As films of human meibomian lipids were heated, there was an increase in surface pressure at maximum area, little change in maximum surface pressure at the smallest area, and the Π-A isocycles became less complex (
Fig. 7). This is consistent with the molecules at higher temperature taking up more space on the surface (increase of pressure at maximum surface area with temperature) and more readily forming multiple layers at minimum surface area. The cooling cycle, after heating, gave completely unexpected results (
Fig. 7). As the film was cooled, there was an unexpected increase in surface pressure at smaller areas or higher compressions (approximately area <50 cm
2 or pressure >10 mN/m), indicating molecules taking more space on cooling. At bigger areas or low compressions (approximately area >50 cm
2 or pressure <10 mN/m), the film seemed to occupy less area on cooling, which one would normally expect (
Fig. 7, inset: for simplicity only the compression parts of isocycles are shown). The Π-A isocycles of the heating and cooling cycle did not overlap with each other: the isocycles at equivalent temperatures were very different after the film had been heated (
Fig. 8). Once the lipid film had been heated, the meibomian lipids occupied more surface area at the same temperature than before heating, greater hysteresis, and higher maximum surface pressures. This indicates that the input of external thermal energy into the film had caused a dramatic reorganization of the molecules, which meant that they were more resistant to collapse (higher maximum surface pressure) and cohesion also seemed to be increased (increased hysteresis).
To confirm that these data were due to the meibomian lipids and not somehow due to the solvent or to the very high temperature (50°C), 0.06 mg of meibomian lipids were immediately, after collection, spread from the collection spatula onto the AT buffer in the Langmuir trough maintained at 37°C. At this temperature, the meibomian lipids spread across the subphase without the need of a solvent. A Π-A isocycle of the film was taken at 37°C before cooling to 20°C, when another Π-A isocycle was taken (
Fig. 9). This experiment was repeated on three other occasions with similar, but not exactly the same, amount of lipids. The results were similar to those obtained on cooling of meibomian lipids spread using a solvent. In another experiment, the surface area in the Langmuir trough was kept constant. Meibomian lipids were spread from a spatula onto the AT buffer at 37°C and the pressure was allowed to stabilize (3 mN/m). The pressure was monitored as the subphase was cooled to 20°C (Π-time profile). The result was a pressure increase to 8 mN/m at 20°C (
Fig. 9). Overall, these results indicate that cooling meibomian lipid films from 37°C or above caused a relative increase in surface pressure, hence such cooling apparently enhances the surfactant properties of meibomian lipid films.
To further explore the possible significance of cooling of meibomian lipids after warm compresses that are generally recommended for MGD patients, Π-A isocycles of the meibomian lipid film were taken at 41°C (warm compress temperature) and after cooling to 35°C (ocular temperature). An increase in surface pressure was observed on cooling of lipids from 41 to 35°C (
Fig. 10). The results were similar for lipids spread with or without solvent.