Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 46, Issue 3
March 2005
Volume 46, Issue 3
Free
Retinal Cell Biology  |   March 2005
Selective Suppression of Pathologic, but Not Physiologic, Retinal Neovascularization by Blocking the Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor
Author Affiliations
  • Norihiro Nagai
    From the Departments of Ophthalmology,
    Cell Differentiation, and
  • Kousuke Noda
    From the Departments of Ophthalmology,
  • Takashi Urano
    Cell Differentiation, and
  • Yoshiaki Kubota
    Cell Differentiation, and
  • Hajime Shinoda
    From the Departments of Ophthalmology,
    Pathology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Takashi Koto
    From the Departments of Ophthalmology,
    Pathology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Kei Shinoda
    From the Departments of Ophthalmology,
  • Makoto Inoue
    From the Departments of Ophthalmology,
  • Takayuki Shiomi
    Pathology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Eiji Ikeda
    Pathology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Kazuo Tsubota
    From the Departments of Ophthalmology,
  • Toshio Suda
    Cell Differentiation, and
  • Yuichi Oike
    Cell Differentiation, and
  • Susumu Ishida
    From the Departments of Ophthalmology,
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2005, Vol.46, 1078-1084. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.04-1101
  • Views
  • PDF
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Norihiro Nagai, Kousuke Noda, Takashi Urano, Yoshiaki Kubota, Hajime Shinoda, Takashi Koto, Kei Shinoda, Makoto Inoue, Takayuki Shiomi, Eiji Ikeda, Kazuo Tsubota, Toshio Suda, Yuichi Oike, Susumu Ishida; Selective Suppression of Pathologic, but Not Physiologic, Retinal Neovascularization by Blocking the Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005;46(3):1078-1084. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.04-1101.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

purpose. To investigate the anti-inflammatory and anti-angiogenic effects of telmisartan, an angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1-R) antagonist, on ischemia-induced retinal neovascularization.

methods. C57BL/6 neonatal mice were reared in an 80% concentration of oxygen from postnatal day (P)7 to P12, followed by room-air breathing until P17, to induce ischemia-initiated retinal neovascularization (i.e., a murine model of ischemic retinopathy). Tissue localization of AT1-R was examined by immunohistochemistry for murine retinal wholemounts and human fibrovascular tissues excised at vitrectomy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Animals received intraperitoneal injection of telmisartan or vehicle. A concanavalin A lectin perfusion-labeling technique was used to evaluate the areas of physiological and pathologic retinal new vessels and the number of leukocytes adhering to the vasculature. Retinal mRNA and protein levels of intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-1, and VEGFR-2 were examined by RT-PCR and ELISA.

results. Vessels in human fibrovascular tissues and the murine retinas were positive for AT1-R. Pathologic (P < 0.01), but not physiologic (P > 0.05), retinal neovascularization was significantly suppressed in telmisartan-treated mice compared with vehicle-treated animals. The number of adherent leukocytes (P < 0.01) was also significantly reduced, together with retinal ICAM-1 levels (P < 0.01) in the telmisartan-treated group compared with the control group. No significant difference was detected in retinal VEGFR-2 levels between the two groups, whereas retinal VEGFR-1 levels in the telmisartan-treated group were significantly (P < 0.05) lower than in the vehicle-treated group.

conclusions. The present findings suggest that the AT1-R signaling blockade leads to the selective suppression of pathologic, but not physiological, retinal neovascularization through the inhibition of the inflammatory processes related to pathologic neovascularization.

The renin-angiotensin system is well known as a major controller of systemic blood pressure. Angiotensin II (Ang II), a final product of the system, has two cognate receptors: the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1-R) and the angiotensin II type 2 receptor (AT2-R). 1 2 3 4 Because major Ang II-related systemic functions are mediated by AT1-R signaling, its antagonist is widely used for the treatment of hypertension and cardiac diseases. In contrast, several reports have recently suggested that Ang II plays crucial roles in promoting tumor angiogenesis and cardiovascular remodeling through the proliferation of smooth muscle cells and the induction of various growth factors. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 As concerns its relationship with ocular angiogenesis, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor has been shown to suppress the progression of human diabetic retinopathy to its proliferative (angiogenic) stage. 17 A recent report has indicated that an AT1-R antagonist suppressed retinal neovascularization in a murine model of ischemic retinopathy 7 and supports the result of the clinical trial. However, little is known about the mechanisms of the anti-angiogenic effects of AT1-R inhibition in retinal disorders. 
Retinal neovascularization is a hallmark of vision-threatening retinal diseases, including diabetic retinopathy and retinopathy of prematurity, which are major causes of blindness in adults and children, respectively. There are two distinctly different types of retinal neovascularization, physiological versus pathologic, both of which are basically induced by retinal ischemia. In the former, new vessels grow systematically in the retina to compensate for the retinal ischemia, whereas in the latter, retinal new vessels ectopically invade the transparent vitreous, which originally lacks the vasculature. Because simultaneous prevention of both types of retinal neovascularization causes retinal ischemia to be untreated, ophthalmologists await the establishment of new therapy that selectively targets pathologic neovascularization, while sparing compensatory physiological neovascularization. We have recently highlighted the molecular and cellular mechanisms differentiating pathologic from physiological retinal neovascularization. 18 19 20 The influx of inflammatory cells at the growing tip of new vessels is likely to be a critical step of changing the direction of retinal neovascularization from intraretinal to extraretinal growth. 
Recent reports have suggested that Ang II plays a key role in various inflammatory processes, including not only the expression of chemokines and adhesion molecules for the recruitment of inflammatory cells, but also the differentiation and proliferation of inflammatory cells, per se. 21 22 23 24 Blockade of Ang II signaling seems to be a useful strategy for the improvement of inflammation-related diseases. Focusing on the inflammatory mechanisms that promote pathologic, but not physiological, retinal neovascularization, we investigated the differential effects of an AT1-R antagonist, telmisartan, on each type of retinal neovascularization in a murine model of ischemic retinopathy. 
Methods
Murine Model of Ischemic Retinopathy
C57BL/6 mice (SLC, Shizuoka, Japan) were used. All animal experiments were conducted in accordance with the ARVO Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research. The ethics committee of our institution approved all surgical interventions and animal care procedures, which were in accordance with the Guidelines and Policies for Animal Surgery provided by the Animal Study Committees of the Central Institute for Experimental Animals of Keio University. Postnatal day (P)7 mice with their nursing mothers were maintained for a full 5 days in 80% oxygen to generate the nonvascular retinal area, as described previously. 25 On P12, they were placed in normoxia for an additional 5 days to induce retinal neovascularization. 
Intraperitoneal Injection of Telmisartan
After 80% oxygen exposure, pups were categorized into three groups: The first had no treatment (ischemic retinopathy) and the other two received 0.1-mL intraperitoneal injections of vehicle or telmisartan for 5 days in normoxia (21% oxygen) after the hyperoxic exposure (P12–P16). Telmisartan was a gift of Boehringer Ingelheim (Ingelheim, Germany). We dissolved telmisartan in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) in 30 mM diluted to 60 μM with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and injected at 3 μg/g body weight. This dose was sufficient to block AT1-R signaling to decrease systemic blood pressure in rats. 26 The degree of retinal neovascularization and the number of adherent leukocytes were evaluated on P17. 
Lectin Labeling of Retinal Vasculature and Adherent Leukocytes
The retinal vasculature and adherent leukocytes were imaged by perfusion-labeling with fluorescein-isothiocyanate (FITC)–coupled concanavalin A lectin (Con A; Vector, Burlingame, CA), as described previously. 27 After deep anesthesia, the chest cavity was opened and a 27-gauge cannula was introduced into the left ventricle. After injection of 2 mL of PBS to remove erythrocytes and nonadherent leukocytes, 2 mL FITC-conjugated con A lectin was perfused. After the eyes were enucleated, the retinas were flatmounted. The flatmounts were imaged by an epifluorescence microscope (IX71; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan), and the total number of Con A–stained adherent leukocytes per retina was determined. 
Immunohistochemistry for AT1-R
Immunohistochemical experiments were performed on fibrovascular tissues from patients with diabetic retinopathy and on retinas of C57BL/6 mice. Fibrovascular tissue samples were obtained during vitrectomy performed at Keio University Hospital on patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy, who gave their informed consent to our study. The protocol of the study adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki regarding research involving human tissue. For histopathologic evaluation, the specimen was fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) at 4°C immediately after removal, and embedded in paraffin. 
Three-micrometer paraffin-embedded sections were incubated overnight at 4°C with a rabbit polyclonal antibody against human AT1-R (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) at 1:100 dilution. After incubation, they were reacted for 30 minutes at room temperature with goat antibodies against rabbit immunoglobulins (IgGs) conjugated to a peroxidase-labeled dextran polymer (En Vision+ rabbit; Dako Corp., Carpinteria, CA). As the negative control for staining, the first antibodies were replaced with nonimmune rabbit IgGs (Dako Corp.). Color was developed with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (DAB; 0.2 mg/mL; Dojindo Laboratories, Kumamoto, Japan) in 0.05 M Tris-HCl (pH 7.6) containing 0.003% hydrogen peroxide, and the sections were counterstained with hematoxylin. 
Wholemount retinas from P5 mice were fixed with 4% PFA and incubated overnight at 4°C with rat polyclonal antibody against platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM-1, CD31; BD Microbiology, Cockeysville, MD) at 1:500 dilution and rabbit polyclonal antibody against human AT1-R (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) at 1:50 dilution. Avidin-Alexa 488–and Avidin-Alexa 546–tagged secondary antibody (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) were then applied for 2 hours at room temperature. After two washes, retinas were viewed with an epifluorescence microscope (model IX71; Olympus). 
RT-PCR for Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1 and -2
Total RNA was isolated from the retina using extraction reagent (Isogen; Nippon Gene, Toyama, Japan) and reverse-transcribed with a cDNA synthesis kit (First-Strand; Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden) according to the manufacturers’ protocols. PCR was performed with Taq DNA polymerase (Toyobo, Tokyo, Japan) in a thermal controller (MiniCycler; MJ Research, Watertown, MA). The primer sequences are as follows: 5′-ATG TGG CAC CAC ACC TTC TAC AAT GAG CTG CG-3′ (sense) and 5′-CGT CAT ACT CCT GCT TGC TGA TCC ACA TCT GC-3′ (antisense; 37 bp) for β-actin, 5′-GTG TCG AGC TTT GGG ATG GTA-3′ (sense) and 5′-CTG GGC TTG GAG ACT CAG TG-3′ (antisense; 505 bp) for mouse intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1. Human/mouse vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 (VEGF R1) primers (302 bp; PCR Primer Pair; R&D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN) and human/mouse VEGF R2 primers (569 bp; PCR Primer Pair; R&D Systems, Inc.) were used for VEGFR-1 and -2, respectively. 
ELISA for ICAM-1 and VEGFR-1 and -2
The animals were killed with an overdose of anesthesia, and the eyes were immediately enucleated. The retina was carefully isolated and placed into 200 μL lysis buffer (0.02 M HEPES, 10% glycerol, 10 mM Na4P2O7, 100 μM Na3VO4, 1% Triton, 100 mM NaF, 4 mM EDTA [pH 8.0]) supplemented with protease inhibitors and sonicated. The lysate was centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 15 minutes at 4°C, and the ICAM-1 and VEGFR-1 and -2 levels in the supernatant were determined with mouse ICAM-1 and VEGFR-1 and -2 kits (Techne Corp., Minneapolis, MN) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The tissue sample concentration was calculated from a standard curve and corrected for protein concentration. 
Morphometric and Statistical Analyses
All results are expressed as the mean ± SD. The number of leukocytes in each flat mount was counted independently by two investigators under the epifluorescence microscope. Area ratios of pathologic and physiological neovascularization to the flatmounted retina were measured and calculated. The morphology of the pathologic neovascularization was readily discerned from the intraretinal extension of physiological vessels. The results were processed for statistical analyses (Mann-Whitney test). Differences were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05. 
Results
Localization of AT1-R in the Murine Retina and Human Fibrovascular Tissues
Immunohistochemistry for AT1-R was performed to identify its expression on the fibrovascular tissues of patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy and on the murine retina. In the fibrovascular tissues, the vascular endothelium was positive for AT1-R (Figs. 1A 1B) . In the retina of neonatal mice, the AT1-R immunoreactivity was detected mainly on the endothelial cells of inner retinal vessels (Figs. 1C 1D) . Immunohistochemistry of wholemount retinas also showed AT1-R staining on retinal vessels, corresponding to the staining of PECAM-1, which is widely used as a marker of vascular endothelial cells (Figs. 1E 1F 1G)
Effects of Telmisartan on Pathologic Retinal Neovascularization and Inflammation
The retinal vasculature and adherent leukocytes were imaged by perfusion-labeling with FITC-coupled Con A. In normal P17 mice, the retina was covered with physiological (intraretinal) new vessels (Fig. 2A) . In P17 mice with ischemic retinopathy, physiological new vessels and pathologic vascular buds (arrows) were both observed (Fig. 2B) . In higher magnification, abundant leukocytes adhered to the physiological vascular bed (Fig. 2C)and pathologic neovascular fronds (Fig. 2D) . Compared with vehicle-treated mice (Fig. 2E) , systemic application of telmisartan led to the suppression of pathologic neovascularization on P17 (Fig. 2F) . The area ratio of pathologic neovascularization in the telmisartan group was 3.2% ± 1.8%, which was significantly (P < 0.01) decreased compared with the vehicle group (9.7% ± 1.2%) or the ischemic retinopathy group (8.9% ± 1.3%, Fig. 3A ). The number of adherent leukocytes in ischemic retinopathy (57.8 ± 16.5) was significantly (P < 0.01) higher than in normal P17 mice (7.8 ± 4.3, Fig. 3B ). Leukocyte counts showed a significant (P < 0.01) decrease in the telmisartan group (21.3 ± 7.0), compared with the vehicle group (53.7 ± 9.4) or the nontreated ischemic retinopathy group (57.8 ± 16.5, Fig. 3B ). 
Effects of Telmisartan on Physiological Retinal Neovascularization
Area ratios of physiological neovascularization in ischemic retinopathy were compared among nontreated, vehicle- and telmisartan-treated groups (Figs. 2B 2E 2F) . No significant (P > 0.05, Fig. 4A ) difference was detected in physiological neovascularization area between the telmisartan group (62.7% ± 3.7%) and the vehicle group (55.2% ± 5.7%) or the nontreated retinopathy group (69.9% ± 4.4%). To confirm further this sparing effect of telmisartan on physiological vasculature, normal adult mice (Figs. 5A 5B)and neonates undergoing retinal vascular development (Figs. 5C 5D)were used. There was no morphologic difference in adult physiological vessels between vehicle-treated (Fig. 5A)and telmisartan-treated (Fig. 5B)groups. As for physiological neovascularization during postnatal retinal development, no significant (P > 0.05, Fig. 5B ) difference was detected in physiological neovascularization area between the telmisartan group (98.8% ± 2.4%) and the vehicle group (99.8% ± 0.9%) or the nontreated group (99.7% ± 0.9%). 
Detection of mRNA and Protein Levels Of ICAM-1 and VEGFR-1 and -2
Retinas from P17 mice were subjected to RT-PCR and ELISA analyses to detect the mRNA and protein levels of ICAM-1, VEGFR-1, and VEGFR-2 (Fig. 6) . Retinal ICAM-1 mRNA levels in ischemic retinopathy treated with vehicle were higher than in normal age-matched mice. Systemic administration of telmisartan substantially reduced ICAM-1 mRNA levels (Fig. 6A) . Similarly, retinal ICAM-1 protein levels were significantly attenuated by the treatment with telmisartan (P < 0.01, Fig. 6B ). Retinal VEGFR-1 mRNA and protein levels in vehicle-treated mice with retinopathy tended to increase compared with those in normal age-matched mice, but the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Telmisartan treatment for ischemic retinopathy significantly attenuated both mRNA and protein levels of retinal VEGFR-1 (P < 0.05; Figs. 6A 6C ). In contrast, there was no difference in retinal VEGFR-2 mRNA or protein levels among normal age-matched mice and the vehicle-, and telmisartan-treated retinopathy mice (P > 0.05, Figs. 6A 6D ). 
Discussion
The present study demonstrates for the first time that AT1-R blockade selectively prevents pathologic retinal neovascularization, while sparing physiological neovascularization that compensates for the preceding retinal ischemia. Furthermore, we showed that the mechanisms in the differential modulation of retinal neovascularization depend, at least in part, on the suppression of ICAM-1-mediated leukocyte adhesion to the retinal vasculature, inflammatory processes that characterize pathologic retinal neovascularization. 
We have proposed that ischemia-induced retinal neovascularization, when it becomes pathologic, involves inflammatory processes. 18 19 20 A previous immunohistochemical study pointed out the infiltration of macrophages in fibrovascular tissues excised at vitrectomy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy, 28 indicating a possible link between retinal neovascularization and inflammation. In an animal model of ischemic retinopathy, pathologic, but not physiological, neovascularization was shown to be preceded and accompanied by the adhesion of inflammatory monocytes to the retinal vasculature. When clodronate-liposome, a reagent that induces apoptosis specifically in monocyte/macrophage cells, was used, pathologic retinal neovascularization was suppressed without any substantial effects on physiological neovascularization. 18 In addition, other reports have suggested the proangiogenic role of inflammatory monocytes and macrophages in murine ischemic retinopathy. Intravitreally infiltrating macrophages adjacent to the pathologic new vessels express and produce VEGF in the animal model. 29 Neutralizing antibodies against monocyte chemotactic protein (MCP)-1 and macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1α have been shown to reduce pathologic retinal neovascularization and inflammation. 30 Therefore, inflammatory monocytes are likely to disrupt the direction of physiological neovascularization, triggering pathologic retinal neovascularization. 
ICAM-1 is a ligand for β2-integrins constitutively expressed on the leukocyte surface and is a key adhesion molecule that controls leukocyte adhesion to the vessel walls. 31 ICAM-1, constitutively expressed on vascular endothelial cells at a low level, is swiftly upregulated during inflammation, resulting in enhancement of leukocyte–endothelial interaction. A previous study in donor eyes demonstrated that diabetic retinas had increased levels of ICAM-1 immunoreactivity in the vessels as well as infiltrating leukocytes, compared with normal retinas. 32 In a rodent model of diabetes, ICAM-1-dependent leukocyte adhesion is enhanced in the early stage, 33 34 and various retinal diseases related to long-term diabetes have been shown to be mediated by ICAM-1. 35 In vitro, Ang II was shown to induce the expression of ICAM-1 on vascular endothelial and promote leukocyte-endothelial adhesion. 22 In accordance with the in vitro data, telmisartan-treated animals in our study exhibited the decreased retinal ICAM-1 mRNA and protein expression as well as the suppressed leukocyte adhesion to the retinal vessels, reasonably resulting in the inhibition of inflammation-related pathologic neovascularization. 
As for other proangiogenic mechanisms shown in the literature, Ang II induced the in vitro expression of VEGFR-2 mRNA on cultured bovine retinal endothelial cells and pericytes, enhancing VEGF-induced angiogenic activity. 15 16 VEGF has two cognate receptors called VEGFR-1 and -2. 36 37 38 VEGF-mediated endothelial cell mitogenic activity was shown to depend, not on VEGFR-1, but on VEGFR-2. 39 In our ischemic retinopathy model, as others reported, 40 retinal VEGFR-2 expression showed levels similar to those in retinal vascular development, and telmisartan had a minimal effect on VEGFR-2 expression levels in vivo. Although VEGFR-2 blockade in the retinopathy model was reported to result in the suppression of pathologic neovascularization, 40 the telmisartan-induced effects shown in the present study are thought to be mediated, not by VEGFR-2 inhibition, but mainly by ICAM-1 inhibition, causing the prevention of inflammation to maintain the right direction of physiological neovascularization. 
The current data show that AT1-R blockade led to the significant decrease in retinal VEGFR-1 levels in ischemic retinopathy. Shih et al. 41 showed that VEGFR-1 signaling activated by placental growth factor (PlGF)-1 led to the suppression of hyperoxia-induced vaso-obliteration and suggested the possibility of VEGFR-1-mediated prevention of pathologic retinal neovascularization secondary to the decreased extent of retinal ischemia. They also described that PlGF-activated signaling of VEGFR-1 did not affect any of three types of vaso-proliferation (i.e., physiological neovascularization during normal retinal development, physiological neovascularization after hyperoxia-induced ischemia, or pathologic neovascularization after hyperoxia-induced ischemia). In the present study, we applied telmisartan to mice with retinopathy during the proliferative stage after the phase of hyperoxia-induced vaso-obliteration. Reasonably, our administration of telmisartan did not affect the extent of avascular area formation in these mice. Because vasoproliferation after the ischemic phase depends not on VEGFR-1, 41 but on VEGFR-2, 40 VEGFR-1 downregulation on vascular endothelial cells is thought to have little or no effect on retinal neovascularization. In contrast, VEGFR-1 is well-known to be expressed on inflammatory leukocytes including monocytes. 42 43 44 The telmisartan-induced decrease in retinal VEGFR-1 seen in the present study, therefore, is compatible with and explained at least in part by the suppression of VEGFR-1-bearing inflammatory leukocytes’ adhering to the retinal vasculature. 
Although in a recent paper the antiangiogenic effect of AT1-R blockade (losartan) on pathologic retinal neovascularization in ischemic retinopathy was reported, 7 no comparison was made between physiological versus pathologic neovascularization, and no mechanistic explanation was provided about the inhibitory effects on pathologic neovascularization. In this context, the present study is the first to indicate the molecular and cellular mechanisms in the differential effects of AT1-R blockade on both types of retinal neovascularization. Our novel findings are supported by a recent paper showing that Ang II-mediated subcutaneous neovascularization in a murine model (Matrigel; BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ) is mediated by inflammation-related pathways. 6  
Currently, several AT1-R antagonists are widely applied to hypertensive patients and have been shown to be safe and effective. 45 46 Hypertension is well known to be a worsening factor in proliferative diabetic retinopathy. 47 A recent report 48 has shown the increased levels of Ang II in the vitreous fluid of patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy, although its role in pathogenesis remains undetermined. More work is needed to establish the validity of this therapeutic approach in vision-threatening ischemic retinopathies. 
 
Figure 1.
 
Immunohistochemical staining for AT1-R. (A, B) Fibrovascular tissue of eyes with proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Most vascular endothelial cells in the fibrovascular tissue were positive for AT1-R (A, arrows), whereas the immunoreactivity was diminished in the negative control section (B), where the primary antibodies were replaced with nonimmune rabbit IgG. (C, D) Retinal section of a normal mouse. Positive staining for AT1-R on the inner retinal vessels (C, arrows). No staining appeared in the serial section for the negative control (D). (EG) Flatmounts of neonatal mouse retinas. Red fluorescence from the anti-PECAM-1 antibody (E) and green fluorescence from the anti-AT1-R antibody (F) identified the AT1-R-positive cells as being PECAM-1-positive endothelial cells when the images were superimposed (G). Scale bars: (A, B) 25 μm; (C, D) 80 μm.
Figure 1.
 
Immunohistochemical staining for AT1-R. (A, B) Fibrovascular tissue of eyes with proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Most vascular endothelial cells in the fibrovascular tissue were positive for AT1-R (A, arrows), whereas the immunoreactivity was diminished in the negative control section (B), where the primary antibodies were replaced with nonimmune rabbit IgG. (C, D) Retinal section of a normal mouse. Positive staining for AT1-R on the inner retinal vessels (C, arrows). No staining appeared in the serial section for the negative control (D). (EG) Flatmounts of neonatal mouse retinas. Red fluorescence from the anti-PECAM-1 antibody (E) and green fluorescence from the anti-AT1-R antibody (F) identified the AT1-R-positive cells as being PECAM-1-positive endothelial cells when the images were superimposed (G). Scale bars: (A, B) 25 μm; (C, D) 80 μm.
Figure 2.
 
Flatmounted retinas from a P17 normal mouse (A) and a mouse with ischemic retinopathy with pathologic neovascular buds (B, arrowheads). (C) Adherent leukocytes (arrows) followed by pathologic neovascularization. (D) Adherent leukocytes (arrows) accompanied by pathologic neovascularization. (E) Vehicle-injected retinopathy mice showing no apparent difference in pathologic neovascularization (arrowheads) compared with nontreated retinopathy mice (B). (F) Telmisartan-treated retinopathy showing decreased pathologic neovascularization (arrowheads) and intact physiological neovascularization compared to vehicle-treated retinopathy mice (E).
Figure 2.
 
Flatmounted retinas from a P17 normal mouse (A) and a mouse with ischemic retinopathy with pathologic neovascular buds (B, arrowheads). (C) Adherent leukocytes (arrows) followed by pathologic neovascularization. (D) Adherent leukocytes (arrows) accompanied by pathologic neovascularization. (E) Vehicle-injected retinopathy mice showing no apparent difference in pathologic neovascularization (arrowheads) compared with nontreated retinopathy mice (B). (F) Telmisartan-treated retinopathy showing decreased pathologic neovascularization (arrowheads) and intact physiological neovascularization compared to vehicle-treated retinopathy mice (E).
Figure 3.
 
Effects of telmisartan on pathologic neovascularization (A) and inflammation (B). Telmisartan-treated mice with retinopathy showed significantly less pathologic neovascularization and significantly fewer adherent leukocytes than nontreated or vehicle-treated mice. The results represent means ± SD. *P < 0.01 by Mann-Whitney test.
Figure 3.
 
Effects of telmisartan on pathologic neovascularization (A) and inflammation (B). Telmisartan-treated mice with retinopathy showed significantly less pathologic neovascularization and significantly fewer adherent leukocytes than nontreated or vehicle-treated mice. The results represent means ± SD. *P < 0.01 by Mann-Whitney test.
Figure 4.
 
Effects of telmisartan on physiological neovascularization in ischemic retinopathy (A) and during normal vascular development (B). Telmisartan-treated mice exhibited no significant difference in physiological neovascularization compared with vehicle-treated or nontreated mice. The results represent means ± SD. *P < 0.01 by Mann-Whitney test.
Figure 4.
 
Effects of telmisartan on physiological neovascularization in ischemic retinopathy (A) and during normal vascular development (B). Telmisartan-treated mice exhibited no significant difference in physiological neovascularization compared with vehicle-treated or nontreated mice. The results represent means ± SD. *P < 0.01 by Mann-Whitney test.
Figure 5.
 
Flatmounted retinas from normal adult mice (A, B) and neonates with physiological vascular development (C, D). No morphologic difference was detected between vehicle-treated (A, C) and telmisartan-treated mice (B, D).
Figure 5.
 
Flatmounted retinas from normal adult mice (A, B) and neonates with physiological vascular development (C, D). No morphologic difference was detected between vehicle-treated (A, C) and telmisartan-treated mice (B, D).
Figure 6.
 
RT-PCR (A) and ELISA (B, C) analyses for retinal ICAM-1 and VEGFR-1 and -2. (A) Retinal ICAM-1 mRNA expression in ischemic retinopathy treated with telmisartan, reduced to those in normal mice, was lower than those in vehicle-treated mice with retinopathy. Retinal VEGFR-1 mRNA expression in telmisartan-treated retinopathy mice also decreased compared with vehicle-treated mice with retinopathy. There was no apparent difference in retinal VEGFR-2 expression between vehicle-treated and telmisartan-treated mice. (B) Retinal ICAM-1 protein levels in vehicle-treated mice with retinopathy were significantly higher than in normal mice and were significantly suppressed by treatment with telmisartan. The results are expressed as the mean ± SD; n = 6. *P < 0.01 by Mann-Whitney test. (C) Retinal VEGFR-1 protein levels in telmisartan-treated mice with retinopathy were significantly lower than in vehicle-treated mice with retinopathy; n = 6. †P < 0.05. (D) No significant (P > 0.05) difference in retinal protein levels of VEGFR-2 was detected among three groups (n = 6).
Figure 6.
 
RT-PCR (A) and ELISA (B, C) analyses for retinal ICAM-1 and VEGFR-1 and -2. (A) Retinal ICAM-1 mRNA expression in ischemic retinopathy treated with telmisartan, reduced to those in normal mice, was lower than those in vehicle-treated mice with retinopathy. Retinal VEGFR-1 mRNA expression in telmisartan-treated retinopathy mice also decreased compared with vehicle-treated mice with retinopathy. There was no apparent difference in retinal VEGFR-2 expression between vehicle-treated and telmisartan-treated mice. (B) Retinal ICAM-1 protein levels in vehicle-treated mice with retinopathy were significantly higher than in normal mice and were significantly suppressed by treatment with telmisartan. The results are expressed as the mean ± SD; n = 6. *P < 0.01 by Mann-Whitney test. (C) Retinal VEGFR-1 protein levels in telmisartan-treated mice with retinopathy were significantly lower than in vehicle-treated mice with retinopathy; n = 6. †P < 0.05. (D) No significant (P > 0.05) difference in retinal protein levels of VEGFR-2 was detected among three groups (n = 6).
de GasparoM, CattKJ, InagamiT, WrightJW, UngerT. International union of pharmacology. XXIII. The angiotensin II receptors. Pharmacol Rev. 2000;52:415–472. [PubMed]
de GasparoM, HusainA, AlexanderW, et al. Proposed update of angiotensin receptor nomenclature. Hypertension. 1995;25:924–927. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
MurphyTJ, AlexanderRW, GriendlingKK, RungeMS, BernsteinKE. Isolation of a cDNA encoding the vascular type-1 angiotensin II receptor. Nature. 1991;351:233–236. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
SasakiK, YamanoY, BardhanS, et al. Cloning and expression of a complementary DNA encoding a bovine adrenal angiotensin II type-1 receptor. Nature. 1991;351:230–233. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
TamaratR, SilvestreJS, DurieM, LevyBI. Angiotensin II angiogenic effect in vivo involves vascular endothelial growth factor- and inflammation-related pathways. Lab Invest. 2002;82:747–756. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
MoravskiCJ, KellyDJ, CooperME, et al. Retinal neovascularization is prevented by blockade of the renin-angiotensin system. Hypertension. 2000;36:1099–1104. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
LonchamptM, PennelL, DuhaultJ. Hyperoxia/normoxia-driven retinal angiogenesis in mice: a role for angiotensin II. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:429–432. [PubMed]
FujitaM, HayashiI, YamashinaS, ItomanM, MajimaM. Blockade of angiotensin AT1a receptor signaling reduces tumor growth, angiogenesis, and metastasis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002;294:441–447. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
MiyajimaA, KosakaT, AsanoT, et al. Angiotensin II type I antagonist prevents pulmonary metastasis of murine renal cancer by inhibiting tumor angiogenesis. Cancer Res. 2002;62:4176–4179. [PubMed]
WalshDA, HuDE, WhartonJ, CatravasJD, BlakeDR, FanTP. Sequential development of angiotensin receptors and angiotensin I converting enzyme during angiogenesis in the rat subcutaneous sponge granuloma. Br J Pharmacol. 1997;120:1302–1311. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
StollM, SteckelingsUM, PaulM, BottariSP, MetzgerR, UngerT. The angiotensin AT2-receptor mediates inhibition of cell proliferation in coronary endothelial cells. J Clin Invest. 1995;95:651–657. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
DaemenMJ, LombardiDM, BosmanFT, SchwartzSM. Angiotensin II induces smooth muscle cell proliferation in the normal and injured rat arterial wall. Circ Res. 1991;68:450–456. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
DelafontaineP, LouH. Angiotensin II regulates insulin-like growth factor I gene expression in vascular smooth muscle cells. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:16866–16870. [PubMed]
ChuaCC, HamdyRC, ChuaBH. Upregulation of vascular endothelial growth factor by angiotensin II in rat heart endothelial cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1998;1401:187–194. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
OtaniA, TakagiH, SuzumaK, HondaY. Angiotensin II potentiates vascular endothelial growth factor-induced angiogenic activity in retinal microcapillary endothelial cells. Circ Res. 1998;82:619–628. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
OtaniA, TakagiH, OhH, et al. Angiotensin II-stimulated vascular endothelial growth factor expression in bovine retinal pericytes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:1192–1199. [PubMed]
ChaturvediN, SjolieAK, StephensonJM, et al. Effect of lisinopril on progression of retinopathy in normotensive people with type 1 diabetes. The EUCLID Study Group. EURODIAB Controlled Trial of Lisinopril in Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus. Lancet. 1998;351:28–31. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
IshidaS, UsuiT, YamashiroK, et al. VEGF164-mediated inflammation is required for pathological, but not physiological, ischemia-induced retinal neovascularization. J Exp Med. 2003;198:483–489. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
IshidaS, YamashiroK, UsuiT, et al. Leukocytes mediate retinal vascular remodeling during development and vaso-obliteration in disease. Nat Med. 2003;9:781–788. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
IshidaS, UsuiT, YamashiroK, et al. VEGF164 is proinflammatory in the diabetic retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:2155–2162. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Hernandez-PresaM, BustosC, OrtegoM, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition prevents arterial nuclear factor-kappa B activation, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 expression, and macrophage infiltration in a rabbit model of early accelerated atherosclerosis. Circulation. 1997;95:1532–1541. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
PastoreL, TessitoreA, MartinottiS, et al. Angiotensin II stimulates intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) expression by human vascular endothelial cells and increases soluble ICAM-1 release in vivo. Circulation. 1999;100:1646–1652. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
GrafeM, Auch-SchwelkW, ZakrzewiczA, et al. Angiotensin II-induced leukocyte adhesion on human coronary endothelial cells is mediated by E-selectin. Circ Res. 1997;81:804–811. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
OkamuraA, RakugiH, OhishiM, et al. Upregulation of renin-angiotensin system during differentiation of monocytes to macrophages. J Hypertens. 1999;17:537–545. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
SmithLE, WesolowskiE, McLellanA, et al. Oxygen-induced retinopathy in the mouse. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35:101–111. [PubMed]
BaltJC, MathyMJ, PfaffendorfM, van ZwietenPA. I Inhibition of angiotensin II-induced facilitation of sympathetic neurotransmission in the pithed rat: a comparison between losartan, irbesartan, telmisartan, and captopril. J Hypertens. 2001;19:465–473. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
JoussenAM, MurataT, TsujikawaA, KirchhofB, BursellSE, AdamisAP. Leukocyte-mediated endothelial cell injury and death in the diabetic retina. Am J Pathol. 2001;158:147–152. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
EsserP, HeimannK, WiedemannP. Macrophages in proliferative vitreoretinopathy and proliferative diabetic retinopathy: differentiation of subpopulations. Br J Ophthalmol. 1993;77:731–733. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
NaugHL, BrowningJ, GoleGA, GobeG. Vitreal macrophages express vascular endothelial growth factor in oxygen-induced retinopathy. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000;28:48–52. [CrossRef]
YoshidaS, YoshidaA, IshibashiT, ElnerSG, ElnerVM. Role of MCP-1 and MIP-1alpha in retinal neovascularization during postischemic inflammation in a mouse model of retinal neovascularization. J Leukoc Biol. 2003;73:137–144. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
SmithCW, MarlinSD, RothleinR, TomanC, AndersonDC. Cooperative interactions of LFA-1 and Mac-1 with intercellular adhesion molecule-1 in facilitating adherence and transendothelial migration of human neutrophils in vitro. J Clin Invest. 1989;83:2008–2017. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
McLeodDS, LeferDJ, MergesC, LuttyGA. Enhanced expression of intracellular adhesion molecule-1 and P-selectin in the diabetic human retina and choroid. Am J Pathol. 1995;147:642–653. [PubMed]
MiyamotoK, KhosrofS, BursellSE, et al. Prevention of leukostasis and vascular leakage in streptozotocin-induced diabetic retinopathy via intercellular adhesion molecule-1 inhibition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:10836–10841. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
JoussenAM, PoulakiV, QinW, et al. Retinal vascular endothelial growth factor induces intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and endothelial nitric oxide synthase expression and initiates early diabetic retinal leukocyte adhesion in vivo. Am J Pathol. 2002;160:501–509. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
JoussenAM, PoulakiV, LeML, et al. A central role for inflammation in the pathogenesis of diabetic retinopathy. FASEB J. 2004;18:1450–1452. [PubMed]
ShibuyaM, YamaguchiS, YamaneA, et al. Nucleotide sequence and expression of a novel human receptor-type tyrosine kinase gene (flt) closely related to the fms family. Oncogene. 1990;5:519–524. [PubMed]
TermanBI, CarrionME, KovacsE, RasmussenBA, EddyRL, ShowsTB. Identification of a new endothelial cell growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase. Oncogene. 1991;6:1677–1683. [PubMed]
WaltenbergerJ, Claesson-WelshL, SiegbahnA, ShibuyaM, HeldinCH. Different signal transduction properties of KDR and Flt1, two receptors for vascular endothelial growth factor. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:26988–26995. [PubMed]
IshihamaH, OhbayashiM, KurosawaN, et al. Colocalization of neuropilin-1 and Flk-1 in retinal neovascularization in a mouse model of retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:1172–1178. [PubMed]
McLeodDS, TaomotoM, CaoJ, ZhuZ, WitteL, LuttyGA. Localization of VEGF receptor-2 (KDR/Flk-1) and effects of blocking it in oxygen-induced retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:474–482. [PubMed]
ShihSC, JuM, LiuN, SmithLE. Selective stimulation of VEGFR-1 prevents oxygen-induced retinal vascular degeneration in retinopathy of prematurity. J Clin Invest. 2003;112:50–57. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
UsuiT, IshidaS, YamashiroK, et al. VEGF164(165) as the pathological isoform: differential leukocyte and endothelial responses through VEGFR1 and VEGFR2. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:368–374. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
SawanoA, IwaiS, SakuraiY, et al. Flt-1, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1, is a novel cell surface marker for the lineage of monocyte-macrophages in humans. Blood. 2001;97:785–791. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
ClaussM, WeichH, BreierG, et al. The vascular endothelial growth factor receptor Flt-1 mediates biological activities: implications for a functional role of placenta growth factor in monocyte activation and chemotaxis. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:17629–17634. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
NeutelJM, KollochRE, PlouinPF, MeinickeTW, SchumacherH,OTELLOH Study Group. Telmisartan vs losartan plus hydrochlorothiazide in the treatment of mild-to-moderate essential hypertension: a randomised ABPM study. J Hum Hypertens. 2003;17:569–575. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
MallionJ, SicheJ, LacourciereY. ABPM comparison of the antihypertensive profiles of the selective angiotensin II receptor antagonists telmisartan and losartan in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. J Hum Hypertens. 1999;13:657–664. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. BMJ. 1998;317:703–713. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
FunatsuH, YamashitaH, NakanishiY, HoriS. Angiotensin II and vascular endothelial growth factor in the vitreous fluid of patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86:311–315. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1.
 
Immunohistochemical staining for AT1-R. (A, B) Fibrovascular tissue of eyes with proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Most vascular endothelial cells in the fibrovascular tissue were positive for AT1-R (A, arrows), whereas the immunoreactivity was diminished in the negative control section (B), where the primary antibodies were replaced with nonimmune rabbit IgG. (C, D) Retinal section of a normal mouse. Positive staining for AT1-R on the inner retinal vessels (C, arrows). No staining appeared in the serial section for the negative control (D). (EG) Flatmounts of neonatal mouse retinas. Red fluorescence from the anti-PECAM-1 antibody (E) and green fluorescence from the anti-AT1-R antibody (F) identified the AT1-R-positive cells as being PECAM-1-positive endothelial cells when the images were superimposed (G). Scale bars: (A, B) 25 μm; (C, D) 80 μm.
Figure 1.
 
Immunohistochemical staining for AT1-R. (A, B) Fibrovascular tissue of eyes with proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Most vascular endothelial cells in the fibrovascular tissue were positive for AT1-R (A, arrows), whereas the immunoreactivity was diminished in the negative control section (B), where the primary antibodies were replaced with nonimmune rabbit IgG. (C, D) Retinal section of a normal mouse. Positive staining for AT1-R on the inner retinal vessels (C, arrows). No staining appeared in the serial section for the negative control (D). (EG) Flatmounts of neonatal mouse retinas. Red fluorescence from the anti-PECAM-1 antibody (E) and green fluorescence from the anti-AT1-R antibody (F) identified the AT1-R-positive cells as being PECAM-1-positive endothelial cells when the images were superimposed (G). Scale bars: (A, B) 25 μm; (C, D) 80 μm.
Figure 2.
 
Flatmounted retinas from a P17 normal mouse (A) and a mouse with ischemic retinopathy with pathologic neovascular buds (B, arrowheads). (C) Adherent leukocytes (arrows) followed by pathologic neovascularization. (D) Adherent leukocytes (arrows) accompanied by pathologic neovascularization. (E) Vehicle-injected retinopathy mice showing no apparent difference in pathologic neovascularization (arrowheads) compared with nontreated retinopathy mice (B). (F) Telmisartan-treated retinopathy showing decreased pathologic neovascularization (arrowheads) and intact physiological neovascularization compared to vehicle-treated retinopathy mice (E).
Figure 2.
 
Flatmounted retinas from a P17 normal mouse (A) and a mouse with ischemic retinopathy with pathologic neovascular buds (B, arrowheads). (C) Adherent leukocytes (arrows) followed by pathologic neovascularization. (D) Adherent leukocytes (arrows) accompanied by pathologic neovascularization. (E) Vehicle-injected retinopathy mice showing no apparent difference in pathologic neovascularization (arrowheads) compared with nontreated retinopathy mice (B). (F) Telmisartan-treated retinopathy showing decreased pathologic neovascularization (arrowheads) and intact physiological neovascularization compared to vehicle-treated retinopathy mice (E).
Figure 3.
 
Effects of telmisartan on pathologic neovascularization (A) and inflammation (B). Telmisartan-treated mice with retinopathy showed significantly less pathologic neovascularization and significantly fewer adherent leukocytes than nontreated or vehicle-treated mice. The results represent means ± SD. *P < 0.01 by Mann-Whitney test.
Figure 3.
 
Effects of telmisartan on pathologic neovascularization (A) and inflammation (B). Telmisartan-treated mice with retinopathy showed significantly less pathologic neovascularization and significantly fewer adherent leukocytes than nontreated or vehicle-treated mice. The results represent means ± SD. *P < 0.01 by Mann-Whitney test.
Figure 4.
 
Effects of telmisartan on physiological neovascularization in ischemic retinopathy (A) and during normal vascular development (B). Telmisartan-treated mice exhibited no significant difference in physiological neovascularization compared with vehicle-treated or nontreated mice. The results represent means ± SD. *P < 0.01 by Mann-Whitney test.
Figure 4.
 
Effects of telmisartan on physiological neovascularization in ischemic retinopathy (A) and during normal vascular development (B). Telmisartan-treated mice exhibited no significant difference in physiological neovascularization compared with vehicle-treated or nontreated mice. The results represent means ± SD. *P < 0.01 by Mann-Whitney test.
Figure 5.
 
Flatmounted retinas from normal adult mice (A, B) and neonates with physiological vascular development (C, D). No morphologic difference was detected between vehicle-treated (A, C) and telmisartan-treated mice (B, D).
Figure 5.
 
Flatmounted retinas from normal adult mice (A, B) and neonates with physiological vascular development (C, D). No morphologic difference was detected between vehicle-treated (A, C) and telmisartan-treated mice (B, D).
Figure 6.
 
RT-PCR (A) and ELISA (B, C) analyses for retinal ICAM-1 and VEGFR-1 and -2. (A) Retinal ICAM-1 mRNA expression in ischemic retinopathy treated with telmisartan, reduced to those in normal mice, was lower than those in vehicle-treated mice with retinopathy. Retinal VEGFR-1 mRNA expression in telmisartan-treated retinopathy mice also decreased compared with vehicle-treated mice with retinopathy. There was no apparent difference in retinal VEGFR-2 expression between vehicle-treated and telmisartan-treated mice. (B) Retinal ICAM-1 protein levels in vehicle-treated mice with retinopathy were significantly higher than in normal mice and were significantly suppressed by treatment with telmisartan. The results are expressed as the mean ± SD; n = 6. *P < 0.01 by Mann-Whitney test. (C) Retinal VEGFR-1 protein levels in telmisartan-treated mice with retinopathy were significantly lower than in vehicle-treated mice with retinopathy; n = 6. †P < 0.05. (D) No significant (P > 0.05) difference in retinal protein levels of VEGFR-2 was detected among three groups (n = 6).
Figure 6.
 
RT-PCR (A) and ELISA (B, C) analyses for retinal ICAM-1 and VEGFR-1 and -2. (A) Retinal ICAM-1 mRNA expression in ischemic retinopathy treated with telmisartan, reduced to those in normal mice, was lower than those in vehicle-treated mice with retinopathy. Retinal VEGFR-1 mRNA expression in telmisartan-treated retinopathy mice also decreased compared with vehicle-treated mice with retinopathy. There was no apparent difference in retinal VEGFR-2 expression between vehicle-treated and telmisartan-treated mice. (B) Retinal ICAM-1 protein levels in vehicle-treated mice with retinopathy were significantly higher than in normal mice and were significantly suppressed by treatment with telmisartan. The results are expressed as the mean ± SD; n = 6. *P < 0.01 by Mann-Whitney test. (C) Retinal VEGFR-1 protein levels in telmisartan-treated mice with retinopathy were significantly lower than in vehicle-treated mice with retinopathy; n = 6. †P < 0.05. (D) No significant (P > 0.05) difference in retinal protein levels of VEGFR-2 was detected among three groups (n = 6).
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×