In addition to technical differences, in our study, the ICG-preinjection fluorescence images we termed NIR fluorescence images were noise reduced by software averaging five to nine single images. Such an averaging is a standard technique to improve image quality of originally weak signals and is in clinical use for blue-light–excited autofluorescence imaging.
4 8 11 In our opinion, the different technical systems used explain the lower overall rate of NIR fluorescence observed in our patient group and probably also explains why we did not observe any persistence of NIR fluorescence after ICG was injected. Observing the high correlation of increased NIR fluorescence and increased NIR reflectance indicated that the observed NIR fluorescence is pseudofluorescence deriving from barrier filter leakage. In contrast, highly NIR-reflective structures such as depigmented areas were successfully blocked by the barrier filter. An explanation is that structures producing NIR fluorescence have a much stronger NIR reflectance than do depigmented areas, and this could be observed in several cases in which NIR reflectance of pathologic lesions was in saturation, whereas other structures that reflected NIR light
(Fig. 6)were not. It seemed further possible that both pseudofluorescence and autofluorescence contribute to the NIR fluorescence signal. Comparing gray-value ratios of NIR reflectance and fluorescence images indicates that part of the observed NIR fluorescence signal could derive from autofluorescence. It has to be mentioned, though, that gray-value analysis requires a correction for offset in the image to define the 0 gray value. For this purpose, the gray value of the darkest area in an image is determined and subtracted from gray values in the area of interest within the same image. Naturally, this correction for offset has a stronger influence on dark NIR fluorescence images than on bright NIR reflectance images, particularly if the offset value is high
(Fig. 8) . Because the NIR fluorescence signals are very weak and close to noise we are careful in the interpretation of these findings. The analysis of barrier filter transmission and output coupling mirror reflectance of the scanning laser ophthalmoscope revealed a leakage in the measured leakage deriving from sidebands of 6.2 × 10
−6 for p-polarized and 6.7 × 10
−6 for s-polarized laser light. As the output coupling mirror reflectance differed for s-polarized (0.32) and p-polarized (0.07) laser light, the observed leakage deriving from sidebands must consist of primarily nonpolarized laser light
(Figs. 9 10) . Overall, the observed leakage is very discrete, supporting the idea that the observed NIR fluorescence is basically NIR autofluorescence, even if some pseudofluorescence cannot be ruled out. In four eyes with chloroquine maculopathy and chronic CSC, a weak preinjection signal could be observed, whereas the corresponding NIR reflectance image did not show increased NIR reflectance at the same fundus location. In these cases, we interpret the observed NIR fluorescence as NIR autofluorescence. The NIR autofluorescence could have been caused by accumulation of chloroquine or its degradation products. In cases of CSC, exudates from choroidal leakage like fibrin may have NIR autofluorescence properties. NIR fluorescence and increased NIR reflectance correlated in most of the patients with AMD with increased blue-light–excited autofluorescence at identical fundus locations. In contrast, NIR fluorescence due to choroidal nevi did not show increased blue-light–excited autofluorescence. Melanin appears to be the most likely candidate for increased NIR reflectance and NIR fluorescence. Obviously, the composition of pigmented RPE condensation responsible for NIR reflectance in patients with AMD is different from pigmented nevi. We speculate that lipofuscinoid fluorophores, together with pigmented melanocytes are present in these AMD cases, whereas choroidal nevi did not accumulate lipofuscin in our series. Eyes with subretinal hemorrhages showed both strong NIR fluorescence and NIR reflectance, as well as blue-light–excited autofluorescence in some cases, showing that fluorophores in degrading hemorrhages can emit light in a broad spectrum. We have also observed NIR-autofluorescence without corresponding NIR reflectance in cases of albipunctate fundus and lysosomal storage disease (data not shown). Despite the fact that acquisition of NIR fluorescence and NIR fluorescence images is simple and takes a few seconds, the relatively low incidence of NIR fluorescence we observed currently restricts the use of these imaging modalities to academic hospitals until a broader database is available. From our observation, we suggest looking for NIR reflectance and NIR fluorescence in eyes with pigmented macular lesions, CSC, and rare maculopathies.