A heterogeneous variety of inherited or acquired clotting abnormalities are related to unbalanced hemostasis.
29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 Once the thrombocoagulative process starts, whether physiologically or therapeutically triggered, both anticoagulative and fibrinolytic pathways are involved in modulating thrombosis in the ill-treated area. During PDT-V, the therapeutic photothrombosis is mainly due to a preferential photosensitizer binding to neovascular endothelium in comparison with that of normal macular vessels. The intravenously injected verteporfin couples with plasma low density lipoproteins (LDL) to form a complex, which is predominantly taken up into CNV endothelial cells via endocytosis, owing to an overexpression of LDL receptors in this neovascular lesion.
17 The photodynamic damage to the CNV endothelium is activated by the oxidative action of numerous reactive oxygen species (ROS), acting as triggering agents for the hemodynamic stasis within the target neovascularization. In fact, ROS-related exposure of the vascular basement membrane initiates adhesion, degranulation and aggregation of the platelets, with consequent release of vasoactive mediators (i.e., thromboxane A2, histamine, prostaglandins, and/or tumor necrosis factor-α). These molecules elicit amplification of platelet activation, thrombosis, vasoconstriction, and increased vascular permeability, which synergistically cause blood hypoperfusion, hypoxia, and shutdown of the neovascular complex.
17 This mechanism of action points out that three phases are reliably involved in determining the variable CNV responsiveness to standardized PDT-V: (1) the triggering of photochemical damage at the level of the neovascular endothelium; (2) the extent of photothrombotic occlusion within the neovascular complex; and (3) the persistence of CNV hemodynamic closure after verteporfin therapy.
17 19 21 These distinctive events are consistently modifiable by the different genetic thrombophilic or antithrombophilic backgrounds of each individual. Recently, in Caucasian patients with classic or predominantly classic CNV secondary to AMD, Parmeggiani et al.
39 documented the presence of significant predictive associations among diverse levels of PDT-V effectiveness and peculiar coagulation-balance SNPs: (1) the carriers of thrombophilic gene variants, directly predisposing to thrombosis through a higher thrombin generation (i.e., FVL-G1691A and FII-G20210A) or indirectly affecting thrombocoagulative functionality via hyperhomocysteinemic activation of endothelial cells and platelets (i.e., MTHFR-C677T), were characterized by a greater possibility of showing a benefit after PDT-V; (2) the PDT-V nonresponders were clearly overrepresented within the carriers of the FXIIIA 185 T-allele, which induces an antithrombophilic diathesis that reduces the fibrin-clot stability.
39 In the present study cluster, treated with PDT-V for occult CNV with no classic component, the same methodological approach was used to investigate these pharmacogenetic predictors, but the results just partially confirm those in the prior study. In fact, considering both classic and occult CNVs, FV-1691A+FII-20210A and, most of all, FXIIIA-185T covariates seem to be predictive of, respectively, clinical success or failure of PDT-V; whereas higher odds of photodynamic benefit is recordable in classic-CNV patients with MTHFR-C677T mutation, but not in occult-CNV patients with the same SNP.
39