Previous histopathology studies in the dermatology literature revealed dense perivascular and perifollicular infiltrates, often with abundant neutrophils and occasionally with multinucleated histiocytes, excessive
Demodex mites in follicular infundibula, and infundibular pustules containing mites in perifollicular inflammatory infiltrates.
38 In a study by Vollmer,
39 83% of the follicles with mites showed inflammation. It has been suggested that an increasing density of mites correlated with an increasing perifollicular inflammation and clinical manifestations.
3 A density of >5 mites/follicle or 5 mites/cm
2 of skin biopsy specimens has been considered to be pathogenic.
2,3 Until now, the density of
Demodex mites has been traditionally studied by KOH preparations of follicular plugs, skin scrapings, and skin biopsy specimens in dermatology literature and light microscopic examination of epilated eyelashes in ophthalmology.
14,15 Kheirkhah et al.
16 suggested among other methods that fluorescein dye staining improved microscopic evaluation and counting of
Demodex in blepharitis with cylindrical dandruff. We tried to find out whether in vivo confocal microscopy would be effective in the diagnosis and follow-up of the eyelid disease in patients with blepharitis associated with cylindrical dandruff. Our results suggested that this technology not only effectively disclosed the mites embedded in the bulbs but also provided additional useful information on the meibomian gland/conjunctival disease, the features of which were acinar dilatation, periglandular inflammation, and conjunctival inflammatory infiltrates. In vivo confocal microscopy was also helpful in following the course of the eyelid-meibomian-conjunctival disease with tea tree oil treatment revealing resolution of inflammatory cells, resolution of acinar dilatation, and clearance of the mites with an obvious and significant decrease in mean mite counts in the eyelashes. Further improvements in relation to resolution of this new technology might allow us to visualize the eggs of the novice mites and tailor our treatment strategies accordingly. Likewise, future studies on larger populations establishing the cutoff value for mite density that causes clinically significant ocular surface disease and studies looking into the correlation between eyelid mite density assessed by confocal microscopy and corneal epithelial and meibomian gland disease severity will provide invaluable information. Although statistically insignificant, it was of interest that the mean mite counts in confocal microscopy were higher than the counts obtained by light microscopy, which may be owing to the in vivo examination of the mites, while the mites could be lost during epilation or coverslipping for light microscopy examination. Some patients may experience pain during epilation for light microscopy evaluation of the eyelashes. The painless nature of in vivo confocal microscopy examination compared with epilation may be another advantage of this technology. On the other hand, it is sometimes quite difficult to show the mites embedded in dandruff attached to the midportion of the eyelashes because of lack of stability of the examination background in confocal microscopy where mites embedded within the dandruff can be visualized with ease ex vivo when epilated and coverslipped with this technology. Finally, in accordance with data coming mostly from studies by Gao et al.,
13,29 we found 50% tea tree oil treatment to be effective based on our in vivo observations on the improvement of meibomian gland disease, eyelid inflammatory status, and clearance of the mites from the base of the eyelashes. In conclusion, we found laser scanning confocal microscopy to be an efficient noninvasive tool in the diagnosis and follow-up of ocular demodicosis infestation.