In this study, we report for the first time evidence that inner and outer retinal MEMRI patterns reflect known changes in retinal layer–specific ion demand during functional adaptation in the rat. In this initial report, we thought it reasonable to refer to Mn
2+ as a general cation surrogate without focusing specifically on which ions it may or may not be tracking given that the particular ion species could change depending on the situation or even the retinal layer. We speculate that Mn
2+ likely tracks Ca
2+ ion movement, but we did not perform experiments to support this notion. It is well established that rod and cone photoreceptors depolarize (i.e., release glutamate) in the dark and hyperpolarize in response to light. The latter is caused by the closure of the cGMP-gated ion channels by way of the phototransduction cascade, which leads to a reduction in their graded potential, a decrease in glutamate release, and a buildup of ions such as sodium and calcium. Thus, the activity and ion demand of photoreceptors are increased in the dark and attenuated in the light. In this study, a significantly greater uptake of manganese in outer retina was found in dark adaptation relative to that in the light. In the inner retina, the situation is more complex. The output of the outer retina is divided equally into a light-driven pathway, known as the ON pathway, and a dark-driven pathway, known as the OFF pathway.
13 It is at the bipolar level that the ON and OFF pathways are formed through sign-conserving action of ionotropic glutamate receptors, which signal the OFF pathway (through OFF bipolar cells), and the sign-inverting response through metabotropic glutamate receptors, which signal the ON pathway (through ON bipolar cells).
14 Thus, when the retina is dark adapted, the OFF pathway (OFF bipolar cell to OFF ganglion cell) is active in the inner retina; conversely, in the light, the ON pathway (ON bipolar cell to ON ganglion cell) is depolarizing. With equal representation of ON and OFF cells (bipolar and ganglion cells) in the retina, changes in inner retina activity caused by light or dark adaptation would be expected to be relatively equal. Indeed, in the present study, we found changes in signal intensity in inner retina between light and dark adaptation that were on the order of the baseline changes and were significantly (
P < 0.05) smaller than those found in outer retina. We do not yet understand the significance of the apparent offset in superior signal intensities in outer retina
(Fig. 4) . This offset does not appear to be related to the use of the surface coil since it is found
(Figs. 2 3)in only one condition (dark outer retina) and not in the others.