Overall, reaction times were significantly longer on the blind than the seeing side (means: 1.99 vs. 1.15 seconds; F(1,9) = 72.29
P < 0.001), at the large than the small eccentricity (1.76 vs. 1.38 seconds; F(1,9) = 12.43,
P = 0.01), and in the approaching than the stationary condition (1.72 vs. 1.41 seconds; F(1,9) = 6.90,
P = 0.03). Reaction times to pedestrians on the blind side were significantly longer for the approaching than the stationary condition at the large eccentricity (2.82 vs. 1.80 seconds,
P = 0.02;
Fig. 4), but not the small eccentricity (1.82 vs. 1.51 seconds,
P = 0.16). By comparison, on the seeing side, differences in reaction times between the two conditions were much smaller at both the large eccentricity (1.21 vs. 1.20 seconds,
P = 0.89;
Fig. 4) and the small eccentricity (1.06 vs. 1.14 seconds,
P = 0.02). Furthermore, for the approaching condition (but not the stationary condition), reaction times were significantly longer at the large than the small eccentricity on both the blind and seeing sides (2.82 vs. 1.82 seconds,
P = 0.01; and 1.21 vs. 1.06 seconds,
P = 0.008, respectively;
Fig. 4). This three-way, side-by-condition-by-eccentricity interaction was significant (F[1,9] = 5.93,
P = 0.04). When data for only timely responses were considered, blind-side reaction times were still significantly longer in the approaching than the stationary condition at the large eccentricity (2.20 vs. 1.59 seconds,
P = 0.03).