Routinely used microbiologic staining techniques have been shown to have a high sensitivity and specificity in the detection of microsporidia in ocular samples.
5 However, a practical and simple confirmatory test to support direct smear examination findings is not available. Apart from being subjective, detection of microsporidial spores in smears requires expertise and training In addition, the species of microsporidia cannot be determined by these staining techniques. A technique that is rapid, sensitive, scaleable, and capable of being used for the identification of human pathogenic microsporidia to the species level, in both clinical and environmental sample matrices, has been lacking to date. Culture of microsporidia requires access to tissue culture facilities which, apart from being expensive, are unable to identify species. Consequently, a strong effort is being directed toward development and application of molecular biology methods, particularly PCR, to increase the levels of reliability, for detection and species identification of microsporidia. This test can be easily added to the armamentarium of diagnostic methods in a microbiology laboratory.
To enhance our diagnostic capability, we decided to include PCR for detection of four species of microsporidia in corneal scrapings, in addition to smear examination. Confirmation of smear results using PCR with pan-microsporidian primers can increase confidence in making the diagnosis of microsporidial keratitis. Although PCR-based assays for the detection of microsporidia in stools, urine, and sputum have been described,
1 8 9 10 none has been tested on corneal scrapings. To validate the PCR method on clinical samples, in this study, 31 samples from the test group and 103 from the control subjects were examined using pan-microsporidial PCR. The results showed that 26 of the test samples were PCR positive. Five smear-positive samples were not positive by these primers probably due to lack of DNA in the sample, since invariably the last scraping was used for PCR. Another possibility could be the presence of other species of microsporidia that are not detectable by the pan-microsporidia primers. Possibility of PCR inhibitors was ruled out in these samples.
Two samples in the control group were positive with pan-microsporidian primers. These were identified as E. cuniculi with species-specific primers and confirmed by sequencing and database homology comparison. A review of clinical records of these two patients showed that they had had microsporidial keratoconjunctivitis clinically diagnosed and that they had a few, minute, coarse, punctate, superficial epithelial lesions on the cornea, with associated conjunctivitis. These cases were probably missed on direct examination of corneal scrapings. One patient was seen in the emergency clinic whose scraping was collected after working hours of the laboratory, and the smears were examined on the following day. This delay may account for quenching of the fluorescence from the calcofluor white-stained smear and may have caused an error in interpretation. The cause of missing the diagnosis in the second case, however, could not be established. Because the corneal lesions were very minimal, it is possible that the occasional spores in the smears missed detection. This study has shown PCR using pan-microsporidian primers to have a sensitivity of at least 83% and specificity of 98%. Considering the low prevalence of the disease, a very large sample size of negative control subjects would be necessary to be tested to determine predictive values of the PCR assays. Owing to this limitation in this study, the positive predictive value was 21.9% after adjustment with Bayes Theorem. The negative predictive value of the assay was 95.3%, however. The sensitivity may improve by further optimizing PCR reaction conditions; nevertheless, the results of this study indicate that pan-microsporidia PCR can be used in routine diagnosis for a quick confirmation of the clinical diagnosis. This PCR can also be used for epidemiologic studies as a means to define the source and spread of human microsporidian infections. The limitation of this PCR is that the species-representative amplicons are too close in size to be distinguished from each other.
Species-specific identification of microsporidia in clinical specimens is becoming increasingly important because of various levels of responses to some drugs.
1 Although albendazole and fumagillin have been reported to be useful against many species of
Encephalitozoon, no drug has been shown to be effective against
E. bieneusi.
1 Though most species of microsporidia respond favorably to fumagillin in the United States,
1 these may be only anecdotal observations and blinded, placebo-controlled, comparative trials are lacking to date. Therefore, these PCR assays may also find utility as a means of monitoring the effectiveness of antimicrosporidial therapy.
The ability of PCR sequencing and database searching to distinguish between very closely related species has already been shown
1 and allows human and nonhuman microsporidia to be distinguished. This study considered a homology of 96% or above to be definitive. Amplicons showing less than 100% homology to the database sequences in our cases were probably due to the computer sequencing software’s inability to identify bases during sequencing, especially when the sequencing software incorporated an “N” in place of an actual base due to a weak or covered signal from the actual base. Taking this and the fidelity of
Taq polymerase into account, we felt thought that at least 96% homology was necessary for definitive species determination of microsporidia. Examination of sequences deposited in GenBank for the gene encoding the SSU rRNA of
E. hellem,
E. cuniculi,
E. intestinalis, and
V. corneae reveals considerable disagreement about the degree of sequence conservation in the 5′ region (base pairs 1–300) of this gene. Because DNA from all four parasites was efficiently amplified in the assay using the pan-microsporidian primers, it is concluded that this region covered by the primer is conserved in these organisms and therefore a single PCR using these primers can be a useful adjunct to smear examination of corneal scrapings by routine staining methods. In epidemiologic studies that require species identification, one may use sequencing after pan-microsporidian PCR or resort to species-specific PCR.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study in which PCR was used for detection and identification of species of microsporidia from ocular specimens. The short time and relatively lower cost and expertise required for PCR testing is a distinct advantage over electron microscopy. We believe that our work will increase the awareness of this rare disease and open avenues for further research.