The percentage change from baseline in the EG eyes is compared with the percentage change in control eyes in
Table 2 for each of the SDOCT parameters. The values for percentage change were calculated as the difference between the parameter value at the designated follow-up session and the average of the two baseline values (expressed as a percentage).
Table 2 shows that the magnitude of change was generally greater in EG eyes than in control eyes. To evaluate longitudinal changes within each group, we compared the raw parameter values for each eye at each follow-up time point with the average of the two baseline observations for each eye (using paired
t-tests and a conservative definition of significance,
P < 0.01). At FU1, four SDOCT parameters were found to have changed significantly from baseline in the EG eyes: mean rim width (
P = 0.003, paired
t-test corrected for multiple comparisons), mean rim volume (
P = 0.007), mean ALCS depth
NCO (
P = 0.0008), and mean ALCS depth
BM (
P = 0.002). In EG eyes at FU1, there was no significant change in mean RNFLT (
P = 0.04) or RNFLV (
P = 0.13), although both of these parameters declined significantly by FU2 (
P = 0.007 and
P = 0.009, respectively). The four parameters identified in EG eyes as having changed significantly at FU1 (mean rim width, rim volume, ALCS depth
NCO, and ALCS depth
BM) all continued to have significantly changed from baseline at FU2 (
P = 0.006, 0.003, 0.001, and 0.0007, respectively). Mean NCO depth relative to peripheral RPE/BM was also found to significantly increase (
P = 0.002) and mean PLTT to significantly decrease (
P = 0.009) in EG eyes at FU2. In the control eye group, none of the SDOCT parameters was found to be significantly different from their average baseline (
P > 0.01) at either follow-up time point.