During the 20-minute dark adaptation, there was a progressive increase between five- and six-fold in pure rod b-wave amplitude for all groups (
Fig. 4). Due to significant interindividual variability in fully recovered amplitudes at
t = 20 (coefficient of variation > 30%), normalized values at each time point were used for all subjects (
Fig. 4). Averaged data points were fitted to a sigmoid function of the form:
where
y represents normalized b-wave amplitude;
base represents normalized pure rod b-wave amplitude values at the beginning of the dark adaptation (
t = 0);
thalf represents the time to reach half the maximum normalized amplitude value (0.5);
t represents time, and
t 10 represents the inverse slope as measured at 10 minutes (at which point linearity of the sigmoid curve was optimal). This inverse slope has the dimensions of time. All curves met a goodness of fit (
R 2) of at least 0.95. Best-fit parameters for
thalf and
rate were calculated for all groups (
Fig. 5). Base values were identical for all three groups (0.04 ± 0.02 for non-AMD eyes, 0.04 ± 0.02 for dry AMD eyes, and 0.04 ± 0.02 for neovascular AMD eyes). Therefore, the marginal rod contribution prior to beginning dark adaptation was not affected by AMD status. Best-fit coefficient values for
thalf, the time to reach half of the fully recovered pure rod b-wave amplitude (obtained at the end of the dark adaptation, i.e.,
t = 20 minutes), were significantly higher (
P < 0.0001) in AMD eyes. These were estimated to be 9 ± 0.4 minimum for the non-AMD group, 13 ± 0.4 for the dry AMD eyes, and 13 ± 0.3 for the wet AMD eyes. In addition, the slope parameter of the fitted curve (
rate) was reduced compared to controls (
P = 0.0008), implying a delay in recovery (not illustrated). The dynamic of recovery was equally delayed in both neovascular (wet AMD) and their fellow eyes (dry AMD). Inclusion of all subjects or subanalysis limited to pseudophakic subjects yielded similar results. As such, to eliminate potential contributions of various levels of lens opacification, we restricted data presentation to subjects with artificial lenses in both eyes (
n = 12 AMD and
n = 11 control subjects).