December 2010
Volume 51, Issue 12
Free
Letters to the Editor  |   December 2010
Amblyopia and Strabismus Questionnaire: Rasch Analysis
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Elizabeth S. van de Graaf
    Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Huibert J. Simonsz
    Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science December 2010, Vol.51, 6898. doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5761
  • Views
  • PDF
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Elizabeth S. van de Graaf, Huibert J. Simonsz; Amblyopia and Strabismus Questionnaire: Rasch Analysis. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010;51(12):6898. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5761.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
We read with interest the article by Vianya-Estopa et al., 1 “An Evaluation of the Amblyopia and Strabismus Questionnaire Using Rasch Analysis.” It criticized our Amblyopia and Strabismus Questionnaire (A&SQ) by highlighting “the limitations of the A&SQ instrument in the assessment of VR-QoL in subjects with strabismus and especially in those with amblyopia alone.” We would like to comment on the selection of subjects used in their appraisal. 
The A&SQ was presented to 102 patients (mean age, 48 years) from ophthalmic, orthoptic, and optometric clinics and practices. Eleven had strabismus without amblyopia, 33 had anisometropic amblyopia, 39 had strabismic amblyopia, and 19 had combined-mechanism amblyopia. The sample seems representative of amblyopia of various causes in patients age 48. However, average visual acuity is worse than would be expected in 48-year-old U.K. citizens with amblyopia. Visual acuity of the amblyopic eye was 0.38 logMAR in anisometropic amblyopes, 0.6 logMAR in strabismic amblyopes, and 0.70 logMAR in combined-mechanism amblyopes. Accordingly, almost all had amblyopia with a visual acuity worse than 0.3 logMAR. 
The prevalence of adults with a visual acuity of worse than 0.3 logMAR is approximately 2.5% in untreated populations, 2 4 but 0.8% to 1.1% in treated populations. 5 8 Treatment of amblyopia was well established in the United Kingdom the 1960s. Hence, the sample of patients consisted primarily of severe or insufficiently treated amblyopia, whereas there were only 11 patients with strabismus without amblyopia. The large category in the middle of the spectrum that runs from strabismus without amblyopia, through strabismus with mild or treated amblyopia, to more severe amblyopia is underrepresented in the sample of Vianya-Estopa et al. 1  
Although the Rasch model does not assume a population distribution from a certain class, in practice, a sample that extends over the whole range of the spectrum provides more balanced statistical information about the functioning of the different response categories. This may well be the reason that they found that merging five-point scales into three-point scales did not make the A&SQ less informative for their sample. It could also explain the ceiling effect that they found. The relatively small sample size, 102, may have aggravated the problem. 
In previous studies, 9 11 in an almost nonselect sample of amblyopia and/or strabismus patients treated in the Waterland area 35 years earlier, we found that the two conditions strabismus and amblyopia are heavily interwoven. We agree that, in principle, separate instruments would be preferable to assess VR-QoL in individuals with strabismus, individuals with amblyopia, individuals with both amblyopia and strabismus, and individuals with loss of binocular vision. However, this conclusion cannot be drawn from the study by Vianya et al. 1 in a sample dominated by amblyopia with very low visual acuity. 
References
Vianya-Estopa M Elliott DB Barrett BT . An evaluation of the Amblyopia and Strabismus Questionnaire using Rasch analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:2496–2503. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Vinding T Gregersen E Jensen A Rindziunski E . Prevalence of amblyopia in old people without previous screening and treatment: an evaluation of the present prophylactic procedures among children in Denmark. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1991;69:796–798. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Attebo K Mitchell P Cumming R Smith W Jolly N Sparkes R . Prevalence and causes of amblyopia in an adult population. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:154–159. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ohlsson J Villarreal G. Sjöström A Cavazos H Abrahamsson M Sjöstrand J . Visual acuity, amblyopia and ocular pathology in 12–13-year-old children in Northern Mexico. J AAPOS. 2003;7:47–53. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Köhler L Stigmar G . Vision screening of four-year-old children. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1973;62:17–27. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Jensen B Goldschmidt E . Visual acuity in Danish school children. Acta Ophthalmol. 1986;64:187–191. [CrossRef]
Kvarnström G Jakobsson P Lennerstrand G . Screening for visual and ocular disorders in children, evaluation of the system in Sweden. Acta Paediatr. 1998;87:1173–1179. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ohlsson J Villarreal G. Sjöström A Abrahamsson M Sjöstrand J . Visual acuity, residual amblyopia and ocular pathology in a screened population of 12–13-year-old children in Sweden. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2001;79:589–595. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Simonsz-Tóth B Loudon SE van Kempen-du Saar H van de Graaf ES Groenewoud JH Simonsz HJ . Visusevaluierung in einer historischen Kohorte von 137 okkludierten Patienten, 30-35 Jahre nach Ende der Okklusionsbehandlung. [Evaluation of visual acuity in a historic cohort of 137 patients treated for amblyopia by occlusion 30-35 years ago.] Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 2007;224:40–46. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Van de Graaf ES van der Sterre GW van Kempen-du Saar H Simonsz B Looman CW Simonsz HJ . Amblyopia and Strabismus Questionnaire (A&SQ): clinical validation in a historic cohort. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007;245:1589–1595. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Van de Graaf ES Felius J van Kempen-du Saar H . Construct validation of the Amblyopia and Strabismus Questionnaire (A&SQ) by factor analysis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009;247:1263–1268. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×