Development of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a major cause of visual loss in elderly populations of industrialized countries. Results of epidemiologic studies have shown factors such as age, sex, smoking, and genetic background to be important in association with neovascular AMD.
1,2 Among the disease-associated genetic variations reported to date, many have been identified in and around complement-related genes, including genes encoding complement factor H (CFH),
3 –6 complement factor B,
7 complement component 2 (C2),
7 and complement component 3 (C3).
8,9 In Asian countries, a condition called polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) is often distinguished clinically from neovascular AMD without PCV (nAMD). This distinction might be important, at least for patients of East Asian origin, for two reasons. First, though nAMD and PCV share cardinal clinical features and disease-associated genes,
10,11 emerging evidence suggests that they could be distinguished not only by clinical features but also by responses to treatments. This suggests that some difference in basic pathomechanisms may exist between the two conditions. For example, compared with nAMD, photodynamic therapy appears to be more effective for treating PCV,
12,13 whereas neutralizing vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), a critical regulator of angiogenesis and CNV formation,
14 might be less effective in reducing vasculopathy in PCV.
15,16 Second, PCV is diagnosed in 22.3% to 54.7% of neovascular AMD patients in Asian populations, thereby constituting a significant subtype of AMD, whereas it is diagnosed in only 4.0% to 9.8% of Caucasian patients in an equivalent analysis.
11