The pathophysiology of acute retinal pigment epitheliitis is unknown. Some electrophysiologic and ophthalmic evidence suggests that acute retinal pigment epitheliitis is an inflammatory disorder of the RPE.
11 Previous studies have suggested that the associated inflammation involves primarily outer neurosensory retina.
12 Several OCT-based studies have shown that acute retinal pigment epitheliitis typically involves outer neurosensory retina and associated areas of the RPE.
6 A recent case report of SD-OCT in four patients suggested the possibility that the junction between the photoreceptor outer segments and the apical side of the RPE cells is the initial area involved in acute retinal pigment epitheliitis.
13 However, due to the low incidence of this condition, the published literature comprises mostly case reports and small case series. There is limited information available for those looking to study this unique macular disease.
The outermost highly reflective band of the outer retina on OCT is thought to be the RPE, with a potential contribution from Bruch's membrane and the choriocapillaris.
14,15 Previous reports have supported this designation, including histologic-OCT correlation in animal eyes.
16 In the current study, all subjects showed abnormal reflectivity of the inner RPE at baseline. Moreover, the affected area of the inner RPE was similar in size or larger than the corresponding region of the ISe band on SD-OCT images. These findings suggest that acute retinal pigment epitheliitis primarily affects the inner RPE area. Inner layer reflectivity of the RPE as detected by commercial SD-OCT is commonly thought to represent the tips of outer segments of the photoreceptors
17 or Verhoeff's membrane.
18,19 Verhoeff's membrane is now known to comprise junctional complexes between RPE cells.
20 Therefore, a reflective band that appears to be physically separated from the RPE on OCT images cannot be Verhoeff's membrane. This would mean that the inner RPE reflectivity detectable by SD-OCT does not correspond to Verhoeff's membrane. Reflectivity of the RPE inner layer as detected by SD-OCT is commonly considered to correspond to the area of contact between the RPE apical process and the external portion of the cone outer segment (contact cylinder of the outer segment).
15 Therefore, it could be assumed that acute retinal pigment epitheliitis is the result of a transient dysfunction or inflammation at the interface between the RPE and photoreceptor outer segments. In the present study, the lesions associated with acute retinal pigment epitheliitis were all located juxtafoveally, involving the foveal center or at the foveola. The fovea is the area of greatest cone density and lowest rod density of the retina.
21 Additionally, the integrity of the ISe line at the fovea on SD-OCT was related with cone cell density on adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy.
22,23 Thus, acute retinal pigment epitheliitis could originate at the interface between RPE cells and cone photoreceptor outer segments.
Focal inflammation originating at the RPE/cone photoreceptor outer segment interface might expand to the inner photoreceptor segments or disrupt the ISe. In cases of severe inflammation, photoreceptor cell bodies could swell or exhibit other signs of damage. Interestingly, the abnormal reflectivity revealed by SD-OCT was not found at the level of the RPE, Bruch's membrane, or the choriocapillaris. The progression of acute retinal pigment epitheliitis that can be visualized using SD-OCT seems to expand from the RPE/photoreceptor junction toward the inner photoreceptor layer in all cases. We hypothesized that inflammation could spread from the discs of cone photoreceptors or apical processes of the RPE, to extend through photoreceptor axons, such that inflammatory change would be confined to the cone photoreceptor layer.
It has been reported that good visual acuity can be recovered in most acute retinal pigment epitheliitis patients within 6 to 12 weeks, without treatment.
1,3,6,7 In the current study, 89% of patients (16 eyes) recovered good visual acuity, and 11% patients (two eyes) exhibited limited improvements in visual acuity despite participation in follow-up exams for more than 1 year. All patients with incomplete recovery exhibited visual acuity of less than 20/70 at baseline, which represented relatively reduced visual acuity compared to the overall mean visual acuity (20/40). In addition, the SD-OCT findings of incomplete visual recovery cases showed more extensive retinal involvement at baseline, involving the inner layer of the RPE, the ELM, the ONL and the ISe. Histological analysis has shown that the cell bodies of cone photoreceptors are located at the similar level as the ELM, external to the rod photoreceptors.
21 Thus, involvement of the ELM or ONL could be associated with the damage of cone photoreceptor nuclei, which could result in irreversible destruction. Our results indicate that poor visual outcome could be predicted in patients with poor visual acuity at baseline and/or involvement of the ELM or ONL as detected by SD-OCT at baseline.
Considering its self-limiting nature, the accurate diagnosis of acute retinal pigment epitheliitis is essential for avoiding unnecessary treatment. In some of the cases presented here, the FA findings were unremarkable despite the presence of pigmented foveal lesions in 17% of eyes (three of eighteen), and ICGA showed no specific findings in 17% of eyes (one of six eyes imaged by ICGA). The reason why ancillary imaging tests showed unremarkable findings in some patients is unclear. Such unremarkable findings did not seem to be associated with disease severity or progression over time. In some patients, in spite of relatively poor baseline visual acuity, involvement of various retinal layers on SD-OCT images, and brief symptom duration, FA and ICGA results were unremarkable (
Fig. 2, patient 18). However, abnormal reflectivity of the inner RPE was detected at the fovea with SD-OCT in every case (100%). Our results showed that SD-OCT provided enhanced diagnostic sensitivity for acute retinal pigment epitheliitis that was unmatched by any other examination modality. Spectral domain–OCT can thus be used to assist in the diagnosis of this unique retinal condition, particularly in the early stages of disease, or in patients with minimal changes to the retina. Therefore, SD-OCT should be considered preferentially over other examinations when acute retinal pigment epitheliitis is suspected.
Our study is limited by its retrospective nature and the small size of the cohort. In addition, if other multimodal imaging techniques were available (e.g., near-infrared reflectance images), it would be possible to redefine the clinical presentation of acute retinal pigment epitheliitis and thereby to enhance our analysis. However, we focused on the SD-OCT findings to identify characteristics that could be used to diagnose this rare macular disease. Moreover, to the best of our knowledge, this is the largest case series devoted to the investigation of acute retinal pigment epitheliitis.
Herein, on the basis of the morphologic changes shown by SD-OCT, we suggest that acute retinal pigment epitheliitis derives from the interface between the RPE and cone photoreceptor outer segments. Although visual acuity was fully recovered in most cases, poor visual acuity at baseline and involvement of the ELM or ONL on SD-OCT at baseline were associated with the incomplete recovery of visual acuity. Further investigations are required to elucidate the precise physiopathology of this rare and unique macular disease.