June 2013
Volume 54, Issue 15
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2013
A Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis with a Flexible Lead is Reliable for Patient Testing
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Joel Villalobos
    Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
  • Penelope Allen
    Centre for Eye Research Australia, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
    Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
  • Chi Luu
    Centre for Eye Research Australia, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
    Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
  • Lauren Ayton
    Centre for Eye Research Australia, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
    Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
  • Jonathan Yeoh
    Centre for Eye Research Australia, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
    Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
  • David Nayagam
    Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
  • Nicholas Opie
    Centre for Eye Research Australia, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
    Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
  • Mohit Shivdasani
    Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
  • Robert Shepherd
    Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
    Medical Bionics Department, University of Melbourne, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
  • Chris Williams
    Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
    Medical Bionics Department, University of Melbourne, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Joel Villalobos, The Bionics Institute of Australia (P); Penelope Allen, Bionic Vision Australia (P); Chi Luu, None; Lauren Ayton, None; Jonathan Yeoh, None; David Nayagam, None; Nicholas Opie, None; Mohit Shivdasani, None; Robert Shepherd, None; Chris Williams, Bionic Vision Australia (P)
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2013, Vol.54, 1030. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Joel Villalobos, Penelope Allen, Chi Luu, Lauren Ayton, Jonathan Yeoh, David Nayagam, Nicholas Opie, Mohit Shivdasani, Robert Shepherd, Chris Williams; A Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis with a Flexible Lead is Reliable for Patient Testing. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013;54(15):1030.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose
 

A flexible intraorbital lead was developed to minimise risk and simplify implantation of a retinal prosthesis. The microwire based prosthesis was tested in a preclinical model, then optimised in cadavers and tested in a clinical pilot study.

 
Methods
 

Initially, a suprachoroidal (SC) electrode array was developed with a transscleral lead of 14-22 platinum microwires in silicone. It was implanted in cats (n = 16) for 3 months. The lead was sutured on the sclera with a silicone patch and tunnelled under conjunctiva to a patch on the orbital rim. It followed either a straight path (3 implants) of 12 mm; or a curved path (13 implants; Fig. 1) of 16 mm with 1 mm strain relief cones. Histological assessment was performed on the tissue around the lead. The lead routing was then fitted to a human orbit and tested in cadavers. This lead, with strain relief cones, was 34 mm to the lateral orbit where it was fitted inside a channel. Lead durability was then tested in a mechanical model of a skull and eye moving to 25° of abduction/adduction. A 24-channel electrode array with optimised lead and a percutaneous connector (on the parietal bone) was then implanted in a clinical pilot. The lead location was monitored with X-ray and CT imaging.

 
Results
 

The SC implant and orbital lead were well tolerated in all 16 cat eyes, with no conjunctival or skin erosion around the eye. From 197 individually wired electrodes with a curved lead, 177 were connected following 3 months of implantation; which contrasted with 24 connected out of 36 implanted using a straight lead (Chi-square P < 0.001). Implant and lead were stable in all but one case where the implant’s anterior end eroded the sclera. The typical tissue response around the moving lead was a thick granulomatous fibrous capsule. The leads in mechanical durability testing have undergone 65 million eye movements with no wire breakages. In humans, the implant with intraorbital lead was stable during the initial 6 months of implantation (Fig. 2). All the electrodes remained connected.

 
Conclusions
 

The SC retinal implant with flexible lead allowed for minimal surgical manipulation of the eye and distal placement of larger components. The strain-relieved lead was reliable during chronic implantation in a preclinical model and in a clinical pilot.

 
 
Fig 1. Suprachoroidal implant with curved lead for cat
 
Fig 1. Suprachoroidal implant with curved lead for cat
 
 
Fig 2. CT scan of patient with retinal prosthesis and strain-relieved lead (blue)
 
Fig 2. CT scan of patient with retinal prosthesis and strain-relieved lead (blue)
 
Keywords: 762 vitreoretinal surgery • 688 retina • 631 orbit  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×