July 2008
Volume 49, Issue 7
Free
Retina  |   July 2008
Coagulation Gene Predictors of Photodynamic Therapy for Occult Choroidal Neovascularization in Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Author Affiliations
  • Francesco Parmeggiani
    From the Department of Ophthalmology and the
  • Ciro Costagliola
    Department of Health Sciences, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy.
  • Donato Gemmati
    Department of Hematology, Study Center for Hemostasis and Thrombosis, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy; and the
  • Sergio D'Angelo
    From the Department of Ophthalmology and the
  • Paolo Perri
    From the Department of Ophthalmology and the
  • Claudio Campa
    From the Department of Ophthalmology and the
  • Linda Catozzi
    Department of Hematology, Study Center for Hemostasis and Thrombosis, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy; and the
  • Federica Federici
    Department of Hematology, Study Center for Hemostasis and Thrombosis, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy; and the
  • Adolfo Sebastiani
    From the Department of Ophthalmology and the
  • Carlo Incorvaia
    From the Department of Ophthalmology and the
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science July 2008, Vol.49, 3100-3106. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.07-1654
  • Views
  • PDF
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Francesco Parmeggiani, Ciro Costagliola, Donato Gemmati, Sergio D'Angelo, Paolo Perri, Claudio Campa, Linda Catozzi, Federica Federici, Adolfo Sebastiani, Carlo Incorvaia; Coagulation Gene Predictors of Photodynamic Therapy for Occult Choroidal Neovascularization in Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2008;49(7):3100-3106. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.07-1654.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

purpose. To determine whether different coagulation-balance genetic polymorphisms explain the variable clinical outcomes of photodynamic therapy with verteporfin (PDT-V) in Caucasian patients with occult subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) due to age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

methods. The clinical records of consecutive patients with AMD-related occult CNV, treated with PDT-V for evidence of disease progression, were retrospectively examined. Eighty-four eligible subjects were subdivided into responders and nonresponders based on CNV responsiveness to the first PDT-V over a 3-month period. Six gene polymorphisms (i.e., factor V G1691A, prothrombin G20210A, factor XIII-A G185T, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T, methionine synthase A2756G, and methionine synthase reductase A66G) were genotyped in each patient. Logistic regression analyses were performed to explore the predictive role of phenotypic and genotypic variables for PDT-V effectiveness.

results. Regression models documented that PDT-V nonresponders were more frequently patients with the hyperfibrinolytic G185T mutation of factor XIII-A (odds ratio [OR], 0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.11–0.73; P < 0.01). Univariate logistic regression was indicative of an overrepresentation of PDT-V responders among the combined carriers of thrombophilic factor V 1691A and prothrombin 20210A alleles (OR = 3.8; 95% CI: 0.94–15.6; P = 0.07). All the other predictors considered did not significantly influence the short-term CNV responsiveness to PDT-V.

conclusions. These data provide evidence of the presence of a pharmacogenetic relationship between peculiar coagulation-balance genetic backgrounds and different levels of PDT-V effectiveness in patients with AMD with occult CNV.

The occurrence of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) beneath the fovea is a common cause of central blindness or low vision in Caucasian individuals with age-related macular degeneration (AMD). 1 2 Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin (PDT-V) and drugs acting against vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) represent the most commonly used treatments for subfoveal AMD-related CNV. 3 4 5 6 7 8 The combined use of both these strategies is the most promising therapeutic approach toward this harmful disease. 9 10 11 12 13 14 In patients with AMD, the PDT-V benefit has been reported not only for predominantly classic CNVs, but also for selected cases of occult lesions without classic component. Particularly, PDT-V can be useful for the treatment of subfoveal occult CNV with evidence of recent progression and a lesion size ≤4 Macular Photocoagulation Study (MPS) disc areas (DAs). 3 7 15 16 The therapeutic effect of PDT-V is achieved by a laser-light–induced thrombosis of CNV that has been photosensitized by the administration of verteporfin. 17 18 19 20 21 The individually variable efficacy of standardized PDT-V is clearly noticeable reviewing the outcomes of Treatment of Age-Related Macular Degeneration with Photodynamic Therapy (TAP), Visudyne in Photodynamic Therapy (VIP), and Visudyne in Minimally Classic Choroidal Neovascularization studies. 15 22 23 In fact, the rather proportioned percentage of cases with or without severe visual loss after PDT-V is evident for all the AMD-related forms of CNV 7 and, especially, for occult neovascular lesions. 15 Moreover, differences in CNV responsiveness to standardized PDT-V between Asian and Caucasian patients have recently been pointed out. 24 25 Despite the evidence of individual and racial variabilities, the predictors of verteporfin therapy for occult CNV have been hitherto examined without considering the role of coagulation-balance genetic conditions in changing its effectiveness. 26 27 28 Several gene mutations can affect the balance between pro- and anticoagulant mechanisms, accounting for the occurrence of thrombophilic or hemorrhagic diatheses. 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 Although the well-known, therapeutic effect of PDT-V is based on a photochemical perturbation of the hemostasis and coagulation within the neovascular complex, only recently we have documented the presence of predictive correlations between peculiar coagulation-balance gene polymorphisms and different levels of PDT-V responsiveness in patients with AMD who have classic or predominantly classic CNV. 39  
The purpose of this study was to investigate the predictive role of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that encode enzymes involved in coagulation, fibrinolysis, and/or thrombosis in the extent of the benefit that will be realized by the application of standardized PDT-V in Caucasian patients with AMD, complicated by subfoveal occult CNV with no classic component. For this reason, we have examined the short-term variability of angiographic findings after the first PDT-V, considering its putative association with several common or uncommon gene variants, schematically shared in two typologies: (1) gain-of-function SNPs directly influencing the coagulation cascade: factor V Leiden (FVL-G1691A), prothrombin G20210A (FII-G20210A), and factor XIII-A G185T (FXIIIA-G185T) 30 31 32 33 34 35 ; and (2) the SNPs that modulate homocysteine (Hcy) metabolism, which indirectly affects thrombocoagulative functionality: methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T (MTHFR-C677T), methionine synthase A2756G (MS-A2756G), and methionine synthase reductase A66G (MTRR-A66G). 36 37 38  
Methods
We conducted a retrospective analysis of the clinical records of 84 Caucasian patients affected by newly diagnosed, subfoveal, AMD-related occult CNV, who had been exclusively treated with standardized PDT-V. Diagnosis of exudative AMD was based on the International ARM Epidemiologic Study Group criteria. 40 For the purposes of this study, patients with AMD were consecutively selected to achieve a consistent study population affected by occult CNV, evidencing recent disease progression and a lesion size ≤4 MPS-DA. The CNV classification was based on the definitions used for the TAP/VIP Study Groups. 15 22 Within 2 weeks from the onset of CNV-related visual symptoms, all patients underwent fluorescein angiography (FA) and indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) to detail the presence of AMD-related subfoveal CNV. All photodynamic treatments were performed, within 1 week after angiographic examinations, according to the TAP/VIP criteria. 3  
The differentiation between a PDT-V responder and a nonresponder was accomplished, for each patient, by examining the short-term clinical changes that occurred after the first photodynamic application. Pretreatment data (recorded seven or fewer days before PDT-V) and posttreatment data (recorded after 3 months ± 1 week from PDT-V) were re-evaluated by two retinal specialists separately (CI and FP). They distinguished responders and nonresponders basing on the modifications of FA/ICGA patterns, recording the differences in fluorescein CNV-leakage, greatest linear dimension (GLD) and area of the lesion. 3 During both pre- and post-PDT-V checks, all patients underwent medical and ophthalmic histories, autorefraction, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), slit lamp biomicroscopy of the anterior segment, applanation tonometry, 60-D lens ophthalmoscopy, FA, and ICGA. Snellen BCVA was measured with a standard logarithmic chart at a test distance of 3 m. FA and ICGA were performed with a digitizing system (IMAGEnet; Topcon Corp., Tokyo, Japan). The CNV sizes (GLD and area) were directly measured on angiograms by using the software. Soon after the pre-PDT-V angiographies, three blood samples were collected for SNPs genotyping. In the course of retrospective data examination, patients with equal or decreased post-PDT-V GLD and area of CNV and concomitant CNV leakage reduction were considered responders to PDT-V (Fig. 1) . When one or more of these signs of recovery were absent at the post-PDT-V examination, the patient was labeled as a nonresponder to PDT-V (Fig. 2) . Both responders and nonresponders underwent re-treatments when needed, in accordance with the international guidelines for PDT-V application (TAP/VIP protocol). 3  
Inclusion and exclusion criteria are listed in Table 1 . All patients gave written informed consent to participate to the study. The local ethics committee reviewed and approved the clinical trial. The study adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. After the typology of the investigated clinical parameters, the calculation for the size of the study sample (84 cases) provided a value constantly higher than 85%. This test was performed with commercial statistical analysis software (PASS 97; NCSS Inc., Kaysville, UT). 
Genomic DNA was isolated from the peripheral blood by standard proteinase K treatment, followed by phenol-chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation. Samples were polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-genotyped for FVL-G1691A, FII-G20210A, FXIIIA-G185T, MTRR-A66G, MS-A2756G, and MTHFR-C677T gene variants, according to our previous reports. 41 42 43 The expected allele frequencies in the whole group of investigated cases were checked by the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium test for those SNPs showing a rate <5% and compared with a cluster of normal subjects. The control subjects were matched for sex, age, and ethnicity with the case group. 
Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were used to estimate the probability of having a satisfactory or unsatisfactory response to PDT-V, respectively, in responder and nonresponder patients. Adjusted ORs for single or combined comparisons were calculated with logistic regression models, controlled for sex and age. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine which variables were predictive of PDT-V responder, using responder/nonresponder as the dependent binary variable. In these regression models, the putative predictors were included according to the clinical plausibility of their possible influence on the dependent variable. The following parameters were examined as PDT-V predictors: patient’s age, pre-PDT-V BCVA, pre-PDT-V CNV area, FVL-G1691A GA/AA, FII-G20210A GA/AA, FXIIIA-G185T GT/TT, MTRR-A66G AG/GG, MS-A2756G AG/GG, and MTHFR-C677T CT/TT. Those putative predictors that did not significantly contribute to the univariate logistic regression were ruled out from the final multivariate selected one (exclusion threshold, P > 0.10). All analyses were performed with commercial softwares (Systat ver. 5.0; Systat Inc., Evanston, IL, and SPSS Statistical Package; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). A probability of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. 
Results
Demographic and ophthalmic characteristics of the study population are summarized in Table 2 . A single photodynamic treatment was sufficient in 16 of the 38 responders. On the other hand, after 3 months from the first PDT-V, re-treatment was necessary in all the other 68 (80.9%) enrolled subjects, including nonresponders (46 cases) and responders with residual signs of CNV activity (22 cases). This rate of application of the second PDT-V resembles the datum already observed during the VIP study (78.7%), which, however, also included 52 patients with classic CNV. 15  
Genotype frequencies in the total study cluster, as well as in responders and nonresponders to PDT-V are reported in Table 3 . Both FVL-G1691A and FII-G20210A showed an allele frequency <5%. In the investigated case group, no significant deviations from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (all P ≥ 0.944) and from genotype distribution of a healthy control population were observed for these SNPs. In detail: (1) in the FVL-G1691A cases (n = 84) GG = 79, AG = 5, and AA = 0 versus the control group (n = 100), GG = 97, GA = 3, and AA = 0; (2) in the FII-G20210A cases (n = 84) GG = 78, AG = 6, and AA = 0 versus the control group (n = 100) GG = 98, GA = 2, and AA = 0. Genotype distributions of FVL-G1691A and FII-G20210A detected within our control cluster were in accordance with those previously reported in Caucasians. 29 30 41 Since both FVL 1691 GA/AA and FII 20210 GA/AA result in a well-known procoagulant predisposition in Caucasian subjects 32 33 34 and are not present as frequently as the other examined SNPs, these genetic variants were also collectively analyzed (FVL 1691 GA/AA+FII 20210 GA/AA) owing to the absence of concomitant-carrier cases. 
The ORs, adjusted by univariate logistic regression for the probability estimation of clinical efficacy (responders) or inefficacy (nonresponders) of PDT-V, are shown in Table 4 . When each phenotypic or genotypic factor was examined on a univariate basis as putative PDT-V predictor, FVL-G1691A+FII-G20210A A carriers were more frequent within the responders, whereas FXIIIA-G185T T carriers were more commonly represented within the nonresponder group. In particular, FVL-G1691A GA/AA+FII-G20210A GA/AA (OR = 3.8 [AA or GA versus GG], 95% CI: 0.94–15.6; P = 0.07) was tendentially overrepresented within the cases of CNV with satisfactory PDT-V response; conversely, FXIIIA-G185T GT/TT (OR = 0.28 [GT or TT versus GG], 95% CI: 0.11–0.73; P < 0.01) had a higher prevalence in the CNV cases without any evident PDT-V benefit. All the other predictive factors considered did not significantly modify the short-term CNV responsiveness to PDT-V application (Table 4) . On selected multivariate analysis, including predictors with a univariate P ≤ 0.10, only the FXIIIA-G185T GT/TT covariate still displayed influence on the PDT-V clinical outcome (OR = 0.29 [GT or TT versus GG], 95% CI: 0.11–0.77; P < 0.05; Table 5 ). 
Discussion
A heterogeneous variety of inherited or acquired clotting abnormalities are related to unbalanced hemostasis. 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 Once the thrombocoagulative process starts, whether physiologically or therapeutically triggered, both anticoagulative and fibrinolytic pathways are involved in modulating thrombosis in the ill-treated area. During PDT-V, the therapeutic photothrombosis is mainly due to a preferential photosensitizer binding to neovascular endothelium in comparison with that of normal macular vessels. The intravenously injected verteporfin couples with plasma low density lipoproteins (LDL) to form a complex, which is predominantly taken up into CNV endothelial cells via endocytosis, owing to an overexpression of LDL receptors in this neovascular lesion. 17 The photodynamic damage to the CNV endothelium is activated by the oxidative action of numerous reactive oxygen species (ROS), acting as triggering agents for the hemodynamic stasis within the target neovascularization. In fact, ROS-related exposure of the vascular basement membrane initiates adhesion, degranulation and aggregation of the platelets, with consequent release of vasoactive mediators (i.e., thromboxane A2, histamine, prostaglandins, and/or tumor necrosis factor-α). These molecules elicit amplification of platelet activation, thrombosis, vasoconstriction, and increased vascular permeability, which synergistically cause blood hypoperfusion, hypoxia, and shutdown of the neovascular complex. 17 This mechanism of action points out that three phases are reliably involved in determining the variable CNV responsiveness to standardized PDT-V: (1) the triggering of photochemical damage at the level of the neovascular endothelium; (2) the extent of photothrombotic occlusion within the neovascular complex; and (3) the persistence of CNV hemodynamic closure after verteporfin therapy. 17 19 21 These distinctive events are consistently modifiable by the different genetic thrombophilic or antithrombophilic backgrounds of each individual. Recently, in Caucasian patients with classic or predominantly classic CNV secondary to AMD, Parmeggiani et al. 39 documented the presence of significant predictive associations among diverse levels of PDT-V effectiveness and peculiar coagulation-balance SNPs: (1) the carriers of thrombophilic gene variants, directly predisposing to thrombosis through a higher thrombin generation (i.e., FVL-G1691A and FII-G20210A) or indirectly affecting thrombocoagulative functionality via hyperhomocysteinemic activation of endothelial cells and platelets (i.e., MTHFR-C677T), were characterized by a greater possibility of showing a benefit after PDT-V; (2) the PDT-V nonresponders were clearly overrepresented within the carriers of the FXIIIA 185 T-allele, which induces an antithrombophilic diathesis that reduces the fibrin-clot stability. 39 In the present study cluster, treated with PDT-V for occult CNV with no classic component, the same methodological approach was used to investigate these pharmacogenetic predictors, but the results just partially confirm those in the prior study. In fact, considering both classic and occult CNVs, FV-1691A+FII-20210A and, most of all, FXIIIA-185T covariates seem to be predictive of, respectively, clinical success or failure of PDT-V; whereas higher odds of photodynamic benefit is recordable in classic-CNV patients with MTHFR-C677T mutation, but not in occult-CNV patients with the same SNP. 39  
Thrombophilic SNPs and Post-PDT-V Magnitude of Thrombosis in Occult CNV
In patients with neovascular AMD, the sequence of early vascular events after PDT-V has been investigated using the scanning laser system to achieve confocal FA and ICGA images for the evaluation of CNV size and leakage. These examinations show that the photothrombotic occlusion of the entire CNV does not immediately take place, but it happens over a prolonged period of approximately 24 hours. 19 During this time course, procoagulant, anticoagulant, and fibrinolytic factors may influence the extent of thrombocoagulative process inside CNV. Thus, thrombophilic gain-of-function SNPs can modify this photodynamic phase of CNV thrombosis. Both the uncommon SNPs G1691A of the FV gene and G20210A of the FII gene induce thrombophilia, increasing the level of thrombin bioavailability in plasma. 32 33 34 35 FV is a cofactor enzyme with pivotal roles in hemostatic equilibrium, especially stimulating the inactivation of factor VIIIa by activated protein C. In FV-1691A carriers, this anticoagulant function is altered with a consequent increased thrombin generation causing a prothrombotic state. 30 33 Prothrombin is the central component of the coagulation cascade that, in its active form thrombin, regulates both pro- and anticoagulant processes. In FII-20210A carriers the elevation of prothrombin expression is due to functional abnormalities in its mRNA metabolism, which predisposes to thrombosis by affecting a tightly balanced architecture of noncanonical 3′ end formation signals. 30 34 Consistently, as a consequence of their individual thrombophilic predisposition, our heterozygous A-allele carriers of FV 1691 or FII 20210 gene appeared to be characterized by an higher possibility of receiving a clinical benefit from PDT-V, owing to a greater magnitude of CNV photothrombosis. This remarkable statistical trend supports the pharmacogenetic suitability of the study postulations, even if, in selected multivariate analysis, the FVL-G1691A GA/AA+FII-G20210A GA/AA covariate did not reach a significant rank, probably because of its minor frequencies with respect to the other included SNPs. 
Hyperfibrinolytic SNPs and Post-PDT-V Hemodynamic Recanalization in Occult CNV
The three-dimensional analyses of FA/ICGA angiograms after PDT-V disclose several aspects about the “dark spot,” a typical retinochoroidal circular hypofluorescence corresponding to the laser-light–exposed area. During the first hours after PDT-V, this angiographic pattern is just partially due to the photothromboses of CNV and collateral choroid, which are also associated with a massive fluid extravasation. One week later, the slow regression of exudation displays the whole extent of the post-PDT-V occlusive effects. 21 However, this phase of blood nonperfusion is individually variable and, at 7-day check after PDT-V, the angiographic findings show that the CNV vascular net is still apparent in approximately half of the treated patients. 20 The changeability in the post-PDT-V retinochoroidal appearance may be associated with differences in fibrin structure, which influences the individual fibrinolytic rate. 31 35 FXIII is the precursor of a transglutaminase that cross-links fibrin and, altering its network and properties, regulates fibrinolysis. The FXIII activation is modulated by FXIIIA-G185T polymorphism, 35 a common genetic variation in Caucasians. 31 Both the GT and TT genotypes cause modification in FXIII transglutaminase activity, which appears to be highly increased in homozygotes and exhibits an intermediate function in heterozygous carriers. 31 In our study cluster, a reduced fibrin clot stability and persistence, followed by the early CNV recanalization, could explain the correlation between PDT-V’s inefficacy and the hyperfibrinolytic polymorphism of FXIII. Otherwise, the neoangiogenic properties ascribed to FXIII may in part account for this result. In fact, a more active FXIII molecule at the site of injury (i.e., in the FXIII T-carriers) could downgrade the benefit of PDT-V by contrasting the laser-induced ischemia. Our speculation is supported by the evidence of neovascularization development after FXIIIA injection in an experimental cornea model. 44  
Hyperhomocysteinemic SNPs and Post-PDT-V Endothelial Response in Occult CNV
The modalities by which PDT-V’s damage of the neovascular endothelium triggers the therapeutic CNV thrombosis 17 45 resemble those occurring in the course of hyperhomocysteinemia due to folate-related gene variants. 36 38 These SNPs cause enzymatic defects at different levels of the methionine-homocysteine pathway, inducing thrombophilic diathesis via hyperactivation of endothelial cells and platelets. 36 38 46 Hyperhomocysteinemic conditions lead to vascular changes as result of a ROS-related triggering, 47 48 49 which initiates lipid peroxidation in endothelial cell membranes and in circulating LDL, 37 causes overexpression of lectin-like oxidized LDL receptor-1, 50 51 and enhances platelet activation. 52 All these prothrombotic intersections among hyperhomocysteinemic and photodynamic oxidant effects, as well as our previous findings observed in AMD patients treated with PDT-V for classic CNV, strongly support the existence of a potential gene–environment interaction between PDT-V efficacy and thrombophilic SNPs affecting the homocysteine metabolism. 17 36 37 38 39 45 However, in the present AMD cluster with occult CNV, no influence on PDT-V outcome is recordable considering as predictors those hyperhomocysteinemic SNPs that convert vascular endothelium and natural anticoagulant pathway to a more prothrombotic phenotype. This discrepancy could provide the rationale for a pharmacogenetic interpretation of the clinical limits and unpredictability of standardized PDT-V application, especially considering the occult neovascular complex. 3 7 15 In fact, the absence of any endothelium-related PDT-V predictors in occult CNV indirectly indicates that the vascular parietal pattern does not represent an ideal receptor target for the circulating verteporfin–LDL complex. Speculatively, the responsiveness to PDT-V of a large part of occult lesions seems to be scarcely determined by the photo-oxidative, LDL-mediated, endothelial triggering, probably because their endothelial cells do not possess those peculiar receptor properties characterizing the real aberrant neovascular ones. On the other hand, the higher odds of PDT-V benefit recorded in AMD patients with classic CNV and MTHFR-C677T polymorphism is attributable to an effectual photochemical activation during the first phases of CNV photothrombosis, 39 consistently related to a more homogeneous overexpression of LDL receptors in the endothelium of classic CNVs. 
In Caucasian patients with AMD with occult CNV, the present findings document the presence of gene–environment interactions between responsiveness to PDT-V and SNPs encoding enzymes relevant to the coagulation–fibrinolysis balance. Particularly, the post-PDT-V extent of CNV occlusion appears to be directly dependent on rare thrombophilic SNPs (i.e., FV-1691A+FII-20210A), whereas the post-PDT-V persistence of CNV shutdown appears to be inversely dependent on common hyperfibrinolytic genotypes (i.e., FXIIIA-185 GT or TT). Moreover, the retrospective assessment of hyperhomocysteinemic PDT-V predictors, carried out by comparing the results obtained in AMD study populations with classic 39 or occult CNV, provides a possible intriguing explanation for the minor clinical responsiveness to PDT-V of the occult subfoveal lesions. In fact, the review of TAP/VIP data shows a remarkable difference in post-PDT-V severe vision loss between classic and occult CNVs, respectively: 33% versus 51% at 1 year, and 41% versus 55% at 2 years. 7 15 53 The comprehensive appraisal of these controlled clinical findings and our predictive pharmacogenetic outcomes rationally support the hypothesis that standardized PDT-V is more effective in affecting the uncoagulable endothelial properties of classic CNV with respect to that occurring in occult CNV. 7 15 39 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55  
The clinical applicability of the present results mainly concerns the possibility of upgrading the PDT-V eligibility criteria in patients with AMD-related occult CNV, currently centered just on the monitoring of visual acuity and of changes in morphologic CNV composition. 3 7 16 26 A preoperative genetic assessment of the individual thrombophilic background should provide support for a more rational selection of candidates for PDT-V. 7 16 56 In particular, standardized PDT-V, in combination with anti-VEGF compounds, seems to be elective just for thrombophilic patients with FVL-G1691A and/or FII-G20210A mutations, whereas no indication for PDT-V have been obtained in our carriers of hyperhomocysteinemic SNPs. Finally, among patients with hyperfibrinolytic FXIIIA-G185T polymorphism, anti-VEGF treatments alone are strongly suggested, both considering our post-PDT-V results, indicative of an early CNV recanalization related to insufficient fibrin clot persistence, 31 35 39 and for the recently recognized outstanding proangiogenic properties of FXIII. 57 58 This new exploratory attitude could address the question of proper dosimetry for an individually targeted PDT-V application in patients with AMD-related CNV, prospectively indicating a rationale to re-evaluate the suitability of previous notions regarding the optimized laser-light parameters. 3 59 60 61 Further pharmacogenetic investigations with large controlled trials are warranted to outline the appropriate paradigm for improving the international guidelines of PDT-V. 
 
Figure 1.
 
Fluorescein angiography before and 3 months after PDT-V in a responder. The comparison between (A) pre- and (B) post-PDT-V late-phase angiograms shows the stabilization of CNV dimensions and the concomitant reduction of CNV-leakage.
Figure 1.
 
Fluorescein angiography before and 3 months after PDT-V in a responder. The comparison between (A) pre- and (B) post-PDT-V late-phase angiograms shows the stabilization of CNV dimensions and the concomitant reduction of CNV-leakage.
Figure 2.
 
Fluorescein angiography before and 3 months after PDT-V in a nonresponder. The comparison between (A) pre- and (B) post-PDT-V late-phase angiograms shows the slight dimensional increase of CNV and the concomitant intensification of CNV-leakage.
Figure 2.
 
Fluorescein angiography before and 3 months after PDT-V in a nonresponder. The comparison between (A) pre- and (B) post-PDT-V late-phase angiograms shows the slight dimensional increase of CNV and the concomitant intensification of CNV-leakage.
Table 1.
 
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
Table 1.
 
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
Inclusion criteria
 Patient’s age > 65 years
 Diagnosis of AMD
 Best-correct visual acuity better than 20/200 (Snellen equivalent)
 FA/ICGA diagnosis of occult with no classic CNV secondary to AMD
 CNV under the geometric center of the foveal avascular zone (subfoveal)
 Evidence of recent CNV progression
 Greatest dimension of entire CNV ≤ 4 MPS-DAs (equivalent to 10.16 mm2 on the retina)
Exclusion criteria
 History of any other CNV treatment before PDT
 Presence of any other possible cause of CNV, such as degenerative myopia, angioid streaks, chorioretinal inflammatory diseases, hereditary retinal disorders, presumed ocular histoplasmosis syndrome, and/or severe ocular trauma
 Intraocular surgery and any ocular laser-treatment during the 6 months before or the 3 months after PDT-V
 Presence of any significant side effect, condition and/or event influencing PDT-V outcome
 Active or chronic systemic diseases (such as porphyria, diabetes mellitus, hepatopathies, metabolic, cardiovascular, and hematological disorders), as well as assumption of any medication, known to affect the hemostatic balance
 Protein intake, during breakfast or lunch, occurred 12 hours before PDT-V
 Lack of consensus about the definition of responder and non-responder to PDT-V
Table 2.
 
Demographic and Ophthalmic Characteristics of the Study Population
Table 2.
 
Demographic and Ophthalmic Characteristics of the Study Population
Patients (n) 84
Sex (males/females, n) 39/45
Age (mean± SD; range, y) 75.84 ± 5.31 (66–85)
Pre-PDT-V BCVA (mean± SD; range, Snellen equivalent) 0.33 ± 0.16 (0.1–0.8)
Pre-PDT-V CNV area (mean± SD; range, μm2) 5641.9 ± 3268.9 (638–10120)
PDT-V responder/nonresponder 38/46
Table 3.
 
Genotype Frequencies in Total Study Population, PDT-V Responder and PDT-V Non-Responder Groups
Table 3.
 
Genotype Frequencies in Total Study Population, PDT-V Responder and PDT-V Non-Responder Groups
Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (Genotype) Genotype Frequency
Total Study Population (n = 84) PDT-V Responder Group (n = 38) PDT-V Non-Responder Group (n = 46)
FVL-G1691A (GG/GA/AA) (%) 79 (94.1)/5 (5.9)/0 (0.0) 34 (89.5)/4 (10.5)/0 (0.0) 45 (97.8)/1 (2.2)/0 (0.0)
FII-G20210A (GG/GA/AA) (%) 78 (92.9)/6 (7.1)/0 (0.0) 34 (89.5)/4 (10.5)/0 (0.0) 44 (95.6)/2 (4.4)/0 (0.0)
FVL-G1691A+FII-G20210A (GG/GA/AA) (%) 73 (86.9)/11 (13.1)/0 (0.0) 30 (78.9)/8 (21.1)/0 (0.0) 43 (93.5)/3 (6.5)/0 (0.0)
FXIIIA-G185T (GG/GT/TT) (%) 51 (60.7)/28 (33.4)/5 (5.9) 29 (76.3)/9 (23.7)/0 (0.0) 22 (47.9)/19 (41.3)/5 (10.8)
MTHFR-C677T (CC/CT/TT) (%) 38 (45.2)/34 (40.5)/12 (14.3) 19 (50.0)/15 (39.5)/4 (10.5) 19 (41.3)/19 (41.3)/8 (17.4)
MS-A2756G (AA/AG/GG) (%) 60 (71.4)/20 (23.8)/4 (4.8) 25 (65.8)/12 (31.6)/1 (2.6) 35 (76.1)/8 (17.4)/3 (6.5)
MTRR-A66G (AA/AG/GG) (%) 32 (38.1)/34 (40.5)/18 (21.4) 17 (44.8)/20 (52.6)/1 (2.6) 15 (32.6)/14 (30.4)/17 (37.0)
Table 4.
 
Summary of the Univariate Logistic Regression Analyses
Table 4.
 
Summary of the Univariate Logistic Regression Analyses
Variable P OR (95% CI)
Age NS NR
Pre-PDT-V BCVA NS NR
Pre-PDT-V CNV area NS NR
FVL-G1691A (GA or AA) NS NR
FII-G20210A (GA or AA) NS NR
FVL-G1691A+FII-G20210A (GA or AA) 0.07 (NS) 3.8 (0.94–15.6)
FXIIIA-G185T (GT or TT) <0.01 0.28 (0.11–0.73)
MTHFR-C677T (CT or TT) NS NR
MS-A2756G (AG or GG) NS NR
MTRR-A66G (AG or GG) NS NR
Table 5.
 
Summary of the Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis, Including the Variables with a Univariate P ≤ 0.10
Table 5.
 
Summary of the Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis, Including the Variables with a Univariate P ≤ 0.10
Variable P OR (95% CI)
FVL-G1691A+FII-G20210A (GA or AA) NS NR
FXIIIA-G185T (GT or TT) <0.05 0.29 (0.11–0.77)
The authors thank Giuseppe Gilli (Department of Health Physics and Transfusion Center, Santa Anna Hospital, Ferrara, Italy) for assistance in the statistical analyses, and Graziella Ferraresi for logistic support. 
FerrisFL, 3rd, FineSL, HymanL. Age-related macular degeneration and blindness due to neovascular maculopathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1984;102:1640–1642. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
KleinR, KleinBE, KnudtsonMD, et al. Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in 4 racial/ethnic groups in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:373–380. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Verteporfin Roundtable Participants. Guidelines for using verteporfin (Visudyne) in photodynamic therapy for choroidal neovascularization due to age-related macular degeneration and other causes: update. Retina. 2005;25:119–134. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
WickensJ, BlinderKJ. A preliminary benefit-risk assessment of verteporfin in age-related macular degeneration. Drug Saf. 2006;29:189–199. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
GragoudasES, AdamisAP, CunninghamET, Jr, et al. VEGF inhibition study in Ocular Neovascularization Clinical Trial Group: pegaptanib for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2805–2816. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
RosenfeldPJ, BrownDM, HeierJS, MARINA Study Groupet al. Ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1419–1431. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
ChakravarthyU, SoubraneG, BandelloF, et al. Evolving European guidance on the medical management of neovascular age related macular degeneration. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:1188–1196. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
KaiserPK. Antivascular endothelial growth factor agents and their development: therapeutic implications in ocular diseases. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;142:660–668. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
HeierJS, BoyerDS, CiullaTA, FOCUS Study Groupet al. Ranibizumab combined with verteporfin photodynamic therapy in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: year 1 results of the FOCUS Study. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006;124:1532–1542. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
LazicR, GabricN. Verteporfin therapy and intravitreal bevacizumab combined and alone in choroidal neovascularization due to age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:1179–1185. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
SpaideRF. Rationale for combination therapies for choroidal neovascularization. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141:149–156. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
ZuluagaMF, MailhosC, RobinsonG, et al. Synergies of VEGF inhibition and photodynamic therapy in the treatment of age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:1767–1772. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
BradleyJ, JuM, RobinsonGS. Combination therapy for the treatment of ocular neovascularization. Angiogenesis. 2007;10:141–148. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Schmidt-ErfurthUM, PruenteC. Management of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2007;26:437–451. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Verteporfin in Photodynamic Therapy (VIP) Study Group. Verteporfin therapy of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization in age related macular degeneration: 2 year results of a randomized clinical trial including lesions with occult with no classic choroidal neovascularization. VIP Report No. 2. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001;131:541–560. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
PieramiciDJ, BresslerSB, KoesterJM, BresslerNM. Occult with no classic subfoveal choroidal neovascular lesions in age-related macular degeneration: clinically relevant natural history information in larger lesions with good vision from the Verteporfin in Photodynamic Therapy (VIP) Trial. VIP Report No. 4. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006;124:660–664. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Schmidt-ErfurthU, HasanT. Mechanisms of action of photodynamic therapy with verteporfin for the treatment of age-related macular degeneration. Surv Ophthalmol. 2000;45:195–214. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Schlotzer-SchrehardtU, ViestenzA, NaumannGO, et al. Dose-related structural effects of photodynamic therapy on choroidal and retinal structures of human eyes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2002;240:748–757. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Schmidt-ErfurthU, MichelsS, BarbazettoI, LaquaH. Photodynamic effects on choroidal neovascularization and physiological choroid. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:830–841. [PubMed]
MichelsS, Schmidt-ErfurthU. Sequence of early vascular events after photodynamic therapy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:2147–2154. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Schmidt-ErfurthU, NiemeyerM, GeitzenauerW, MichelsS. Time course and morphology of vascular effects associated with photodynamic therapy. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:2061–2069. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Treatment of Age-Related Macular Degeneration with Photodynamic Therapy (TAP) study group. Photodynamic therapy of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration with verteporfin: one-year results of 2 randomized clinical trials. TAP Report No. 1. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:1329–1345. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
AzabM, BoyerDS, BresslerNM, et al. Visudyne in Minimally Classic Choroidal Neovascularization Study Group: verteporfin therapy of subfoveal minimally classic choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration—2-year results of a randomized clinical trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:448–457. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
ChanWM, LaiTY, TanoY, et al. Photodynamic therapy in macular diseases of Asian populations: when East meets West. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2006;50:161–169. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
YangN, FanCM, HoCK. Review of first year result of photodynamic therapy on age-related macular degeneration in Chinese population. Eye. 2006;20:523–526. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
BlinderKJ, BradleyS, BresslerNM, TAP study groupVIP study groupet al. Effect of lesion size, visual acuity, and lesion composition on visual acuity change with and without verteporfin therapy for choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration: TAP and VIP report 1. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;136:407–418. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
SivaprasadS, SalehGM, JacksonH. Does lesion size determine the success rate of photodynamic therapy for age-related macular degeneration?. Eye. 2006;20:43–45. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
MankuKK, RotchfordA, WhitakerJ, AmoakuWM. Factors influencing poor visual outcome in patients treated with photodynamic therapy for choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007;35:330–334. [CrossRef]
BernardiF, MarchettiG. Modulation of thrombophilia genes by environmental factors. Pathophysiol Haemost Thromb. 2002;32:335–337. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
LaneDA, GrantPJ. Role of hemostatic gene polymorphisms in venous and arterial thrombotic disease. Blood. 2000;95:1517–1530. [PubMed]
AriensRA, LaiTS, WeiselJW, GreenbergCS, GrantPJ. Role of factor XIII in fibrin clot formation and effects of genetic polymorphisms. Blood. 2002;100:743–754. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
YeZ, LiuEH, HigginsJP, KeavneyBD, et al. Seven haemostatic gene polymorphisms in coronary disease: meta-analysis of 66,155 cases and 91,307 controls. Lancet. 2006;367:651–658. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
CastoldiE, RosingJ. Factor V Leiden: a disorder of factor V anticoagulant function. Curr Opin Hematol. 2004;11:176–181. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
DanckwardtS, HartmannK, GehringNH, et al. 3′ end processing of the prothrombin mRNA in thrombophilia. Acta Haematol. 2006;115:192–197. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
ShemiraniAH, HaramuraG, BagolyZ, MuszbekL. The combined effect of fibrin formation and factor XIII A subunit Val34Leu polymorphism on the activation of factor XIII in whole plasma. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006;1764:1420–1423. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
SchwahnB, RozenR. Polymorphisms in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene: clinical consequences. Am J Pharmacogenomics. 2001;1:189–201. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
CoppolaA, DaviG, De StefanoV, et al. Homocysteine, coagulation, platelet function, and thrombosis. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2000;26:243–254. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
CastroR, RiveraI, BlomHJ, et al. Homocysteine metabolism, hyperhomocysteinaemia and vascular disease: an overview. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2006;29:3–20. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
ParmeggianiF, CostagliolaC, GemmatiD, et al. Predictive role of coagulation-balance gene polymorphisms in the efficacy of photodynamic therapy with verteporfin for classic choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration. Pharmacogenet Genom. 2007;17:1039–1046. [CrossRef]
BirdAC, BresslerNM, BresslerSB, et al. An international classification and grading system for age-related maculopathy and age-related macular degeneration. The International ARM Epidemiological Study Group. Surv Ophthalmol. 1995;39:367–374. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
GemmatiD, SerinoML, MoratelliS, et al. Coexistence of factor V G1691A and factor II G20210A gene mutations in a thrombotic family is associated with recurrence and early onset of venous thrombosis. Haemostasis. 2001;31:99–105. [PubMed]
GemmatiD, SerinoML, OngaroA, et al. A common mutation in the gene for coagulation factor XIII-A (VAL34Leu): a risk factor for primary intracerebral hemorrhage is protective against atherothrombotic diseases. Am J Hematol. 2001;67:183–188. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
GemmatiD, OngaroA, ScapoliGL, et al. Common gene polymorphisms in the metabolic folate and methylation pathway and the risk of acute lymphoblastic leukemia and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in adults. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004;13:787–794. [PubMed]
DardikR, SolomonA, LoscalzoJ, et al. Novel proangiogenic effect of factor XIII associated with suppression of thrombospondin 1 expression. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003;23:1472–1477. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
ParmeggianiF, CostagliolaC, IncorvaiaC, et al. Vision loss after PDT. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:157.
RongiolettiM, BaldassiniM, PapaF, et al. Homocysteinemia is inversely correlated with platelet count and directly correlated with sE- and sP-selectin levels in females homozygous for C677T methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase. Platelets. 2005;16:185–190. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
AustinRC, LentzSR, WerstuckGH. Role of hyperhomocysteinemia in endothelial dysfunction and atherothrombotic disease. Cell Death Differ. 2004;11(Suppl 1)S56–S64. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
WeissN. Mechanisms of increased vascular oxidant stress in hyperhomocysteinemia and its impact on endothelial function. Curr Drug Metab. 2005;6:27–36. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
KananiPM, SinkeyCA, BrowningRL, et al. Role of oxidant stress in endothelial dysfunction produced by experimental hyperhomocyst(e)inemia in humans. Circulation. 1999;100:1161–1168. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
HolvenKB, ScholzH, HalvorsenB, et al. Hyperhomocysteinemic subjects have enhanced expression of lectin-like oxidized LDL receptor-1 in mononuclear cells. J Nutr. 2003;133:3588–3591. [PubMed]
SakuraiK, SawamuraT. Stress and vascular responses: endothelial dysfunction via lectin-like oxidized low-density lipoprotein receptor-1: close relationships with oxidative stress. J Pharmacol Sci. 2003;91:182–186. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
HolvenKB, AukrustP, PedersenTM, et al. Enhanced platelet activation in hyperhomocysteinemic individuals. J Thromb Haemost. 2007;5:193–195. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
BresslerNM, Treatment of Age-Related Macular Degeneration with Photodynamic Therapy (TAP) Study Group. Photodynamic therapy of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration with verteporfin: two-year results of 2 randomized clinical trials. TAP report 2. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:198–207. [PubMed]
VolantiC, MatrouleJY, PietteJ. Involvement of oxidative stress in NF-kappaB activation in endothelial cells treated by photodynamic therapy. Photochem Photobiol. 2002;75:36–45. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
PosteaO, KrotzF, HengerA, et al. Stereospecific and redox-sensitive increase in monocyte adhesion to endothelial cells by homocysteine. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006;26:508–513. [PubMed]
WormaldR, EvansJ, SmeethL, HenshawK. Photodynamic therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;18:CD002030.
InbalA, DardikR. Role of coagulation factor XIII (FXIII) in angiogenesis and tissue repair. Pathophysiol Haemost Thromb. 2006;35:162–165. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
DardikR, LoscalzoJ, InbalA. Factor XIII (FXIII) and angiogenesis. J Thromb Haemost. 2006;4:19–25. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Schmidt-ErfurthU, MillerJ, SickenbergM, et al. Photodynamic therapy of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization: clinical and angiographic examples. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1998;236:365–374. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
MillerJW, Schmidt-ErfurthU, SickenbergM, et al. Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin for choroidal neovascularization caused by age-related macular degeneration: results of a single treatment in a phase 1 and 2 study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:1161–1173. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Schmidt-ErfurthU, MillerJW, SickenbergM, et al. Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin for choroidal neovascularization caused by age-related macular degeneration: results of retreatments in a phase 1 and 2 study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:1177–1187. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1.
 
Fluorescein angiography before and 3 months after PDT-V in a responder. The comparison between (A) pre- and (B) post-PDT-V late-phase angiograms shows the stabilization of CNV dimensions and the concomitant reduction of CNV-leakage.
Figure 1.
 
Fluorescein angiography before and 3 months after PDT-V in a responder. The comparison between (A) pre- and (B) post-PDT-V late-phase angiograms shows the stabilization of CNV dimensions and the concomitant reduction of CNV-leakage.
Figure 2.
 
Fluorescein angiography before and 3 months after PDT-V in a nonresponder. The comparison between (A) pre- and (B) post-PDT-V late-phase angiograms shows the slight dimensional increase of CNV and the concomitant intensification of CNV-leakage.
Figure 2.
 
Fluorescein angiography before and 3 months after PDT-V in a nonresponder. The comparison between (A) pre- and (B) post-PDT-V late-phase angiograms shows the slight dimensional increase of CNV and the concomitant intensification of CNV-leakage.
Table 1.
 
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
Table 1.
 
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
Inclusion criteria
 Patient’s age > 65 years
 Diagnosis of AMD
 Best-correct visual acuity better than 20/200 (Snellen equivalent)
 FA/ICGA diagnosis of occult with no classic CNV secondary to AMD
 CNV under the geometric center of the foveal avascular zone (subfoveal)
 Evidence of recent CNV progression
 Greatest dimension of entire CNV ≤ 4 MPS-DAs (equivalent to 10.16 mm2 on the retina)
Exclusion criteria
 History of any other CNV treatment before PDT
 Presence of any other possible cause of CNV, such as degenerative myopia, angioid streaks, chorioretinal inflammatory diseases, hereditary retinal disorders, presumed ocular histoplasmosis syndrome, and/or severe ocular trauma
 Intraocular surgery and any ocular laser-treatment during the 6 months before or the 3 months after PDT-V
 Presence of any significant side effect, condition and/or event influencing PDT-V outcome
 Active or chronic systemic diseases (such as porphyria, diabetes mellitus, hepatopathies, metabolic, cardiovascular, and hematological disorders), as well as assumption of any medication, known to affect the hemostatic balance
 Protein intake, during breakfast or lunch, occurred 12 hours before PDT-V
 Lack of consensus about the definition of responder and non-responder to PDT-V
Table 2.
 
Demographic and Ophthalmic Characteristics of the Study Population
Table 2.
 
Demographic and Ophthalmic Characteristics of the Study Population
Patients (n) 84
Sex (males/females, n) 39/45
Age (mean± SD; range, y) 75.84 ± 5.31 (66–85)
Pre-PDT-V BCVA (mean± SD; range, Snellen equivalent) 0.33 ± 0.16 (0.1–0.8)
Pre-PDT-V CNV area (mean± SD; range, μm2) 5641.9 ± 3268.9 (638–10120)
PDT-V responder/nonresponder 38/46
Table 3.
 
Genotype Frequencies in Total Study Population, PDT-V Responder and PDT-V Non-Responder Groups
Table 3.
 
Genotype Frequencies in Total Study Population, PDT-V Responder and PDT-V Non-Responder Groups
Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (Genotype) Genotype Frequency
Total Study Population (n = 84) PDT-V Responder Group (n = 38) PDT-V Non-Responder Group (n = 46)
FVL-G1691A (GG/GA/AA) (%) 79 (94.1)/5 (5.9)/0 (0.0) 34 (89.5)/4 (10.5)/0 (0.0) 45 (97.8)/1 (2.2)/0 (0.0)
FII-G20210A (GG/GA/AA) (%) 78 (92.9)/6 (7.1)/0 (0.0) 34 (89.5)/4 (10.5)/0 (0.0) 44 (95.6)/2 (4.4)/0 (0.0)
FVL-G1691A+FII-G20210A (GG/GA/AA) (%) 73 (86.9)/11 (13.1)/0 (0.0) 30 (78.9)/8 (21.1)/0 (0.0) 43 (93.5)/3 (6.5)/0 (0.0)
FXIIIA-G185T (GG/GT/TT) (%) 51 (60.7)/28 (33.4)/5 (5.9) 29 (76.3)/9 (23.7)/0 (0.0) 22 (47.9)/19 (41.3)/5 (10.8)
MTHFR-C677T (CC/CT/TT) (%) 38 (45.2)/34 (40.5)/12 (14.3) 19 (50.0)/15 (39.5)/4 (10.5) 19 (41.3)/19 (41.3)/8 (17.4)
MS-A2756G (AA/AG/GG) (%) 60 (71.4)/20 (23.8)/4 (4.8) 25 (65.8)/12 (31.6)/1 (2.6) 35 (76.1)/8 (17.4)/3 (6.5)
MTRR-A66G (AA/AG/GG) (%) 32 (38.1)/34 (40.5)/18 (21.4) 17 (44.8)/20 (52.6)/1 (2.6) 15 (32.6)/14 (30.4)/17 (37.0)
Table 4.
 
Summary of the Univariate Logistic Regression Analyses
Table 4.
 
Summary of the Univariate Logistic Regression Analyses
Variable P OR (95% CI)
Age NS NR
Pre-PDT-V BCVA NS NR
Pre-PDT-V CNV area NS NR
FVL-G1691A (GA or AA) NS NR
FII-G20210A (GA or AA) NS NR
FVL-G1691A+FII-G20210A (GA or AA) 0.07 (NS) 3.8 (0.94–15.6)
FXIIIA-G185T (GT or TT) <0.01 0.28 (0.11–0.73)
MTHFR-C677T (CT or TT) NS NR
MS-A2756G (AG or GG) NS NR
MTRR-A66G (AG or GG) NS NR
Table 5.
 
Summary of the Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis, Including the Variables with a Univariate P ≤ 0.10
Table 5.
 
Summary of the Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis, Including the Variables with a Univariate P ≤ 0.10
Variable P OR (95% CI)
FVL-G1691A+FII-G20210A (GA or AA) NS NR
FXIIIA-G185T (GT or TT) <0.05 0.29 (0.11–0.77)
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×