We evaluated 25 eyes with acute NAION an average of 9.9
+ 5.5 days from the time of self-reported vision loss. Five patients had prior NAION in the fellow eye. None had glaucoma or retinal disease that could cause visual field or acuity deficits. The visual field and visual acuity deficits varied, but were typical of NAION (
Table 2). The acute visual field was abnormal for the inferior field region in 19 eyes and for the superior field region in 9 eyes (6 eyes had deficits in both regions, one of which was almost complete visual threshold loss). A maculopapillary type defect occurred in 1 eye, and a small superior arcuate defect that did not register as abnormal for the entire region occurred in one eye. The average threshold deviation was −12.89
+ 6.62 dB for the affected superior field Garway-Heath region and −11.87
+ 5.52 dB for the affected inferior field region. At presentation, the average RNFL measurement (
Table 3) varied widely for OCT and for SLP. All eyes had OCT average RNFL measurements that were abnormally thickened, greater than the 95th percentile of controls, and two or more quadrants were thickened in every affected eye, as described previously.
10 No eyes had an OCT average or quadrant RNFL measurement less than the fifth percentile of controls. For SLP at presentation, no affected eye had an average RNFL or quadrant measurement greater than the 95th percentile of controls. SLP was below the fifth percentile (for control and unaffected fellow eyes) for the superior quadrant in 12 eyes (11 with abnormal corresponding inferior visual field region;
Figs. 2,
3, case example) and for the inferior quadrant in 6 eyes (6 with abnormal superior visual field region; 2 with superior and inferior sectors affected).
At presentation, for NAION eyes there was no correlation between the visual acuity deficit and sector retardance. Twelve of the 19 eyes with abnormal inferior field region and 6 of 10 eyes with abnormal superior visual field region had retardance values less than the fifth percentile of controls in the corresponding SLP superior and inferior sectors. For eyes with abnormal field regions, the corresponding SLP superior or inferior sector average values were 58
+ 16 μm (
P = 0.003) compared to 67
+ 12 μm for sectors with corresponding normal field regions. The acute SLP retardance values for the superior sector correlated with inferior region threshold (
r = 0.45,
P = 0.04) and the inferior sector correlated with superior region threshold (
r = 0.63,
P = 0.002; for SLP values for superior and inferior sectors
r = 0.59,
P = 0.04,
Fig. 4). The eye with complete visual field loss had no sectors with retardance less than the fifth percentile of controls. The values for baseline, acute OCT RNFL values for the same sectors did not correlate with the corresponding area of field loss at baseline.
At one month, all affected eyes had persistent visual field loss (
Table 2). None of the eyes with an abnormal SLP sector retardance at presentation showed recovery of the corresponding field region to the normal threshold range. However, three eyes with normal baseline SLP and abnormal visual regional threshold during the acute stage had improvement of the field region over time. All affected eyes at the second visit at approximately one month later showed less thickening or thinning of the RNFL by SLP and OCT compared to the measurement at presentation (
Table 3). None of the RNFL sectors with abnormal retardance by SLP at presentation recovered retardance. Nine eyes had thinning of OCT RNFL less than the control fifth percentile in at least one sector at the one month visit (9 superior, 1 temporal, and 3 inferior quadrants). OCT values for either superior or inferior sectors at one month did not correlate with the field loss in the corresponding quadrant at 3 months.
After three or more months, significant visual threshold loss (<5th percentile) was seen in the inferior quadrant in 19 eyes and in the superior quadrant in 12 eyes. The OCT was below the fifth percentile of controls in the corresponding 19 superior sectors and in 10/12 inferior sectors. Presentation superior sector SLP-derived RNFL values correlated with the
>3-month inferior region threshold (
r = 0.45,
P = 0.04) and the inferior sector SLP-derived RNFL values correlated with the
>3-month superior region threshold (
r = 0.42,
P = 0.08; for SLP values for superior and inferior sectors
r = 0.44,
P = 0.02,
Fig. 4). The
>3-month OCT-derived inferior RNFL sector (but not the superior RNFL sector), correlated with the corresponding superior regional threshold value (
r = 0.60,
P = 0.002).