The relationship between MPOD in the affected eyes with acute and chronic CSC and the covariates (i.e., age, sex, smoking, RPE damage, the presence or absence of an SRD, the size of the SRD, and the time from the onset of the latest event), are shown in
Tables 2 and
3, respectively. MPOD correlated significantly with CRT (
r = 0.28,
P = 0.0210) and the time from the onset of the latest event (
r = −0.34,
P = 0.0026) in the affected eyes with chronic CSC. The other covariates did not correlate significantly with MPOD. To determine the major factors associated with MPOD, we performed stepwise regression analyses in all eyes, including the control group and the CSC subgroups (
Table 4). RPE damage, SRD, and the CSC subgroups were included as explanatory covariates along with sex, age, smoking, and CRT. Because the duration was directly associated with the definition of chronic or acute and correlated strongly with CRT (
r = −0.31,
P = 0.0017), it was not included in this analysis. Stepwise regression analysis showed that CRT and the affected eyes and fellow eyes with chronic CSC were the important covariates associated with MPOD (
P = 0.0016,
P = 0.0126, and
P = 0.0023, respectively). The smokers also tended to have a lower MPOD than did the nonsmokers (
P = 0.1320). The other covariates had little effect on MPOD.
The results of stepwise regression analysis showed that CRT and CSC affected MPOD independently. To confirm the relationship between CRT and CSC, we used stepwise regression analysis and ANCOVA to analyze the factors that affected CRT.
CRT in the CSC eyes ranged from 44 to 289 μm (mean ± SD, 168.0 ± 49.3). Because stepwise regression analysis identified RPE damage, SRD, and the CSC subgroups as significant covariates associated with CRT among the sex, age, smoking, RPE damage, SRD, and CSC subgroups, we performed ANCOVA and the Dunnett test to compare CRT among the CSC subgroups. The adjusted mean CRT was 181.9 μm (95% CI, 168.3–195.4) in the control group, 138.4 μm (95% CI, 130.5–146.2) in the affected eyes with chronic CSC, 176.7 μm (95% CI, 162.4–190.9) in the fellow eyes with chronic CSC, 159.2 μm (95% CI, 147.2–171.3) in the affected eyes with acute CSC, and 179.2 μm (95% CI, 162.7–195.8) in the fellow eyes with acute CSC (
Fig. 3). The Dunnett test showed that the central retinas in the affected eyes with chronic and acute CSC were thinner than those in the control group (
P < 0.0001 and
P = 0.0487, respectively). However, no significant differences were found in the CRT in the fellow eyes with chronic and acute CSC (
P = 0.9019 and
P = 0.9945, respectively).