A schematic of the experimental system is shown in
Figure 1. Two independent fiber-based SD-OCT systems (OCT1 and OCT2) were integrated and two sets of X-Y galvanometer scanners (XY1 and XY2) were used in the sample arm to scan the probing light beams with predefined scan patterns. Owing to the availability issues and to avoid extra cost we used two different OCT systems with different light sources. In OCT1, a superluminescent diode (SLD; Superlum Diodes Ltd., Moscow, Russia) with a full-width-at-half-maximum (FWHM) bandwidth of 50 nm and a center wavelength of 840 nm was used. In OCT2, a three-module SLD (T-840 Broadlighter; Superlum Diodes Ltd.) with a center wavelength of 840 nm and FWHM bandwidth of 100 nm was used.
In the sample arm, the x-scanning mirror of XY1 is imaged onto the x-scanning mirror of XY2 by a 4f (f = 50 mm) system consisting of lenses (L) L1 and L3. The probing beam of OCT1 is scanned by XY1 before it is coupled with the probing beam of OCT2 by a beam splitter cube. The probing beam of OCT2 passes through another 4f (f = 50 mm) system consisting of L2 and L3. The coupled probing beams were then scanned by XY2 and delivered onto the retina by the same optical systems. In experiments, the two probing beams were separated at a preset distance on the retina at a direction controlled by the XY1 scanner.
In the detection arms, the combined reflected beams from the sample and reference arms were collimated and detected by two spectrometers (spectrometer 1 and spectrometer 2), respectively. Spectrometer 1 consists of an 1800 line/mm transmission grating, a multi-element imaging lens (f = 100 mm), and a line scan charge-coupled device (CCD) camera (Sprint spL2048-70k, 2048 pixels with 10-μm pixel size; Basler, Ahrensburg, Germany); spectrometer 2 consists of a 1200 line/mm transmission grating, a multi-element imaging lens (f = 150 mm), and a line scan CCD camera (AVIIVA EM4 2k 4 × 12bits, 2048 pixels with 14-μm pixel size; e2V, Saint Egreve, France). The linear CCD cameras were synchronized and operated at a line rate of 30k lines per second. Two image acquisition boards (NI PCI-1429) acquired the images captured by the cameras and transferred them to a computer for signal processing and image display.
The two OCT systems have different performances. The sensitivities of OCT1 and OCT2 are 105 dB and 96 dB, respectively. The actual detectable imaging depth ranges were measured to be 4.978 and 2.684 mm for OCT1 and OCT2, respectively. Theoretical and measured depth resolutions of OCT1 are 6.2 μm and 6.9 μm in air. The theoretical and measured depth resolutions of OCT2 are 3.1 μm and 4.2 μm in air. Since we used exactly the same optical components in the sample arm of the two OCT systems, and the two probing light beams had the same beam diameter, the lateral resolutions of the two OCT systems are the same, which were mainly limited by the optical properties of the eye.
The system was adjusted so that the two probing beams were coaxial when the driving voltages of the two scanners were set to zero volts. For compensating the residual small misalignment between the two scanners we made a coordinate transformation between the two sets of scan data. By using a 2D raster scan the constructed projection images (OCT fundus image) of a model eye were compared quantitatively. A coordinate transformation matrix between the two sets of scan data was constructed to ensure that the scaled images accurately matched with each other. The imaging depth ranges of the two OCT channels were calibrated by using an optical flat as a sample together with a high-precision translational stage. The power of the probing light was 1.3 mW in OCT1 and 0.7 mW in OCT2. Since the probing light beams illuminated different locations in the retina, the light intensity is well below the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) standard for laser safety.