The particle velocities were calculated using spatiotemporal images generated from raw videos in which high-intensity and thick lines represented the particle trajectories. The mean particle velocity in retinal capillaries that we found in our study was in good agreement with the data of Yang et al.,
40 who reported a mean leukocyte velocity of 1.37 mm/s determined with SLO and fluorescein angiography (FA), and with the data of Paques et al.,
16 who reported a mean velocity of 1.43 mm/s determined with FA using fluorescein-labeled autologous leukocytes. Grunwald et al.
14 and Arend et al.
41 used the blue field entoptic phenomenon and reported values of 0.89 and 0.75 mm/s, respectively, which are lower than the values in our study. As a reference, Nishiwaki et al.
4 used acridine orange staining and reported the mean leukocyte velocity in monkeys to be 0.92 mm/s. Moreover, Martin et al.
17,23 measured the mean leukocyte velocity directly from AO-SLO videos and reported it to be 1.37 mm/s, which is in excellent agreement with our results. However, our values were considerably lower than the corresponding data of Tam et al.,
34 who reported a value of 1.80 mm/s by using spatiotemporal images generated from AO-SLO videos acquired from one subject. The reason for this difference is unclear; however, because the particle velocity in our study was variable (0.73–2.36 mm/s), measurements can vary across different subjects and locations of measurements. Therefore, results from one subject would be likely to suffer more from this variability. Another possible reason for the difference is the lack of evaluation of pulsatility in our study. Measurement of pulsatility would reveal the cyclic changes in flow velocity, which would help in calculating the appropriate mean velocity.
23,42,43 In the present study, we could not assess the pulsatility because our system requires an internal memory to allow storage of the obtained video data and restricts the size of the video to a few seconds, and this could be a limitation of our study. The lack of correction of error due to raster scanning also may be a reason for the difference in velocities. As reported by Tam and Roorda,
35 we have to consider the relationship between the direction of moving objects and the direction of the raster scan to improve the method's accuracy in determining object velocity. Our results were obtained using spatiotemporal images without slope modification to reduce the error associated with raster scanning. Although evaluations of pulsatility and raster scan error are indispensable for studying blood flow velocity in the retinal circulation, we believe that excluding this parameter did not affect our main findings that the high-intensity particles were reflections of photoreceptor aggregates.