October 1965
Volume 4, Issue 5
Articles  |   October 1965
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science October 1965, Vol.4, 941. doi:
  • Views
  • PDF
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Erratum. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1965;4(5):941.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

In the article, "Changes associated with tlie appearance of mature sugar cataracts," by Drs. Patterson and Bunting, in the April issue of this JOURNAL, page 167, Figs. 1' and 2 are reversed, so that the legend for Fig. 1 applies to Fig. 2 and vice versa. The footnote of Table I should have read as follows: *Corrected hydration index equals (wet weight in milligrams minus [milligrams of dulcitol per lens multiplied by 16.5]) divided by (the diy weight of the lens in milligrams minus milligrams of dulcitol per lens)


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.