October 1965
Volume 4, Issue 5
Articles  |   October 1965
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science October 1965, Vol.4, 941. doi:
  • Views
  • PDF
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Erratum. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1965;4(5):941.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements
This content is PDF only. Please click on the PDF icon to access.

In the article, "Changes associated with tlie appearance of mature sugar cataracts," by Drs. Patterson and Bunting, in the April issue of this JOURNAL, page 167, Figs. 1' and 2 are reversed, so that the legend for Fig. 1 applies to Fig. 2 and vice versa. The footnote of Table I should have read as follows: *Corrected hydration index equals (wet weight in milligrams minus [milligrams of dulcitol per lens multiplied by 16.5]) divided by (the diy weight of the lens in milligrams minus milligrams of dulcitol per lens)


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.