Using serial histologic sections from the whole human and monkey orbits, it was possible to reconstruct the tridimensional pattern of the larger intramuscular motor nerve distributions within all four rectus EOMs in macaque monkey and humans. Findings were similar in both species. Results in an additional human orbit confirm and extend an earlier report that, externally to the LR, CN6 bifurcates into two major divisions that separately innervate correspondingly distinct superior and inferior zones of the LR muscle.
11 Progeny branches derived from these two divisions distributed to separate, minimally overlapping zones of the LR whose fibers run mutually parallel over a long anteroposterior extent consistent with reported broad distribution of motor endplates in the middle two thirds of the EOM (
Fig. 2).
28 This highly compartmentalized pattern was approximated to a slightly lesser degree by intramuscular innervation by the CN3 branch to the MR muscle, albeit with an intermediate region between the superior and inferior zones in which innervation was overlapping from the two major motor nerve trunks (
Fig. 3). It may thus be concluded that an anatomic basis also exists for possible selective neural control of the superior versus inferior zone of the MR, as has been postulated for the LR.
11 The distribution of CN3 to the vertical rectus EOM did not, in humans or monkey, show a clear two-zone pattern with significant segregation (
Fig. 5). There was nevertheless some inhomogeneity in the IR, where the medial portion was exclusively innervated by one motor nerve branch, and the lateral IR portion was innervated by an overlapping mix of both major nerve branches. No topographic segregation could be discerned at all in the SR. The specificity of compartmental segregation of relatively large intramuscular motor nerves to horizontal but not to the SR, and only medially in the IR, argues for a functional correlation. Based on findings in rabbit, it is assumed that finer terminal branches of the motor nerves continue within their compartments to neuromuscular junctions that are widely distributed throughout each rectus EOM.
29
Compartmentalization is not uncommon in skeletal muscles; different regions can act as if they were independent muscles and frequently are innervated by discrete motor subnuclei.
3,4,30 Among cranial nerves, it is known that facial nerve fibers directed to the superior orbicularis oris exhibit a somatotopic organization, reflecting a potential compartmentalization of function of the rostral, middle, and caudal segments of the muscle.
31 Although the horizontal EOMs exhibit compartmental innervation, it is not known if the distinct EOM zones are innervated by independent motor subnuclei. The CN3 nucleus is composed of a complex of subnuclei within the midbrain, each command a specific EOM and so well defined topographically that a small lesion in the one subnucleus can cause an isolated palsy of the corresponding EOM.
32,33 The MR subnucleus projects to the contralateral CN6 nucleus through the medial longitudinal fasciculus, which facilitates coordinated horizontal movements. In fact, single unit recording studies has shown that both versional and vergence signals are present in MR and LR motoneurons
34 ; however, these motoneurons do not behave uniformly during different ocular movements. In both nuclei, most cells have the same firing rate for a given eye position regardless of vergence angle, but a minority of cells exist in which the firing rate depends on both eye position and vergence state.
35 It has been commonly presumed that overall horizontal rectus EOM behavior reflects a simple population average of motor neurons, but this assumption might not apply under at least some physiological conditions. It seems possible that these different types of motoneurons might contribute differently to different tasks, and that CN6 innervation to the superior and inferior LR zones might be segregated at the motor nucleus and motor nerve levels. Indeed, 8–15% of CN6 in humans are grossly duplicated, with segregation throughout the nerve.
20,21 Functional evidence for differential compartmental activation of the human LR is now available from magnetic resonance imaging during ocular counter-rolling induced by head tilt. The inferior but not superior LR zone demonstrated contractile changes due to head tilt in both normal humans and in the uninvolved orbit of patients with superior oblique (SO) palsy, while neither LR zone exhibited contractile changes due to head tilt in orbits affected by SO palsy.
36
Peng et al.
11 used a computational simulation (Orbit 1.8; Eidactics, San Francisco, CA) to infer that selective LR compartmental activation could impart vertical action ±13–15% of total LR tendon force and torsional action ±16–22% of total LR tendon force.
37 This simulation assumed that differential activation shifts the effective point of LR insertion on the sclera by 2.5 mm, without shifting the effective origin at the pulley. If EOM fibers in the superior zone can slide independently of those in the inferior zone, then it may be more realistic to assume that the centroid of LR force also shifts within its pulley by the same direction and amount as the effective shift in scleral insertion. Such an assumption in the computational simulation (Orbit 1.8; Eidactics)
37 reduces the torsional effect of differential activation of the two LR compartments to 0–4% of total LR force but increases vertical action to 22–24% of total LR force. Simulation of analogous shift in effective MR insertion and MR centroid at the pulley yields 5–7% torsional and 20–21% vertical action of total MR force. Simulation of simultaneous activation of the superior zones of both the MR and LR in one eye, with inhibition of the inferior zones, predicts a 6° supraduction relative to a central target, with torsion <0.5°; this vertical rotation exceeds by some sixfold the amplitude of normal vertical fusional vergence. Differential compartmental activation of the horizontal rectus EOMs is therefore a viable mechanism for vertical vergence eye movements associated with little or no torsion, potentially confounding efforts to identify motor mechanisms based on classical mechanical actions of the cyclovertical EOMs.
38 Pathologic derangements of compartmental activation could perhaps be a cause of vertical strabismus. Evidence of a possible role of the horizontal rectus EOMs in vertical eye movements is the existence of projections to the CN6 nucleus derived from cell groups in vertical eye movement pathways, including the superior vestibular nucleus, interstitial nucleus of Cajal, and rostral interstitial nucleus of the medial longitudinal fasciculus
36 . Similar studies using different tracers in the distal superior and inferior zones of the EOMs would be of value to determine whether this compartmentalization has a topographic representation in the brain stem. Since the motor nerve divisions bifurcate externally to the horizontal rectus EOMs, possible behavioral effects of selective topographic lesions, nerve fiber recording, or electrical stimulation might be explored experimentally.
Mean CN6 motor neuron firing rates are higher during convergent than conjugate adduction. In other words, relative to primary position, the decrease in firing rate of a right CN6 motor neuron during convergent adduction is only 50–62% of the decrease in firing rate observed during levoversion (conjugate adduction).
39 This would suggest that there must be an increase in LR force during convergence with concomitant MR co-contraction. Surprisingly, it has been shown that during convergence there is a decrease of both LR and MR force, greater in LR, as measured across the insertional tendon.
39 Compartmentalization in horizontal rectus EOMs might resolve this paradox. Based on the current observations, we propose that the higher firing rate recorded in the CN6 motoneurons might be directed to a specific LR compartment contributing a smaller value when this force is measured as an average across the whole tendon at the insertion. One possibility might be that an increase in motor neuron activity innervating the superior zone of one horizontal rectus EOM (for example, the MR) might be accompanied by a corresponding decrease in the inferior zone, leading to overall reduction in force at the scleral insertion; if this behavior were accompanied in the antagonist EOM (for example, the LR) by a decrease in innervation to the superior zone and a smaller increase in the inferior zone leading again to a reduction in force at the scleral insertion, horizontal and vertical eye position might remain unchanged.
Considering the close relationship between the MR and LR in coordination of horizontal movements, and the compartmental pattern found so prominently in these two rectus EOMs, we suppose that there might exist similar topographic organization of the subnuclei of CN3 and CN6 innervating the horizontal rectus EOMs. The more limited compartmental pattern of intramuscular innervation in the IR might also be associated with some topographical organization of its subnucleus. Although there as yet exists no direct evidence supporting the foregoing suppositions, neuroanatomical and neurophysiological studies of the selective intramuscular innervation zones are warranted to determine whether this segregation is maintained within the brain stem.
Supported by the U.S. Public Health Service; National Eye Institute Grants No. EY08313 and EY00331; and Research to Prevent Blindness.