The functional outcomes of a mutation in PITX2 can often be reliably predicted because of the characteristic genotype/phenotype correlation established from molecular studies.
24 Based on structural modeling of the PITX2-DNA interface,
47 it is clear that mutations in HD residues that make direct contact with a DNA target should reduce affinity for a DNA probe in EMSA experiments. The ARS mutations R43W and R90C followed this prediction accordingly
(Fig. 2c) . Given that R5 in the HD (equivalent to R43 in PITX2A) makes direct contact with DNA,
47 the R43W mutation would likely prevent binding of the mutant PITX2A protein to the target sequence because the W43 side chain is bulky and would sterically hinder incorporation into the protein-DNA interface. Similarly, R52 (equivalent to R90 in PITX2A) is extremely well conserved
(Fig. 5) 48 and contacts DNA.
47 It is, therefore, unlikely to tolerate substitution. PITX2A constructs bearing these two mutations resulted in no detectable binding to the bicoidBS probe. Consequently, it is not surprising that both mutant constructs also failed to result in transactivation of a bicoidBS-containing reporter plasmid at wild-type levels
(Fig. 2d) . Activation of R90C was greatly reduced, and that of R43W was almost at empty vector values. Transient trace level binding may occur in vivo that in vitro mobility shift assays are unable to detect, which may explain why these mutant constructs have residual activity.
It has been shown that a construct encompassing region III (specifically, residues 99–193) is involved in PITX2 dimerization.
37 Therefore, we hypothesized that the L105V and N108T mutations might affect intermolecular interactions. Our EMSA experiment revealed differences in the quality of DNA binding of these mutant Xpress-PITX2A constructs. The L105V-transfected sample appears to have a reduced number of high-mobility DNA-protein complexes that, in contrast, are enriched in the N108T-transfected sample. It is possible that our EMSA results indicate PITX2 binding to DNA probes in monomer (high-mobility) or dimer (low-mobility) forms
38 in which L105V favors, but N108T discourages, dimerization. Regardless, our EMSA results show that L105V and N108T can still bind the bicoidBS probe at levels similar to those of wild type. Luciferase assay revealed that L105V has no significant effect on transactivation of the bicoidBS-containing reporter. N108T exhibits slight hyperactivity on this synthetic target promoter suggesting that, like the previously studied PITX2 HD mutation V83L, anterior ocular development is sensitive to even subtle gain-of-function mutations in PITX2.
9 These mutations may elicit more dramatic responses on other native target sequences that are sensitive to their effects on monomeric versus dimeric protein-DNA binding.
Any alteration to a primary amino acid sequence can influence a protein’s secondary and tertiary structure, which can manifest as a change in its cellular abundance. The longevity of maintaining detectable levels of a given protein in cells disrupted for protein synthesis is a measure of the molecule’s stability. To investigate the possibility of the C-terminal PITX2 mutations having effects on protein stability, the levels of recombinant PITX2 proteins in cells treated with CHX were determined. The L108T mutation did not lead to a measurably altered protein half-life. Interestingly, however, the N108T mutation affected protein stability by causing the protein to decay faster than wild-type HA-PITX2A. The consequence of the combination of qualitatively altered DNA-binding with elevated transactivity and protein instability in a patient harboring the N108T mutation would likely be dysregulation of PITX2 targets and is strongly consistent with the suggestion that PITX2 activity is under stringent control for normal ocular development and function.
The C-terminus of PITX2 has been shown to have inhibitory
38 and stimulatory
21 effects on transactivation, depending on the specific deletion construct and promoter context examined. Our PITX2A deletion constructs were used to further delineate discrete domains that confer inhibitory or stimulatory effects on PITX2 transactivation. Our results with constructs Δ1–38 and Δ39–98
(Fig. 4b)are consistent with a previous study
38 demonstrating that the N-terminus of PITX2A (region I) enhances transcriptional activation of a reporter and that the HD (region II) is essential for function as a transcription factor. Removal of residues 99–159 from PITX2A resulted in a hyperactive effect revealing that region III inhibits PITX2 activity. The slightly increased activity observed with the N108T construct
(Fig. 2d)may be attributable to disruption of the region III inhibitory domain. However, L105V had no effect on transactivity in our assay, suggesting that localized disruption of the intermolecular or intramolecular interactions of region III is not a commonality in these “neighboring” mutations. Instead, there remains the possibility that these C-terminal mutations exerted their disease-associated effects in specific cell or binding target contexts that our reporter assay did not test. We propose that residues 160–232 encompass a single stimulatory module (region IV) based on the apparent hypoactive effects of the separate Δ160–190 and Δ191–232 constructs and the characteristic low-complexity in amino acid sequence spanning these adjacent segments
(Fig. 5) . The separate constructs did not result in a statistically significant difference in transactivation when considered at a stringent value (
P < 0.05), but we predict they would show additive effects if tested in a combined Δ160–232 construct. Finally, the extreme C-terminus (region V) containing the OAR domain encodes a distinct inhibitory domain. Construct Δ233–271 results in increased transactivation to a degree similar to deletion of region III. In summary,
Figure 5depicts PITX2 as a protein composed of a mosaic of functional modules. Activation domain (AD) 1 is poorly conserved in zebrafish, fruit flies (not shown), and paralogous human PITX proteins, which is an indication of the specialization of PITX2 encoded by the alternative isoforms that differ only at the N-terminus. The HD is very well conserved throughout evolution, reflecting its functional sensitivity to mutation. Inhibitory domain (ID) 1 and AD2 are moderately well conserved in various homologous and paralogous proteins. By virtue of their location in ID1, the mutations L105V and N108T could perturb the transactivation ability of PITX2 independently of its ability to bind DNA. Finally, inhibitory ID2 encompasses the OAR and, like the HD, its functional significance is highlighted by the high degree of evolutionary conservation.
Although our C-terminal deletions are not exact re-creations of previously studied expression constructs
21 38 44 and we did not use the same cell types or reporter plasmids, it is interesting to analyze the published results of molecular dissections of PITX2 in the context of these new findings. Deletion of ID2
(Fig. 5) , or most of the region, had the effect of slightly decreasing PITX2 transactivation of various reporters in COS-7 or CHO cells (with the CΔ39 and ΔT1261 constructs).
38 44 This region was also demonstrated to be required for binding by PIT1, which acts to promote synergistic transactivation with PITX2A.
38 Those authors proposed a model by which self-regulating intramolecular interactions involving the PITX2 C-terminal tail are relieved by intermolecular interactions, such as homodimerization or binding to other transcription factors, such as PIT1, but are not relieved when ID2 is absent.
38 In our assay with HTM cells, however, we observed that deletion of ID2 results in greatly increased transactivation
(Fig. 4b) . We interpret this result as evidence that cell-specific factors may alleviate PITX2-intrinsic inhibition despite the absence of this regulatory domain that is important in other cellular contexts. Saadi et al.
21 reported that larger C-terminal deletions of PITX2A (into ID1) led to increased transactivation in COS-7 and CHO cells. Presumably, these constructs disrupt the intramolecular interactions that otherwise suppress PITX2A activity. This scenario is consistent with the behavior of our Δ99–159 construct, which helps to delineate the regions of the PITX2 C-terminus required for the inhibition of activity (ID1 and ID2).
This is the first report of PITX2 functional analyses performed in an ocular cell line (HTM) relevant to ARS and glaucoma. The R43W and R90C mutations, which lie within the HD, alter residues structurally known to be important for protein-DNA contacts and, as expected, severely reduce the ability of PITX2 to bind and transactivate the bicoidBS target. These findings are consistent with the unusually severe clinical presentations of patients with R43W mutations. The L105V mutation is enigmatic in that it had no effect on any quantitative assayed properties of PITX2A in vivo. Because the original report of the L105V and N108T mutations studied the sequence of only
PITX2 and did not provide details of the affected pedigrees,
10 it remains a possibility that the associated ARS features were caused by defects in genes other than
PITX2. In this manner, L105V and N108T may be rare variants with no or only mild effects on patient phenotypes. However, the unique EMSA bandshift patterns for the L105V and N108T samples suggests these mutations alter PITX2 homodimerization, which may be important for the precise regulation of specific target genes. The N108T mutation exhibits elevated reporter activation but also causes destabilization of PITX2. The combination of these altered PITX2 properties, which result from the N108T mutation, could manifest as stochastic effects on protein function and target gene regulation during ocular development. We identified three discrete functional domains in the C-terminal tail of PITX2. Two of these domains are inhibitory to reporter transactivation and are separated by a domain responsible for increasing transactivity. The L105V and N108T mutations are located in the HD-proximal inhibitory domain (ID1) and may exert their ARS-associated effects through the involvement of molecular interactions of this domain in a target gene-specific, cell-specific, or isoform-specific context. These analyses establish that prediction of the effects of PITX2 mutations outside the HD is not straightforward. In this context, the characterization of distinct functional regions in the PITX2 C-terminal domain will be a useful tool for further studies on the complexities of PITX2 regulation.
The authors thank May Yu and Hermina Strungaru for technical contributions.