June 2013
Volume 54, Issue 15
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2013
Influences on effector functions of monocyte-derived macrophages in corneal allograft rejection
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Thabo Lapp
    Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    University Eye Hospital, University Medical Centre Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
  • Nandi Simpson
    Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, United Kingdom
  • Sarah Zaher
    Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom
  • Benjamin Chain
    Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, United Kingdom
  • Thomas Reinhard
    University Eye Hospital, University Medical Centre Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
  • Mahdad Noursadeghi
    Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, United Kingdom
  • Frank Larkin
    NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Thabo Lapp, None; Nandi Simpson, None; Sarah Zaher, None; Benjamin Chain, None; Thomas Reinhard, None; Mahdad Noursadeghi, None; Frank Larkin, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2013, Vol.54, 1291. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Thabo Lapp, Nandi Simpson, Sarah Zaher, Benjamin Chain, Thomas Reinhard, Mahdad Noursadeghi, Frank Larkin; Influences on effector functions of monocyte-derived macrophages in corneal allograft rejection. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013;54(15):1291.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: To examine inhibition of recruitment of monocyte and related macrophages and factors derived from these cells in the context of corneal graft rejection.

Methods: Flow cytometry was used to examine monocyte recruitment at the site of corneal graft rejection, and multiplex protein assays to quantify pro-inflammatory mediators in this context. An inflammatory milieu was modelled by stimulation of human macrophages with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or interferon (IFN)γ. Transwell apparatus were used to model monocyte migration towards inflammatory foci across an endothelial barrier and the effect of targeting chemokine pathways was tested by depleting specific chemokines or using neutralising antibodies to selected chemokine receptors. The cytotoxic effect on human corneal endothelium was tested by confocal microscopy enumeration of nuclei after ex vivo exposure to inflammatory mediators and inflammatory monocytes.

Results: Aqueous humour samples showed a selective enrichment for classical (CD14++/CD16-) monocytes during corneal graft rejection. We established the repertoire of monocyte chemokines upregulated in inflammatory responses and tested the effect of targeting these pathways on monocyte recruitment. We show that depletion of individual chemokines only partially attenuates monocyte recruitment, and that targeting of chemokine receptors may be more effective. Confocal microscopy showed that macrophage derived inflammatory milieus in this model had significant cytopathic effect on human corneal endothelial cells.

Conclusions: We have built on the evidence from human and rodent studies supporting a role for monocyte recruitment in the immunopathogenesis of corneal rejection. We have developed human experimental models to identify candidates for therapeutic targeting to inhibit monocyte recruitment and cytopathic mechanisms for corneal endothelial injury during corneal allograft rejection. These models may lead to novel immunotherapeutic strategies to modulate the pathogenesis of rejection and prolong the survival of corneal allografts.

Keywords: 481 cornea: endothelium • 490 cytokines/chemokines • 741 transplantation  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×