The samples were analyzed on three HPLC systems on a gradient HPLC apparatus (Thermo Separations; San Jose CA) equipped with a high-sensitivity UV6000 photodiode array detector. System 1: Mobile phase containing hexane-dichloromethane-methanol: N,N′-di-isopropylethylamine (80:19.2:0.7:0.1 vol/vol); HPLC separation was performed at a flow rate of 1.0 mL · min−1 on a cyano column (Microsorb 25 cm length × 4.6 mm inside diameter [ID]; Rainin Instrument Co., Woburn, MA). System 2: mobile phase containing methanol and dichloromethane; HPLC separation was performed at a flow rate of 1.0 mL · min−1 on a C30 column (Waters 25 cm length × 4.6 mm ID; Waters, Milford, MA) by a linear gradient of methanol and methylene chloride. A mobile phase of methanol (100%; phase A) and methylene chloride (100%; phase B) with the following linear gradient elution was developed: 90% A and 10% B in the beginning, maintained for 5 minutes, decreased to 78% A in 15 minutes, 62% A in 30 minutes, 52% A in 40 minutes, 41% A in 50 minutes, and 38% A in 58 minutes and returned to 90% A in 60 minutes. System 3: Mobile phase containing hexane: iso-propanol (95:5 vol/vol); HPLC separation was performed at a flow rate of 0.7 mL · min−1 on a chiral column (ChiralPak, 25 cm length × 4.6 mm ID; Chiral Technologies, Exton, PA). All columns were maintained at room temperature, and the HPLC detector was operated at 450 nm. Peak identities were confirmed by photodiode-array (PDA) spectra and by co-elution with authentic standards as necessary. We do not routinely include an internal standard because it can mask the presence of low-abundance carotenoid metabolites, especially when samples are split and run on multiple HPLC columns. We periodically perform quality control runs to confirm that our extraction and injection efficiencies exceed 95%.