Purchase this article with an account.
Erratum. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1965;4(5):941. doi: https://doi.org/.
Download citation file:
© ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)
In the article, "Changes associated with tlie appearance of mature sugar cataracts," by Drs. Patterson and Bunting, in the April issue of this JOURNAL, page 167, Figs. 1' and 2 are reversed, so that the legend for Fig. 1 applies to Fig. 2 and vice versa. The footnote of Table I should have read as follows: *Corrected hydration index equals (wet weight in milligrams minus [milligrams of dulcitol per lens multiplied by 16.5]) divided by (the diy weight of the lens in milligrams minus milligrams of dulcitol per lens)
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only