To investigate the validity of surface wave elastometry as a nondestructive technique for measuring scleral tissue stiffness, we performed surface wave elastometry and tensile mechanical testing of the same scleral strips in an additional set of experiments. Fresh porcine eye globes were acquired and stored at 4°C. Nine 4 × 9-mm scleral strips were excised from nine porcine globes posterior to the globe equator. Three strips served as the control group, three were cross-linked with riboflavin/UVA light, and the last three were cross-linked with GTA according to the methods described earlier. Five sonic wave velocity measurements were taken on excised strips and averaged. A total of three sets of such averaged measurements were recorded in all 3 groups. The specimens were kept moist with 15% dextran (MW = 500,000) solution in 0.9% saline.
The scleral strips were then mounted on the special clamps, one on each end of the strip, for mounting on a frame (model 5543; Instron, Norwood, MA, with MTS FlexTest SE controller; Eden Prairie, MN). Tensile testing was performed at control stress. To achieve the same reference state for each scleral specimen and reduce the effect of residual stresses, loading was performed until a tensile load of 1 g was recorded by the load sensors. A high-resolution digital photograph of the cross-section sample was taken at this point to measure the thickness of the specimen. The specimens were then preconditioned to a peak load of 250g over three cycles to obtain a recoverable reference state at the beginning of the actual tensile test. Each specimen was then stretched up to a maximum load of 250g over a time of 3 seconds. This measurement was taken three times and force/displacement data were recorded at a sampling rate of 40 Hz. The average of the three force/displacement curves was then used to obtain the engineering stress-versus-strain data for each specimen. The stress was calculated as the ratio of force and cross-sectional area at the start of the test (after 1 g tensile loading of the specimen). The strain was calculated as the ratio of instantaneous distance between the clamps and distance at the start of the test. The stress-versus-strain data were then curve-fitted to the equation: σ = A(e B ε − 1), where σ is the stress, ε is the strain, and A and B are the material constants. The constants A and B were determined by using a least-squares minimization routine (MatLab; The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA). The Young’s modulus at strain ε was calculated as E = dσ/dε = A × B × e B ε, where E, the modulus, is the slope of the stress-versus-strain curve.