We have recently demonstrated in cats
14 15 and monkeys
11 that palisade endings are cholinergic. These novel findings have reopened the debate about the functional significance of palisade endings and have advanced the question: Are palisade endings cholinergic sensory organs or effector organs involving collagen fibrils? We have extended our prior finding on palisade endings in monkeys.
11 Herein, we show that nerve fibers supplying palisade endings establish α-bungarotoxin-positive neuromuscular contacts outside the palisade complex; that all palisade endings exhibit ChT/ChAT/VAChT-immunoreactivity; and that neuromuscular contacts, when present in palisade endings, exhibit features of motor terminals and are α-bungarotoxin-positive as well. The implications of these findings with respect to the function of palisade endings are discussed below.
In line with our prior CLSM findings, we observed that ChAT-immunoreactive nerve fibers supply palisade endings in monkey and also establish multiple neuromuscular contacts outside the palisade complex.
11 Such additional neuromuscular contacts were observed either on the same muscle fiber of the palisade/muscle fiber complex or—in a new finding—on a neighboring muscle fiber. Additional neuromuscular contacts were found in about 25% of the palisade endings, which is slightly less (30% of the palisade endings) than in our prior study
11 on monkeys. Concordant with our prior study,
11 we showed that additional neuromuscular contacts are ChAT-immunoreactive. Here, we further demonstrated that these contacts are VAChT-immunoreactive and, more importantly, α-bungarotoxin-positive as well. α-Bungarotoxin binding proves that additional neuromuscular contacts are motor; this finding has a direct consequence with respect to palisade endings. In fact, palisade endings arising from axons that supply motor neuromuscular contacts in other locations would have to be interpreted as motor as well.
By TEM, we demonstrated that each palisade ending in monkey establishes nerve terminals targeting collagen fibrils. In 40% of the palisade endings, we observed nerve terminals targeting the muscle fibers as well. Such neurotendinous and neuromuscular contacts contain mitochondria and clear vesicles. Neuromuscular contacts in palisade endings of monkeys usually have a basal lamina in the synaptic cleft, which is a defining feature of motor terminals.
30 We observed that the basal lamina is discontinuous in only a few neuromuscular contacts. Such an interruption of the basal lamina was also detected in motor terminals on muscle fibers of rat EOMs.
31 By immunohistochemistry, we confirmed our previous findings
11 that neurotendinous and neuromuscular contacts in palisade endings of this primate species are ChAT/VAChT immunoreactive; here we demonstrated that they are ChT-immunoreactive as well. Neuromuscular contacts, when present in palisade endings, also exhibit α-bungarotoxin staining. The co-localization of ChT, ChAT, and VAChT demonstrates that neurotendinous and neuromuscular contacts in palisade endings contain all components for the synthesis of acetylcholine. α-Bungarotoxin-binding shows that neuromuscular contacts in palisade endings have nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Applying morphologic and molecular criteria, the present study proves that neuromuscular contacts in palisade endings are definitely motor. In neurotendinous contacts of palisade endings, α-bungarotoxin staining, which is typical for motor terminals, is absent. On the other hand, we provided evidence that the palisade endings themselves are motor structures and in this case, palisade neurotendinous contacts would have to be interpreted as motor as well.
Taken together, the present study confirms our prior findings that palisade endings are cholinergic and provides novel data clearly indicating that palisade endings are cholinergic motor and not cholinergic sensory.
A major argument to classify palisade endings as putative effectors is based on the finding that nerve fibers supplying palisade endings also supply motor neuromuscular contacts outside the palisade complex. Such additional neuromuscular contacts were observed in 25% of the cases, and in fact, it is a critical question whether all palisade endings have these contacts. To detect additional neuromuscular contacts, the nerve fibers supplying palisade endings had to be traced over a long distance, and often the axons intermingled with others and could not be traced any further. In such cases we did not observe another nerve fiber that establishes neuromuscular contacts on a muscle fiber associated with a palisade ending, and we assume that the axon supplying palisade endings might establish additional neuromuscular contacts more proximal. Nevertheless, due to technical difficulties, we cannot conclude with certainty whether additional neuromuscular contacts of nerve fibers supplying palisade endings are a general feature. It is, however, difficult to imagine that palisade endings in which such a construction could not be confirmed represent another population of palisade endings. If this were indeed the case, we would have to distinguish between two categories of palisade endings.
With respect to innervation, EOMs in mammals have two kinds of muscle fibers, SIFs and MIFs. SIFs have a single motor endplate (en plaque ending), whereas MIFs receive multiple neuromuscular contacts (en grappe endings) throughout their length.
32 33 Palisade endings are exclusively found on the tip of a particular muscle fiber that is the MIF of the global EOM layer.
12 21 23 There can be no doubt that the additional neuromuscular contacts ascertained in palisade endings of the present study are en grappe endings. We therefore conclude that palisade endings arise from axons that also supply MIFs. Interestingly, palisade endings were either found on the tip of the same muscle fiber innervated by the MIF motoneurons or, alternatively, on a neighboring muscle fiber, indicating a variability of the MIF motoneuron/palisade ending unit.
To date, physiological investigations on palisade endings are completely missing; their morphology, however, is well described. Ultrastructural investigations which focused on palisade nerve terminals have presented anatomic evidence to classify palisade endings as sensory organs. Specifically, in palisade endings of cats,
12 15 sheep,
18 and humans,
20 and in Ruskell’s
10 earlier study on palisade endings in rhesus monkeys, neurotendinous contacts were constantly observed and, despite the presence of clear vesicles, nerve terminals in apposition to collagen fibrils seem to point to a sensory function. With the exception of humans, neuromuscular contacts in palisade endings of these species lack a basal lamina in the synaptic cleft, a feature common with sensory nerve terminals on intrafusal muscle fibers of muscle spindles.
34 35 36 37 Surprisingly, there are differences between Ruskell’s
10 findings and ours with respect to neuromuscular contacts in palisade endings of monkeys. In Ruskell’s study,
10 neuromuscular contacts appear morphologically sensory-like, whereas in the present study neuromuscular contacts are morphologically motor-like, which is confirmed by α-bungarotoxin binding. By TEM, we analyzed 50 palisade endings of different EOMs in detail and it is extremely unlikely that we missed morphologically sensory-like neuromuscular contacts. At the moment, the discrepancies between Ruskell’s
10 and our study regarding neuromuscular contacts in palisade endings of the same species are not explicable.
The most compelling argument that palisade endings are sensory structures has come from Billig et al.,
13 who injected neuronal tracer into the trigeminal ganglion, which is presumed to exclusively contain cell bodies of afferent nerve fibers. In cats, Billig et al.
13 found three kinds of labeled nerve endings, one resembling palisade endings. Recently, Wang et al.
26 provided indirect evidence that palisade endings are sensory. Using rhesus monkeys, Wang and colleagues
26 recorded eye position signals from the contralateral side in the primary somatosensory cortex. Since muscle spindles and Golgi tendon organs are rare or absent in monkey EOMs and palisade endings are numerous, the authors concluded that the signals arise from the palisades.
3 26 38
Despite the impressive support in the literature that palisade endings are sensory organs, the present report challenges this view for three reasons. First, nerve fibers supplying palisade endings also supply motor neuromuscular contacts. Second, palisade endings contain acetylcholine, the neurotransmitter of motor terminals. Third, neuromuscular contacts in palisade endings are endowed with nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, which are otherwise present in motor terminals. Indication that palisade endings are putative effectors was provided by α-bungarotoxin binding in palisade endings of humans
20 and cats.
14 15 Specifically, in palisade endings of humans, neuromuscular contacts are α-bungarotoxin-positive, and in palisade endings of cats, the sparse neuromuscular contacts are α-bungarotoxin positive as well.
14 15 20 Further evidence that palisade endings are putative effectors comes from a nerve degeneration experiment. Sas and Schab
27 made lesions of the oculomotor nuclei and showed that in addition to the expected loss of motor terminals on the EOMs, palisade endings were degenerated. The authors concluded that palisade endings are supplied by axons which originate from the EOM motor nuclei.
27