Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 49, Issue 11
November 2008
Volume 49, Issue 11
Free
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology  |   November 2008
Lysosome-Related Genes Are Regulated in the Orbital Fat of Patients with Graves’ Ophthalmopathy
Author Affiliations
  • Mei-Hsiu Chen
    From the Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Taiwan University Medical College, Taipei, Taiwan; the
    Department of Internal Medicine, Far-Eastern Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; the
  • Shu-Lang Liao
    Departments of Ophthalmology and
  • Ming-Hong Chen
    Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Pei-Ling Tsou
    Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; and the
  • Mei-Ju Shih
    Departments of Ophthalmology and
  • Tien-Chun Chang
    Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; and the
  • Lee-Ming Chuang
    From the Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Taiwan University Medical College, Taipei, Taiwan; the
    Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; and the
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science November 2008, Vol.49, 4760-4764. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.08-2020
  • Views
  • PDF
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Mei-Hsiu Chen, Shu-Lang Liao, Ming-Hong Chen, Pei-Ling Tsou, Mei-Ju Shih, Tien-Chun Chang, Lee-Ming Chuang; Lysosome-Related Genes Are Regulated in the Orbital Fat of Patients with Graves’ Ophthalmopathy. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2008;49(11):4760-4764. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.08-2020.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

purpose. The molecular mechanism involved in the hypertrophy of the orbital fat in patients with Graves’ ophthalmopathy or thyroid eye disease (TED) remains unclear. Comparison of genome-wide expression profiles may help in the search for the gene sets involved in TED.

methods. Twenty-five orbital adipose tissue specimens were obtained, from which the RNA was isolated. Four of the tissue specimens (from four individuals, two with TED and two control subjects) were subjected to cDNA microarray analysis. The data were analyzed by the gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) to survey the biological pathways involved in the pathogenesis of TED. Messenger RNA levels of some top-ranked genes in GSEA-selected pathways are validated by quantitative PCR (QPCR).

results. The expression of specific gene sets related to lytic vacuoles, lysosomes, and vacuoles were different between the specimens obtained from patients with TED and control subjects (P < 0.001). These three gene sets overlapped. For QPCR, four top-ranked genes were selected from these overlapping gene sets and another one that related to visual failure, using 21 independent samples of patients with TED (n = 15) and control subjects (n = 6). The results showed that ceroid-lipofuscinosis, neuronal 2, late infantile (CLN2; P = 0.044) and ceroid-lipofuscinosis, neuronal 3, juvenile (CLN3, which related to visual failure; P = 0.012) were significantly downregulated in the orbital fat of patients with TED. The expression of the β subunit of hexosaminidase A (HEXB) was reduced as well, but the change did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.058).

conclusions. Lysosome-related genes, such as CLN2, CLN3, and HEXB, may be involved in the pathogenesis of adipose tissue hypertrophy in TED.

The clinical manifestations of Graves’ disease include thyrotoxicosis and several extrathyroidal signs, such as ophthalmopathy, dermopathy, and acropachy. 1 Between 25% and 50% of patients with Graves’ disease may exhibit ocular complications, which are properly termed Graves’ ophthalmopathy or thyroid eye disease (TED). Patients with TED have clinical manifestations such as lid retraction, proptosis, soft tissue swelling, strabismus, and compressive optic neuropathy. 2 The swollen soft tissues within the bony orbit displace the globe forward and impede venous outflow from the orbit. The swollen soft tissues are the results of adipogenesis and glycosaminoglycan accumulation, a result of the activation of local fibroblasts secondary to inflammation. 3 Although it is widely accepted that Graves’ disease is an autoimmune process and that the primary antigen in the thyroid is the TSH receptor, 4 5 the pathogenesis of TED remains poorly understood. Most believe that it is also an autoimmune process and involves TSH and IGF-1 receptors and other as yet unidentified shared autoantigen(s) in the thyroid and orbital tissues. 3 6 7  
In TED, proptosis appears to be related to the orbital adipose tissue 8 and muscle volume. 9 The expansion of adipose tissue volume results from the accumulation of glycosaminoglycans and the emergence of newly differentiated fat cells within these tissues. 3 7 10 Studies for the mechanism of proptosis using the orbital fibroblast culture model help to reveal the mechanism of adipocyte differentiation in vitro. However, they fail to approach the pathophysiology of adipose tissue, which is composed of several cell types, in the orbits of patients with TED. Identification of the differentially expressed genes in the orbital fat from patients with TED has the potential to provide new insight into the molecular mechanisms involved in the pathologic process and to provide new therapeutic targets for treatment of this disease. 
Kumar et al. 11 performed gene expression profiling of orbital adipose tissue and found that secreted frizzled-related protein-1 (sFRP-1) was upregulated in orbital fat from patients with TED, which enhanced adipogenesis in orbital preadipocyte cultures. However, this kind of single gene expression profiling in array analysis failed to show the pathophysiology of adipose tissue as a whole in TED. In this study, we applied a more powerful analytical method, referred to as gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), 12 to search for gene sets that may be involved in the pathogenesis of TED. Before we applied GSEA, single gene expression profiling had been used to find possible target genes, but the top-ranked genes failed to show a significant difference when they were tested with quantitative real-time PCR (QPCR). In this study, we combined computational screening using GSEA with experimental follow-up to detect and validate the relevant genes. 
Materials and Methods
Human Orbital Adipose Tissues
Orbital adipose tissues were obtained from 17 patients with severe TED who underwent orbital decompression surgery and 8 patients with no history of Graves’ disease who underwent elective orbital surgery. The demographic and clinical characteristics of patients are listed in Table 1 . Patients enrolled in the study were those with moderate to severe proptosis measured by a Hertel exophthalmometer. Those with a high clinical activity score (CAS) may receive steroid treatment first and will not undergo surgical intervention until they have been observed by an ophthalmologist for at least 3 months. These patients did not receive other immunosuppressive agents or orbital radiotherapy. All patients were in euthyroid status at least for 3 months. TED orbital adipose tissues were obtained while patients with TED underwent orbital decompression surgery. The normal orbital adipose tissues were retrieved from the same anatomic site in patients with no history of Graves’ disease who underwent elective orbital surgery. Seven of them had benign mixed tumor of the lacrimal gland, the other one had a benign cyst. One was a man (12.5%, and the percentage of men in the disease group was 11.8%). Their mean age was 30.6 ± 10.4 years (mean ± SD, range 22–53), which was not different from that of the patients with TED. The orbital tissues were soaked in liquid nitrogen for 3 seconds, then put in a sterile container and immediately put in liquid nitrogen for transfer to a −70°C freezer before RNA isolation. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the National Taiwan University Hospital. Written informed consent was obtained from each patient, and the protocol adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. 
RNA Isolation
Total RNA was isolated from the tissue samples (RNeasy Lipid Tissue Mini kit; Qiagen, Valencia, CA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The optical density 260/280 ratios of all samples were >1.8. 
Gene Array Sample Preparation, Hybridization, and Scanning
The tissue samples that were used for array analyses were taken from patients with severe proptosis with prominent fat volume expansion. Microscopically, the size of the adipocytes was enlarged and an edematous change was also found in the adjacent area. The quality of total RNA samples from orbital tissues were examined in a bioanalyzer and the 28s/18s ratios of the four samples were >1.5. We chose two TED and two control samples from different individuals by excluding those had been treated with steroid or other immunosuppressive agent. Two TED samples were taken from two patients who had severe proptosis with predominant extraocular fat volume expansion but less extraocular muscle volume expansion. These qualified total RNA samples were processed with one-cycle target labeling, and control reagents to fragmented cRNA were then hybridized with a microarray (Human Genome U 133A Array; Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA), which contains 22,215 human gene probes. After washing and staining (Fluidics Station 400; Affymetrix), the arrays were scanned (GeneArray 2500 scanner). 
Microarray Data Normalization and Analysis
A gene microarray (Microarray Suite, version 5.0; Affymetrix), was used as the first tool for data analysis. This software allowed for calculation of the signal and determination of whether each probe set was present. To test for sets of related genes that may have been systematically altered in the orbital fat of patients with TED, we used GSEA, 12 which combines information from the members of previously defined sets of genes (e.g., biological pathways) to increase the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and thus, to improve the statistical power. 12 13 First, all genes were ranked according to the difference in expression using the SNR between those in patients with and without TED. The null hypothesis of GSEA predicted that the rank ordering of the genes in a given comparison would be random with regard to the diagnostic categorization of the samples. The alternative hypothesis was that the rank ordering of the pathway members would be associated with the specific diagnostic criteria used to categorize the groups of affected individuals. Then, we measured the extent of association by a nonparametric, running-sum statistic termed the enrichment score (ES), and recorded the maximum ES (MES) over all gene sets in the actual data set from the patients with TED. To assess the statistical significance of the MES, we used permutation testing of the GO (Gene Ontology; a collaborative database, available at www.geneontology.org) labels of the genes. We chose to permutate the gene labels instead of phenotypes because a small array number makes phenotype permutation impractical. Furthermore, gene label permutation is one of the standard options in the GESA software. Specifically, we compared the MES achieved in the actual data to that which occurred in each of 1000 permutations that shuffled the GO labels of the genes. The significance of the MES score was calculated as the fraction of the 1000 random permutations in which the top pathway gave a stronger result than that observed in the actual data. 
Quantitative PCR
QPCR for assessment of selected genes was performed by using individual orbital adipose tissue samples from patients with TED (n = 15) and control subjects (n = 6). The samples used for QPCR were different from those used for microarray analysis. Total real-time PCR reactions were performed in a 10-μL total reaction mixture (1 μL of cDNA, 1 μL of LightCycler FateStart DNA MasterSYBR Green I, 1 μL of each of the 5-μM forward and reverse primers shown in Table 2 , 5.8 μL of H2O and 1.2 μL of 25 mM MgCl2 stock solution) in a thermocycler (LightCycler; Roche, Penzberg, Germany). The PCR program was initiated with 10 minutes at 95°C before 40 thermal cycles. Calculation of the relative expression ratios of target genes in patients with TED versus control subjects in comparison to a reference gene (β-actin) was made by using 2−ΔΔCt. 14 The Student’s t-test was used to assess statistically significant differences between the groups of tissue samples. 
Results
Gene Array Analysis
We used the GSEA procedure, which does not directly detect genes, but tests all categories in the gene ontology database to analyze the array result. First, we filtered out those genes with expression values <100 in all four arrays, leaving 17,123 genes. Then, we applied GSEA combined with the Gene Ontology (GO) database. We arbitrarily chose the term with several genes were between 10 and 200. There were 1439 terms remaining for further analysis. After 1000 permutations, we identified seven gene sets with significance (Table 3) . The genes in Gene Ontology ID (GOID) 323 are overlapped with GOID 5764 and 5763, and so we grouped them into a set. The genes, in terms of components, were primarily related to lytic vacuoles, lysosomes, and vacuoles and were expressed significantly differently between orbital tissues from patients with TED and control subjects. 
QPCR Analysis of Lysosome-Related Genes
Based on the GSEA results, we targeted the category of genes in GOID 323, 5764, and 5763. There were four genes in this category that were expressed highly differently between the patients with TED and control subjects—that is, ceroid-lipofuscinosis, neuronal 2, late infantile (CLN2; P < 0.001), lysosomal-associated membrane protein 3 (LAMP3; P < 0.001), mucolipin (MCOLN1; P < 0.001), and the β subunit of hexosaminidase A (HEXB; P = 0.002). In addition to the four highly differently expressed genes, we picked up ceroid-lipofuscinosis, neuronal 3, juvenile (CLN3; P = 0.049; Table 4 ) in the same category for QPCR analysis, because the first manifestation of its deficiency is visual failure. 15 QPCR analysis was performed using samples distinct from those used in the gene array studies. The levels of CLN2 (P = 0.044) and CLN3 (P = 0.012) mRNA, normalized to β-actin mRNA, were significantly lower in the orbital adipose tissue samples from patients with TED than from the control subjects. Although the level of HEXB expression was not significant (P = 0.058), there was a lower trend in the TED group (Fig. 1)
Discussion
Expression profiling using DNA microarray has been performed extensively and has enabled researchers to generate hypotheses with respect to several disease mechanisms. However, the large number of genes tested, the high variability between individuals, and the limited samples sizes in human studies has made it difficult to distinguish true differences from noise. Thus, consideration of the variability in gene sets of biological pathways, rather than individual gene changes, is more sensitive and more useful for understanding biological changes. The standard GSEA procedure is one of the choices. By using the GSEA method, we determined that the expressions of specific gene sets related to lytic vacuoles, lysosomes, and vacuoles were substantially different (P < 0.001) between orbital adipose tissues obtained from patients with and without TED. Furthermore, although the GOID of lytic vacuole-, lysosome- and vacuole-related gene sets were different, most of the genes listed within these three gene sets were overlapping. Ultrastructural studies using transmission electron microscopy have observed the formation of vacuoles in extraocular muscles and cultured orbital fibroblasts from patients with TED. 16 17 In the early stage of adipocyte differentiation, small vacuoles appeared before the accumulation of lipids (laboratory observation). We believe that the biologically meaningful and statistically significant categories are very unlikely to be false positives. 
Many overlapping genes were found under the categories GOID 323, 5763, and 5764; approximately 140 genes were found. We were interested in specific lysosomal storage disease-related genes, because our colleagues found exophthalmos in a patient with lysosomal storage disease in whom the disease regressed with enzyme replacement therapy. 18 For selecting genes to be validated by QPCR, we went back to check the comparisons of individual genes within GOID 323, 5763, and 5764 between patients with TED and control subjects, to narrow down our targets. Among the approximately 140 genes, the top-ranked four genes related to lysosomal storage disease (CLN2, LAMP3, MCOLN1, and HEXB), along with CLN3, though not top ranked, were selected for QPCR. Deficiency of CLN3 not only caused lipofuscinosis but also had visual failure as its first manifestation, and we were interested in the late-onset visual problem. LAMP3 and MCOLN1 expression did not show a difference, but the expression of CLN2, CLN3, and HEXB were downregulated in the orbital fat of patients with TED. CLN2 and CLN3 are involved in neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses (NCLs), a group of neurodegenerative disorders characterized by the accumulation of autofluorescent inclusion bodies in many cell types that resemble ceroid and lipofuscin. Classically, the NCLs have been divided into three main childhood types (infantile, late infantile, and juvenile) and one adult type. Juvenile NCL, caused by mutation in the CLN3 gene, typically manifests from 6 years of age with visual failure. 19 20 CLN3 encodes a 43-kDa polypeptide localized to the lysosomal compartment, and its exact function is unknown. 21 CLN2 encodes a lysosomal enzyme, tripeptidyl peptidase I (TPP1). 22 23 Mutation in the CLN2 gene causes late infantile NCL, manifesting from 2 years of age with seizures. Gene therapy with the CLN2 has resulted in safe long-term TPP1 expression in rats and nonhuman primates. 24 Our study showed downregulation of CLN2 and CLN3 in orbital fat of patients with TED. It would be interesting to determine whether the treatment for NCL could be applied to the treatment of TED. HEXB, another lysosome-related gene, encodes the β subunit of hexosaminidase A and is involved in the breakdown of gangliosides as well as glycosaminoglycans. Accumulation of glycosaminoglycans is seen in the tissues of mice with hexosaminidase deficiency. 25 In our study, the expression HEXB tended to be downregulated in the orbital fat of patients with TED. We thought that the hexosaminidase deficiency because of HEXB downregulation might cause the accumulation of glycosaminoglycans and result in orbital fat volume expansion in patients with TED. Although the degree of downregulation of these three genes, at around a 30% decrease, were not as high as a main factor in a disease could be, but we believe that subtle but broad changes of components of one functional pathway may be truly important in the pathogenesis of disease. 
None of these lysosomal genes (CLN2, CLN3, and HEXB) have been reported to be associated with TED. Our study suggests that lysosome-related genes, such as CLN2, CLN3, and HEXB, may have contributed to orbital fat volume expansion by increasing adipocyte size or increasing edematous change by the accumulation of glycosaminoglycans in patients with TED. 
There are more than 50 acid-dependent hydrolases (e.g., proteases, lipases, glycosidases) within in the limiting membrane named lysosomal-associated membrane proteins (LAMPs), 26 which exist in different types of cells. One of our studies revealed the expression of CD68, a LAMP, was increased in the orbital fat of patients with TED. 27 Adipose tissue is a heterogeneous tissue that contains not only adipocytes but also fibroblasts and inflammatory cells. The adipose tissue disease in TED may be associated with the regulation of lysosome-related genes in different types of cells. Our work shows that lysosome-related genes, such as CLN2, CLN3, and HEXB, may be involved in the pathogenesis of orbital adipose tissue hypertrophy in patients with moderate to severe TED. 
 
Table 1.
 
Demographics and Clinical Characteristics of Patients with TED and Control Subjects
Table 1.
 
Demographics and Clinical Characteristics of Patients with TED and Control Subjects
Characteristics TED (n = 17) Control (n = 8)
Age (y) 31.3 ± 6.2 (22–45)* 30.6 ± 10.4 (22–53)*
Sex
 Female 15 (88.2%) 7 (87.5%)
 Male 2 (11.8%) 1 (12.5%)
BMI 22.0 ± 2.1 (18.6–26.4)* 22.0 ± 2.3 (19.5–24.5)*
 Proptosis (mm) 23.4 ± 1.5 (21–26)* NA
 Clinical activity score (CAS) 3.4 ± 1.1 (2–6)* NA
 TBII (%) 24.3 ± 6.0 (17.4–41.9)* NA
Duration of TED (mo) 58.9 ± 28.3 (30–20)* NA
Drug history
 ATD 17 (100%) NA
 Steroid 8 (47.0%) NA
 Thyroxine 7 (41.2%) NA
Radioactive iodine 3 (17.6%) NA
Thyroidectomy 1 (5.9%) NA
Smoking 0 NA
Table 2.
 
Primers for QPCR of Candidate Genes
Table 2.
 
Primers for QPCR of Candidate Genes
Genes Forward Primer Reverse Primer
CLN2 GACCTACGGAAACCCA AGTTGTATCGCTTACGGA
LAMP3 AGGTTCTAAACGGAAGC AGACGGTCAAATAGGC
HEXB TCTGCTCCTTGGTACT CTGTCATAGGCGTCATC
MCOLN1 TGCGACAAGTTTCGAG CGGACATACGCATACC
CLN3 CCACGACATCCTTAGC ATCCCACTGACGAGAA
β-Actin TTCTACAATGAGCTGCG AGGTAGTCAGTCAGGT
Table 3.
 
Summary Results of GSEA of the mRNA Expressions between Subjects with TED vs. Controls
Table 3.
 
Summary Results of GSEA of the mRNA Expressions between Subjects with TED vs. Controls
GOID No. of Gene P Name Term Type
323 143 <0.001 Lytic vacuole Component
5764 143 <0.001 Lysosome Component
5773 146 <0.001 Vacuole Component
8143 13 0.022 Poly(A) binding Function
375 137 0.039 RNA splicing, via transesterification reactions Process
377 137 0.039 RNA splicing, via transesterification reactions with bulged adenosine as nucleophile Process
398 137 0.039 Nuclear mRNA splicing, via spliceosome Process
Table 4.
 
Details of the Selected Individual Genes in GOID 323, 5764, 5773
Table 4.
 
Details of the Selected Individual Genes in GOID 323, 5764, 5773
Gene Name Gene Symbol Location t P
Ceroid-lipofuscinosis, neuronal 2, late infantile (Jansky-Bielschowsky disease) CLN2 11p15 −32.8707 0.000462
Lysosomal-associated membrane protein 3 LAMP3 3q26.3–q27 −31.734 0.000496
Mucolipin MCOLN1 19p13.3–p13.2 −23.9679 0.000868
Hexosaminidase, beta polypeptide HEXB 5q13 −15.9726 0.001948
Ceroid-lipofuscinosis, neuronal 3, juvenile (Batten, Spielmeyer-Vogt disease) CLN3 16p12.1 −2.93752 0.04949
Figure 1.
 
mRNA expression of lysosome-related genes. Relative expression of CLN2, CLN3, and HEXB in orbital adipose tissue samples from patients with TED (n = 15) and control subjects (n = 6). P = 0.044, 0.012, and 0.058, respectively, for TED compared with control groups.
Figure 1.
 
mRNA expression of lysosome-related genes. Relative expression of CLN2, CLN3, and HEXB in orbital adipose tissue samples from patients with TED (n = 15) and control subjects (n = 6). P = 0.044, 0.012, and 0.058, respectively, for TED compared with control groups.
TaylorS. Graves of Graves’ disease, 1796–1853. J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1986;20:298–300. [PubMed]
BartleyGB, GormanCA. Diagnostic criteria for Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1995;119:792–795. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
GarrityJA, BahnRS. Pathogenesis of graves ophthalmopathy: implications for prediction, prevention, and treatment. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;142:147–153. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
PaschkeR, LudgateM. The thyrotropin receptor in thyroid diseases. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:1675–1681. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
KohnLD, ShimojoN, KohnoY, SuzukiK. An animal model of Graves’ disease: understanding the cause of autoimmune hyperthyroidism. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2000;1:59–67. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
BahnRS, HeufelderAE. Pathogenesis of Graves’ ophthalmopathy. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1468–1475. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
BahnRS. Clinical review 157: Pathophysiology of Graves’ ophthalmopathy: the cycle of disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88:1939–1946. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
PeysterRG, GinsbergF, SilberJH, AdlerLP. Exophthalmos caused by excessive fat: CT volumetric analysis and differential diagnosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986;146:459–464. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
FeldonSE, LeeCP, MuramatsuSK, WeinerJM. Quantitative computed tomography of Graves’ ophthalmopathy: extraocular muscle and orbital fat in development of optic neuropathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1985;103:213–215. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
SoriskyA, PardasaniD, GagnonA, SmithTJ. Evidence of adipocyte differentiation in human orbital fibroblasts in primary culture. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996;81:3428–3431. [PubMed]
KumarS, CoenenMJ, SchererPE, BahnRS. Evidence for enhanced adipogenesis in the orbits of patients with Graves’ ophthalmopathy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89:930–935. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
MoothaVK, LindgrenCM, ErikssonKF, et al. PGC-1alpha-responsive genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation are coordinately downregulated in human diabetes. Nat Genet. 2003;34:267–273. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
SubramanianA, TamayoP, MoothaVK, et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:15545–15550. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
LivakKJ, SchmittgenTD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 2001;25:402–408. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
SpaltonDJ, TaylorDS, SandersMD. Juvenile Batten’s disease: an ophthalmological assessment of 26 patients. Br J Ophthalmol. 1980;64:726–732. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
LuoQ, HeW, TangL, et al. Ultrastructure study on extraocular muscle of infiltrative exophthalmos. (in Chinese)Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2000;36:323.366–368
HenriksonRC, SmithTJ. Ultrastructure of cultured human orbital fibroblasts. Cell Tissue Res. 1994;278:629–631. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
ChenCA, TangNL, ChienYH, ZhangWM, WangJK, HwuWL. Type I Gaucher disease with exophthalmos and pulmonary arteriovenous malformation. BMC Med Genet. 2005;6:25. [PubMed]
SantavuoriP. Neuronal ceroid-lipofuscinoses in childhood. Brain Dev. 1988;10:80–83. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
MoleSE, MitchisonHM, MunroePB. Molecular basis of the neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses: mutations in CLN1, CLN2, CLN3, and CLN5. Hum Mutat. 1999;14:199–215. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
JarvelaI, SainioM, RantamakiT, et al. Biosynthesis and intracellular targeting of the CLN3 protein defective in Batten disease. Hum Mol Genet. 1998;7:85–90. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
RawlingsND, BarrettAJ. Tripeptidyl-peptidase I is apparently the CLN2 protein absent in classical late-infantile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1999;1429:496–500. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
VinesDJ, WarburtonMJ. Classical late infantile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis fibroblasts are deficient in lysosomal tripeptidyl peptidase I. FEBS Lett. 1999;443:131–135. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
HackettNR, RedmondDE, SondhiD, et al. Safety of direct administration of AAV2(CU)hCLN2, a candidate treatment for the central nervous system manifestations of late infantile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis, to the brain of rats and nonhuman primates. Hum Gene Ther. 2005;16:1484–1503. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
SangoK, McDonaldMP, CrawleyJN, et al. Mice lacking both subunits of lysosomal beta-hexosaminidase display gangliosidosis and mucopolysaccharidosis. Nat Genet. 1996;14:348–352. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Dell'AngelicaEC, MullinsC, CaplanS, BonifacinoJS. Lysosome-related organelles. FASEB J. 2000;14:1265–1278. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
ChenMH, LiaoSL, ChangTC, ChuangLM. Role of macrophage infiltration in the orbital fat of patients with Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). .Published online February 3, 2008
Figure 1.
 
mRNA expression of lysosome-related genes. Relative expression of CLN2, CLN3, and HEXB in orbital adipose tissue samples from patients with TED (n = 15) and control subjects (n = 6). P = 0.044, 0.012, and 0.058, respectively, for TED compared with control groups.
Figure 1.
 
mRNA expression of lysosome-related genes. Relative expression of CLN2, CLN3, and HEXB in orbital adipose tissue samples from patients with TED (n = 15) and control subjects (n = 6). P = 0.044, 0.012, and 0.058, respectively, for TED compared with control groups.
Table 1.
 
Demographics and Clinical Characteristics of Patients with TED and Control Subjects
Table 1.
 
Demographics and Clinical Characteristics of Patients with TED and Control Subjects
Characteristics TED (n = 17) Control (n = 8)
Age (y) 31.3 ± 6.2 (22–45)* 30.6 ± 10.4 (22–53)*
Sex
 Female 15 (88.2%) 7 (87.5%)
 Male 2 (11.8%) 1 (12.5%)
BMI 22.0 ± 2.1 (18.6–26.4)* 22.0 ± 2.3 (19.5–24.5)*
 Proptosis (mm) 23.4 ± 1.5 (21–26)* NA
 Clinical activity score (CAS) 3.4 ± 1.1 (2–6)* NA
 TBII (%) 24.3 ± 6.0 (17.4–41.9)* NA
Duration of TED (mo) 58.9 ± 28.3 (30–20)* NA
Drug history
 ATD 17 (100%) NA
 Steroid 8 (47.0%) NA
 Thyroxine 7 (41.2%) NA
Radioactive iodine 3 (17.6%) NA
Thyroidectomy 1 (5.9%) NA
Smoking 0 NA
Table 2.
 
Primers for QPCR of Candidate Genes
Table 2.
 
Primers for QPCR of Candidate Genes
Genes Forward Primer Reverse Primer
CLN2 GACCTACGGAAACCCA AGTTGTATCGCTTACGGA
LAMP3 AGGTTCTAAACGGAAGC AGACGGTCAAATAGGC
HEXB TCTGCTCCTTGGTACT CTGTCATAGGCGTCATC
MCOLN1 TGCGACAAGTTTCGAG CGGACATACGCATACC
CLN3 CCACGACATCCTTAGC ATCCCACTGACGAGAA
β-Actin TTCTACAATGAGCTGCG AGGTAGTCAGTCAGGT
Table 3.
 
Summary Results of GSEA of the mRNA Expressions between Subjects with TED vs. Controls
Table 3.
 
Summary Results of GSEA of the mRNA Expressions between Subjects with TED vs. Controls
GOID No. of Gene P Name Term Type
323 143 <0.001 Lytic vacuole Component
5764 143 <0.001 Lysosome Component
5773 146 <0.001 Vacuole Component
8143 13 0.022 Poly(A) binding Function
375 137 0.039 RNA splicing, via transesterification reactions Process
377 137 0.039 RNA splicing, via transesterification reactions with bulged adenosine as nucleophile Process
398 137 0.039 Nuclear mRNA splicing, via spliceosome Process
Table 4.
 
Details of the Selected Individual Genes in GOID 323, 5764, 5773
Table 4.
 
Details of the Selected Individual Genes in GOID 323, 5764, 5773
Gene Name Gene Symbol Location t P
Ceroid-lipofuscinosis, neuronal 2, late infantile (Jansky-Bielschowsky disease) CLN2 11p15 −32.8707 0.000462
Lysosomal-associated membrane protein 3 LAMP3 3q26.3–q27 −31.734 0.000496
Mucolipin MCOLN1 19p13.3–p13.2 −23.9679 0.000868
Hexosaminidase, beta polypeptide HEXB 5q13 −15.9726 0.001948
Ceroid-lipofuscinosis, neuronal 3, juvenile (Batten, Spielmeyer-Vogt disease) CLN3 16p12.1 −2.93752 0.04949
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×