In our review of the previous three nationwide myopia surveys (1995, 2000, and 2006), we found that the mean prevalence of myopia increased from 1995 to 2000; subsequently, it was similar between 2000 and 2006, and the prevalence was even lower after the age of 13 in 2006
(Fig. 1) . AL
(Fig. 2A)and ACD
(Fig. 2B)gradually increased with age from 8 to 12 years, and thus the severity of myopia increased in 2006 (
P = 0.0001). In addition, ACD remained relatively stable with age after 13. At the same time, the mean LT decreased from the ages of 7 to 11, and increased with age after 12 (
P < 0.001;
Fig. 2C ). The mean in K had a complicated and variable pattern, but appeared rather stable or slightly increased (
P = 0.08;
Fig. 2D ).
The correlations between LT, age, K, ACD, AL, and REF were assessed by Pearson correlation. We found that LT significantly increased with age (r = 0.085, P < 0.0001) and REF (r = 0.028, P = 0.003), but decreased with ACD (r = −0.265, P < 0.0001) and AL (r = −0.073, P < 0.0001) between ages 7 and 18. Then, if we separated the data into two age groups—7 to 11 and 12 to 18—LT showed a significant decrease with age (r = −0.17, P < 0.0001), ACD (r = −0.159, P < 0.0001), and AL (r = −0.17, P < 0.0001), but REF increased (r = 0.164, P < 0.0001) between ages 7 and 11. LT significantly increased with age (r = 0.202, P < 0.0001) and decreased with ACD (r = −0.358, P < 0.0001) and AL (r = −0.052, P < 0.0001) between the ages of 12 and 18. However, it does not correlate significantly with REF (r = 0.006, P = 0.34).
The probabilities are significant, but the correlation coefficients are quite low. We thought this may be due to very small changes in LT and a large variance in REF. Therefore, we divided the ocular refraction into three groups: hyperopia (≥ +0.5 D), emmetropia (+0.25 to −0.25 D), and myopia (< −0.25 D). No significant difference in K was found among the three groups
(Fig. 3A) , but myopic eyes had deeper ACDs than did emmetropic and hyperopic eyes in all age groups (
P < 0.001). All three groups showed increased ACD from the ages of 7 to 11 and then remained relatively stable. Myopic and emmetropic eyes showed more prominent changes than did hyperopic eyes (
Fig. 3B ;
P < 0.001). LT in all three groups decreased from the ages of 7 to 11, but subsequently increased with age
(Fig. 3C) . LT in myopic eyes was found to be the least of the three groups (
P < 0.001). The change in LT in hyperopic eyes was relatively smaller than in myopic or emmetropic eyes. AL in the myopia group showed a prominent increase with age from age 7 to 18. However, hyperopic and emmetropic eyes showed only slight increases in AL with age
(Fig. 3D) .
Most of the myopic groups showed a decrease in LT from the ages of 7 to 11, but a subsequent increase with age
(Fig. 4) . However, when we examined the changes in highly myopic (< −6.0 D) and moderately hyperopic (> +3.0 D) eyes, we found that LT decreased very quickly from the age of 7 to 11 in the latter, whereas the former showed continuous thickening of the lens from the age of 7 onward
(Fig. 5) .
When we examined LT in different age groups, we found that 18-year-olds had thicker lenses than the younger children had (
P < 0.001), with no significant difference in LT between myopic refraction groups. At the age of 15, LT decreased from hyperopic refraction to emmetropia, and subsequently remained stable. At the ages of 8 and 12, LT decreased from hyperopic refraction to emmetropia, and then continuously decreased with myopic refraction
(Fig. 6) . LT in hyperopic eyes was greater than in emmetropic eyes in these four age groups. According to the passive emmetropization model, these slopes should depend on how quickly hyperopia decreased. Younger age groups had a more rapidly decreasing slope from hyperopia to emmetropia than to myopia. However, the lenses were thinner in younger age groups. LT increased with age after the age of 12. We tested major ocular components and age on LT by regression analysis, and we found LT significantly decreased with age from age of 7 to 11 (
P < 0.0001) and increased with age after 12 (
P < 0.0001). Age was the most important factor for increasing LT.
Because a relationship was noted between ACD, LT, and AL, we examined the ratio of each ocular component to the AL, and the relationship of the ratio with ocular refraction and age. The mean ratio of ACD/AL did not significantly differ between myopic eyes and the other groups
(Fig. 7A) . However, the ratio of LT/AL appeared to be more stable with age in emmetropic and hyperopic eyes
(Fig. 7B) . Myopic eyes showed a decrease in the LT/AL ratio with age. The ratio was <0.145 in myopic eyes
(Fig. 7B) . In addition, the mean ratios of the anterior segment (ACD+LT)/AL among emmetropic and hyperopic eyes were very stable with age, but decreased with age in myopic eyes
(Fig. 7C) . The mean ratio of anterior segment/AL in myopic eyes was <0.3.
Table 2shows the mean ocular component ratios for the different refractive groups. The mean ratio of LT/AL in schoolchildren was approximately 0.147 in the emmetropic group, 0.152 in the hyperopic group, and 0.139 in the myopic group, and the mean ratio of ACD/AL in schoolchildren was approximately 0.1537 in the emmetropic group, 0.1542 in the hyperopic group, and 0.152 in the myopic group. Still, the mean anterior segment/AL ratio was approximately 0.3 in the emmetropic group and 0.292 in the myopic group. We found that all ratios were highest in hyperopic eyes and lowest in myopic eyes. The mean ratio of LT/AL in emmetropic eyes was 0.147 and ACD/AL was 0.153 in emmetropic eyes for schoolchildren. We also compared the emmetropic eye data of adults
9 with data of younger schoolchildren. We found the LT/AL ratio increased with age, whereas the ACD/AL ratio decreased with age
(Table 3) . However, the anterior segment/AL ratio was constant with age (∼0.3;
Table 4 ).