The coronal lacrimal gland area was significantly larger in active (
P < 0.000) and inactive TAO (
P = 0.002) than the control; meanwhile, it was larger in active than inactive TAO (
P = 0.018). The axial lacrimal gland area was significantly larger in active (
P < 0.000) and inactive TAO (
P = 0.001) than the control; meanwhile, it was larger in active than inactive TAO (
P = 0.001). Coronal lacrimal gland width was significantly wider in active (
P < 0.000) and inactive TAO (
P = 0.001) than in the control. Axial lacrimal gland width was significantly wider in active (
P < 0.000) and inactive TAO (
P = 0.035) than the control; meanwhile, it was wider in active than inactive TAO (
P = 0.044). No significant difference was found in lacrimal gland coronal lengths (
P = 0.068) and axial lengths (
P = 0.281) among the three groups (
Figs. 4,
5).
In TAO patients, the coronal area, axial area, and axial width were positively correlated with the CAS (
Fig. 6;
r = 0.409,
P = 0.004;
r = 0.585,
P < 0.000;
r = 0.368,
P = 0.010) and the OSDI score (
r = 0.466,
P = 0.001;
r = 0.631,
P < 0.000;
r = 0.418,
P = 0.003), and negatively correlated with the Schirmer test score (
r = −0.361,
P = 0.012;
r = −0.361,
P = 0.012;
r = −0.294,
P = 0.043).