January 2009
Volume 50, Issue 1
Free
Erratum  |   January 2009
ERRATUM
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science January 2009, Vol.50, 46. doi:
  • Views
  • PDF
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      User Alerts
      You are adding an alert for:
      ERRATUM
      You will receive an email whenever this article is corrected, updated, or cited in the literature. You can manage this and all other alerts in My Account
      The alert will be sent to:
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation
      Citation

      ERRATUM. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009;50(1):46.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
    • Get Permissions
  • Supplements
Erratum in: “Individual Variations in Human Cone Photoreceptor Packing Density: Variations with Refractive Error” by Chui et al. ( Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:4679–4687.) 
Equation 1 should be S = 1000[2/( \(\sqrt{3}\) D)]1/2. 
The corrected Figure 10is printed below. These changes do not affect the discussion centered around Reference 20. 
Figure 1.
Relationship between retinal resolution acuity and spherical equivalent refractive error. y-Axis: retinal resolution acuity. Data are the computed temporal retinal resolution acuity at (•) 4° and (○) 10° retinal eccentricities. Dashed lines: linear fits to the data at 4° (y1: heavy dashed line) and 10° (y3: light dashed line). Solid lines: the linear regression of retinal resolution acuity at 4° (y2: heavy solid line) and 10° (y4: light solid line) from Coletta and Watson.20
View OriginalDownload Slide
 
Relationship between retinal resolution acuity and spherical equivalent refractive error. y-Axis: retinal resolution acuity. Data are the computed temporal retinal resolution acuity at (•) 4° and (○) 10° retinal eccentricities. Dashed lines: linear fits to the data at 4° (y1: heavy dashed line) and 10° (y3: light dashed line). Solid lines: the linear regression of retinal resolution acuity at 4° (y2: heavy solid line) and 10° (y4: light solid line) from Coletta and Watson.20
Figure 1.
 
Relationship between retinal resolution acuity and spherical equivalent refractive error. y-Axis: retinal resolution acuity. Data are the computed temporal retinal resolution acuity at (•) 4° and (○) 10° retinal eccentricities. Dashed lines: linear fits to the data at 4° (y1: heavy dashed line) and 10° (y3: light dashed line). Solid lines: the linear regression of retinal resolution acuity at 4° (y2: heavy solid line) and 10° (y4: light solid line) from Coletta and Watson.20
Relationship between retinal resolution acuity and spherical equivalent refractive error. y-Axis: retinal resolution acuity. Data are the computed temporal retinal resolution acuity at (•) 4° and (○) 10° retinal eccentricities. Dashed lines: linear fits to the data at 4° (y1: heavy dashed line) and 10° (y3: light dashed line). Solid lines: the linear regression of retinal resolution acuity at 4° (y2: heavy solid line) and 10° (y4: light solid line) from Coletta and Watson.20
View OriginalDownload Slide
Figure 1.
Relationship between retinal resolution acuity and spherical equivalent refractive error. y-Axis: retinal resolution acuity. Data are the computed temporal retinal resolution acuity at (•) 4° and (○) 10° retinal eccentricities. Dashed lines: linear fits to the data at 4° (y1: heavy dashed line) and 10° (y3: light dashed line). Solid lines: the linear regression of retinal resolution acuity at 4° (y2: heavy solid line) and 10° (y4: light solid line) from Coletta and Watson.20
View OriginalDownload Slide
 
Relationship between retinal resolution acuity and spherical equivalent refractive error. y-Axis: retinal resolution acuity. Data are the computed temporal retinal resolution acuity at (•) 4° and (○) 10° retinal eccentricities. Dashed lines: linear fits to the data at 4° (y1: heavy dashed line) and 10° (y3: light dashed line). Solid lines: the linear regression of retinal resolution acuity at 4° (y2: heavy solid line) and 10° (y4: light solid line) from Coletta and Watson.20
Figure 1.
 
Relationship between retinal resolution acuity and spherical equivalent refractive error. y-Axis: retinal resolution acuity. Data are the computed temporal retinal resolution acuity at (•) 4° and (○) 10° retinal eccentricities. Dashed lines: linear fits to the data at 4° (y1: heavy dashed line) and 10° (y3: light dashed line). Solid lines: the linear regression of retinal resolution acuity at 4° (y2: heavy solid line) and 10° (y4: light solid line) from Coletta and Watson.20
Relationship between retinal resolution acuity and spherical equivalent refractive error. y-Axis: retinal resolution acuity. Data are the computed temporal retinal resolution acuity at (•) 4° and (○) 10° retinal eccentricities. Dashed lines: linear fits to the data at 4° (y1: heavy dashed line) and 10° (y3: light dashed line). Solid lines: the linear regression of retinal resolution acuity at 4° (y2: heavy solid line) and 10° (y4: light solid line) from Coletta and Watson.20
View OriginalDownload Slide
Copyright 2009 The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
Copyright © 2024 Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology.
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our privacy policy.Accept