Figure 1 shows color fundus photographs of the right and left eyes in a rat at D + 3. CNV was induced in 6 spots in the right eye.
Figure 2 shows the procedures of automatic segmentation of the retina in a rat using the active contour method and morphologic image processing technique. The active contour method was performed on a high resolution T2-weighted MR image with an initial mask (
Fig. 2a). The initial curve (box shape) was evolved iteratively to detect the inner edge of retina (
Fig. 2b). Finally, the inner edge of the retina was detected after 500 evolutions of the initial curve (
Fig. 2c). The segmented image on a high resolution T2-weighted image (voxels within the green line in
Fig. 2c) was interpolated linearly to overlap low resolution T1-weighted images (
Fig. 2d). We expanded one-voxel outside of this overlapped image using dilation image processing (
Fig. 2e). Finally, the retina was segmented automatically by image subtraction technique (voxels between green and yellow line in
Fig. 2f). A quarter of the segmented retina was defined as a region of interest (ROI) for each eye. The mean concentration profile was created by averaging the concentration of contrast agent as a function of time across all voxels within the segmented retina for each eye. It was higher for the right retina than for the left retina in the control group, whereas these were similar between the left and right retinas in the KR-31831–treated group at D + 7 and D + 14 (
Fig. 3). For quantification of these concentration profiles, the AIF was defined by drawing the arterial vessel for each rat manually (
Figs. 4a,
4b). Nonlinear fitting was performed on the mean concentrations from the segmented retina using the population AIF to compute
Ktrans ,
ve , and
vp (
Figs. 4c,
4d). The
Table summarizes the mean and SD of
Ktrans ,
ve , and
vp parameters in all rats. The
Ktrans and
ve values of the CNV-induced right eyes were significantly higher than those of the intact eyes in control rats at D + 14 (
P < 0.05), and the relative
Ktrans and
ve values of the KR-31831–treated eyes were significantly lower than those of nontreated eyes at D + 14 (
P < 0.05). There was no significant change in the
vp values at any time points (
Fig. 5).
Figure 6 shows FITC-dextran angiography for representative control and KR-31831–treated rats at D + 14. CNV was well visualized by fluorescein-labeled high molecular-weight dextran (
Figs. 6a,
6b). The angiography showed that CNV was reduced observably in the rat treated with antiangiogenic drug compared to those of nontreated rats.