Our first key observation was the point at which cells could be seen growing on the central posterior capsule (i.e., within the rhexis margin). This was particularly important because it corresponded with the visual axis; thus, changes that occur here can affect visual quality. When capsular bags were maintained without an IOL, cells typically were observed at the day 4 time point (
Fig. 4). The presence of an IOL affected at which point cells growing within the central posterior capsule was determined. This observation was made at day 8 ± 0.41 in the presence of a Rayner PMMA round-edge IOL and at day 11 ± 0.7 in the presence of an Alcon AcrySof acrylic IOL (
Fig. 4). This general pattern ties in well with clinical data
18 ; the further delay with the Alcon AcrySof acrylic IOL can be attributed to the well-described barrier effect from the interaction of the capsule and the square edge of this IOL.
10 At day 28 (end point), low-power images revealed that the percentage coverage of the posterior capsule differed between the groups (see
Fig. 6). Without an IOL, or with a Rayner PMMA round-edge, the entire posterior capsule became covered with cells (
Fig. 5). However, the Alcon AcrySof acrylic IOL reduced growth; though some coverage of the posterior capsule was observed, it was not complete (
Fig. 5). This pattern was observed in all four experiments using this IOL. In the absence of an IOL, marked wrinkling occurred. However, the presence of an IOL reduced the severity of wrinkling (
Figs. 6,
7). End point analysis using immunocytochemistry further confirmed the presence of cells on the posterior capsule of capsular bags maintained without an IOL and in the presence of a Rayner PMMA round-edge (
Figs. 7,
8). These data also reveal a number of interesting findings relating to cells within capsular bags maintained with Alcon AcrySof acrylic IOL. In the example shown in
Figure 7, negligible coverage of the central posterior capsule had occurred. Moreover, the images reveal an accumulation of cells in the region adjacent to the IOL edge (
Fig. 7, asterisk). This provides evidence that the barrier effect can be mimicked in our in vitro system and is likely to explain the delay in cell growth presented in
Figure 4. In addition, the cells that manage to breach the barrier created by the square-edge appear to reside on the posterior capsule at lower density than observed with capsular bags maintained in the presence of a Rayner PMMA round-edge (
Fig. 8). This could also explain why the degree of contraction/wrinkling was markedly reduced. In addition, cell growth on the outside of the anterior capsule was observed in all preparations (
Fig. 9). Changes to these cells can lead to anterior capsule fibrosis, which can affect IOL positioning and reduce visual quality. The degree of this growth was similar in all groups.