When investigating regional interactions (accomplished by averaging groups in
Figs. 4–
6, not shown), we found that the superior and inferior regions had fewer equatorially aligned fibers (PEF = 45% ± 2% and 44% ± 2%, respectively;
P < 0.001) and a lower Ecc (Ecc = 0.46 ± 0.007 and 0.46 ± 0.007, respectively;
P < 0.01) compared to the nasal and temporal regions (PEF = 52% ± 2% and 52% ± 2%, respectively; Ecc = 0.49 ± 0.007 and 0.47 ± 0.007, respectively). The PEF results support a similar observation noted by Pijanka et al.,
16 who found that in both glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous sclera there were meridional fiber bands radiating tangentially from the superior and inferior regions in superior–nasal and inferior–nasal directions, respectively (
Fig. 6 versus
Figs. 4A–
4D from Pijanka et al.
16). Given the hypothesis that the circumferential ring of collagen fibers present in the peripapillary sclera confers protection to the LC,
12,13,22,24 it is possible that the difference in orientation and microstructural organization between these regions could be a contributing factor to the well-characterized clinical observation that the superior and inferior regions experience axon loss at a preferential rate during POAG development.
35,36 In contrast to the group and regional anisotropy findings of Pijanka et al.,
16 our Ecc results (analogous to their anisotropy measurement) indicated that there were statistically significant differences in the degree of preferred fiber angle for the areas of sclera that correspond across studies. Our results indicated that the glaucomatous samples exhibited a greater degree of preferred fiber angle in the nasal region and a lower degree of preferred fiber angle in the superior region (as measured using Ecc, shown in
Fig. 4). Additionally, our data showed that the G group had a significantly higher percentage of equatorially aligned fibers in the temporal region compared to the NG group, while Pijanka et al.
16 found that there were no notable differences between groups in their bulk fiber direction. However, several factors may make direct comparisons between the studies difficult. Firstly, the areas of the sclera analyzed were not identical. In the Pijanka et al. study, the sclera was subdivided into grouped quadrants (superior–nasal quadrant, inferior–temporal quadrant, and so on), while our scleral samples were obtained directly from the superior, nasal, inferior, and temporal regions. Secondly, the size of the area studied and the proximity to the ONH were quite different. Pijanka et al. analyzed all scleral tissue within a 6.5-mm annulus of the ONH, while our group sampled a 1-cm
2 area that started on average 2.25 mm from the edge of the optic nerve. Thirdly, different modalities were used to quantify the scleral microstructure. Additionally, it should be noted that while the Ecc region–group differences were statistically significant, the magnitudes of differences were relatively small. Further research is warranted to investigate if these small differences result in important physiologically consequences.