All participants were examined on the school premises by a team of ophthalmologists, optometrists, and research assistants at the 2006 visit. After pupil dilatation with cyclopentolate 1%, digital retinal photographs centered on the optic disc were taken of both eyes using standardized settings.
15
Fractal analysis was performed on the optic disc-centered retinal photographs using a computer-based program (International Retinal Imaging Software [IRIS-Fractal], version 1; National University of Singapore, Singapore) following a standardized protocol, as described previously.
6,7 For each retinal photograph, one trained grader, masked to participants' characteristics and clinical diagnoses, used the program to measure retinal D
f within a predefined circular region of 3.5 optic disc radii centered on the optic disc. After the program automatically traced all the retinal vessels within this region, the grader checked the tracing with the original photograph and removed occasional artifacts misidentified as vessels (peripapillary atrophy, choroidal vessels, pigment abnormalities, and nerve fiber reflection). The program then performed fractal analysis and calculated retinal D
f using the box-counting approach,
6,7,16 an established method for measuring fractal dimension of structures that are not perfectly self-similar, such as the retinal vasculature. Intragrader reproducibility of measurements using IRIS-Fractal was high, with the grader showing an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.93. The grader also showed high intergrader correlation of 0.97 with other fractal graders in our center using the same images. Retinal vascular caliber was also measured from these photographs, and summarized as central retinal artery equivalent (CRAE) or central retinal vein equivalent (CRVE) using a standardized protocol described elsewhere.
17,18