The present study showed that CsA had a negligible effect on protein release from LG fragments compared with the stimulatory effect of carbachol, a cholinergic agonist.
31 32 33 Hence, CsA did not directly stimulate LG fluid release from acinar cells. In several studies,
3 17 19 the amount of CsA reached the main LG after topical administration was investigated in rabbits. Although they showed beneficial results, the amount was small compared with the volume used in the present study.
In the present study, a single drop of 0.1% CsA increased lacrimal tear flow in vivo. The tear flow response was the same as previously reported 3 hours after CsA administration, and an ipsilateral increase of flow continued for 8 hours in normal rabbits as measured by the STT.
20 21 Similar results were found when LG fluid flow from the excretory lacrimal duct was measured after topical administration of CsA eyedrops in normal rabbits. This lacrimatory response was too rapid to be attributable to the immunosuppressive action of CsA,
4 5 8 34 35 and it seemed to differ from the typical immunologic and anti-inflammatory actions of this drug. In humans, the suppression of inflammation and immune reactions by CsA occurs slowly. Long-term administration of CsA in humans may reduce chronic inflammation, and it has been reported that inflammation impairs the ability of the LG to secrete and inhibits neural transmission.
36 In contrast, acute inflammation developed in the present rabbit model. Regarding the immediate secretory response to topical CsA in this experimental animal model and the much longer time course of the response in humans, one possible explanation may be a species-specific response, as has been reported for high ocular sensitivity in rabbits and rats.
37
An irritant effect of CsA has been reported.
34 35 38 39 Solch et al.
40 found that CsA eyedrops caused itching in volunteers during a clinical trial. To ascertain whether an uncomfortable sensation occurred in rabbits, the blink rate was monitored.
41 It increased ipsilaterally after instillation of CsA in normal rabbits
(Fig. 2) , suggesting that sensory nerves were stimulated by topical CsA. The irritative side effect of CsA eyedrops in humans has also been reported and notified in the interview form of CsA, ophthalmic solution (Papilock Mini 0.1%; Santen Pharmaceutical Company, Osaka, Japan), which was approved only for vernal keratoconjunctivitis in Japan. Ocular irritation was noted in 11.1% of subjects in the present study, and lacrimation was observed in 2.2% of subjects in clinical trials. Based on these data and those of the present study, it can be thought that itching, but not lacrimation, is a common side effect of CsA in humans and rabbits. Furthermore, the reactivity of CsA in humans may be different, depending on the person.
In the present study, CGRP in tear fluid increased significantly after instillation of CsA. A similar result was reported by Mertaniemi et al.
42 after excimer laser keratectomy. Furthermore, we have previously reported that intraocular pressure was increased at 1 hour after the application of CsA eyedrops and that the blood-aqueous barrier was disrupted with an increase of anterior flare and higher expression of CGRP.
39 These findings suggest an irritant effect of CsA or the induction of neurogenic inflammation. We suggest that the reason for the return of tear flow after its suppression by inflammation is that the irritant effect of CsA may diminish as time passes, as we have reported previously.
20 39 Another possibility is that the administration of CsA may prevent the disruption of acinar structure and promote LG fluid production by acinar cells.
36 On the other hand, the blink rate was decreased in denervated eyes at 3 hours after CsA treatment compared with before CsA administration. This suggests that the depletion of neurotransmitters from sensory nerves
21 might have led to desensitization or anesthesia of the ocular surface. It is also possible that tear film composition and stability were abnormal because of GSPN transection so that the reduced blink rate was associated with an adaptive response of the cornea. In other words, GSPN transection did not reduce the blink rate directly but through a secondary effect.
Still another possibility is that the origin or cause of inflammation induced by a single application of CsA was different from the chronic inflammation associated with dry eye. The former may be neurogenic, and the acute lacrimomimetic effect of CsA eyedrops is caused by increased reflex tear flow. In contrast, the latter may be caused by such factors as autoimmune reaction, environment, increased evaporation, and decreased lacrimation. The latter may also be treated by continuous application of CsA and would enable patients to recover from chronic inflammation associated with dry eye by preventing T-cell activation and epithelial apoptosis and by inhibiting the upregulation of NF-κB. This solution could be more effective than the former and would prove invaluable for patients with chronic inflammation of the ocular surface.
In general, an increase of reflex tear flow occurs after stimulation of the main LG by efferent parasympathetic nerves,
43 44 45 whereas sympathetic nerves are thought to have no effect on the LG, as shown in a sympathetic denervation study conducted by Meneray et al.
46 They also reported that after sensory denervation, there was no difference in response to adrenergic receptor stimulation between control and sensory denervated glands. In the present rabbit model of dry eye with GSPN efferent nerve transection, there was no significant increase of tear flow after topical administration of CsA and no increase of tear fluid secretion from the excretory lacrimal duct
(Fig. 3b) . These results suggest that a reflex tearing response is involved in the increase in lacrimation after the application of CsA. Furthermore, in our previous studies, atrophic changes were detected on the ocular surfaces and the LGs after the GSPN was cut,
47 48 and we suggest that continuous neural drive of the pterygopalatine ganglion is necessary to maintain adequate tear flow and mucin secretion.
22 It is likely that the trigeminal system is the afferent origin of this continuous neural tone, and this nerve seemed to be having a trophic effect. A single application of CsA might stimulate it on the intact eye. After GSPN denervation, the drug response might be also eliminated.
Histologic examination of the LG in denervated rabbits after CsA administration showed dense secretory granules in the acinar cells that resembled the denervated LG before CsA treatment.
22 These findings suggest that the mechanism for the release of secretory granules might not have been functioning and that the efferent pathway through the GSPN was necessary to promote lacrimation by CsA. The accessory and main LGs are functionally similar, as Hunt et al.
49 report, and these glands are also thought to be structurally and neurologically similar.
50 51 Accordingly, CsA may not act on the accessory LGs either. Chronic inflammation may interfere with neurally mediated secretion by the main and the accessory LGs.
39
Previous reports have indicated that patients experience itching when they start treatment with CsA eyedrops but that the itching gradually decreases,
38 44 possibly because patients develop tolerance. Although the stimulation of sensory nerves may cause an uncomfortable sensation, CsA eyedrops should still be used if the benefits outweigh the side effects. It has been reported that cyclophilin, a cyclosporine-binding protein, is expressed in the eye, and it is possible that cyclophilin may be involved in the ocular response to CsA.
52 53 There may also be a difference in the reaction to CsA between rabbits and humans because rabbits seem to show higher ocular sensitivity to irritant substances.
37 Furthermore, the vehicle used to deliver CSA in this study was different from that in prescription eyedrops (Restasis 0.05%; Allergan Inc.). Although that vehicle had no effect on lacrimation in our previous study,
20 the present vehicle might have caused indirect stimulation when combined with CsA.