June 2013
Volume 54, Issue 15
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2013
Influence of Automated Disc Margin Determination on Stratus OCT Optic Nerve Head Measurements
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Ivan Tavares
    Ophthalmology, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • Andre Camargo
    Ophthalmology, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • Flavio Hirai
    Ophthalmology, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • Luiz Alberto Melo
    Ophthalmology, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Ivan Tavares, None; Andre Camargo, None; Flavio Hirai, None; Luiz Alberto Melo, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2013, Vol.54, 1449. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Ivan Tavares, Andre Camargo, Flavio Hirai, Luiz Alberto Melo; Influence of Automated Disc Margin Determination on Stratus OCT Optic Nerve Head Measurements. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013;54(15):1449.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose
 

To analyze the influence in the optic disc measurements of the automatically determined edge of the optic nerve head (ONH) and the manually corrected one in cases where the Optical Coherence Tomography did not identify the disc limits correctly.

 
Methods
 

One-hundred seven of 127 consecutive patients, either normal or glaucomatous, submitted to the Fast Optic Disc Stratus OCT (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA, USA; software 4.0) test were selected. 47 eyes in which either the manual assignment was not necessary or the signal strength was below six were excluded. OCT ONH scans are composed of six radial scans in a spokelike pattern centered on the disc and with each radial scan spaced 30 degrees from one to another. After image acquisition and processing, one expert examiner manually corrected the determination of the edge of the ONH, identified as the end of the retinal pigment epithelium/choriocapillaris layer. Disc Area, Cup Area, Rim Area and Cup/Disc Area Ratio results were compared before and after the optic disc margin manually corrected determination. Paired t-test was performed to evaluate the differences, and P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

 
Results
 

Eighty eyes of 80 people, either normal or glaucomatous, were analyzed. No statistically significant difference (P=0.538) was found when analyzing results obtained with automated and manual determination of Rim Area (mean ± SD): (1.30 ± 0.45 mm2; 1.29 ± 0.39 mm2). Cup Area (1.39 ± 0.58 mm2; 1.31 ± 0.55 mm2), Cup/Disc Area Ratio (0.50 ± 0.16 mm2; 0.49 ± 0.15 mm2) and Disc Area results (2.69 ± 0.55 mm2; 2.60 ± 0.51 mm2) were significantly different, but clinically irrelevant.

 
Conclusions
 

The Stratus OCT Optic Nerve Head Report results were little influenced when optic disc limits were manually determined. Therefore the standard automated Stratus OCT disc margin assignment is adequate, and manual edition is not necessary.

 
 
Disc area: comparison between automated and manual disc margin determination
 
Disc area: comparison between automated and manual disc margin determination
 
 
Cup/disc area ratio: comparison between automated and manual disc margin determination
 
Cup/disc area ratio: comparison between automated and manual disc margin determination
 
Keywords: 627 optic disc • 552 imaging methods (CT, FA, ICG, MRI, OCT, RTA, SLO, ultrasound) • 550 imaging/image analysis: clinical  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×