An alternative though not mutually exclusive possibility is that activated CD8
+ T cells are discouraged from entering the cornea by a CD4
+ T cell-independent mechanism. Supporting this concept, HSV-1 corneal infection of OT-1 mice on a RAG
−/− background resulted in infiltration and apparent bystander activation of Ova-specific CD8
+ T cells, leading to the development of HSK.
11 That the OT-1/RAG mice are deficient in CD4
+ T cells again suggests that in the absence of CD4
+ T cells, CD8
+ T cells can infiltrate the infected cornea and be activated. Of interest, when HSV-1-specific CD8
+ T cells were adoptively transferred into these mice, they were found in the trigeminal ganglion, but not in the infected corneas. One can reasonably conclude from these findings that HSV-1-specific CD8
+ T cells were excluded from the infected corneas of these mice, whereas Ova-specific, presumably naïve CD8
+ T cells could enter and be activated. In that regard, it is noteworthy that although CD8
+ T cells are prominently present in the corneas of CD4-deficient mice, the frequency of HSV-1-specific CD8
+ T cells is quite low, relative to their frequency in the trigeminal ganglia of the same mice (Lepisto AJ, unpublished observation, 2002), and relative to the frequency of HSV-1-specific CD4
+ T cells in the infected corneas of wild-type mice
(Figs. 2 6) . Together these observations suggest that activated CD8
+ T cells may be preferentially, though not absolutely, excluded from the cornea.