A panel of graphs of light-adapted 30-Hz flicker amplitudes is shown in
Figure 4 . Note the clear exponential decay of amplitude in some cases and also the considerable variation from animal to animal. Summary box-and-whisker plot of dark- and light-adapted 30-Hz and light-adapted 2-Hz amplitudes are given in
Figure 5 . Note how the absolute amplitudes (
B 0) were lower in affected cases and that the rate of decline (
B 1) was faster. The scotopic intensity series parameters are presented in
Fig. 6 . Data are given for flash intensities of 0.789 cd · s/m
2 (approximately the 50%
V/
V max stimulus intensity in these dogs), 3.125 cd · s/m
2 (standard flash), and 12.5 cd · s/m
2 (bright-flash stimulus dominated by rod responses, but with a cone component). In
Figures 6A and 6Bare the
B 0 parameters for a- and b-wave amplitudes at increasing stimulus intensity. These values affectively represent a backward extrapolation of maximum amplitude before the degeneration starts, and there was very little difference between heterozygous and affected animals. By contrast, shown in
Figures 6C and 6Dare the rate constants for the decay of the scotopic responses. The decay rates were much faster in the affected pups. Note, however, that the rates of decay were much gentler than those for photopic responses. The a- and b-wave implicit times for the scotopic series are given in
Figures 7A 7B . There was a consistent, modest increase in median a-wave implicit times that is significant at all intensities (
P < 0.0001;
P = 0.06 and
P = 0.0005 with increasing intensity). There was a significant increase in median b-wave implicit time only with the highest-intensity flash (
P = 0.0001). With photopic stimuli
(Figs. 7C 7D) , only the single flash median times increased significantly (
P = 0.0009 and
P = 0.006 for a- and b-wave, respectively), but in general the homozygotes showed greater variability.