Purchase this article with an account.
Karin W. Littink, Robert K. Koenekoop, L. Ingeborgh van den Born, Rob W. J. Collin, Luminita Moruz, Joris A. Veltman, Susanne Roosing, Marijke N. Zonneveld, Amer Omar, Mahshad Darvish, Irma Lopez, Hester Y. Kroes, Maria M. van Genderen, Carel B. Hoyng, Klaus Rohrschneider, Mary J. van Schooneveld, Frans P. M. Cremers, Anneke I. den Hollander; Homozygosity Mapping in Patients with Cone–Rod Dystrophy: Novel Mutations and Clinical Characterizations. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010;51(11):5943-5951. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5797.
Download citation file:
© ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)
To determine the genetic defect and to describe the clinical characteristics in a cohort of mainly nonconsanguineous cone–rod dystrophy (CRD) patients.
One hundred thirty-nine patients with diagnosed CRD were recruited. Ninety of them were screened for known mutations in ABCA4, and those carrying one or two mutations were excluded from further research. Genome-wide homozygosity mapping was performed in the remaining 108. Known genes associated with autosomal recessive retinal dystrophies located within a homozygous region were screened for mutations. Patients in whom a mutation was detected underwent further ophthalmic examination.
Homozygous sequence variants were identified in eight CRD families, six of which were nonconsanguineous. The variants were detected in the following six genes: ABCA4, CABP4, CERKL, EYS, KCNV2, and PROM1. Patients carrying mutations in ABCA4, CERKL, and PROM1 had typical CRD symptoms, but a variety of retinal appearances on funduscopy, optical coherence tomography, and autofluorescence imaging.
Homozygosity mapping led to the identification of new mutations in consanguineous and nonconsanguineous patients with retinal dystrophy. Detailed clinical characterization revealed a variety of retinal appearances, ranging from nearly normal to extensive retinal remodeling, retinal thinning, and debris accumulation. Although CRD was initially diagnosed in all patients, the molecular findings led to a reappraisal of the diagnosis in patients carrying mutations in EYS, CABP4, and KCNV2.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only