Previously, we reported that
Fbn2 was the dominant fibrillin isoform during early eye development.
25 In situ hybridization experiments demonstrated that
Fbn2 was expressed strongly by capillary endothelial cells in the temporary vasculature (PM, anteriorly; and tunica vasculosa lentis, posteriorly) surrounding the developing WT lens. Consistent with this observation, PM microfibrils were found to be particularly enriched in Fbn2 protein, with comparatively low levels of Fbn1.
25 We examined the PM in eyes from P1
Fbn2−/− mice, to determine whether the absence of
Fbn2 affected the organization or composition of the microfibril network or the disposition of the associated capillary bed (
Fig. 3). The distribution of microfibrils was visualized using an antibody against the microfibril-associated protein, Magp1 (
Fig. 3A). At low magnification, the characteristic anastomosing pattern of PM capillaries was evident in Magp1-stained WT samples (
Fig. 3A). In contrast, the microfibril network in the PM of
Fbn2−/− animals was so disorganized that it was difficult to discern the organization (or even existence) of the underlying capillaries. The distribution of individual WT or
Fbn2-deficient microfibrils and their relationship to the PM capillaries was analyzed at higher magnification (
Fig. 3B). Capillaries were visualized directly using antibodies against CD31, an endothelial cell marker. In WT animals, microfibrils were evenly spaced and most were located in the gaps between neighboring capillaries. In contrast,
Fbn2−/− microfibrils formed disorganized fiber aggregates, many of which extended over, rather than between, capillaries. However, although disorganized, Magp1-positive microfibrils remained plentiful in the PM of
Fbn2−/− mice (
Figs. 3A,
3B). To determine whether
Fbn1 expression was increased in the absence of
Fbn2, we double-labeled PMs from WT or
Fbn2−/− mice with anti-Magp1 and anti-Fbn1 (
Fig. 3C). Magp1 staining intensity was comparable between the two genotypes. In WT PMs, microfibrils contained relatively low levels of Fbn1, as noted previously.
25 However, in
Fbn2-null animals, the level of Fbn1 in PM microfibrils was markedly increased. Thus, in
Fbn2−/− mice, the absence of Fbn2 was accompanied by increased Fbn1 immunofluorescence in PM microfibrils.