 0.05 or less for baseline versus time 0 and for days 1 and 3 versus baseline day for each corresponding time point. n = 7.
Table 1.
 
Isotope Study Results: Aqueous Humor Flow, Trabecular Outflow, and Uveoscleral Outflow after 100 μg R-DOI
Table 1.
 
Isotope Study Results: Aqueous Humor Flow, Trabecular Outflow, and Uveoscleral Outflow after 100 μg R-DOI
IOP n R-DOI Vehicle R-DOI/Veh R-DOI/Veh
AHF Spontaneous 8 1.70 ± 0.13 1.31 ± 0.06 1.30 ± 0.08, † 0.39 ± 0.11, †
IOP > 8 mm Hg 5 1.82 ± 0.10 1.33 ± 0.07 1.38 ± 0.10* 0.49 ± 0.12*
Reservoir open 8 4.64 ± 0.58 3.86 ± 0.45 1.22 ± 0.11 0.78 ± 0.40
FTB Spontaneous 8 0.48 ± 0.14 0.84 ± 0.12 0.57 ± 0.12, † −0.35 ± 11*
IOP > 8 mm Hg 5 0.72 ± 0.14 0.98 ± 0.06 0.72 ± 0.12 −0.26 ± 0.10
Reservoir open 8 2.92 ± 0.34 3.60 ± 0.30 0.84 ± 0.10 −0.68 ± 0.38
Fu Spontaneous 8 1.22 ± 0.16 0.48 ± 0.13 3.12 ± 0.49, ‡ 0.74 ± 0.11, §
IOP > 8 mm Hg 5 1.10 ± 0.18 0.35 ± 0.05 3.41 ± 0.72* 0.75 ± 0.18*
Reservoir open 8 1.72 ± 0.47 0.26 ± 0.42 9.20 ± 9.18 1.47 ± 0.29, ‡
FTB/AHF Spontaneous 8 0.28 ± 0.08, § 0.64 ± 0.09, ‡ 0.43 ± 0.09, § −0.37 ± 0.08, ‡
IOP > 8 mm Hg 5 0.40 ± 0.08, ‡ 0.74 ± 0.03, § 0.54 ± 0.11* −0.34 ± 0.08*
Reservoir open 8 0.66 ± 0.07, ‡ 0.97 ± 0.07 0.69 ± 0.06, § −0.31 ± 0.07, ‡
Fu/AHF Spontaneous 8 0.72 ± 0.08, † 0.36 ± 0.09, § 2.41 ± 0.32, ‡ 0.37 ± 0.08, ‡
IOP > 8 mm Hg 5 0.60 ± 0.08, † 0.26 ± 0.03, § 2.38 ± 0.36* 0.34 ± 0.08*
Reservoir open 8 0.34 ± 0.07, § 0.03 ± 0.07, § 5.72 ± 5.68 0.31 ± 0.07, ‡
Table 2.
 
Trabecular and Total Outflow Facility after Topical R-DOI
Table 2.
 
Trabecular and Total Outflow Facility after Topical R-DOI
n R-DOI Vehicle R-DOI/Veh
OF1 (3.5–5 h) 8 0.89 ± 0.15 0.90 ± 0.26 1.27 ± 0.16
OF2 (5.5–6.25 h) 8 0.87 ± 0.14 0.69 ± 0.14 1.35 ± 0.17
Ctrab (4–5.5 h) Spontaneous IOP 8 0.40 ± 0.06 0.56 ± 0.08 0.84 ± 0.11
IOP > 8 mm Hg 5 0.44 ± 0.08 0.62 ± 0.10 0.74 ± 0.16
Table 3.
 
Aqueous Humor Formation (Fluorophotometry) after Topical R-DOI
Table 3.
 
Aqueous Humor Formation (Fluorophotometry) after Topical R-DOI
Aqueous Humor Formation
R-DOI Vehicle R-DOI/Veh
Pre Rx Baseline 1 1.98 ± 0.31 2.02 ± 0.30 0.99 ± 0.04
Post Rx Baseline 2 2.12 ± 0.29 2.06 ± 0.21 1.02 ± 0.04
Average Baseline 2.05 ± 0.28 2.04 ± 0.23 1.00 ± 0.04
Post Rx 2.57 ± 0.38 2.26 ± 0.23 1.14 ± 0.09
Post Rx/Avg BL 1.26 ± 0.05, † 1.12 ± 0.04* 1.13 ± 0.05*
The authors thank Theodora J. Bunch, Julie A. Kiland, MS, and Beth Hennes for lending expertise in performing outflow facility measurements and for assistance with fluorophotometry measurements and femoral artery cannulations for blood collection; Timothy S. Grant, MS, for statistical consultation; and Marsha McLaughlin, Jesse A. May, and Mark Hellberg (Alcon Research) for assistance with the serotonin discovery program, study coordination, and drug formulations. 
ChidlowG, Le CorreS, OsborneNN. Localization of 5-hydroxytryptamine1A and 5-hydroxytryptamine7 receptors in rabbit ocular and brain tissues. Neuroscience. 1998;87:675–689. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
MartinXD, MalinaHZ, BrennanMC, HendricksonPH, LichterPR. The ciliary body: the third organ found to synthesize indoleamines in humans. Eur J Ophthalmol. 1992;2:67–72. [PubMed]
ChidlowG, HiscottPS, OsborneNN. Expression of serotonin receptor mRNAs in human ciliary body: a polymerase chain reaction study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004;242:259–264. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
GabeltBT, MillarCJ, KilandJA, PetersonJA, SeemanJL, KaufmanPL. Effects of serotonergic compounds on aqueous humor dynamics in monkeys. Curr Eye Res. 2001;23:120–127. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
MayJC, McLaughlinMA, SharifNA, HellbergMR, DeanTR. Evaluation of the ocular hypotensive response of serotonin 5-HT1A and 5-HT-2 receptor ligands in conscious ocular hypertensive cynomolgus monkeys. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2003;306:301–309. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
ChidlowG, NashMS, De SantisLM, OsborneNN. The 5-HT1A receptor agonist 8-OH-DPAT lowers intraocular pressure in normotensive NZW rabbits. Exp Eye Res. 1999;69:587–593. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
OsborneNN, WoodJP, MelenaJ, et al. 5-Hydrroxytrptamine1A agonists: potential use in glaucoma: evidence from animal studies. Eye. 2000;14:454–463. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
ChidlowG, CupidoA, MelenaJ, OsborneNN. Flesinoxan, a 5-HT1A receptor agonist/a1-adrenoceptor antagonist, lowers intraocular pressure in NZW rabbits. Curr Eye Res. 2001;23:144–153. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
MastropasquaL, CostagliolaC, CiancaglininM, CarpinetoP, GallengaPE. Ocular hypotensive effect of ketanserin in patients with primary open angle glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand (Suppl). 1997;224:24–25. [PubMed]
CostagliolaC, IulianoG, RinaldiM, RussoV, ScibelliG, MastropasquaL. Effect of topical ketanserin administration on intraocular pressure. Br J Ophthalmol. 1993;77:344–348. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
MayJA, ChenHH, RusinkoA, LynchVM, SharifNA, McLaughlinMA. A novel and selective 5-HT2 receptor agonist with ocular hypotensive activity: (S)-(+)-1-(2-aminopropyl)-8,9-dihydropyrano[3,2-e]indole. J Med Chem. 2003;46:4188–4195. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
KaufmanPL, DavisGE. “Minified” Goldmann applanating prism for tonometry in monkeys and humans. Arch Ophthalmol. 1980;98:542–546. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
CroftMA, KilandJ, GangeSJ, ArefA, PelzekCD, KaufmanPL. Comparison of Goldmann tonometry measurements using creamer vs fluorescein in cynomolgus monkeys. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser. 1997;60:213–216.
BillA, BárányEH. Gross facility, facility of conventional routes, and pseudofacility of aqueous humor outflow in the cynomolgus monkey. Arch Ophthalmol. 1966;75:665–673. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
BillA. Aqueous humor dynamics in monkeys (Macaca irus and Cercopithecus ethiops). Exp Eye Res. 1971;11:195–206. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
SperberGO, BillA. A method for near-continuous determination of aqueous humor flow: effects of anaesthetics, temperature and indomethacin. Exp Eye Res. 1984;39:435–453. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
GabeltBT, GottankaJ, Lütjen-DrecollE, KaufmanPL. Aqueous humor dynamics and trabecular meshwork and anterior ciliary muscle morphologic changes with age in rhesus monkeys. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:2118–2125. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
GabeltBT, SeemanJL, PodosSM, MittagTW, KaufmanPL. Aqueous humor dynamics in monkeys after topical 8-iso PGE2. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:892–899. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
BillA. Conventional and uveoscleral drainage of aqueous humor in the cynomolgus monkey (Macaca irus) at normal and high intraocular pressures. Exp Eye Res. 1966;5:45–54. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
TakagiY, NakajimaT, ShimazakiA, et al. Pharmacological characteristics of AFP-168 (tafluprost), a new prostanoid FP receptor agonist, as an ocular hypotensive drug. Exp Eye Res. 2004;78:767–776. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
BillA. Further studies on the influence of the intraocular pressure on aqueous humor dynamics in cynomolgus monkeys. Invest Ophthalmol. 1967;6:364–372.
BárányEH. Simultaneous measurements of changing intraocular pressure and outflow facility in the vervet monkey by constant pressure infusion. Invest Ophthalmol. 1964;3:135–143. [PubMed]
JonesRF, MauriceDM. New methods of measuring the rate of aqueous flow in man with fluorescein. Exp Eye Res. 1966;5:208–220. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
EricksonKA, GonneringRS, KaufmanPL, DortzbachRK. The cynomolgus monkey as a model for orbital research. III. Effects on ocular physiology of lateral orbitotomy and isolation of the ciliary ganglion. Curr Eye Res. 1984;3:557–564. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
GabeltBT, RobinsonJC, HubbardWC, et al. Apraclonidine and brimonidine effects of anterior ocular and cardiovascular physiology in normal and sympathectomized monkeys. Exp Eye Res. 1994;59:633–644. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
CrawfordKS, KaufmanPL. Dose-related effects of prostaglandin F2a isopropylester on intraocular pressure, refraction and pupil diameter in monkeys. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991;32:510–519. [PubMed]
GabeltBT, KaufmanPL. Prostaglandin F2a increases uveoscleral outflow in the cynomolgus monkey. Exp Eye Res. 1989;49:389–402. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
NilssonSFE, SamuelssonM, BillA, StjernschantzJ. Increased uveoscleral outflow as a possible mechanism of ocular hypotension caused by prostaglandin F2a-1-isopropylester in the cynomolgus monkey. Exp Eye Res. 1989;48:707–716. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
GabeltBT, RobinsonJC, GangeSJ, KaufmanPL. Superior cervical ganglionectomy in monkeys: aqueous humor dynamics and their responses to drugs. Exp Eye Res. 1995;60:575–584. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1.
 
Time line for studies. Rx, treatment (R-DOI or vehicle); Fluoro, fluorophotometry; OF, total outflow facility.
Figure 1.
 
Time line for studies. Rx, treatment (R-DOI or vehicle); Fluoro, fluorophotometry; OF, total outflow facility.
Figure 2.
 
IOP after 100 μg topical R-DOI. IOP was measured for 6 hours before any treatments (baseline) and on days 1 and 3 of once-daily treatment with 100 μg R-DOI in one eye and vehicle in the opposite eye. Time 0 on day 1 was before any treatment; time 0 on day 3 was approximately 24 hours after the second treatment, but before the third treatment. Significance determined by the two-tailed paired t-test for differences compared to 0.0: *P < 0.05 or less for baseline versus time 0 and for days 1 and 3 versus baseline day for each corresponding time point. n = 7.
Figure 2.
 
IOP after 100 μg topical R-DOI. IOP was measured for 6 hours before any treatments (baseline) and on days 1 and 3 of once-daily treatment with 100 μg R-DOI in one eye and vehicle in the opposite eye. Time 0 on day 1 was before any treatment; time 0 on day 3 was approximately 24 hours after the second treatment, but before the third treatment. Significance determined by the two-tailed paired t-test for differences compared to 0.0: *P < 0.05 or less for baseline versus time 0 and for days 1 and 3 versus baseline day for each corresponding time point. n = 7.
Table 1.
 
Isotope Study Results: Aqueous Humor Flow, Trabecular Outflow, and Uveoscleral Outflow after 100 μg R-DOI
Table 1.
 
Isotope Study Results: Aqueous Humor Flow, Trabecular Outflow, and Uveoscleral Outflow after 100 μg R-DOI
IOP n R-DOI Vehicle R-DOI/Veh R-DOI/Veh
AHF Spontaneous 8 1.70 ± 0.13 1.31 ± 0.06 1.30 ± 0.08, † 0.39 ± 0.11, †
IOP > 8 mm Hg 5 1.82 ± 0.10 1.33 ± 0.07 1.38 ± 0.10* 0.49 ± 0.12*
Reservoir open 8 4.64 ± 0.58 3.86 ± 0.45 1.22 ± 0.11 0.78 ± 0.40
FTB Spontaneous 8 0.48 ± 0.14 0.84 ± 0.12 0.57 ± 0.12, † −0.35 ± 11*
IOP > 8 mm Hg 5 0.72 ± 0.14 0.98 ± 0.06 0.72 ± 0.12 −0.26 ± 0.10
Reservoir open 8 2.92 ± 0.34 3.60 ± 0.30 0.84 ± 0.10 −0.68 ± 0.38
Fu Spontaneous 8 1.22 ± 0.16 0.48 ± 0.13 3.12 ± 0.49, ‡ 0.74 ± 0.11, §
IOP > 8 mm Hg 5 1.10 ± 0.18 0.35 ± 0.05 3.41 ± 0.72* 0.75 ± 0.18*
Reservoir open 8 1.72 ± 0.47 0.26 ± 0.42 9.20 ± 9.18 1.47 ± 0.29, ‡
FTB/AHF Spontaneous 8 0.28 ± 0.08, § 0.64 ± 0.09, ‡ 0.43 ± 0.09, § −0.37 ± 0.08, ‡
IOP > 8 mm Hg 5 0.40 ± 0.08, ‡ 0.74 ± 0.03, § 0.54 ± 0.11* −0.34 ± 0.08*
Reservoir open 8 0.66 ± 0.07, ‡ 0.97 ± 0.07 0.69 ± 0.06, § −0.31 ± 0.07, ‡
Fu/AHF Spontaneous 8 0.72 ± 0.08, † 0.36 ± 0.09, § 2.41 ± 0.32, ‡ 0.37 ± 0.08, ‡
IOP > 8 mm Hg 5 0.60 ± 0.08, † 0.26 ± 0.03, § 2.38 ± 0.36* 0.34 ± 0.08*
Reservoir open 8 0.34 ± 0.07, § 0.03 ± 0.07, § 5.72 ± 5.68 0.31 ± 0.07, ‡
Table 2.
 
Trabecular and Total Outflow Facility after Topical R-DOI
Table 2.
 
Trabecular and Total Outflow Facility after Topical R-DOI
n R-DOI Vehicle R-DOI/Veh
OF1 (3.5–5 h) 8 0.89 ± 0.15 0.90 ± 0.26 1.27 ± 0.16
OF2 (5.5–6.25 h) 8 0.87 ± 0.14 0.69 ± 0.14 1.35 ± 0.17
Ctrab (4–5.5 h) Spontaneous IOP 8 0.40 ± 0.06 0.56 ± 0.08 0.84 ± 0.11
IOP > 8 mm Hg 5 0.44 ± 0.08 0.62 ± 0.10 0.74 ± 0.16
Table 3.
 
Aqueous Humor Formation (Fluorophotometry) after Topical R-DOI
Table 3.
 
Aqueous Humor Formation (Fluorophotometry) after Topical R-DOI
Aqueous Humor Formation
R-DOI Vehicle R-DOI/Veh
Pre Rx Baseline 1 1.98 ± 0.31 2.02 ± 0.30 0.99 ± 0.04
Post Rx Baseline 2 2.12 ± 0.29 2.06 ± 0.21 1.02 ± 0.04
Average Baseline 2.05 ± 0.28 2.04 ± 0.23 1.00 ± 0.04
Post Rx 2.57 ± 0.38 2.26 ± 0.23 1.14 ± 0.09
Post Rx/Avg BL 1.26 ± 0.05, † 1.12 ± 0.04* 1.13 ± 0.05*
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×