Our previous electron microscopy experiments suggest that COS disks are formed but are disorganized in the CNGA3
−/− retina.
11 To achieve an additional view on the structural status of COSs, we performed immunostaining for cone opsins, which represent a major component of COS proteins. A monoclonal antibody (COS1) directed against the MWS (red/green) cone opsin labeled almost all PNA-positive COSs in the dorsal wild-type retina, a region where MWS opsin is the predominant cone opsin
(Figs. 3A 3B) . By contrast, in the PW4 knockout retina, very few PNA-positive cones revealed MWS opsin immunoreactivity
(Figs. 3C 3D) . Similarly, at PW4, a monoclonal antibody (OS2) directed against the SWS (blue) cone opsin labeled only a small percentage of PNA-positive cells in the ventral retina
(Figs. 3E 3F) , a region where SWS opsin is abundantly expressed in the wild-type retina. Thus, in CNGA3
−/− mice, outer segments of both types of cones were essentially devoid of opsins. We addressed this unexpected finding in another set of experiments using polyclonal anti-MWS and anti-SWS opsin antibodies
(Figs. 3G 3H 3I 3J 3K 3L) . The specificity of both antibodies was confirmed in Western blot analysis and immunostaining of wild-type retinal sections (see
Supplementary Fig. S1). As expected, the MWS-specific antibody intensely stained the COSs of a PW3 wild-type retina
(Fig. 3G) , whereas PNA-labeled COSs of age-matched CNGA3
−/− retinas revealed only residual, if any, MWS opsin staining
(Figs. 3H 3I) . However, the MWS-specific antibody detected substantial amounts of opsins in the inner segments, somata, and terminals of knockout but not of wild-type cones
(Fig. 3I) . The same staining pattern was also observed with the anti-SWS antibody (not shown), as well as with another polyclonal anti-opsin antibody (anti-SWS opsin, JH455,
28 data not shown). Even aged MWS cones revealed an opsin signal in the inner segment, the soma, and the terminal, but never showed opsins in the outer segment
(Figs. 3J 3K) . It is noteworthy that mislocalized opsins were not labeled by the monoclonal COS1 and OS2 antibodies, probably because these antibodies are raised against retinal membrane fractions and therefore detect opsin epitopes that are present only if the proteins are correctly folded and expressed in the outer segment. To assess the total opsin levels of wild-type and CNGA3
−/− retinas, we performed Western blot analysis with retinal membrane fractions.
Figure 3Lshows a blot from 3-week-old mice probed with the polyclonal anti-MWS antibody. The antibody recognized a specific 42-kDa band with an intensity that was much weaker in CNGA3
−/− than in wild-type mice. The difference in intensity indicates that the amount of mislocalized opsin in a CNGA3
−/− cone photoreceptor is much lower than the amount of opsin normally present in a wild-type COS. The downregulation of opsins could be caused by inhibition of gene transcription or by posttranscriptional effects. To differentiate between these two options, we determined mRNA levels by semiquantitative RT-PCR. In support of a posttranscriptional mechanism, there was no significant difference in the level of MWS opsin mRNA up to PM3 (
Fig. 3M , left). Even in 1-year-old mice, in which only a few cones contain opsin, the mRNA levels were approximately 35% of the control level (
Fig. 3M , right).