June 2009
Volume 50, Issue 6
Free
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology  |   June 2009
Detailed Ophthalmologic Evaluation of 43 Individuals with PAX6 Mutations
Author Affiliations
  • Melanie Hingorani
    From the Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom; the
  • Kathleen A. Williamson
    Medical Research Council Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; and the
  • Anthony T. Moore
    From the Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom; the
    Division of Inherited Eye Disease, Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, United Kingdom.
  • Veronica van Heyningen
    Medical Research Council Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; and the
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2009, Vol.50, 2581-2590. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.08-2827
  • Views
  • PDF
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Melanie Hingorani, Kathleen A. Williamson, Anthony T. Moore, Veronica van Heyningen; Detailed Ophthalmologic Evaluation of 43 Individuals with PAX6 Mutations. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009;50(6):2581-2590. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.08-2827.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

purpose. Heterozygous mutations of the PAX6 gene cause a variety of ocular malformations, the best known being aniridia (absence of the iris). Mutation analyses and detailed clinical evaluations were performed in 43 individuals with aniridia or closely related ocular anomalies, to investigate whether phenotype correlates with mutation type.

methods. Case notes and medical records were reviewed and patients were reexamined when necessary. Denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) analysis and sequencing of the PAX6 coding region was performed in individuals whose mutation was unknown.

results. The most common PAX6 mutations identified were premature termination mutations, amino acid substitutions, and C-terminal extensions. Six novel mutations are reported. Mutations that inactivate one copy of the gene typically caused a severe phenotype including foveal hypoplasia, marked iris anomalies, and severe visual impairment. Missense mutations, all affecting invariant amino acids in the paired domain, caused milder phenotypes in this cohort, with a lower incidence of foveal hypoplasia and less severe visual loss. C-terminal extension mutations caused relatively severe anomalies and marked reduction in vision. Two C-terminal extension cases had a unilateral exudative retinopathy, resembling Coats’ disease, which has not previously been reported in association with PAX6 mutation.

conclusions. PAX6 mutations cause panocular malformations that vary considerably in pattern and severity. In our cohort, iris hypoplasia, nystagmus, and foveal hypoplasia were most common, with cataracts, corneal anomalies, and high refractive errors also frequently observed. In this cohort, loss-of-function and C-terminal extension mutations were found to cause more severe phenotypes than missense mutations.

The PAX6 gene encodes a key regulator of ocular and neural development. 1 2 The PAX6 protein is highly conserved in a wide variety of species and contains two DNA binding motifs, a paired domain and a homeodomain, and a C-terminal transcriptional activation domain. During eye development PAX6 controls the expression of other regulators, including PAX2, SOX2, and a series of retinal helix-loop-helix transcription factors, as well as structural proteins, such as the crystallins. 2 3 4 5  
In humans, PAX6 mutations are associated with a variety of congenital ocular anomalies. The classic phenotype is aniridia (absence of the iris), a dominantly inherited condition caused by mutations in one copy of the PAX6 gene. 1 Consistent with the expression pattern of PAX6 in the embryonic eye and brain, aniridia is often accompanied by anomalies of the cornea, lens, retina, optic nerve, pineal gland, and anterior commissure. 6 7 8  
Understanding of the phenotypic consequences of different types of PAX6 mutation has improved through increased knowledge of the molecular mechanisms associated with different kinds of mutant allele. 9 10 11 12 13 14 The first mutations to be associated with aniridia were whole gene deletions, leading to the hypothesis that aniridia is caused by inactivation of one allele of PAX6. 15 It soon became clear that aniridia is also caused by mutations that result in the introduction of a premature termination codon (PTC) into the PAX6 coding region (i.e., nonsense mutations, frame-shift insertions and deletions, and most splice mutations). A recent survey found that more than 99% of all PTC mutations cause classic aniridia. 11 The similarity between the phenotypes associated with whole gene deletions and PTC mutations strongly suggest that the latter create null alleles. Until recently, it was believed that PTC mutations result in truncated proteins, some of which may have partial function or dominant negative activity, and it was therefore unclear how PTC mutations in different parts of the coding region could be functionally equivalent. 16 17 It is now known that mRNAs containing a PTC are generally detected and degraded by the nonsense mediated decay (NMD) pathway, rendering most PTC-containing mRNAs from multiexon genes nonfunctional and preventing the accumulation of truncated proteins in the cell. 13  
Missense mutations, which cause one amino acid to be replaced by another, are associated with a variety of phenotypes including aniridia, corectopia, isolated foveal hypoplasia, Peters’ anomaly, microphthalmia, and optic nerve defects. 11 18 19 20 21 22 There is evidence from Pax6 mutant mice that missense alleles are indeed translated to give full-length proteins. 9 10 14 Depending on the location and nature of the amino acid change, the function of the mutant protein may be partially reduced, abolished, or enhanced. 10 14 21 23  
C-terminal extension (CTE) mutations cause the open reading frame to continue into the 3′ untranslated region, where a termination codon is eventually encountered. NMD of the mutant RNA is not predicted, because the NMD surveillance zone ends approximately 50 bp before the penultimate splice junction. 13 As previously discussed, 11 no late-truncating mutations have been observed for PAX6, but examples of extension beyond the usual stop codon have been reported. The properties of such CTE mutant proteins are largely unknown. 
We present a detailed ophthalmic evaluation of 43 individuals with a diagnosed aniridia-like phenotype. PAX6 mutations have been identified for all cases and classified according to type: probable null alleles (gross deletions and PTC mutations), missense mutations, CTE mutations, and mutations with other consequences. 
Methods
Patients
The PAX6 mutation studies were performed on DNA samples provided from a single center (Moorfields Eye Hospital) over a significant period (16 years). All patients gave informed consent, and the study protocol was in keeping with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. A retrospective review of hospital clinical records was performed and where there was incomplete clinical data, patients were re-examined. All patients were examined by ATM and MH. A full eye examination was performed with careful documentation of the morphology of anterior segment changes (including degree of iris absence and subtle changes in iris anatomy and structure), dilated funduscopy, refraction, and orthoptic examination. The phenotype of each individual was given a severity grading based on a combination of the extent of ocular anatomic changes, the occurrence of complications, and the degree of visual impairment. 
Molecular Analysis
The PAX6 mutation had been determined in 24 of the 43 individuals involved in the study. For the remaining individuals, genomic DNA was extracted from blood as previously described, 24 and the coding exons of the PAX6 gene (4 to 13 and 5a) were individually amplified by PCR. Mutation screening was performed on the PCR products by DHPLC 25 (Transgenomic Ltd., Cramlington, UK) followed by direct sequencing of shifted fragments. All sequences were bidirectional and confirmed by repeat PCR. Where individuals (usually children) were not available for screening, the mutation was inferred from the affected parent. In Tables 1 1 2 3 4the location of each mutation is reported in two formats: the new nomenclature system recommended by the Human Genome Variation Society 26 and the traditional nomenclature using the original PAX6 cDNA numbering. 27 Reference sequences for the PAX6 cDNA and protein are contained in GenBank entry NM_000280.3 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Genbank; provided in the public domain by the National Center for Biotechnology Information, Bethesda, MD). In the reference cDNA sequence, the A of the initiating methionine codon is base 534. This A corresponds to base 1 in the new nomenclature system and base 363 in the traditional system. A database of known PAX6 mutations is maintained at http://pax6.hgu.mrc.ac.uk/ (using the Leiden Open Variation Database [LOVD] format, provided in the public domain by the Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands). 
Results
Forty three individuals were evaluated in this study, 26 females and 17 males from 22 families (Tables 1 1 2 3 4) . Their ages ranged from <1 year to 57 years. There were 15 children (mean age 8.5 years) and 28 adults (mean age 37 years). Seven cases were sporadic, with no affected relatives; the remaining 36 were familial. Thirty-four cases were examined prospectively for this report; the remaining nine cases are described from detailed archival information, maintained as structured notes at each visit. Most of the patients described are under long-term follow-up by the Moorfields team. 
The PAX6 mutation was identified in each individual (Tables 1 1 2 3 4) . There were 24 independent mutations in total. Six mutations were novel, including three missense changes in the paired domain. For 12 of the mutations, two or more family members were examined, allowing the consequence of the same mutation to be assessed in different individuals. 
Every individual in our cohort had iris anomalies, although these varied considerably in severity from complete iris absence to relatively subtle architectural anomalies. 
The majority of patients either had a full iris with structural anomalies, or no iris, as observed on slit lamp inspection, although some of these cases may have had a small stump of iris tissue on gonioscopy. In the few cases described as having a partial iris, a significant and somewhat variable amount of tissue was evident on slit lamp examination. Most individuals studied had good concordance of iris phenotype between the two eyes; variability between fellow eyes was mostly observed in the small partial iris category. Details are described in Tables 1 1 2 3 4
Nystagmus and foveal hypoplasia were extremely common, being present in 41 of 43 and 37 of 43 individuals, respectively. Thirty patients had cataracts, 16 had corneal abnormalities, 10 had optic nerve hypoplasia, 5 had glaucoma, and 4 had bilateral ptosis. The corneal abnormalities typically occurred in adult life and manifested as corneal epithelial instability, stromal opacity and vascularization occurring as a result of limbal stem cell deficiency. Nearly half the cohort (21/43) had a significant refractive error, with moderate to high myopia present in five. A novel finding was a unilateral exudative retinopathy, resembling Coats’ disease, in two patients. Progressive features, such as cataracts, glaucoma and keratopathy may be underrepresented as some cases are infants or young children who may develop further complications later on. 
Loss-of-Function Mutations
Eighteen individuals had mutations that are predicted to cause loss of function of one copy of PAX6 (Table 1) 1 . One case had a whole gene deletion as described previously. 7 The other 17 had mutations predicted to introduce a PTC, leading to nonsense-mediated decay of the mutant mRNA and failure of translation. These included two novel frame-shifting deletions, c.1035_1048del14 and c.1061_1070del10. 
Every single individual in this category had foveal hypoplasia and nystagmus. The iris anomalies were relatively severe with complete iris absence in 13 cases, partial iris absence in 1 case, and full irides with abnormal architecture in 4 cases. Cataract and corneal changes were very common. There was a relatively high incidence of glaucoma and dysplasia or developmental anomaly of the optic nerve. Visual acuities in the better eye ranged from perception of light to 20/80 with a median of 20/400. Phenotypes in 10 individuals were classified as severe and only two cases were considered mildly affected. 
Missense Mutations
Nine individuals had missense mutations (Table 2) , sharing four different mutations between them: p.Gly64Val has been described previously 20 but the other mutations (p.Gly36Arg, p.Lys55Arg, and p.Gly72Ser) are novel. All are predicted to result in an amino acid substitution in the paired domain. The affected residues (Gly36, Lys55, Gly64, and Gly72) are absolutely invariant in all PAX6 paired domains sequenced to date, including those from invertebrates such a Drosophila and squid. In the crystal structure of the PAX6 paired domain, Lys55 and Gly72 both make direct contact with the DNA target sequence. 29  
This group contains the only two individuals in the entire cohort without nystagmus (mother 2/1A and daughter 2/1B, Gly36Arg). Despite this similarity, they had different iris phenotypes: 2/1B had partial iris absence, whereas 2/1A, in common with all other members of the group, had full irides with abnormal architecture (Fig. 1a 1b 1c 1d) . Only three missense individuals had foveal hypoplasia. Preserved foveal morphology in case 2/2B (Lys55Arg) is illustrated in Figures 1e and 1f . Cataracts were common in this group (6/9) but only one individual had corneal abnormalities. 
The phenotypes observed in missense mutation carriers clearly overlap those associated with loss of function mutations, but they were significantly milder. Five of the nine missense individuals were mildly or very mildly affected, and none was severely affected. The low incidence of foveal hypoplasia was associated with good preservation of visual function; visual acuities in the better eye ranged from 20/30 to 20/250 with a median of 20/60. In addition, there were no severe optic nerve malformations and no glaucoma, both of which can have highly deleterious effects on vision. 
C-Terminal Extension Mutations
Ten individuals had mutations predicted to result in a protein with a C-terminal extension (Table 3) . One patient (3/1) had a late frame-shifting deletion of nucleotide T1239 that is predicted to replace the last 10 amino acids of the PAX6 protein with a peptide of 45 amino acids. The other individuals all had a duplication of nucleotide T1267 (c.1267dupT) which converts the stop codon (TAA) to a leucine codon (TTA). This mutation is predicted to result in the addition of 107 residues to the end of the PAX6 protein, increasing its length by 25% from 422 amino acids to 529. To date, c.1267dupT has been independently observed 19 times and is one of the most common mutations in the PAX6 Allelic Variant Database (http://pax6.hgu.mrc.ac.uk/). Nucleotide T1267 immediately precedes a stretch of 23 A’s that may increase the chance of mispairing and therefore of errors during DNA replication. 
Exudative vascular retinopathy resembling that observed in Coats’ disease 30 was observed in two CTE cases, 3/2C with the 1267dupT mutation and 3/1 with the 1239delT mutation (Figs. 1g 1h) . Exudative vascular retinopathy has not, to our knowledge, been described previously in association with a PAX6 mutation. Retinal vascular changes were absent in other CTE cases, including the two brothers of 3/2C. 
The severity of the anomalies in the CTE group is comparable to that seen with the loss-of-function mutations (Table 1) 1but the iris anomalies were generally milder. Foveal hypoplasia (10/10), keratopathy (6/10), cataracts (7/10) and myopia (5/10) were all common in this group, but glaucoma was unusual. Visual acuities in the better eye ranged from 20/80 to counting fingers, with a median of 6/200. An example of severe bilateral keratopathy associated with the c.1629dupT mutation is shown in Figures 1i 1j
Other Mutations
Six individuals had PAX6 sequence changes that do not fit into the other categories or are of uncertain consequence (Table 4) . These include four patients with a mutation in the splice donor of intron 6. Patient 4/1 had the mutation c.357+1G>A (IVS6+1G>A) and 4/2 had c.357+2insT (IVS6+2insT), both of which lead to utilization of a cryptic splice donor within exon 6 leading to an in-frame deletion of 36 amino acids from the paired domain, as previously described. 31 The deletion encompasses two of the three α helices in the C-terminal subdomain and would be predicted to impair DNA binding substantially. 29 Cryptic splice donor activation was confirmed by RT-PCR for individuals 4/2 31 and 4/4 7 but the intron 6 splice donor was normal in individual 4/4, and so the underlying genomic mutation, which may lie deep within intron 6, remains to be found. 
Two patients (4/3A and 4/3B) had the novel intron 6 splice donor mutation c.357+5G>A (IVS6+5G>A). Unlike the first and second positions of the splice donor sequence, the fifth is not invariant and the consequence of this change is difficult to predict in the absence of RNA analysis. 
The mutation c.1044+2T>A (IVS8+2T>A) in case 4/5 affects the invariant T at position 2 of the intron 8 splice donor, making it highly probable that splicing is disrupted, but the effect on RNA and protein structure is unknown. Consistent with the idea that this is a causative mutation, the same change has been reported in a family with a similar phenotype of cataracts, foveal hypoplasia, and iris defects. 32  
The patients in this group were all moderately affected, but it is difficult to correlate genotype with phenotype, because the molecular outcome of three of the mutations (4/3A, 4/3B, and 4/5) is unclear. All patients in this group had foveal hypoplasia and three had complete absence of the iris. Corneal changes and optic nerve defects were rare; there were no cases of glaucoma, although two cases had ocular hypertension. One individual 4/3A had a rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Visual acuities in the better eye ranged from 28/80 to 20/400 with a median of 20/200. 
Additional Phenotype Data
The variability of iris and corneal phenotypes and also the spectrum of fundus changes in some of the cases described in Tables 1123are shown in Supplementary Figures S1 and S2
Discussion
We set out to determine whether there was a correlation between the PAX6 mutation type and the severity and pattern of ocular malformation in a large panel of individuals with aniridia-like phenotypes. Based on our current understanding of the effect of different kinds of mutation at the RNA and protein level, we were able to categorize 37 of the 43 mutant alleles in our cohort into three main classes: predicted loss of protein expression, amino acid substitution, and predicted C-terminal extension. Within each mutation class there was phenotypic variability; however, individuals with loss-of-function mutations (Table 1) 1and CTE mutations (Table 3)were generally the most severely affected, whereas individuals with missense mutations (Table 2)had the mildest phenotypes. The main ocular features associated with PAX6 mutations in our cohort were iris anomalies (100%), nystagmus (95%), foveal hypoplasia (84%), cataracts (68%) and ametropia (48%). Missense mutations were associated with better preserved iris structure and a lower incidence of foveal hypoplasia (33%) and nystagmus (78%). In accordance with the emerging pattern, all intragenic PAX6 mutations recently reported from a certified service laboratory, where it may be expected that only classic aniridia cases are sent, were PTC, CTE or splice site changes. 33 It should also be noted that our mutation detection methods did not routinely include deletion analysis, so that this molecularly defined cohort is deficient in the relatively frequent submicroscopic deletion changes that have been observed among isolated aniridia cases in the broader service laboratory study. 33  
Of five subjects described as having ptosis, two (1/6C, 3/1) appeared to have reactive ptosis in response to keratopathy. The other three (1/5A, 1/5B, 4/2) had no reported corneal surface changes and appeared to have true ptosis. Subject 1/5B also had blepharophimosis. The etiology of ptosis and phimosis in terms of the known PAX6 expression pattern is currently unclear. Fourteen cases of ptosis have been reported in the PAX6 mutation database in 480 entries. 
Two patients, both with CTE mutations, had a unilateral exudative retinopathy, which to our knowledge has not been previously described in association with PAX6 mutation. It is uncertain how frequently this occurs in aniridic individuals and whether it is confined to those with CTE mutations. If the fundal view is compromised by nystagmus, corneal changes, and cataracts, subtle retinovascular changes may be difficult to assess and may be underreported. 
Retinal vascularization initially occurs along an astrocyte framework derived from PAX2-expressing cells in the developing optic nerve. 34 35 Since PAX6 represses PAX2, 2 it is possible that PAX6 CTE proteins have a specific effect on PAX2 expression, causing abnormalities of the astrocyte network and consequently of the retinal vasculature. Furthermore, PAX6 suppresses corneal vascularization by promoting the expression of a soluble receptor for vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) which neutralizes the angiogenic activity of VEGF itself. 36 Retinal astrocytes strongly express VEGF, 34 and although it is not yet known whether PAX6 controls retinal VEGF receptors, this could be another mechanism by which specific PAX6 mutations lead to abnormal retinal angiogenesis. 
To assess the phenotypic variability associated with a particular mutation, we examined more than one affected family member when possible. Some aspects of the phenotype were strikingly similar, such as the absence of nystagmus in mother and daughter 2/1A and 2/1B (Gly36Arg, Table 2 ) and the consistently severe effect on visual function caused by the c.763C>T and c.775dupT mutations (Table 1) 1 . Other anomalies were highly variable within families, such as the variable iris hypoplasia in 2/1A and 2/1B and the Coats’-like retinopathy in 3/2C but not in her brothers. During eye development, PAX6 interacts with many other genes and proteins which may themselves have functional variants that differ from person to person. 2 3 4 5 Although there may be chance fluctuations in PAX6 levels in the tissues that affect the phenotypic outcome, it is notable that the iris phenotypes are very similar in the two eyes of a given individual. 
It seems clear from this study and the existing literature, 11 however, that both null mutations (gene deletions and PTCs) and CTE mutations tend to generate relatively severe phenotypes. Presumably, this occurs through different mechanisms because gene deletions and PTC mutations are predicted to generate no protein, whereas CTE mutations are predicted to generate proteins with an abnormally elongated C terminus. At present, the effect on protein function and turnover, if any, of these C-terminal mutations is unknown. In our cohort the CTE group demonstrated qualitatively different phenotypes compared with the null group, supporting the hypothesis that CTE alleles impair ocular development by a different mechanism from null alleles. 
Missense phenotypes are particularly difficult to predict because the outcome depends on the activity of the mutant protein, and this will vary from mutation to mutation depending on the location and function of the substituted residue. All the missense changes in our cohort affected invariant amino acids in the paired domain. These residues, which have been conserved through hundreds of millions of years of evolutionary time, are likely to be absolutely essential for normal PAX6 function. 20 29 Reduced DNA binding and altered transcriptional activation function has been demonstrated for paired domain missense mutant proteins. 21 23 The two individuals with the Gly36Arg change had neither foveal hypoplasia nor nystagmus and were particularly mildly affected, suggesting that the function of this mutant protein is only moderately impaired. Although the missense individuals in this study were relatively mildly affected, missense mutations can cause visually debilitating conditions like Peters anomaly and optic nerve defects, 18 21 and the function of the mutant protein may be more severely compromised in these cases. 
In this article we have concentrated solely on ophthalmic phenotypes, but it is important to remember that PAX6 is also expressed outside the eye. Many of the individuals in this study have also been evaluated for changes in olfaction and brain structure and function (as referenced in Tables 1 1 2 3 4 ), thus building up a comprehensive picture of the effects of different PAX6 mutations. 7 8 20 28 Careful clinical evaluation continues to reveal novel consequences of PAX6 alteration and to extend the range of phenotypes with which PAX6 is associated. 
 
Table 1.
 
Summary of Phenotypes Associated with Loss-of-Function Mutations
Table 1.
 
Summary of Phenotypes Associated with Loss-of-Function Mutations
ID Sex/Age Inheritance Mutation* Exon (Domain) Protein Change Mutation Type Iris Anomaly
1/1 F/41 S Gross deletion of one copy of PAX6 n/a n/a Gross deletion No iris
1/2A F/32 F, sister of 1/2B 115_116dupCC [c.477_478dupCC] Ex5 (PD) p.Cys40ArgfsX15 Frameshift, PTC in Ex6 No iris
1/2B F/37 F, sister of 1/2A 115_116dupCC [c.477_478dupCC] Ex5 (PD) p.Cys40ArgfsX15 Frameshift, PTC in Ex6 Full iris, abnormal structure
1/2C M/12 F, son of 1/2B 115_116dupCC [c.477_478dupCC] Inferred Ex 5 (PD) p.Cys40ArgfsX15 Frameshift, PTC in Ex6 Full iris, abnormal structure
1/3 F/child S c.607C>T [c.969C>T] Ex8 (LNK) p.Arg203X Nonsense, immediate PTC No iris
1/4A F/34 F, mother of 1/4B and 1/4C; wife of 3/2B c.718C>T [c.1080C>T] Ex9 (HD) p.Arg240X Nonsense, immediate PTC No iris
1/4B M/12 F, son of 1/4A and 3/2B c.718C>T [c.1080C>T] Ex9 (HD) p.Arg240X Nonsense, immediate PTC No iris
1/4C F/7 F, daughter of 1/4A and 3/2B c.718C>T [c.1080C>T] Ex9 (HD) p.Arg240X Nonsense, immediate PTC No iris
1/5A M/55 F, father of 1/5B and 1/5C c.763C>T [c.1125C>T] Ex9 (HD) p.Gln255X Nonsense, immediate PTC No iris
1/5B M/34 F, son of 1/5A c.763C>T [c.1125C>T] Ex9 (HD) p.Gln255X Nonsense, immediate PTC No iris
1/5C F/32 F, daughter of 1/5A c.763C>T [c.1125C>T] Ex9 (HD) p.Gln255X Nonsense, immediate PTC No iris
1/6A F/57 F, mother of 1/6B and 1/6C c.775dupT [c.1137dupT] Ex10 (HD) p.Ser259PhefsX2 Frameshift; PTC in Ex10 No iris
1/6B M/27 F, son of 1/6A c.775dupT [c.1137dupT] Ex10 (HD) p.Ser259PhefsX2 Frameshift; PTC in ex10 No iris
1/6C M/24 F, son of 1/6A c.775dupT [c.1137dupT] Ex10 (HD) p.Ser259PhefsX2 Frameshift; PTC in Ex10 No iris
1/6D F/2 F, daughter of 1/6C c.775dupT [c.1137dupT] Inferred Ex10 (HD) p.Ser259PhefsX2 Frameshift; PTC in Ex10 No iris
1/7 F/<1 S c.949C>T [c.1131C>T] Ex11 (PST) p.Arg317X Nonsense, immediate PTC Thin rim of iris, ∼20%
1/8 M/19 F c.1035_1048del14 [c.1397_1410del14] Ex12 (PST) p.Pro346AspfsX20 Frameshift; PTC in Ex12 Full iris abnormal structure
1/9 M/20 S c.1061_1070del10 [c.1423_1432del10] Ex12 (PST) p.Tyr354CysfsX8 Frameshift; PTC in Ex12 Full iris abnormal structure
Table 1A.
 
Summary of Phenotypes Associated with Loss-of-Function Mutations
Table 1A.
 
Summary of Phenotypes Associated with Loss-of-Function Mutations
Foveal Hypoplasia Other Features Refraction Binocular Vision (Corrected) Severity Reference
Yes Severe keratopathy, cataracts, glaucoma, nystagmus −3.5 OD; −3.0 OS CF Severe 7 8
Yes Cataracts, nystagmus +1.5/−1.5×25 OD; +13.0/−1.0 OS (aphakia) 20/200 Moderate 7 8 28
Yes Nystagmus +0.25/−0.5×90 OD; +0.75 OS 20/80 Mild 7 8
Yes Moderate hypermetropia, nystagmus +6.25/−1.0×180 OD; +6.0/−1.0×180 OS 20/120 Mild 28
Yes Mild keratopathy, cataracts, glaucoma, nystagmus ND 20/200 Severe Current
Yes Severe keratopathy, cataracts, severe glaucoma, nystagmus +16.0 OU (aphakia) PL Severe 7 8 28
Yes Mild keratopathy, cataracts, nystagmus, epilepsy ND 20/600 Moderate-severe 28
Yes Cataracts, nystagmus, epilepsy ND 20/300 Moderate 28
Yes Ptosis, cataracts, nystagmus 0/−1.5×5 OD; −1.5/−1.5×10 OS 20/120 Severe 7 8
Yes Blepharophimosis with ptosis, cataracts, ocular hypertension, nystagmus +1.5 OD; +1.0 OS 20/120 Severe 7 8
Yes Cataracts, nystagmus +2.5/−3.0×180 OD; +2.0 OS HM Severe 7 8
Yes Severe keratopathy, cataracts, glaucoma, mild optic nerve hypoplasia, moderate myopia, nystagmus −3.0/−3.5×180 OD; −4.5/−3.5×180 OS 20/120 Severe 7 8
Yes Keratopathy, cataracts, mild optic nerve hypoplasia, moderate myopia, nystagmus −2.0/−2.0×20 OD; −3.5/−2.0×40 OS 20/400 Severe 7 8
Yes Mild ptosis, keratopathy, cataracts, mild optic nerve hypoplasia, moderate myopia, nystagmus −5.5 OD; −3.5 OS 20/400 Severe 7 8
Yes Mild optic nerve hypoplasia, nystagmus 0 OU 20/400 Severe Current
Yes Cataracts, hypermetropia, nystagmus +6.0 OU ?(baby) Moderate Current
Yes Cataracts, high myopia, nystagmus −9.75/−1.5×175 OD; −10.25/−1.5×20 OS 20/200 Moderate Current
Yes Minor keratopathy, mild optic nerve hypoplasia, myopia, nystagmus −5.5/−1.5×180 OD; −4.5/−1.0×15 OS 20/120 Moderate Current
Table 2.
 
Summary of Phenotypes Associated with Missense Mutations
Table 2.
 
Summary of Phenotypes Associated with Missense Mutations
ID Sex/Age Inheritance Mutation Exon (Domain) Codon Change Protein Change Iris Anomaly Foveal Hypoplasia Other Features Refraction Binocular Vision (Corrected) Severity Reference
2/1A F/53 F, mother of 2/1B c.106G>A [c.468G>A] Ex5 (PD) GGG>AGG p.Gly36Arg Full iris, abnormal structure No Cataracts −1.0/−0.25×5 OD; +2.0/−1.75×165 OS 20/30 Very mild 28
2/1B F/16 F, daughter of 2/1A c.106G>A [c.468G>A] Ex5 (PD) GGG>AGG p.Gly36Arg Thin rim of iris, ∼20% No Mild cataracts +1.5/−1.5×145 OD; +2.0/−1.25×20 OS 20/60 Mild 28
2/2A M/48 F, father of 2/2B and 2/2C c.164A>G [c.526A>G] Ex6 (PD) AAA>AGA p.Lys55Arg Full iris, abnormal structure No Cataracts, nystagmus +3.5/−1.5×105 OD; +1.5/−1.5×35 OS 20/80 Mild 28
2/2B M/13 F, son of 2/2A c.164A>G [c.526A>G] Inferred Ex6 (PD) AAA>AGA p.Lys55Arg Full iris, abnormal structure No Blonde fundus, nystagmus −2.5/−1.25×5 OD; +2.0/−2.0×180 OS 20/60 Mild 28
2/2C F/11 F, daughter of 2/2A c.164A>G [c.526A>G] Inferred Ex6 (PD) AAA>AGA p.Lys55Arg Full iris, abnormal structure No Blonde fundus, nystagmus −2.0/−2.0×125 OD; −2.25/−3.25×25 OS 20/60 Mild 28
2/3A M/40 F, brother of 2/3B c.191G>T [c.553G>T] Ex6 (PD) GGC>GTC p.Gly64Val Full iris, abnormal structure No Cataracts, ocular hypertension, nystagmus ND 20/40 Mild-moderate 20
2/3B F/30 F, sister of 2/3A c.191G>T [c.553G>T] Ex6 (PD) GGC>GTC p.Gly64Val Full iris, abnormal structure Yes Cataracts, keratopathy, mild optic nerve hypoplasia, nystagmus ND 20/60 Moderate 8 20
2/4A F/adult F, mother of 2/4B c.214G>A [c.576G>A] Ex6 (PD) GGT>AGT p.Gly72Ser Full iris, abnormal structure Yes Cataracts, high myopia, nystagmus −6.0/−2.0×170 OD; −5.5/−2.0×20 OS 20/200 Moderate Current
2/4B F/6 F, daughter of 2/4A c.214G>A [c.576G>A] Ex6 (PD) GGT>AGT p.Gly72Ser Full iris, abnormal structure Yes Nystagmus −3.25/+2.0×80 OD; −3.75/+0.75×90 OS 20/250 Moderate Current
Figure 1.
 
(ad) Ocular anomalies in a mother and daughter with the PAX6 missense mutation c.106G>A (Gly36Arg). Full iris with abnormal architecture in the left (a) and right (b) eyes of patient 2/1A. Partial iris loss (c) and normal fovea (d) in the left eye of her daughter 2/1B. (e, f) Preserved foveal morphology in patient 2/2B with the missense mutation c.164A>G (Lys55Arg). (e) Retinal OCT, showing a normal foveal pit (arrow). (f) Autofluorescence image showing normal macular region. (g, h) Phenotype in case 3/1 with the C-terminal extension mutation c.1239delT: (g) partial iris defect, opaque lens capsule remnants, and surgical aphakia; and (h) exudative retinal detachment. (i, j) Severe keratopathy due to limbal stem cell failure in both eyes of case 3/4A with the C-terminal extension mutation c.1267dupT. Note that the iris is completely formed (the pupil has been dilated pharmacologically).
Figure 1.
 
(ad) Ocular anomalies in a mother and daughter with the PAX6 missense mutation c.106G>A (Gly36Arg). Full iris with abnormal architecture in the left (a) and right (b) eyes of patient 2/1A. Partial iris loss (c) and normal fovea (d) in the left eye of her daughter 2/1B. (e, f) Preserved foveal morphology in patient 2/2B with the missense mutation c.164A>G (Lys55Arg). (e) Retinal OCT, showing a normal foveal pit (arrow). (f) Autofluorescence image showing normal macular region. (g, h) Phenotype in case 3/1 with the C-terminal extension mutation c.1239delT: (g) partial iris defect, opaque lens capsule remnants, and surgical aphakia; and (h) exudative retinal detachment. (i, j) Severe keratopathy due to limbal stem cell failure in both eyes of case 3/4A with the C-terminal extension mutation c.1267dupT. Note that the iris is completely formed (the pupil has been dilated pharmacologically).
Table 3.
 
Summary of Phenotypes Associated with C-terminal Extension Mutations
Table 3.
 
Summary of Phenotypes Associated with C-terminal Extension Mutations
ID Sex/Age Inheritance Mutation Exon (Domain) Protein Change Iris Anomaly Foveal Hypoplasia Other Features Refraction Binocular Vision (Corrected) Severity Reference
3/1 F/54 S c.1239delT [c.1601delT] Ex13 (PST) p.Asp413GlufsX*46 Scattered peripheral iris remnant ∼30% LE; thin rim, ∼40% RE Yes Mild ptosis, severe keratopathy, cataracts, glaucoma, uni-ocular exudative retinopathy +1.0/−0.5×70; OD; +1.0 OS 20/200 Severe 8
3/2A M/46 F, brother of 3/2B and 3/2C c.1267dupT [c.1629dupT] Ex13 (PST) p.X423LeuextX*108 Full iris, abnormal structure Yes High myopia −7.0 OU 20/200 Moderate 8
3/2B M/43 F, husband of 1/3A c.1267dupT [c.1629dupT] Ex13 (PST) p.X423LeuextX*108 Full iris, abnormal structure Yes Cataracts, high myopia −8.0 OD; −9.0 OS 20/600 Severe 8
3/2C F/40 F, sister of 3/2A and 3/2B c.1267dupT [c.1629dupT] Ex13 (PST) p.X423LeuextX*108 Full iris, abnormal structure; slightly enlarged pupil RE Yes Severe keratopathy, cataracts, exudative retinopathy, high myopia −18.0 OD; −16.0 OS 20/600 Severe 8
3/3A F/44 F, mother of 3/3B c.1267dupT [c.1629dupT] Ex13 (PST) p.X423LeuextX*108 Full iris, abnormal structure Yes Severe keratopathy, cataracts, optic nerve hypoplasia, moderate myopia −3.0/−1.0×70 OD; −4.0/−0.5×90 OS 20/600 Severe 8 28
3/3B F/16 F, daughter of 3/3A c.1267dupT [c.1629dupT] Ex13 (PST) p.X423LeuextX*108 Full iris, abnormal structure Yes Optic disc hypoplasia, blonde fundus, high myopia −7.0/−1.0×180 OU 20/200 Severe 28
3/4A F/adult F, mother of 3/4B c.1267dupT [c.1629dupT] Ex13 (PST) p.X423LeuextX*108 Full iris, abnormal structure Yes Severe keratopathy, mild cataracts ND CF Moderate-severe Current
3/4B F/23 F, mother of 3/4C and 3/4D c.1267dupT [c.1629dupT] Inferred Ex13 (PST) p.X423LeuextX*108 Full iris, abnormal structure Yes Very mild keratopathy, cataracts 0/+1.0×90 OD; −0.5 OS 20/80 Mild-moderate Current
3/4C M/3 F, son of 3/4B c.1267dupT [c.1629dupT] Inferred Ex13 (PST) p.X423LeuextX*108 Full iris, abnormal structure Yes Very mild keratopathy, mild cataract LE −1.75/−0.25×90 OD; −2.0/−0.25×90 OS 20/160 Mild-moderate Current
3/4D F/<1 F, daughter of 3/4B c.1267dupT [c.1629dupT] Inferred Ex13 (PST) p.X423LeuextX*108 Full iris, abnormal structure Yes Blonde fundus ND 20/250 Mild-moderate Current
Table 4.
 
Summary of Phenotypes Associated with Other Types of Mutation
Table 4.
 
Summary of Phenotypes Associated with Other Types of Mutation
ID Sex/Age Inheritance Mutation Intron (Domain) Protein Change Mutation type Iris Anomaly Foveal Hypoplasia Other Features Refraction Binocular Vision (Corrected) Severity Reference
4/1 M/7 S c.357+1G>A [IVS6+1G>A] Intron 6 (PD) Predicted 36-aa deletion in Ex6 Probable splice defect (unconfirmed) ? Yes OHT, moderate hypermetropia +4.0/−1.0×180 OD; +4.0/−1.0×180 OS 20/400 Moderate Current
4/2 F/40 S c.357+2insT [IVS6+2 insT] Intron 6 (PD) Predicted 36-aa deletion in Ex6 Splice defect confirmed by RT-PCR Iris tissue only present temporally. ∼50% RE; nearly full iris, ∼90% LE Yes Mild ptosis, cataracts, mild optic nerve hypoplasia 0/−2.0×180 OD; 0/−2.0×180 OS 20/200 Moderate 8
4/3A M/adult F, father of 4/4B c.357+5G>A [IVS6+5G>A] Intron 6 (PD) Unknown Possible splice defect (unconfirmed) No iris Yes Mild keratopathy, OHT, retinal detachment RE ND 20/120 Moderate 28
4/3B F/12 F, daughter of 4/4A c.357+5G>A [IVS6+5G>A] Intron 6 (PD) Unknown Possible splice defect (unconfirmed) No iris Yes Moderate hypermetropia +5.0 OD; +4.0/−1.0×180 OS 20/200 Moderate 28
4/4 F/37 F Splice defect confirmed, but genomic mutation not yet identified Unknown Predicted 36-aa deletion in Ex6 Splice defect confirmed by RT-PCR No iris Yes Mild cataracts, subluxed lenses −1.0 OU 20/200 Moderate 7 8
4/5 M/28 F c.1044+2T>A [IVS8+2T>A] Intron 8 (HD) Unknown Probable splice defect (unconfirmed) Coloboma-like defect LE; normal RE No Cataracts +12.0 (aphakia) OD; 0/−0.5×100 OS 20/80 Moderate Current
Supplementary Materials
Supplementary Figure S1 - 3.3 MB (PDF) 
Supplementary Figure S1. Fundus details of additional cases. 
Left eye in left column and right eye on the right. Magnification may be variable. (a, b) 1/2B Bilateral foveal hypoplasia with no foveal pit or pigmentation, and crossing of fovea by retinal blood vessels. (c, d) 1/9 Mild optic nerve hypoplasia right eye and bilateral foveal hypoplasia with absence of normal foveal landmarks and retinal blood vessels passing across fovea. (e, f) 2/2B Well-preserved foveal morphology as shown in Figure 1 (e, f). (g, h) 2/2C Mildly hypopigmented (blonde) fundus with well preserved foveal structure. (i, j) 3/2B Myopic chorioretinal degeneration, peripapillary atrophy and foveal hypoplasia in the left and right eyes. 
Supplementary Figure S2 - 3.7 MB (PDF) 
Supplementary Figure S2. Iris features of additional cases. 
Left eye in left column and right eye on the right. Magnification may be variable. (a, b) 1/1 No visible iris tissue and severe keratopathy in left eye with neovascularisation extending into corneal graft; the graft sutures are visible. No visible iris tissue and severe keratopathy with central scarring and neovascularisation in right eye. (c, d) 1/4A Peripheral scarring and vascularisation of cornea in left eye. Right phthisical eye has endstage corneal scarring and vascularisation following failed penetrating keratoplasty and multiple glaucoma operations. (e, f) 1/6B No visible iris tissue and moderate to severe keratopathy with neovascularisation and conjunctivalisation of superficial cornea in left eye and marked opacification and neovascularisation of the peripheral cornea and posterior cataract in the right eye. (g, h) 1/9 Full iris with mild structural abnormality in both eyes. (i, j) 2/3B Full iris with abnormal structure in both eyes. 
The authors thank the patients and their families for participating in the study. 
van HeyningenV, WilliamsonKA. PAX6 in sensory development. Hum Mol Genet. 2002;11(10)1161–1167. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
SchwarzM, CecconiF, BernierG, et al. Spatial specification of mammalian eye territories by reciprocal transcriptional repression of Pax2 and Pax6. Development. 2000;127(20)4325–4334. [PubMed]
InoueM, KamachiY, MatsunamiH, et al. PAX6 and SOX2-dependent regulation of the Sox2 enhancer N-3 involved in embryonic visual system development. Genes Cells. 2007;12(9)1049–1061. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
MarquardtT, Ashery-PadanR, AndrejewskiN, et al. Pax6 is required for the multipotent state of retinal progenitor cells. Cell. 2001;105(1)43–55. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
KamachiY, UchikawaM, TanouchiA, SekidoR, KondohH. Pax6 and SOX2 form a co-DNA-binding partner complex that regulates initiation of lens development. Genes Dev. 2001;15(10)1272–1286. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
LeeH, KhanR, O'KeefeM. Aniridia: current pathology and management. Acta Ophthalmol. 2008;86(7)708–715. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
SisodiyaSM, FreeSL, WilliamsonKA, et al. PAX6 haploinsufficiency causes cerebral malformation and olfactory dysfunction in humans. Nat Genet. 2001;28(3)214–216. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
MitchellTN, FreeSL, WilliamsonKA, et al. Polymicrogyria and absence of pineal gland due to PAX6 mutation. Ann Neurol. 2003;53(5)658–663. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
FavorJ, PetersH, HermannT, et al. Molecular characterization of Pax6(2Neu) through Pax6(10Neu): an extension of the Pax6 allelic series and the identification of two possible hypomorph alleles in the mouse Mus musculus. Genetics. 2001;159(4)1689–1700. [PubMed]
HaubstN, BergerJ, RadjendiraneV, et al. Molecular dissection of Pax6 function: the specific roles of the paired domain and homeodomain in brain development. Development. 2004;131(24)6131–6140. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
TzoulakiI, WhiteIM, HansonIM. PAX6 mutations: genotype-phenotype correlations. BMC Genet. 2005;6(1)27. [PubMed]
GrawJ, LosterJ, PukO, et al. Three novel Pax6 alleles in the mouse leading to the same small-eye phenotype caused by different consequences at target promoters. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(12)4671–4683. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
KhajaviM, InoueK, LupskiJR. Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay modulates clinical outcome of genetic disease. Eur J Hum Genet. 2006;14(10)1074–1081. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
FavorJ, GloecknerCJ, Neuhaeuser-KlausA, et al. Relationship of Pax6 activity levels to the extent of eye development in the mouse, Mus musculus. Genetics. 2008;179(3)1345–1355. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
TonCC, HirvonenH, MiwaH, et al. Positional cloning and characterization of a paired box- and homeobox-containing gene from the aniridia region. Cell. 1991;67(6)1059–1074. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
SinghS, TangHK, LeeJY, SaundersGF. Truncation mutations in the transactivation region of PAX6 result in dominant-negative mutants. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(34)21531–21541. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
DuncanMK, CveklA, LiX, PiatigorskyJ. Truncated forms of Pax-6 disrupt lens morphology in transgenic mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41(2)464–473. [PubMed]
HansonIM, FletcherJM, JordanT, et al. Mutations at the PAX6 locus are found in heterogeneous anterior segment malformations including Peters’ anomaly. Nat Genet. 1994;6(2)168–173. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
AzumaN, NishinaS, YanagisawaH, OkuyamaT, YamadaM. PAX6 missense mutation in isolated foveal hypoplasia. Nat Genet. 1996;13(2)141–142. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
HansonI, ChurchillA, LoveJ, et al. Missense mutations in the most ancient residues of the PAX6 paired domain underlie a spectrum of human congenital eye malformations. Hum Mol Genet. 1999;8(2)165–172. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
AzumaN, YamaguchiY, HandaH, et al. Mutations of the PAX6 gene detected in patients with a variety of optic-nerve malformations. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;72(6)1565–1570. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
SharanS, MirzayansF, FootzT, WalterM, LevinAV. Elliptical anterior iris stromal defects associated with PAX6 gene sequence changes. J AAPOS. 2008;12(4)340–343. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
TangHK, ChaoLY, SaundersGF. Functional analysis of paired box missense mutations in the PAX6 gene. Hum Mol Genet. 1997;6(3)381–386. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
RaggeNK, BrownAG, PoloschekCM, et al. Heterozygous mutations of OTX2 cause severe ocular malformations. Am J Hum Genet. 2005;76(6)1008–1022. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
MorrisonD, FitzPatrickD, HansonI, et al. National study of microphthalmia, anophthalmia, and coloboma (MAC) in Scotland: investigation of genetic aetiology. J Med Genet. 2002;39(1)16–22. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
den DunnenJT, AntonarakisSE. Mutation nomenclature extensions and suggestions to describe complex mutations: a discussion. Hum Mutat. 2000;15(1)7–12. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
BrownA, McKieM, van HeyningenV, ProsserJ. The Human PAX6 Mutation Database. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998;26(1)259–264. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
BamiouDE, FreeSL, SisodiyaSM, et al. Auditory interhemispheric transfer deficits, hearing difficulties, and brain magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities in children with congenital aniridia due to PAX6 mutations. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161(5)463–469. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
XuHE, RouldMA, XuW, et al. Crystal structure of the human Pax6 paired domain-DNA complex reveals specific roles for the linker region and carboxy-terminal subdomain in DNA binding. Genes Dev. 1999;13(10)1263–1275. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
ShieldsJA, ShieldsCL, HonavarSG, DemirciH, CaterJ. Classification and management of Coats disease: the 2000 Proctor Lecture. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001;131(5)572–583. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
HansonIM, SeawrightA, HardmanK, et al. PAX6 mutations in aniridia. Hum Mol Genet. 1993;2(7)915–920. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
SchroederHW, OrthU, Meyer-KönigE, GalA. Hereditary foveal hypoplasia: clinical differentiation. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 2003;220(8)559–562. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
RobinsonDO, HowarthRJ, WilliamsonKA, van HeyningenV, BealSJ, CrollaJA. Genetic analysis of chromosome 11p13 and the PAX6 gene in a series of 125 cases referred with aniridia. Am J Med Genet A. 2008;146(5)558–569.
WestH, RichardsonWD, FruttigerM. Stabilization of the retinal vascular network by reciprocal feedback between blood vessels and astrocytes. Development. 2005;132(8)1855–1862. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
FruttigerM. Development of the retinal vasculature. Angiogenesis. 2007;10(2)77–88. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
AmbatiBK, NozakiM, SinghN, et al. Corneal avascularity is due to soluble VEGF receptor-1. Nature. 2006;443(7114)993–997. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1.
 
(ad) Ocular anomalies in a mother and daughter with the PAX6 missense mutation c.106G>A (Gly36Arg). Full iris with abnormal architecture in the left (a) and right (b) eyes of patient 2/1A. Partial iris loss (c) and normal fovea (d) in the left eye of her daughter 2/1B. (e, f) Preserved foveal morphology in patient 2/2B with the missense mutation c.164A>G (Lys55Arg). (e) Retinal OCT, showing a normal foveal pit (arrow). (f) Autofluorescence image showing normal macular region. (g, h) Phenotype in case 3/1 with the C-terminal extension mutation c.1239delT: (g) partial iris defect, opaque lens capsule remnants, and surgical aphakia; and (h) exudative retinal detachment. (i, j) Severe keratopathy due to limbal stem cell failure in both eyes of case 3/4A with the C-terminal extension mutation c.1267dupT. Note that the iris is completely formed (the pupil has been dilated pharmacologically).
Figure 1.
 
(ad) Ocular anomalies in a mother and daughter with the PAX6 missense mutation c.106G>A (Gly36Arg). Full iris with abnormal architecture in the left (a) and right (b) eyes of patient 2/1A. Partial iris loss (c) and normal fovea (d) in the left eye of her daughter 2/1B. (e, f) Preserved foveal morphology in patient 2/2B with the missense mutation c.164A>G (Lys55Arg). (e) Retinal OCT, showing a normal foveal pit (arrow). (f) Autofluorescence image showing normal macular region. (g, h) Phenotype in case 3/1 with the C-terminal extension mutation c.1239delT: (g) partial iris defect, opaque lens capsule remnants, and surgical aphakia; and (h) exudative retinal detachment. (i, j) Severe keratopathy due to limbal stem cell failure in both eyes of case 3/4A with the C-terminal extension mutation c.1267dupT. Note that the iris is completely formed (the pupil has been dilated pharmacologically).
Table 1.
 
Summary of Phenotypes Associated with Loss-of-Function Mutations
Table 1.
 
Summary of Phenotypes Associated with Loss-of-Function Mutations
ID Sex/Age Inheritance Mutation* Exon (Domain) Protein Change Mutation Type Iris Anomaly
1/1 F/41 S Gross deletion of one copy of PAX6 n/a n/a Gross deletion No iris
1/2A F/32 F, sister of 1/2B 115_116dupCC [c.477_478dupCC] Ex5 (PD) p.Cys40ArgfsX15 Frameshift, PTC in Ex6 No iris
1/2B F/37 F, sister of 1/2A 115_116dupCC [c.477_478dupCC] Ex5 (PD) p.Cys40ArgfsX15 Frameshift, PTC in Ex6 Full iris, abnormal structure
1/2C M/12 F, son of 1/2B 115_116dupCC [c.477_478dupCC] Inferred Ex 5 (PD) p.Cys40ArgfsX15 Frameshift, PTC in Ex6 Full iris, abnormal structure
1/3 F/child S c.607C>T [c.969C>T] Ex8 (LNK) p.Arg203X Nonsense, immediate PTC No iris
1/4A F/34 F, mother of 1/4B and 1/4C; wife of 3/2B c.718C>T [c.1080C>T] Ex9 (HD) p.Arg240X Nonsense, immediate PTC No iris
1/4B M/12 F, son of 1/4A and 3/2B c.718C>T [c.1080C>T] Ex9 (HD) p.Arg240X Nonsense, immediate PTC No iris
1/4C F/7 F, daughter of 1/4A and 3/2B c.718C>T [c.1080C>T] Ex9 (HD) p.Arg240X Nonsense, immediate PTC No iris
1/5A M/55 F, father of 1/5B and 1/5C c.763C>T [c.1125C>T] Ex9 (HD) p.Gln255X Nonsense, immediate PTC No iris
1/5B M/34 F, son of 1/5A c.763C>T [c.1125C>T] Ex9 (HD) p.Gln255X Nonsense, immediate PTC No iris
1/5C F/32 F, daughter of 1/5A c.763C>T [c.1125C>T] Ex9 (HD) p.Gln255X Nonsense, immediate PTC No iris
1/6A F/57 F, mother of 1/6B and 1/6C c.775dupT [c.1137dupT] Ex10 (HD) p.Ser259PhefsX2 Frameshift; PTC in Ex10 No iris
1/6B M/27 F, son of 1/6A c.775dupT [c.1137dupT] Ex10 (HD) p.Ser259PhefsX2 Frameshift; PTC in ex10 No iris
1/6C M/24 F, son of 1/6A c.775dupT [c.1137dupT] Ex10 (HD) p.Ser259PhefsX2 Frameshift; PTC in Ex10 No iris
1/6D F/2 F, daughter of 1/6C c.775dupT [c.1137dupT] Inferred Ex10 (HD) p.Ser259PhefsX2 Frameshift; PTC in Ex10 No iris
1/7 F/<1 S c.949C>T [c.1131C>T] Ex11 (PST) p.Arg317X Nonsense, immediate PTC Thin rim of iris, ∼20%
1/8 M/19 F c.1035_1048del14 [c.1397_1410del14] Ex12 (PST) p.Pro346AspfsX20 Frameshift; PTC in Ex12 Full iris abnormal structure
1/9 M/20 S c.1061_1070del10 [c.1423_1432del10] Ex12 (PST) p.Tyr354CysfsX8 Frameshift; PTC in Ex12 Full iris abnormal structure
Table 1A.
 
Summary of Phenotypes Associated with Loss-of-Function Mutations
Table 1A.
 
Summary of Phenotypes Associated with Loss-of-Function Mutations
Foveal Hypoplasia Other Features Refraction Binocular Vision (Corrected) Severity Reference
Yes Severe keratopathy, cataracts, glaucoma, nystagmus −3.5 OD; −3.0 OS CF Severe 7 8
Yes Cataracts, nystagmus +1.5/−1.5×25 OD; +13.0/−1.0 OS (aphakia) 20/200 Moderate 7 8 28
Yes Nystagmus +0.25/−0.5×90 OD; +0.75 OS 20/80 Mild 7 8
Yes Moderate hypermetropia, nystagmus +6.25/−1.0×180 OD; +6.0/−1.0×180 OS 20/120 Mild 28
Yes Mild keratopathy, cataracts, glaucoma, nystagmus ND 20/200 Severe Current
Yes Severe keratopathy, cataracts, severe glaucoma, nystagmus +16.0 OU (aphakia) PL Severe 7 8 28
Yes Mild keratopathy, cataracts, nystagmus, epilepsy ND 20/600 Moderate-severe 28
Yes Cataracts, nystagmus, epilepsy ND 20/300 Moderate 28
Yes Ptosis, cataracts, nystagmus 0/−1.5×5 OD; −1.5/−1.5×10 OS 20/120 Severe 7 8
Yes Blepharophimosis with ptosis, cataracts, ocular hypertension, nystagmus +1.5 OD; +1.0 OS 20/120 Severe 7 8
Yes Cataracts, nystagmus +2.5/−3.0×180 OD; +2.0 OS HM Severe 7 8
Yes Severe keratopathy, cataracts, glaucoma, mild optic nerve hypoplasia, moderate myopia, nystagmus −3.0/−3.5×180 OD; −4.5/−3.5×180 OS 20/120 Severe 7 8
Yes Keratopathy, cataracts, mild optic nerve hypoplasia, moderate myopia, nystagmus −2.0/−2.0×20 OD; −3.5/−2.0×40 OS 20/400 Severe 7 8
Yes Mild ptosis, keratopathy, cataracts, mild optic nerve hypoplasia, moderate myopia, nystagmus −5.5 OD; −3.5 OS 20/400 Severe 7 8
Yes Mild optic nerve hypoplasia, nystagmus 0 OU 20/400 Severe Current
Yes Cataracts, hypermetropia, nystagmus +6.0 OU ?(baby) Moderate Current
Yes Cataracts, high myopia, nystagmus −9.75/−1.5×175 OD; −10.25/−1.5×20 OS 20/200 Moderate Current
Yes Minor keratopathy, mild optic nerve hypoplasia, myopia, nystagmus −5.5/−1.5×180 OD; −4.5/−1.0×15 OS 20/120 Moderate Current
Table 2.
 
Summary of Phenotypes Associated with Missense Mutations
Table 2.
 
Summary of Phenotypes Associated with Missense Mutations
ID Sex/Age Inheritance Mutation Exon (Domain) Codon Change Protein Change Iris Anomaly Foveal Hypoplasia Other Features Refraction Binocular Vision (Corrected) Severity Reference
2/1A F/53 F, mother of 2/1B c.106G>A [c.468G>A] Ex5 (PD) GGG>AGG p.Gly36Arg Full iris, abnormal structure No Cataracts −1.0/−0.25×5 OD; +2.0/−1.75×165 OS 20/30 Very mild 28
2/1B F/16 F, daughter of 2/1A c.106G>A [c.468G>A] Ex5 (PD) GGG>AGG p.Gly36Arg Thin rim of iris, ∼20% No Mild cataracts +1.5/−1.5×145 OD; +2.0/−1.25×20 OS 20/60 Mild 28
2/2A M/48 F, father of 2/2B and 2/2C c.164A>G [c.526A>G] Ex6 (PD) AAA>AGA p.Lys55Arg Full iris, abnormal structure No Cataracts, nystagmus +3.5/−1.5×105 OD; +1.5/−1.5×35 OS 20/80 Mild 28
2/2B M/13 F, son of 2/2A c.164A>G [c.526A>G] Inferred Ex6 (PD) AAA>AGA p.Lys55Arg Full iris, abnormal structure No Blonde fundus, nystagmus −2.5/−1.25×5 OD; +2.0/−2.0×180 OS 20/60 Mild 28
2/2C F/11 F, daughter of 2/2A c.164A>G [c.526A>G] Inferred Ex6 (PD) AAA>AGA p.Lys55Arg Full iris, abnormal structure No Blonde fundus, nystagmus −2.0/−2.0×125 OD; −2.25/−3.25×25 OS 20/60 Mild 28
2/3A M/40 F, brother of 2/3B c.191G>T [c.553G>T] Ex6 (PD) GGC>GTC p.Gly64Val Full iris, abnormal structure No Cataracts, ocular hypertension, nystagmus ND 20/40 Mild-moderate 20
2/3B F/30 F, sister of 2/3A c.191G>T [c.553G>T] Ex6 (PD) GGC>GTC p.Gly64Val Full iris, abnormal structure Yes Cataracts, keratopathy, mild optic nerve hypoplasia, nystagmus ND 20/60 Moderate 8 20
2/4A F/adult F, mother of 2/4B c.214G>A [c.576G>A] Ex6 (PD) GGT>AGT p.Gly72Ser Full iris, abnormal structure Yes Cataracts, high myopia, nystagmus −6.0/−2.0×170 OD; −5.5/−2.0×20 OS 20/200 Moderate Current
2/4B F/6 F, daughter of 2/4A c.214G>A [c.576G>A] Ex6 (PD) GGT>AGT p.Gly72Ser Full iris, abnormal structure Yes Nystagmus −3.25/+2.0×80 OD; −3.75/+0.75×90 OS 20/250 Moderate Current
Table 3.
 
Summary of Phenotypes Associated with C-terminal Extension Mutations
Table 3.
 
Summary of Phenotypes Associated with C-terminal Extension Mutations
ID Sex/Age Inheritance Mutation Exon (Domain) Protein Change Iris Anomaly Foveal Hypoplasia Other Features Refraction Binocular Vision (Corrected) Severity Reference
3/1 F/54 S c.1239delT [c.1601delT] Ex13 (PST) p.Asp413GlufsX*46 Scattered peripheral iris remnant ∼30% LE; thin rim, ∼40% RE Yes Mild ptosis, severe keratopathy, cataracts, glaucoma, uni-ocular exudative retinopathy +1.0/−0.5×70; OD; +1.0 OS 20/200 Severe 8
3/2A M/46 F, brother of 3/2B and 3/2C c.1267dupT [c.1629dupT] Ex13 (PST) p.X423LeuextX*108 Full iris, abnormal structure Yes High myopia −7.0 OU 20/200 Moderate 8
3/2B M/43 F, husband of 1/3A c.1267dupT [c.1629dupT] Ex13 (PST) p.X423LeuextX*108 Full iris, abnormal structure Yes Cataracts, high myopia −8.0 OD; −9.0 OS 20/600 Severe 8
3/2C F/40 F, sister of 3/2A and 3/2B c.1267dupT [c.1629dupT] Ex13 (PST) p.X423LeuextX*108 Full iris, abnormal structure; slightly enlarged pupil RE Yes Severe keratopathy, cataracts, exudative retinopathy, high myopia −18.0 OD; −16.0 OS 20/600 Severe 8
3/3A F/44 F, mother of 3/3B c.1267dupT [c.1629dupT] Ex13 (PST) p.X423LeuextX*108 Full iris, abnormal structure Yes Severe keratopathy, cataracts, optic nerve hypoplasia, moderate myopia −3.0/−1.0×70 OD; −4.0/−0.5×90 OS 20/600 Severe 8 28
3/3B F/16 F, daughter of 3/3A c.1267dupT [c.1629dupT] Ex13 (PST) p.X423LeuextX*108 Full iris, abnormal structure Yes Optic disc hypoplasia, blonde fundus, high myopia −7.0/−1.0×180 OU 20/200 Severe 28
3/4A F/adult F, mother of 3/4B c.1267dupT [c.1629dupT] Ex13 (PST) p.X423LeuextX*108 Full iris, abnormal structure Yes Severe keratopathy, mild cataracts ND CF Moderate-severe Current
3/4B F/23 F, mother of 3/4C and 3/4D c.1267dupT [c.1629dupT] Inferred Ex13 (PST) p.X423LeuextX*108 Full iris, abnormal structure Yes Very mild keratopathy, cataracts 0/+1.0×90 OD; −0.5 OS 20/80 Mild-moderate Current
3/4C M/3 F, son of 3/4B c.1267dupT [c.1629dupT] Inferred Ex13 (PST) p.X423LeuextX*108 Full iris, abnormal structure Yes Very mild keratopathy, mild cataract LE −1.75/−0.25×90 OD; −2.0/−0.25×90 OS 20/160 Mild-moderate Current
3/4D F/<1 F, daughter of 3/4B c.1267dupT [c.1629dupT] Inferred Ex13 (PST) p.X423LeuextX*108 Full iris, abnormal structure Yes Blonde fundus ND 20/250 Mild-moderate Current
Table 4.
 
Summary of Phenotypes Associated with Other Types of Mutation
Table 4.
 
Summary of Phenotypes Associated with Other Types of Mutation
ID Sex/Age Inheritance Mutation Intron (Domain) Protein Change Mutation type Iris Anomaly Foveal Hypoplasia Other Features Refraction Binocular Vision (Corrected) Severity Reference
4/1 M/7 S c.357+1G>A [IVS6+1G>A] Intron 6 (PD) Predicted 36-aa deletion in Ex6 Probable splice defect (unconfirmed) ? Yes OHT, moderate hypermetropia +4.0/−1.0×180 OD; +4.0/−1.0×180 OS 20/400 Moderate Current
4/2 F/40 S c.357+2insT [IVS6+2 insT] Intron 6 (PD) Predicted 36-aa deletion in Ex6 Splice defect confirmed by RT-PCR Iris tissue only present temporally. ∼50% RE; nearly full iris, ∼90% LE Yes Mild ptosis, cataracts, mild optic nerve hypoplasia 0/−2.0×180 OD; 0/−2.0×180 OS 20/200 Moderate 8
4/3A M/adult F, father of 4/4B c.357+5G>A [IVS6+5G>A] Intron 6 (PD) Unknown Possible splice defect (unconfirmed) No iris Yes Mild keratopathy, OHT, retinal detachment RE ND 20/120 Moderate 28
4/3B F/12 F, daughter of 4/4A c.357+5G>A [IVS6+5G>A] Intron 6 (PD) Unknown Possible splice defect (unconfirmed) No iris Yes Moderate hypermetropia +5.0 OD; +4.0/−1.0×180 OS 20/200 Moderate 28
4/4 F/37 F Splice defect confirmed, but genomic mutation not yet identified Unknown Predicted 36-aa deletion in Ex6 Splice defect confirmed by RT-PCR No iris Yes Mild cataracts, subluxed lenses −1.0 OU 20/200 Moderate 7 8
4/5 M/28 F c.1044+2T>A [IVS8+2T>A] Intron 8 (HD) Unknown Probable splice defect (unconfirmed) Coloboma-like defect LE; normal RE No Cataracts +12.0 (aphakia) OD; 0/−0.5×100 OS 20/80 Moderate Current
Supplementary Figure S1
Supplementary Figure S2
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×